cRPG

Strategus => Diplomacy => Topic started by: Wesleysnipes on April 25, 2013, 02:17:03 am

Title: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Wesleysnipes on April 25, 2013, 02:17:03 am
The Art of Wu-Tang declares war on Illdist and mates.


visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: ildist on April 25, 2013, 02:43:33 am
I mean you spelled my name wrong, it has one L and it's the Republic of Mates, so I guess good luck ILLDIST and Mates
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Pooper on April 25, 2013, 02:44:45 am
I feel like they're are going to war with the wrong people....
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: In Cauda Venenum on April 25, 2013, 02:44:54 am
killer beez on a swarm
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Wesleysnipes on April 25, 2013, 02:58:49 am
The two LLs cause youre ILL for real.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: ildist on April 25, 2013, 03:02:15 am
i've been got
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Holiday203 on April 25, 2013, 05:17:06 am
i've been gotten
Fixed.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Keshian on April 25, 2013, 05:19:26 am
The two LLs cause youre ILL for real.

i've been got

I just have to say this looks to be a fun war just looking at these quotes.  Who is goin be served!
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Malaclypse on April 25, 2013, 05:21:24 am
Looks like Teutonic is going to war.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Holiday203 on April 25, 2013, 05:22:48 am
Looks like Teutonic is going to war.
Who's that?
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Malaclypse on April 25, 2013, 05:39:21 am
Who's that?

AFAIK it's Teutonics  (old name) vs The Republic of M8s (new name) and Art of Wu-Tang (new name) vs Ildist and M8s (old name), so two wars for the price of one!
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Holiday203 on April 25, 2013, 06:01:52 am
AFAIK it's Teutonics  (old name) vs The Republic of M8s (new name) and Art of Wu-Tang (new name) vs Ildist and M8s (old name), so two wars for the price of one!
Can't go wrong with that.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Penguin on April 25, 2013, 06:44:26 am
Good luck to the mates in fighting off these vultures. Condolences to Remnant for likely being tossed away by their patrons once their last castle falls and never getting the chance to regain Karindi.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Holiday203 on April 25, 2013, 06:55:45 am
Good luck to the mates in fighting off these vultures. Condolences to Remnant for likely being tossed away by their patrons once their last castle falls and never getting the chance to regain Karindi.
The Justice League fights evil :P anyways.....JUSTICE LEAGUE ASSEMBLE!
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: ArysOakheart on April 25, 2013, 07:37:40 am
Good luck to the mates in fighting off these vultures. Condolences to Remnant for likely being tossed away by their patrons once their last castle falls and never getting the chance to regain Karindi.

Just because the peasants take a long time to gather their cattle, doesn't mean we're not going to get all our cattle together to do some grazing.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: kasMVC on April 25, 2013, 07:56:26 am
The RZA
The GZA
Ol' Dirty Bastard
Inspectah Deck
Raekwon The Chef
U-God
Ghost Face Killah
and the Method Man

Edit: 300 killah beez

WU TANG KILLA BEEZ WE IN DA SWARM
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Jon Agony on April 25, 2013, 08:07:27 am
The RZA
The GZA
Ol' Dirty Bastard
Inspectah Deck
Raekwon The Chef
U-God
Ghost Face Killah
and the Method Man

Edit: 300 killah beez

WU TANG KILLA BEEZ WE IN DA SWARM


wat
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Holiday203 on April 25, 2013, 08:57:31 am

wat
Wu-Tang.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: ildist on April 25, 2013, 03:35:11 pm
Time to start the shit talking

you guys are gay
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Jon Agony on April 25, 2013, 03:44:24 pm
Time to start the shit talking

you guys are gay



Yeah? Your slutty mum taught me that.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: ildist on April 25, 2013, 04:25:42 pm
Jon Agony more like Jon Agaybundle of sticks
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on April 25, 2013, 04:32:11 pm
My 420 bong rips support Ildist and his republic of m8s

Reinhardt you're going down
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: dynamike on April 25, 2013, 04:35:30 pm
Condolences to Remnant for likely being tossed away by their patrons once their last castle falls and never getting the chance to regain Karindi.

We are in your village, preparing supper.


Wu-Tang.

Mates will be dropped like da beat.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: AshTre on April 25, 2013, 10:51:53 pm
Art of Wu-Tang, more like Art of Wieners. HEHEHEH

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Orc_Slayer on April 25, 2013, 10:56:06 pm
The game of chess, is like a swordfight
You must think first, before you move
Toad style is immensely strong, and immune to nearly any weapon
When it's properly used, it's almost invincible
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on April 25, 2013, 10:56:21 pm
RepublicAN  Wha wha?


If you think you can fuck with the Wu clan, you get your nose swolled up like Toucan


From one of my favorite Wu albums, gza genius legend of the liquid sword
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Wesleysnipes on April 26, 2013, 04:46:08 am
Fun fight. See you tomorrow!
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Malaclypse on April 26, 2013, 05:02:29 am
Was a fun battle, sucks that Le Republica de Mates was down seven men from the start and lost two more to poll griefing though D: Hopefully future rosters will be full ones for both sides.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Wallace_Ritchie on April 26, 2013, 05:18:09 am
We all know Wu-tang "aint nuthin to fuk wit", but what is to be done when they are the ones who are doing the fucking with? Ildist, sweetheart, let me know if there's anything I can do to help you in this troubled, and confusing time.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Gmnotutoo on April 26, 2013, 06:41:44 am

How is this on topic? It makes sense to me because I'm too damn high.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: ildist on April 27, 2013, 05:49:41 am
had fun m8s, derped and didn't bring c sites

I BLEW IT MAN
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Jack1 on April 27, 2013, 07:25:34 am
Siege is spelled with a S..... Not a C
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Tom Cruise on April 27, 2013, 07:30:05 am
Siege is spelled with a S..... Not a C

Construction is built with a C

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Jack1 on April 27, 2013, 07:32:58 am
But from where I come from we call them siege sites.

