PM chadz, we do not know the logic behind this weapon.I suggest this as well. Also, ask him to make the weapon throwable.
I suggest this as well. Also, ask him to make the weapon throwable.
what is it for?How is it having a blunt swing bad?
if it was a little bit longer, i wouldnt even doubt to use it. great piercing damage is a supa advantage, but i see no other. is there any other advantages?
and what are disadvantages?
what i see are:
advantages
pierceing
disadvantages
very short lenght
blunt swing (if there was a cuttting edge oh i would love it)
no need to discuss the second side of this lance))
How is it having a blunt swing bad?
How is it having a blunt swing bad?i mean that this lance is short enough to control the swing to hit by the blade, not by the haft. ofc cut damadge suppose to be bigger.
This weapon is actually much better than it seems. I did a "mounted hoplite" type build for a while, using a +1 double sided lance. Excellent pierce damage, couching and four attack directions make it very viable for both infantry and cavalry.
Besides couching and one more speed, sadly the battlefork outperforms the double-sided lance in too many aspects for me to consider it besides "Looks cool" (which is admittedly important).