i'm still expected multi to be basically the same as bf3 but for next gen consoles, but we'll see.
Looked like BF3 with slightly fancier graphics, not impressed.
I'm curious what else you could have been expecting ;p
Bf2 was acceptable. Anything after that barely worth looking at.
You guys preferred 1942 over BF2 ? Why ? I'm genuinely curious.BF2 had appalling shooting mechanics and hit detection. Yet I played it 200 hours infantry only on Strike at Karkand. Recently played it again and I just couldn't stop wondering why I played it so much.
Anyone else remembers 2005-2006 when the entire shooter audience was so sick of WW 2 games? Boy did they overcorrect,
You guys preferred 1942 over BF2 ? Why ? I'm genuinely curious.
Anyone else remembers 2005-2006 when the entire shooter audience was so sick of WW 2 games? Boy did they overcorrect, a good old fashioned WW 2 shooter would be something I could enjoy.
Yet I played it 200 hours infantry only on Strike at Karkand.
Yeah.I had seen that video before, but this just gave me a massive sense of nostalgia... must play through Metro2033 and Stalker series again (for the fuck knows which time) >_<
Thanks to that mass whining we got... this.
One does not simply forget 2142.
Great theme, Titan mode, good gameplay, still had commander mode.
However i have heared that Desert Combat was really good for bf 1942, but that i was too young for that stuff back then so i have missed that out.
Yeah.Really makes you appreciate Arma 3, eh.
Thanks to that mass whining we got... this.
it's the same game as bf3, already tried beta
these games are made simply for people to buy a new pc every 2 years.
i wished they cared about the game itself, not about the graphic whores stroking their egos on how much awesome rig they have..
I don't buy an awesome rig to stroke my ego, I buy it because I have a lot of money and prefer to play on the highest settings and the best graphics available for the current technology for any game I play. Too bad for EA that I'm boycotting their sorry asses until they get a fucking clue and they won't be seeing any of my cash in their pockets.
i know, but i would like them to focus more on the actual gameplay side of the game, than oooh shiny graphics! 11/10!
remember crysis? it sounded awesome, until you played it and realized it is just an average shooter, only with best graphics available during those times.In your opinion. A lot of people thought Crysis had good gameplay.
and the suit, well...it was meh at best.
Also I definitely think that bf1942 was more fun than bf2. BF2 was good but it didn't have the same epic feel. I played a great mod for bf1942 called forgotten hope that added a lot of units maps guns and realism to the game. There may still be people playing....
You can no longer drive AND shoot vehicles like tanks from the same seat, they now have an extra slot for dedicated drivers.
New kit added "Pilot" required to spawn, drive and operate tanks/aircrafts. Has only pistol/knife and vechicle customisations.
Vehicle loadouts determined by the pilot kit loadout of the pilot who spawned it.
Entering and exiting vehicles has a short timer/animation, no more instantly popping in and out to easily avoid death.
Vehicles now cost your team a few tickets when destroyed. Their spawns are still limited per team like usual so you could only lose so many tickets per round. But it still has a small impact on the final score. Losing vehicles now actually matters, they aren't just throwaway transport.
You can no longer drive AND shoot vehicles like tanks from the same seat, they now have an extra slot for dedicated drivers.
New kit added "Pilot" required to spawn, drive and operate tanks/aircrafts. Has only pistol/knife and vechicle customisations.
Vehicle loadouts determined by the pilot kit loadout of the pilot who spawned it.
Entering and exiting vehicles has a short timer/animation, no more instantly popping in and out to easily avoid death.
Vehicles now cost your team a few tickets when destroyed. Their spawns are still limited per team like usual so you could only lose so many tickets per round. But it still has a small impact on the final score. Losing vehicles now actually matters, they aren't just throwaway transport.
The Oriental version of the Battlefield theme? :rolleyes:
I however doubt we'll see it relaunched soon, given Titanfall resembles it, and all Respawn Entertainment would need to do is add a similar 2142 Titan gamemode and they're set.
I'm throwing my money at Titanfall and staying far away from the Battlefield franchise (unless max sale somewhere :P).