I'm too dumb to know how to quote so.... I just love you.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: TurmoilTom on April 27, 2013, 07:51:19 am
u r 1 cheeky kunt m8 i swer on me mum ill bash ur fooking faec in m8
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Herr_Thomas on April 27, 2013, 11:17:43 am
u r 1 cheeky kunt m8 i swer on me mum ill bash ur fooking faec in m8

oi bruv u bettah shut your mouf befor i shove my stonking tadger in ur shit box m8 i sware i will
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Wesleysnipes on April 29, 2013, 06:19:06 am
Yet another close battle...
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Canary on April 29, 2013, 06:42:29 am
Without a doubt if you have a Chaos tag and in another strat faction ( you are obvs working together ). It's such a coincidence Illdist and mates attacked us at the same time when Chaos did. It's impossible for a 7 man faction to have twice as many troops(plate armor) then us without the help of Chaos. Stop denying it on the forums to make you look good. And stop posting in our faction hall. I made a thread in the deplomacy section.

Since some argument got cross-posted somewhere it didn't quite belong, I'll address this here, I guess.

I sincerely don't know what the Mates are going to do before it happens. As far as I could see, it was coincidental when they went after Teutonic Knights, since Ildist has never really seen fit to make it clear what he's doing to me. It did just seem like they were rallying to the war on our side when Chaos attacked you, but the notion you're trying to imply (and Kesh, as well; see these (http://forum.meleegaming.com/faction-halls/venomous-art-of-war(na)-under-construction-47887/msg773244/#msg773244) posts (http://forum.meleegaming.com/faction-halls/venomous-art-of-war(na)-under-construction-47887/msg773480/#msg773480) ), that they're full-blown allies with us, is not the truth.

You didn't directly say that directly, but here's the rub: the S&D in the Mates' territories empties out relatively routinely, or pert' near. They're actually active, as far as I can tell, and apparently more active than you've been, considering the amount of S&D leftover in your fiefs compared to theirs - but more importantly the fact that they've got three current fiefs, and had another for over a week until you took it. It's easier to get gold when you've got the means to do so and territories to generate S&D in. I can't tell you how they've managed to get the gold to afford as many tickets as they bought from us and gear them up, let alone to gear them with armor as heavy as varangopoulos part way. They haven't gotten any money from us, whatever else we've exchanged with them.

"Working together" is not the same as allied, and it is not the same as handing over resources for free, either. Not to disparage, of course, the fact that it happens or the people who do that (such as Chaos and FIDLGB). The Mates haven't gotten their plate armor from us, and they haven't gotten the gold to buy it from us. Any "working together" is by way of trade agreements and access to the same information, nothing more. Malaclypse wasn't trying to make us look good; the Mates (incidentally now a 10-man faction) have not been given anything by us for free, and you're just being accusatory to make us and them look bad, in your faction thread or not.


Yet another close battle...

Now this is something I think we can all agree on: These recent Art of War vs. Republic of Mates fights have been incredibly engaging, intense and fun as a result. Cheers to us all for you guys' war, I say.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Keshian on April 29, 2013, 06:45:30 am
They haven't gotten any money from us, whatever else we've exchanged with them.

"Working together" is not the same as allied, and it is not the same as handing over resources for free, either. Not to disparage, of course, the fact that it happens or the people who do that (such as Chaos and FIDLGB). The Mates haven't gotten their plate armor from us, and they haven't gotten the gold to buy it from us. Any "working together" is by way of trade agreements and access to the same information, nothing more. Malaclypse wasn't trying to make us look good; the Mates (incidentally now a 10-man faction) have not been given anything by us, and you're just being accusatory to make us and them look bad, in your faction thread or not.


Nobody said they did, malaclypse just admitted they got 3K troops from you guys for dirt cheap, that's all.  No one said they got gear, just you talking about it now.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Canary on April 29, 2013, 06:48:31 am
Nobody said they did, malaclypse just admitted they got 3K troops from you guys for dirt cheap, that's all.  No one said they got gear, just you talking about it now.

Wesley implied just that by putting "plate armor" in parentheses. On top of which he mentioned "help" as though it wasn't a matter of making payments for those troops.

Dirt cheap is also relative, as I don't think we've ever gouged anyone for prices on anything, ever.*

*Except maybe when I sold Partyboy that fief.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Duster on April 29, 2013, 06:52:07 am
I'd never heard Canary sperg out quite so epically before the end of this battle, 10/10
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Keshian on April 29, 2013, 06:55:42 am
Yeah HOC_Grunt_Taxtros was leeching for most of the battle while spawning on our champion rouncies and using up most of them while dying afk.  Took a while to get him kicked then he rejoined.  he died 44 times this way and AOW lost by 33 tickets and we were out of horses during the last 300 tickets when we stopped doing a 1 for 1 :(

Its true, one guy can decide a battle.  Needless to say he was added to a couple clan's blacklists.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Penguin on April 29, 2013, 07:19:18 am
Yeah HOC_Grunt_Taxtros was leeching for most of the battle while spawning on our champion rouncies and using up most of them while dying afk.  Took a while to get him kicked then he rejoined.  he died 44 times this way and AOW lost by 33 tickets and we were out of horses during the last 300 tickets when we stopped doing a 1 for 1 :(

Its true, one guy can decide a battle.  Needless to say he was added to a couple clan's blacklists.
I wouldn't say he single-handedly lost the battle for you guys...to put the blame on one person is a bit ridiculous. Witchcraft went 9:34, Fringe went 9:33 and Dach went 9:32. But they are not to blame. The kill death ratio for the mates was simply better than the AoW side and there were many other reasons for the loss. One I can think of is losing your flags twice and getting your forward spawn attacked. Another would be the dominance rohypnol displayed in the battle. Finally, the commander was able to (for the most part) keep us from pushing out too far. Either way it was a close and exciting battle and I look forward to more!
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Keshian on April 29, 2013, 07:35:35 am
I wouldn't say he single-handedly lost the battle for you guys...to put the blame on one person is a bit ridiculous. Witchcraft went 9:34, Fringe went 9:33 and Dach went 9:32. But they are not to blame. The kill death ratio for the mates was simply better than the AoW side and there were many other reasons for the loss. One I can think of is losing your flags twice and getting your forward spawn attacked. Another would be the dominance rohypnol displayed in the battle. Finally, the commander was able to (for the most part) keep us from pushing out too far. Either way it was a close and exciting battle and I look forward to more!

