Right now the charts show only public information which was already there anyway (just a bit cumbersome having to click through each fief). Not sure if showing all information about a faction would be a good or bad idea.
EU and NA have both lost around the same amount of troops (NA @ closer to 900k million, EU @ closer to 1 million). NA side lost them in about half the attacks- our battles are bloodier, I guess.
HM, i would tend to disagree. I've been keep track, for the most part, of all NA battles and we've lost no more than 700k troops. Unless I'm misreading what you've said?
Just going by the pie chart m8. Only thing I turned on was Region, says NA has lost 904'067 in total (Fimbul about 50k, Chaos about 44k, FCC about 155k, VE about 127k, Hosp about 95k, LCO about 87k, and the rest less on their own but more together.
Right now the charts show only public information which was already there anyway (just a bit cumbersome having to click through each fief). Not sure if showing all information about a faction would be a good or bad idea.
I would say that its almost certainly inaccurate :D.
1) Greys are on an offensive right now whilst the West is turtled up meaning Greys are more likely to have uncounted troops and gold
2) The UIF has recently made a transition to Plate armour meaning they potentially have more gold tied up in equipment than the West
As for market share what do you expect? I don't think there's a single village under UIF control that hasn't at some point been taken by the Anti-UIF whereas most Western Fiefs have been firmly held the entire round.
When did you ever see Apostates etc walking around with <500 troops? They have always had >1000 troops on each merc... So the fact that greys have >1000 troops on each player also just keeps the ratio the same..
As far as gold tied up in equipment... Both sides are using plate so once again this keeps the ratio correct..
And finally your market point just confirms that the ratio is correct