I'm not going to buy Battlefield 4 because it feels like a ripoff. Even though everyones hating on Dice they're still killin' it with the trailer music :DPfft, the guys wrote a killer theme in 1942 and now they have just been reducing it more and more until there are only farting noises left.
Pfft, the guys wrote a killer theme in 1942 and now they have just been reducing it more and more until there are only farting noises left.(click to show/hide)
Battlefield 4 = BF3.5
altho BF3 was actually a pretty good game if you didn't play on the cod maps. it was a pretty big step up from the previous game bc2
I used to love playing Metro 24/7 64 player servers which is as arcady as it can get. Best maps in my opinion were the CQ maps.
Think Im starting to become a dirty casual.
What I dislike about Battlefield is the vehicles, which is half the game really. As someone who loves playing infantry I often find that you are seldomly equipped as a squad to be able to properly deal with a tank, enemy squads and enemy air vehicles. Being in a tank does give you a better position compared to the average infantryman, and as I didn't like playing in a tank much I was always on the receiving end of that better position. Often you feel like you just have no chance and it gets frustrating, switching class all the time only to be faced by your counter all the time. I played Battlefield 2 like 300 hours on infantry only mode on Strike at Karkand, which I really enjoyed back then. Played it again more recently and I was appalled at the shooting mechanics, hit detection and the entire system were pretty horrible. But 64 player matches with only infantry were pretty intense.
I bought Battlefield 3 but only played it 20 hours. I thought maps and gameplay were very chaotic almost all the time where you would often get shot from multiple angles or multiple vertical levels, making playing offensively rather hard compared to holding a nice spot. Might be me being tired of shooters and gaming in general though.
Also I definitely think that bf1942 was more fun than bf2. BF2 was good but it didn't have the same epic feel. I played a great mod for bf1942 called forgotten hope that added a lot of units maps guns and realism to the game. There may still be people playing....
What I dislike about Battlefield is the vehicles, which is half the game really. As someone who loves playing infantry I often find that you are seldomly equipped as a squad to be able to properly deal with a tank, enemy squads and enemy air vehicles. Being in a tank does give you a better position compared to the average infantryman, and as I didn't like playing in a tank much I was always on the receiving end of that better position. Often you feel like you just have no chance and it gets frustrating, switching class all the time only to be faced by your counter all the time. I played Battlefield 2 like 300 hours on infantry only mode on Strike at Karkand, which I really enjoyed back then. Played it again more recently and I was appalled at the shooting mechanics, hit detection and the entire system were pretty horrible. But 64 player matches with only infantry were pretty intense.
I bought Battlefield 3 but only played it 20 hours. I thought maps and gameplay were very chaotic almost all the time where you would often get shot from multiple angles or multiple vertical levels, making playing offensively rather hard compared to holding a nice spot. Might be me being tired of shooters and gaming in general though.
I'm with you on this one, Titanfall I'm sure will be the new trendsetter for the FPS in the future years just like COD4:Modern Warfare was. In the next 2/3 years it will be all about future warfare, kinda looking forawrd to it. Will most likely purchase Titanfall.
Fuck EA. Hate them
titanfall looks completely meh to me.
also why do you need a giant robot if in the future kicking people in the stomach is lethal.
that siege of shanghai map looks cool but it should have a US carrier in the harbour plus a destroyer, and at least the destroyer should be moveable so you can sail around and gun down buildings. The defenders could have some heavy artillery emplacements too, and their own fixed wing aircraft, then that would be some proper battlefield style maybe. Instead it's just a few choppers and people on jetskis.
Titanfall looks pretty good I would hope they integrate those carriers they show in trailer into maps and it becomes like bf2142 titan mode and combat taking place on ground, on/in buildings, and 1000 feet in air. throw in a bit more combined arms like some gunships flying around too. I also like the faster pace of infantry, with the jump jets and wall scaling, so it's almost like a combination of tribes & battlefield.
So anybody got this day 1, worth a buy? Berenger?
My compjooooter is gay and won't handle this. And PS4 is most likely all sold out and cant preorder em anymore. And i have my doubts with playing this on current gen consoles (might be too nerfed compared to next gen consoles and PC).