Lol - we were doing better than a 1 for 1 until our weaker armor ran out down to broken lamellar while you guys still had  almost 70 body armor the entire battle, it was around the same time we ran out of horses.  We never had more than 50ish body armor the entire battle and were doing better than 1 for 1 as attackers.  And yes someone just standing still leeching our best and most limited gear for most of the battle did make the difference between winning and losing when we lost by 33 tickets.  Sitting and doing nothing, without him those tickets would not have been lost since being afk contributes nothing.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Penguin on April 29, 2013, 07:47:02 am
So what is it kesh, was it the weaker armor or Taxtros that lost you the battle? He had 9 kills, who is to say those 9 killed wouldn't have gone on to kill 4 of your guys, thus nullifying your ticket advantage? What if Dach didn't play and allers got 100 kills? It's all a lot of "ifs" and you're the only one who seems to think this way. Large battles are not decided by one person unless it someone comes down to a 1 versus 1 duel (which would be awesome). If you accept your wins as superior team tactics, then accept your losses as a team as well and acknowledge the other teams efforts. Sorry for ruining this thread AoW!
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on April 29, 2013, 07:53:47 am
shut the fuck up with your whining you nerds

edit: just saw that the only person whining is keshian, let me correct my statement

shut the fuck up with your whining nerds kesh
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Keshian on April 29, 2013, 08:03:43 am
shut the fuck up with your whining you nerds

edit: just saw that the only person whining is keshian, let me correct my statement

shut the fuck up with your whining nerds kesh

Really you daruvian are calling me a whiner, lol
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on April 29, 2013, 08:10:41 am
upvote this post if you think kesh is a my old friend

(post stricken for being too mean, sorry kesh i am drunk and saying mean things)
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Keshian on April 29, 2013, 08:14:00 am
if you think kesh is a my old friend up vote this post

?  Aren't you openly gay though?  Why would you use that word? By the way, I liked your song lyrics the other night, mildly amusing and original, need to practice a bit more on your vocals, came out a little flat.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: partyboy on April 29, 2013, 08:34:51 am
*Except maybe when I sold Partyboy that fief.

I thought that was a bidding war :(

p.s. can I buy troops from you
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: ildist on April 29, 2013, 03:22:59 pm
More like who cares about strat, it turns good people into spergs, especially on the forums. I don't care about strat as much as I used to when The Mates first started, if you haven't noticed I pretty much call people gay in diplomacy threads. Leave the sperg out of this war, I still consider Wesley, Holiday and other AoW guys to be friends and nice guys. Let's not be mad nerds and spoil our cRPG relationships over worthless pixels on some web browser.

Or of course, make the decision to become a sperg forum warrior. I couldn't care less, it's your life m8s
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: dynamike on April 29, 2013, 03:41:53 pm
This battle was the first one in a long time that made me rage and go ctrl+m on a lot of peoples' asses. Even though it was thrilling how close it was at the end of the battle, the amount of teamwounding and teamkilling was simply frustrating. That, combined with some people ACTUALLY not participating in most of the battle, running out of decent gear (horses!) and some contradicting commands from our officers were limiting my enjoyment.

I apologize to anyone I reported anyway, it's the wrong thing to do in a Strat battle.

tl;dr: THE AMOUNT OF TK'S WAS TOO DAMN HIGH!
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Wesleysnipes on April 29, 2013, 03:42:38 pm
I agree ILL-Dist, I used to feel like a good Aniken. With the power of an army I always want more. The Venom controls my brain... More, more, more, therefore: creating a Darth.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on April 29, 2013, 03:51:07 pm
Since Jesus brought it up, Roh's always one of the top performers (usually the top by far) in strat battles.  What kind of drugs do you guys think he uses?  He clearly is on performance enhancing drugs, I'd wager some amphetamine.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on April 29, 2013, 04:13:36 pm
So what is it kesh, was it the weaker armor or Taxtros that lost you the battle? He had 9 kills, who is to say those 9 killed wouldn't have gone on to kill 4 of your guys, thus nullifying your ticket advantage? What if Dach didn't play and allers got 100 kills? It's all a lot of "ifs" and you're the only one who seems to think this way. Large battles are not decided by one person unless it someone comes down to a 1 versus 1 duel (which would be awesome). If you accept your wins as superior team tactics, then accept your losses as a team as well and acknowledge the other teams efforts. Sorry for ruining this thread AoW!

Not really true, most battles are decided by who has the worst players, the only "tactic" you can do in cRPG is grouping up and charging at the same time or camping some defensible place which are hardly going to win you the battle unless your players do well too.

I wish everyone who goes 1:1 or less in a battle would just leave because they're worthless and I know in my battles i'd just unhire anyone not going 1:1 mid battle if I could. I pretty much always leave battles if I can't go atleast 1:1 because you just are a burden.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Turboflex on April 29, 2013, 04:14:17 pm
Since Jesus brought it up, Roh's always one of the top performers (usually the top by far) in strat battles.  What kind of drugs do you guys think he uses?  He clearly is on performance enhancing drugs, I'd wager some amphetamine.

Maul or cav lancer is a drug.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Duster on April 29, 2013, 09:39:38 pm
Maul or cav lancer is a drug.

No skill involved, it's all in the build.

That's why all those Raven 2h cav are all 100-30 every battle right
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Artyem on April 29, 2013, 10:13:29 pm
No skill involved, it's all in the build.

