cRPG

cRPG => Beginner's Help and Guides => Topic started by: Segd on November 19, 2013, 03:24:11 am

Title: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Segd on November 19, 2013, 03:24:11 am
Made a little test for my after-patch build
different amount of wpf & reticle size(in pixels) for mw arbalest
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Cap is located on 185-190. For non +3 arbalest or other xbows the cap is even lower.
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Pinche on December 24, 2013, 09:38:50 pm
thanks!
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Ronin on December 24, 2013, 09:57:37 pm
Deserves to be moved to guides. I wish I knew that before making a crossbow/inf hybrid. I have 150 wpf at xbows.
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Quentry on December 25, 2013, 06:03:12 am
Quote from: Ronin on December 24, 2013, 09:57:37 pm
Deserves to be moved to guides. I wish I knew that before making a crossbow/inf hybrid. I have 150 wpf at xbows.
+1
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Boerenlater on December 25, 2013, 07:32:25 pm
And for bows?
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Segd on December 27, 2013, 09:48:42 pm
Quote from: Boerenlater on December 25, 2013, 07:32:25 pm
And for bows?
Do it!
I'm not a bowman  :rolleyes:

Btw, for non mw arbalest cap is at 175-180.

imho, best build for dedicated xbowman:
Level:26
Strength:15
Agility:24
Weapon points:15
Crossbow:185
Weapon Master:8

Skill points left:3
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Quentry on December 28, 2013, 10:43:09 am
Segd couldn't you  find the exact value of cap, please
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Segd on January 03, 2014, 09:00:48 pm
185 :)
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Mammonist on May 03, 2014, 08:06:21 pm
Segd what is your resolution, your crosshair was 8 pixels wide, I made this of my crosshair:

(click to show/hide)

Stats:
Wep: +1 Arba
Wpf: 184
Resolution: 1080p
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Taser on May 03, 2014, 08:08:17 pm
Quote from: Pinche on December 24, 2013, 09:38:50 pm
thanks!

This is a hilarious comment to me with this in his sig.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Algarn on May 03, 2014, 09:42:38 pm
Quote from: Mammonist on May 03, 2014, 08:06:21 pm
Segd what is your resolution, your crosshair was 8 pixels wide, I made this of my crosshair:

(click to show/hide)

Stats:
Wep: +1 Arba
Wpf: 184
Resolution: 1080p

Accuracy got a good role in that gap, Segd said it was for +3 arbalests.
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Chamion on May 03, 2014, 10:32:55 pm
Hey

I made some tests too with my +3 arba and the accuracy cap is at 186 wpp.
I also wanted to check the reloadtime for increased wpp with some harsh methods got everytime ~0,5 sec different results its pretty hard to measure it.

If some is interested you can download my test pictures ive started from 1wpp increased 5wpp per picture until 200.
(from 185 to 186 you can see that the crosshair gets a little bit smaller)
:arrow: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/l5c1xl4tdt238aj/h53ep2oCf3
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Segd on May 04, 2014, 10:32:48 am
Quote from: Chamion on May 03, 2014, 10:32:55 pm
Hey

I made some tests too with my +3 arba and the accuracy cap is at 186 wpp.
I also wanted to check the reloadtime for increased wpp with some harsh methods got everytime ~0,5 sec different results its pretty hard to measure it.

If some is interested you can download my test pictures ive started from 1wpp increased 5wpp per picture until 200.
(from 185 to 186 you can see that the crosshair gets a little bit smaller)
:arrow: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/l5c1xl4tdt238aj/h53ep2oCf3
Yep, 186 sounds legit  :) My hardware were too shity to determine precice measures(1366*768 pixels only  :cry: )
Unfortunately, reload time change is too low to be bothered with. It goes from 7 to 5 secs(0 to 180wpf) if I remember correctly.
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: Mallets on May 08, 2014, 11:54:10 pm
Anyone know the cap for a basic (no loom) Arby?  Anyone know the pixel-accuracy at cap?
Title: Re: Arbalest's reticle comparison with different wpf
Post by: San on May 08, 2014, 11:59:24 pm
+0 arb is 180 I believe.