Also one reason i pre-ordered COD Ghosts instead.
Only games i have in my sights and have bought recently is WWE2K14, COD Ghosts, Assassin's Creed IV and might possibly get Warface and Watch Dogs.
Which is more wrong? Shooters on consoles? Or sex with your sister? They are both abominations :twisted:
That's why the majority of COD pro players and tournament players are on consoles trololol.
That's only logical as there are few COD PC players to start with. The scene is simply smaller. But I would like to see what would happen if a mixed competition was organised.
Did they fix the hit detection in this one? Shooting at people always felt delayed in BF3, similar to Planetside 2's shitty hit detection.
I found BF3 fine from that pov. But then the last BF game I played was BF2 and you had to aim behind people to hit them in that one :)
They did this sort of stuff before and pro players on gamepad can't even handle average players on mouse and keyboard. Don't know if autoaim was enabled or not. It only makes sense and doesn't prove anything really, FPS on console and PC is a totally different beast.
That's only logical as there are few COD PC players to start with. The scene is simply smaller. But I would like to see what would happen if a mixed competition was organised.
They did this sort of stuff before and pro players on gamepad can't even handle average players on mouse and keyboard. Don't know if autoaim was enabled or not. It only makes sense and doesn't prove anything really, FPS on console and PC is a totally different beast.
BF SP is shit, why would you even bother.
Because I like stories and enjoy single player campaigns?
And I feel that this is a poor excuse for one
If you like story and single player campaigns don't pick up an MMS.
So I bought BF4 yesterday, got it for 30 bucks, tought it was a nice deal...
Not having the best time so far. Out of last 15 games my team has won 4, I mostly like to play Rush but tried Conquest, some obj. mode where you plant the bomb (clan rolled us every map lasted 10 minutes straight), tried with vehicles, witout vehicles, 32/64 ppl, played with friends (we are never in the same squad, not even in the same team most of the time, gg) and balance is horrible I'm mostly in a team that has 4/5 players less that the other team.
Pls shoot me some tips, some good servers to play because I'm gonna regret this 30 bucks.
note. I like BF3 and am not new to the franchise.
I play on PC and I can't stress enough my disdain towards Battlelog and the server bowsing (and the lack of propper filters)
click "search for servers " dropdown box in server browser. then click advanced for even more. they hid the filters in there. coming from bf3 I couldn't find them at first either.
Yeah I did that tought you suggested somehing else... this still doesn't provide enough options, where hardcore etc. options...
click "search for servers " dropdown box in server browser. then click advanced for even more. they hid the filters in there. coming from bf3 I couldn't find them at first either.
I also spent $30 on BF4 a couple days ago, I would like to give it a proper review but I can't keep a solid connection to any server. I've fucked around with my router already and the servers usually say my ping is normal (typically 80 to US Central servers) but I get really bad lag.
It's the only game that it happens on, so I'm down to contacting my provider and finding shitty fixes online.
Aside from that, the campaign was VERY short and extremely predictable, but a good way to waste five hours of time. Interesting story line that hardly builds on the story from BF3, very "OORAH MARINES YEAH" and "USA USA USA" like but it still kept my interest.
The multiplayer, from what I've played, feels much better than BF3. Especially on hardcore mode, it actually feels like a game where people die when you shoot them. The maps seem to be designed around one huge component that either is visually striking and/or changes the map layout somehow.
tl;dr go re-install BF2 and get Project Reality, 2x better than BF4 and it's only 1/3 of the price of BF4.
No. Mods are gay.
Yeah you probably wouldn't like PR anyway, it doesn't have killstreaks and perks like CoD and BF4.
But you can play a civilian and only be able to throw bricks at US soldiers. #MGL #SWAG #YOLO
Still not liking it, finished singleplayer though... damn that thing is pathetic, scraes me to think what Cod singleplayer looks like, will give multi a few more chances
I heaven't been so sorry about buying a game ever since Rage came out.
MP is decent but Campaign sucked. Btw did you buy COD Ghosts too?