That's why all those Raven 2h cav are all 100-30 every battle right

Those Raven pikemen usually top the scoreboard regardless of the fight, and they usually go unprotected thanks to unaware teammates.

But I guess Cav and 2h are hard mode because arrows can hit you, right?
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Duster on April 30, 2013, 12:11:42 am
Those Raven pikemen usually top the scoreboard regardless of the fight, and they usually go unprotected thanks to unaware teammates.

But I guess Cav and 2h are hard mode because arrows can hit you, right?

Yep, just like every other class.


This petty bickering bullcrap sucks, and the fact that noone can acknowledge skill if it's someone on the other 'side' sucks, too.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: BaleOhay on April 30, 2013, 12:17:22 am
I will admit Roh is a good player. Ask him and he will be the first to tell you just how much.

I will also say super crushthru str build and heavy cav are generally not classes that get much respec.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Relit on April 30, 2013, 12:30:03 am
No skill involved, it's all in the build.

That's why all those Raven 2h cav are all 100-30 every battle right

Before you talk shit about Ravens, maybe you should actually know something about us. We have one (1) 2h cav, its BlackWhite, hes actually pretty good. And nobody here is insulting the opposing teams skill. Turbo made a joke, you need to relax.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Spanish on April 30, 2013, 12:45:37 am
Before you talk shit about Ravens, maybe you should actually know something about us. We have one (1) 2h cav, its BlackWhite, hes actually pretty good. And nobody here is insulting the opposing teams skill. Turbo made a joke, you need to relax.

I agree with  this statement especially since he always goes for my horse :( and I think people are forgetting most raven cav prolly went the diggles route with the superior 1h cav
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Duster on April 30, 2013, 01:34:31 am
Before you talk shit about Ravens, maybe you should actually know something about us. We have one (1) 2h cav, its BlackWhite, hes actually pretty good. And nobody here is insulting the opposing teams skill. Turbo made a joke, you need to relax.

Way to get uber defensive dude, I just went shot for shot. Your boy basically implied Rohy was a no skill puty that crutches on his builds, I only pointed out that there are Ravens with the same builds that don't do nearly as well, as often, and Artyem jumps on almost every post I make in the Diplomacy board.













(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Artyem on April 30, 2013, 01:49:17 am
Way to get uber defensive dude, I just went shot for shot. Your boy basically implied Rohy was a no skill puty that crutches on his builds, I only pointed out that there are Ravens with the same builds that don't do nearly as well, as often, and Artyem jumps on almost every post I make in the Diplomacy board.

Way to get uber defensive dude.

Turboflex made a joke, yet you basically implied that they're 'no skill puties', and came back with a raging attitude when they defended themselves.

Man, your constant passive aggressive behavior combined with your reflexive need to be offended by everything makes it hard for me not to post.  Don't take it so personally, I simply have a need to combat unjustified belligerency.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Lt_Anders on April 30, 2013, 01:51:19 am
Dude, you guys are all liek, skillless man. Only anders has skillz. 8-)
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on April 30, 2013, 01:56:22 am
I am mediocre.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Duster on April 30, 2013, 02:07:28 am
Turboflex made a joke, yet you basically implied that they're 'no skill puties', and came back with a raging attitude when they defended themselves.

No, you were mad first!



Man, your constant passive aggressive behavior combined with your reflexive need to be offended by everything makes it hard for me not to post.  Don't take it so personally, I simply have a need to combat unjustified belligerency.

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)





EDIT:

Quoted before it's changed

And yet again you speak from ignorance. There is not a single Raven with those builds.

We have one (1) 2h cav, its BlackWhite,


DOUBLE EDIT:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Relit on April 30, 2013, 02:09:21 am
Way to get uber defensive dude, I just went shot for shot. Your boy basically implied Rohy was a no skill puty that crutches on his builds, I only pointed out that there are Ravens with the same builds that don't do nearly as well, as often, and Artyem jumps on almost every post I make in the Diplomacy board.
(click to show/hide)

And yet again you speak from ignorance. There is not a single Raven with those builds. And also yet again Turbo was making a joke, he did not imply anything. If you knew anything about him, you would know that he would just come out and say exactly that, if he thought that way. Stop shitting all over us, laugh at a joke and move on.

Editting in a spoiler for Duster:

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Jack1 on April 30, 2013, 02:14:11 am
Soooo..... How bout dem mates n dem AoW's
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Tom Cruise on April 30, 2013, 03:07:13 am
No skill involved, it's all in the build.

That's why all those Raven 2h cav are all 100-30 every battle right
Those Raven pikemen usually top the scoreboard regardless of the fight, and they usually go unprotected thanks to unaware teammates.

But I guess Cav and 2h are hard mode because arrows can hit you, right?
Yep, just like every other class.


This petty bickering bullcrap sucks, and the fact that noone can acknowledge skill if it's someone on the other 'side' sucks, too.
Before you talk shit about Ravens, maybe you should actually know something about us. We have one (1) 2h cav, its BlackWhite, hes actually pretty good. And nobody here is insulting the opposing teams skill. Turbo made a joke, you need to relax.
Way to get uber defensive dude, I just went shot for shot. Your boy basically implied Rohy was a no skill puty that crutches on his builds, I only pointed out that there are Ravens with the same builds that don't do nearly as well, as often, and Artyem jumps on almost every post I make in the Diplomacy board.

Way to get uber defensive dude.

Turboflex made a joke, yet you basically implied that they're 'no skill puties', and came back with a raging attitude when they defended themselves.

Man, your constant passive aggressive behavior combined with your reflexive need to be offended by everything makes it hard for me not to post.  Don't take it so personally, I simply have a need to combat unjustified belligerency.
No, you were mad first!



(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)





EDIT:

Quoted before it's changed


DOUBLE EDIT:

(click to show/hide)
And yet again you speak from ignorance. There is not a single Raven with those builds. And also yet again Turbo was making a joke, he did not imply anything. If you knew anything about him, you would know that he would just come out and say exactly that, if he thought that way. Stop shitting all over us, laugh at a joke and move on.

