cRPG

cRPG => Suggestions Corner => Game Balance Discussion => Topic started by: Glyph on May 02, 2011, 07:14:23 pm

Title: another HA discusion...
Post by: Glyph on May 02, 2011, 07:14:23 pm
i'd like that if you are mounted on a horse with a bow you can only take 1 stack of arrows so HA's can't last for a whole round with enough arrows to shoot at everyone. i don't ask for less damage, less accuracy or horse speed when HA. there are enough topics about that.
name the pros and cons and complain a lot if your a HA.
Title: Re: another HA discusion...
Post by: Magikarp on May 02, 2011, 07:16:00 pm
Err what? I can take 2 or 3 stacks and a scimitar if needed.
What are you talking about?
Title: Re: another HA discusion...
Post by: Soldier_of_God on May 02, 2011, 07:19:11 pm
the only way to make this fair is that ALL archers have the same restrictions, and i guarantee you that no archer will agree to only one quiver of arrows.

but to make a statement, i really hate HA. and to do that in battle is just a cheap tactic in general; about 75% of horse archers have limited melee combat ability, and so i have no respect for it.
Title: Re: another HA discusion...
Post by: EponiCo on May 03, 2011, 03:53:47 am
Well, I wouldn't object to a single quiver if it gets otherwise boosted (double ammo lol?). In fact I think that would be better than forcing longbowmen to go with joke melee weapon and pick up flamberges from the ground.
About horsearchers, you know the age where horsearchers could terrorize the servers are gone, if you get killed often by horsearchers as infantry you are just doing it wrong. I'd support making bows more expensive (cheaper horse) though.
Title: Re: another HA discusion...
Post by: Glyph on May 03, 2011, 07:55:55 am
but in gennaral i think HA's take way to expensive horses that should be available for their class