Editting in a spoiler for Duster:

(click to show/hide)

OH SHIT LOOKS LIKE WE GOT OURSELVES A GOOD OLD FASHION

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Holiday203 on April 30, 2013, 03:19:12 am
Wu-Tang
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Wesleysnipes on April 30, 2013, 03:27:15 am
I resign.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Canary on April 30, 2013, 03:45:01 am
I thought that was a bidding war :(

p.s. can I buy troops from you

That's why I edited the post with that addendum: it was the only case where we tried to get as much as we could out of a thing we sold someone. More than one person being interested was the best way to gauge what we could get out of it.

Unfortunately we may be using most of our remaining troops soon enough.

More like who cares about strat, it turns good people into spergs, especially on the forums. I don't care about strat as much as I used to when The Mates first started, if you haven't noticed I pretty much call people gay in diplomacy threads. Leave the sperg out of this war, I still consider Wesley, Holiday and other AoW guys to be friends and nice guys. Let's not be mad nerds and spoil our cRPG relationships over worthless pixels on some web browser.

Or of course, make the decision to become a sperg forum warrior. I couldn't care less, it's your life m8s

I will once again take up this mantle, yes. War is no fun if you don't discuss it, and if you don't treat enemies like enemies, why bother talking about it here at all?

However, nitpicking over minutia like "who is bad at what build" and whether "X amount of Y circumstances lost a particular battle and therefore it didn't really count as a victory for their side" is asinine and ridiculous.

It's even worse when you stoop to base hyperbole to make yourselves seem more impressive than your opponent, such as this:

Lol - we were doing better than a 1 for 1 until our weaker armor ran out down to broken lamellar while you guys still had  almost 70 body armor the entire battle, it was around the same time we ran out of horses.  We never had more than 50ish body armor the entire battle and were doing better than 1 for 1 as attackers.  And yes someone just standing still leeching our best and most limited gear for most of the battle did make the difference between winning and losing when we lost by 33 tickets.  Sitting and doing nothing, without him those tickets would not have been lost since being afk contributes nothing.

Apparently having around 50 (or less for the last 25 minutes) armor during the latter half equals "almost 70 the entire battle", "were doing better than 1 for 1", I will grant you, does constitute a lead of between 2 and 30 tickets once you gained momentum after the first couple hundred (up until the last half hour when both sides were down to their lightest armor), and some guy who every time I personally saw him (which was many times) was riding around on his horse, often to get piked and killed was actually "just standing still leeching our best and most limited gear". Yup, completely relevant commentary there.

Here's my less sarcastic and equally petty rebuttal:
If the Mates had brought construction sites to this battle (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=battlesparticipated#!?page=battledetail&id=3445), they may well have captured AoW's flags, as they came close to doing so once without any forward spawns.
If I had made it to this battle (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=battlesparticipated#!?page=battledetail&id=3460), they would have won.

I resign.

what
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Duster on April 30, 2013, 03:51:53 am
Zounds! I accidentally resigned by mistake! No wonder thou wert victorious! I shalt abdicate.

Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Canary on April 30, 2013, 04:01:03 am
Almost forgot to mention: STAY ON TOPIC.

This is a thread about Ildist and the Republic of Mates fighting Art of War and their leader Wesley.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Keshian on April 30, 2013, 05:09:53 am

 and some guy who every time I personally saw him (which was many times) was riding around on his horse, often to get piked and killed was actually "just standing still leeching our best and most limited gear". Yup, completely relevant commentary there.


People repeatedly complained about him going afk until he was vote-kicked - he went afk where he would autorun forward with no attacking.  So yes leeching, snideness doesnt make you right.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Canary on April 30, 2013, 05:29:30 am
People repeatedly complained about him going afk until he was vote-kicked - he went afk where he would autorun forward with no attacking.  So yes leeching, snideness doesnt make you right.

My being snide was because of all that other stuff you exaggerated about, too, y'know. (Wait a minute, the battle we're talking about he wasn't even votekicked from... what?!)

I don't disagree that a bad merc is a problem, but I was trying to paint a picture the way you (or more appropriately: Smoothrich) would, by putting the most extreme aspects of what happened in the forefront of the statement, and by removing the shades of gray/totality of the truth.

For what it's worth, I never saw Taxtros ram into the enemies he was charging without trying to attack us... but my whole point was that it's silly to go over these kinds of trivial details as if it matters any way other than academically. A strat retrospective is nice, of course, and talking about the battles after the fact is entertaining, but there's this seemingly constant implication of blame, excuse and guilt that just kills the real arguments to be had. By "real arguments" I mean balderdash Strategus diplomacy disputes and more relevant trash-talking, like what people actually did and not what people could have done or did not do.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: DUKE DICKBUTT on April 30, 2013, 05:32:54 am
I have no idea what is going on, but I like fights.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Keshian on April 30, 2013, 05:34:29 am
My being snide was because of all that other stuff you exaggerated about, too, y'know. (Wait a minute, the battle we're talking about he wasn't even votekicked from... what?!)

I don't disagree that a bad merc is a problem, but I was trying to paint a picture the way you (or more appropriately: Smoothrich) would, by putting the most extreme aspects of what happened in the forefront of the statement, and by removing the shades of gray/totality of the truth.

For what it's worth, I never saw Taxtros ram into the enemies he was charging without trying to attack us... but my whole point was that it's silly to go over these kinds of trivial details as if it matters any way other than academically. A strat retrospective is nice, of course, and talking about the battles after the fact is entertaining, but there's this seemingly constant implication of blame, excuse and guilt that just kills the real arguments to be had. By "real arguments" I mean balderdash Strategus diplomacy disputes and more relevant trash-talking, like what people actually did and not what people could have done or did not do.

Yeah I just talked to taxtros, i guess his internet connection took a complete dump so he had no access or something.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Dach on April 30, 2013, 05:54:36 am
I wish everyone who goes 1:1 or less in a battle would just leave because they're worthless and I know in my battles i'd just unhire anyone not going 1:1 mid battle if I could. I pretty much always leave battles if I can't go atleast 1:1 because you just are a burden.

And then you lose because you are outnumbered 2 against 1.... nice idea...  :lol:
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: ArysOakheart on April 30, 2013, 06:26:26 am
And then you lose because you are outnumbered 2 against 1.... nice idea...  :lol:

I was just about to say the same thing haha
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: BADPLAYER_old2 on April 30, 2013, 04:46:00 pm
And then you lose because you are outnumbered 2 against 1.... nice idea...  :lol:

I'd rather have 20 good players than 40 trash ones.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on April 30, 2013, 04:53:29 pm
If those 20 trash players are just suicide running to their death or playing recklessly (rushing the enemy by themselves or lots of teamwounding/circling in group fights), then sure.  But if they are fighting with a group, or putting up ladders (or taking down enemy ladders) etc, then they are useful.   You can have people being very useful to your team, and not going at least 1:1.  For me the main thing is teamwork and finding ways to be useful.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Wesleysnipes on April 30, 2013, 06:20:00 pm
So how about that fort of armored guys hiding from naked wild hell hounds. :D
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Holiday203 on April 30, 2013, 08:09:50 pm
Damn sorry about this late battle tonight, We did have our night-time settings so I don't know why that happened :/ We'll try to make sure that doesn't happen again. This fights have been coming down to the wire though, all very fun and exciting.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Matey on April 30, 2013, 09:11:12 pm
I'd rather have 20 good players than 40 trash ones.

I had a round where i performed extremely poorly... but i did break the enemy forward spawn with 10 minutes left in the game when they were on the verge of capping all the flags and we then managed to clear them out and last until the time ran out. KDR isn't the only indicator of a useful person in strat. There is also the famous Epoch flag cap against ATS, he was like 2:28 when he capped all the flags and won that match. There are also of course the people who consistently fight in the line and soak up enemy hits and distract people while the 2h heroes rack up the kills; they usually don't get positive KDRs but they enable the 2h heroes to do so.

And as has been mentioned, 40 v 20 would be very hard to win, regardless of how good the 20 are. plus its usually 20 good players who can pull 1:1 or better and 20 guys who aren't doing 1:1 but are probably being useful anyways that make up the 40; so I'd bet on the 40.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: dynamike on April 30, 2013, 11:47:47 pm
I'd rather have 20 good players than 40 trash ones.

What about 20 badplayers?
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Lemmy_Winks on May 01, 2013, 12:07:39 am
You could win a seige with 10 Rohs with full plate and great mauls.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Matey on May 01, 2013, 12:30:05 am
You could win a seige with 10 Rohs with full plate and great mauls.

You wish. I'd have all my players with arbalests; either that or just get a couple guys to sneak off and take his flags. Having good players is nice but you also need to have as many players as you can get. There are mercs not worth hiring even if it means being short a player or two, but there aren't too many of those kinds of mercs... those are mostly the ones who just leech and go afk all battle or intentionally waste gear or just suicide into the enemy without following orders at all.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: In Cauda Venenum on May 01, 2013, 12:38:45 am
wow, sure does look like a lot of discussion relevant to the topic
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Herr_Thomas on May 01, 2013, 03:43:53 am
Damn sorry about this late battle tonight, We did have our night-time settings so I don't know why that happened :/ We'll try to make sure that doesn't happen again. This fights have been coming down to the wire though all very fun and exciting.

I agree, these have been some of the more enjoyable fights this strat, other than me having to call my old friends out on not following orders. But yeah, bad battle times cant be avoided since the 1 hour invincibility keeps pushing the battles back. The one tonight won't be much of a fight, though.

So how about that fort of armored guys hiding from naked wild hell hounds. :D

What were we supposed to do? Run out and get shot to bits by all your ranged?
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Wesleysnipes on May 01, 2013, 03:48:36 am
Perhaps
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Holiday203 on May 01, 2013, 07:20:23 am
I agree, these have been some of the more enjoyable fights this strat, other than me having to call my old friends out on not following orders. But yeah, bad battle times cant be avoided since the 1 hour invincibility keeps pushing the battles back. The one tonight won't be much of a fight, though.

Yeah it's kind of shitty, I wish you guys could get the chance to defend yourselves in this one.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Herr_Thomas on May 02, 2013, 04:45:51 am
Why you guys gotta be raiding? Did 90% of the looted gear from our previous attacks not satisfy you?
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Holiday203 on May 02, 2013, 04:52:23 am
No sir, the wu-tang can never be satisfied. Plus you got Ildist back, you guys will be fine.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Blackzilla on May 02, 2013, 01:43:05 pm
They don't wanna risk the chance of a close battle again where in comes down to the final tickets. Which had the potential to happen and would've been really fun again with 1600 v 1600. You guys need to stop bein like FCC (raiding wise that is)! I can understand a raid if a fief has an  unreasonable amount of population or troops, but not if the total army is less than 1800.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: BaleOhay on May 02, 2013, 02:02:52 pm
privilege of the attacker. Defense has enough advantages
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Wesleysnipes on May 02, 2013, 03:10:34 pm
Tactics.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Jack1 on May 02, 2013, 06:23:27 pm
I personally call it common sense
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Wesleysnipes on May 02, 2013, 06:56:08 pm
Totally agree. If an individual does not believe in "raiding" they R R Tarded.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Canary on May 03, 2013, 01:30:11 am
I dunno, you get situations where you surprise yourself with a flag cap and then don't have to go through the trouble of another fight, complete with opportunity for the defense to reinforce further.

In this battle (http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=battlesparticipated#!?page=battledetail&id=3434) for instance, a raid would have been a waste of time for your side.

privilege of the attacker. Defense has enough advantages

I sure wouldn't call being able to take as much time as I wanted anything but a privilege, you are right about that. It's definitely a good way to keep the opposition from being able to defend themselves when they're already weaker.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Holiday203 on May 03, 2013, 02:07:58 am
Poor Aquaman, may he enjoy his vacation.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: BaleOhay on May 03, 2013, 02:10:31 am
There is an easy way to pick which are battles and at what times and where. Go on the offensive.

Otherwise do not judge those who do.


Last I checked making things as easy as possible for the defenders was not the best idea for a sustained campaign.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Canary on May 03, 2013, 03:44:40 am
There is an easy way to pick which are battles and at what times and where. Go on the offensive.

Otherwise do not judge those who do.


Last I checked making things as easy as possible for the defenders was not the best idea for a sustained campaign.

I'm not sure anyone's beleaguering the notion of attackers putting themselves into an advantageous position; obviously anyone would do what they can (within reason) to perform better than their enemy.

I think the problem people have with the raiding mechanic is that it practically nullifies completely another mechanic: fief population.

Whether that's for good or for ill is, I should think, what the debate centers around, but considering even your own track record, I'm surprised you FCC guys aren't bigger advocates of going for the whole shebang without having to fiddle around with raids.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: BaleOhay on May 03, 2013, 04:46:25 am
I think it is clear we have captured fiefs several ways.

We have taken things in huge brass ball moves (see reyvadin, curaw, and recently tulbuk comes to mind, we have also tried it and failed the first run at ichamur, Huge reward... but huge risk as well)

We have used the whittle technique without raids (see Ahmerrad and several others I can not remember off the top of my head)

Now we have started to incorporate some raiding in to mix things up.

All of them have uses. We have war on three fronts at the moment and preserving troops is the name of the game at the moment.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: AshTre on May 03, 2013, 09:03:46 am
SUMBUJA 2013!!
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Keshian on May 03, 2013, 01:19:20 pm
SUMBUJA 2013!!

Sadly, no. Tadsamesh the legend began with 50 brave peasants against 10 full plated knights bravely defeating the impenetrable armor and was further expanded by defeating multiple armies following.  Sumbuja now - plate armor with more troops and more mercs winning  battle - not really a legend sadly, just expected win.  To look for a new legend to be born we must look for new heroes, ones where they defy all odds to win again and again.  Equip Sumbuja with only peasant gear in the next battle and win and you will get your chance to become a legend.

Do you have what it takes to become a legend?
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Wesleysnipes on May 03, 2013, 01:42:51 pm
Yea if only we had the same tier armor. Now about heroes, I consider my self one of the best in NA strat battles. (21-17 atm)
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Jack1 on May 03, 2013, 01:49:15 pm
Wesley #1 NA strat battle
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: BlindGuy on May 03, 2013, 01:53:16 pm
I dont care about this war or anything I just want to point out: In 2004 I was living in DC (long way from Malaga in Spain) and I was doing a little clubbing, all VIP rooms, party animal, and the Wutang came in (probably not all of the circus but about 5 of them): They had to ask us and the manager for blow cause they were broke, and although we bought them some bubbly and charlie, only one of them stepped up and freestyled, but even then we had to boo him offstage cause he was trying to get away with some prewritten commercial pop trash.

Plastic Ganstas, all of them. Anyway, that is a weird memory from a life I dont live anymore. But it IS a true story. Good times, good times.


But yeah: Wutang are not especially good at any genre of hiphop, I doubt any of them know how to defend themselves any better with martial arts than they could with some sick beats to drop on, when they choked. Dont use them as your avatar/name of clan, they are a joke.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Jack1 on May 03, 2013, 02:04:56 pm
New headline-

      "Blind guy found dead"

Article reads-

      "After posting a note on how the wutang can't 'drop a beat' on an Internet gaming forum, he was found dead at his house. He was killed by being beat to death, experts say They must have been experts of martial arts.

      The authorities say they found a note on the man's dead corpse saying, 'now you know the facts'.

     It was then signed as:

          Clan brawler
                      Wesley"
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Kreczor on May 03, 2013, 05:28:32 pm
Sadly, no. Tadsamesh the legend began with 50 brave peasants against 10 full plated knights bravely defeating the impenetrable armor and was further expanded by defeating multiple armies following.  Sumbuja now - plate armor with more troops and more mercs winning  battle - not really a legend sadly, just expected win.  To look for a new legend to be born we must look for new heroes, ones where they defy all odds to win again and again.  Equip Sumbuja with only peasant gear in the next battle and win and you will get your chance to become a legend.

Do you have what it takes to become a legend?
He's referring to our heroic defense of Sumbuja last strat, where we defended the town against the hospitallers despite terrible odds.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: HeraldOfTheGOBBLINKING on May 03, 2013, 05:47:30 pm
We have used the whittle technique without raids (see Ahmerrad and several others I can not remember off the top of my head)
In the most recent ahmerrad sieges, you guys item bombed the shit out of us, We couldn't access arrows/siege equipment for the first half of the battles, and you gave us something like 2k Torches and rondels, and a insane amount of other useless gear. Not only that, but after 5+ attacks and item bombs you failed to take Ahmerrad. So I wouldn't say it was a successful technique. At least not against us.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Keshian on May 03, 2013, 06:01:31 pm
In the most recent ahmerrad sieges, you guys item bombed the shit out of us, We couldn't access arrows/siege equipment for the first half of the battles, and you gave us something like 2k Torches and rondels, and a insane amount of other useless gear. Not only that, but after 5+ attacks and item bombs you failed to take Ahmerrad. So I wouldn't say it was a successful technique. At least not against us.

Lol, you are joking right?  The one where you cheated and did bannable fief transfer preventing us from attacking it and giving you 24 hours to get reinforcements in the middle of multiple assaults and we attacked with less than 100 item types every battle?  Its just what happens when you dont clear out the inventory - if you hadn't noticed we actually use rondel daggers as a no slot 1-handers in most of our battles.  We never item-bombed yet, but any time we attack more than once a fief and the fief owner doesn't clear out the inventory you make up stuff about item bombing.  So of course we are raiding now, since you guys bitched so much about not having the gear cleared out but too lazy to do it yourselves so we are just helping you clean out your inventory.  :wink:
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: BaleOhay on May 03, 2013, 07:35:27 pm
I have never seen one our armies have torches.. we do use rondels at times.. not as often since the good zero slot one handers. One of the fiefs has them tho for sale and they ship out at times.

Kesh no way to win. We attack in waves we are item bombing. We raid we are abusing mechanics. Just own it man. AoW we are holding a class on dickless map tactics later. u want seats?
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Spanish on May 03, 2013, 08:18:19 pm
Baddies just admit you FCC baddies are baddies and stop trying so hard and bring moar goedendags because everybody needs abortion sticks and you ran out in that Sumbuja battle and i was forced to scavenge for dadao's instead.

Btw this is just my own bad qualities speaking since my clan disappeared...
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: BaleOhay on May 03, 2013, 09:55:07 pm
Dang now we are being blamed for A&W rootbeer equipment.... err AoW equipment
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Orc_Slayer on May 04, 2013, 07:14:39 am
I dont care about this war or anything I just want to point out: In 2004 I was living in DC (long way from Malaga in Spain) and I was doing a little clubbing, all VIP rooms, party animal, and the Wutang came in (probably not all of the circus but about 5 of them): They had to ask us and the manager for blow cause they were broke, and although we bought them some bubbly and charlie, only one of them stepped up and freestyled, but even then we had to boo him offstage cause he was trying to get away with some prewritten commercial pop trash.

Plastic Ganstas, all of them. Anyway, that is a weird memory from a life I dont live anymore. But it IS a true story. Good times, good times.


But yeah: Wutang are not especially good at any genre of hiphop, I doubt any of them know how to defend themselves any better with martial arts than they could with some sick beats to drop on, when they choked. Dont use them as your avatar/name of clan, they are a joke.
and your waiting for the return of 'n sync
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: DUKE DICKBUTT on May 06, 2013, 08:47:22 am
He's referring to our heroic defense of Sumbuja last strat, where we defended the town against the hospitallers despite terrible odds.

I don't think that was in 2013.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: dreadnok on May 06, 2013, 03:12:03 pm
Fuck you clowns
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: dynamike on May 06, 2013, 03:12:42 pm
I remember Sumbuja... and that it is far more fun to defend than attack  :?

REMEMBER SUMBUJA, REMEMBER BRING MOUNTAIN GOAT!
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Kreczor on May 06, 2013, 04:34:06 pm
I don't think that was in 2013.

Using references is hard.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Matey on May 06, 2013, 07:26:29 pm
Sadly, no. Tadsamesh the legend began with 50 brave peasants against 10 full plated knights bravely defeating the impenetrable armor and was further expanded by defeating multiple armies following.  Sumbuja now - plate armor with more troops and more mercs winning  battle - not really a legend sadly, just expected win.  To look for a new legend to be born we must look for new heroes, ones where they defy all odds to win again and again.  Equip Sumbuja with only peasant gear in the next battle and win and you will get your chance to become a legend.

Do you have what it takes to become a legend?

You make me sad Kesh.
That was TEBANDRA!!!! REMEMBER TEBANDRA!
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Keshian on May 06, 2013, 07:40:52 pm
You make me sad Kesh.
That was TEBANDRA!!!! REMEMBER TEBANDRA!

I was wrong - i forgot Tebandra :(

I must commit SEPPUKU!


Also quick question for FILDGB - Should we expect all the fief owners to have nighttime settings of 8 pm to 4 am (so all of primetime in na blocked off) or is that just ethgar?  Thanks for letting us know in advance.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Kreczor on May 06, 2013, 07:47:25 pm
I was wrong - i forgot Tebandra :(

I must commit SEPPUKU!


Also quick question for FILDGB - Should we expect all the fief owners to have nighttime settings of 8 pm to 4 am (so all of primetime in na blocked off) or is that just ethgar?  Thanks for letting us know in advance.
It seems like Ethgar's plan is working.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on May 06, 2013, 07:59:48 pm
Yeah there's some pretty shitty battle times "tonight" (aka tomorrow morning).

have fun fighting in those ones (aka get fucked nerds)
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Rhalzo on May 06, 2013, 11:48:54 pm
I was wrong - i forgot Tebandra :(

I must commit SEPPUKU!


Also quick question for FILDGB - Should we expect all the fief owners to have nighttime settings of 8 pm to 4 am (so all of primetime in na blocked off) or is that just ethgar?  Thanks for letting us know in advance.
It seems like Ethgar's plan is working.

I'm sorry, I don't micromanage my strat faction's actions enough apparently. I wasn't even aware of Ethgar's night time. The tone of your post says that it's all part of a scheme though, which is pretty sad that you're paranoid about that.
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: BaleOhay on May 07, 2013, 12:25:33 am
not really that hard. If you give a guy troops and gear to ask what night time settings are. Its not micromanaging really. Just part of the process to try and avoid weird time fights. We will do our best to mitigate it as well. No need for either side to get angry. Lets handle it like adults.

You have 3 fiefs. Would you mind checking with the owners and seeing if their nighttime makes sense. We would appreciate that. Thank you

Ohay
Title: Re: AoW vs Illdist and mates
Post by: Ethgar on May 07, 2013, 12:50:55 am
I'm sorry for that one m8's.   I wasn't paying attention to my time settings.    It was not part of the plan...........or was it???     To be honest, I haven't adjusted my time in a long long time, so let me see if I can fix that for everyone's benefits.     :)


With this, I say.........................."XP FOR EVERYONE!!!"


edit:   Won't be able to change the settings due to it not allowing me.   I will try to fix it in the morning before I have to go into work.