cRPG

cRPG => Ban/Unban Requests => Closed Requests => Topic started by: Quentry on December 31, 2012, 06:22:00 pm

Title: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: Quentry on December 31, 2012, 06:22:00 pm
Insulting and running between me and guy with whom i was dueling, again insulting and polls without reason
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: Erzengel on December 31, 2012, 06:33:59 pm
.
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: oerput on December 31, 2012, 06:45:20 pm
yeah i was there. cleary he got raged after few defeats or sth like that. he has pretty bad additude too. changes wepons in duel, hitting knocked down opponents etc.
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: Arthur_ on January 01, 2013, 12:50:11 am
I saw him with my own eyes, aproove 100% !!


Ban he!.
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: Shemaforash on January 01, 2013, 12:51:58 am
hitting knocked down opponents etc.

nothing wrong with that, but his behaviour on the other hand is unacceptable in a duel server
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: oerput on January 01, 2013, 03:04:33 pm
well ofc thats not against the rules but not a thing to do in a duel. i was just talking about his behaviour ın general
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: Chris_the_Animal on January 01, 2013, 03:37:12 pm
Hello guys.

At first:
CK did not "running between me and guy with whom i was dueling", and if he did it was probably, because he has bad lags. Reason for lags: WSE2 Beta.
CK did not do that on purpose and i hope you believe me and him.

Now to the more important part:
Its true CK called him "pussy".
If this is bannable i will not say anything against it.

The reason for that is his not honourable fighting in my opinion.
They started the first duel:
CK: Great Maul
Quentry: some 1h-sword

They fought...when Ck made the first Crushthrough and hurt Quentry but did not knockdown, Quentry started to run.
He ran away for over 1 minute searching another duel partner to not loose the duel.

They started again:
CK: Great Sword (he did not want to fight against Great Maul so...)
Quentry: same wpn as before

CK changed weapon to Great Maul (i dont know that this is bannable). Quentry ran away. For a short time CK hunted him, but after 30 seconds of running CK turned around to go back to main duel place to get another duel partner, because CK did not want to waste his time running. After CK turned around and did not look what quentry does anymore, Quentry turned and backstabbed CK. Because of lighter head armor CK died after 3 hits to the head.

In my opinion this is not okay in a duel aswell as CK's reaction to that.
CK feels sorry that he overreact a bit and he knows it is not okay to search any valve for the problems in real life.

But as i said already CK was not the only player who did not act right in this moment.

Greets,
Chris
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: bagge on January 01, 2013, 03:39:13 pm
CK clearly has some issues
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: Quentry on January 01, 2013, 04:30:35 pm
CK did not "running between me and guy with whom i was dueling", and if he did it was probably, because he has bad lags. Reason for lags: WSE2 Beta.
Lie. He did it repeatedly and many times. You can ask Dark_Blade and BashiBazouk_Gosling.

Quote
The reason for that is his not honourable fighting in my opinion.
They started the first duel:
CK: Great Maul
Quentry: some 1h-sword

They fought...when Ck made the first Crushthrough and hurt Quentry but did not knockdown, Quentry started to run.
He ran away for over 1 minute searching another duel partner to not loose the duel.

They started again:
CK: Great Sword (he did not want to fight against Great Maul so...)
Quentry: same wpn as before

CK changed weapon to Great Maul (i dont know that this is bannable). Quentry ran away. For a short time CK hunted him, but after 30 seconds of running CK turned around to go back to main duel place to get another duel partner, because CK did not want to waste his time running. After CK turned around and did not look what quentry does anymore, Quentry turned and backstabbed CK. Because of lighter head armor CK died after 3 hits to the head.
Lie. I haven't accepted 1st duel with maul, cuz i didn't want to duel with mauller, second one he had german greatsword, so i accepted and won the duel, and 3rd at begin he has german greatsword, but he changed it so i run away, and found new duel partener, after that, he started to run between me and my duel partener.

Quote
CK feels sorry that he overreact a bit and he knows it is not okay to search any valve for the problems in real life.
Dear admins, punish him please for trolling.
Regards.
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: Chris_the_Animal on January 01, 2013, 04:49:23 pm
I know CK as a very nice guy and he acts like that the most times.
He is sorry to act that bad in this situation.

I do not like it when anybody call members of The Brotherhood liars. I know all of my guys very good and i do not think they would act like you tell it here.
CK disputes the following cases against him:
-interrupting your duels on porpuse
-loosing against you in fair conditions (no backstabbing)

I fully trust CK and i believe in his statement to this case.

The duels you are telling did not happen like this, but like i said before.

Both, CK_the_Bro and Druzhina_Quentry, did something wrong and maybe not honourful in this situation, but then either both should be punished or none of them.

Greets,
Chris
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: Quentry on January 01, 2013, 05:17:24 pm
I do not like it when anybody call members of The Brotherhood liars. I know all of my guys very good and i do not think they would act like you tell it here.
Screens and people telling another thing.Insulting, weaponchanging and nonreasoned polls isn't good things, is it?
Quote
-interrupting your duels on porpuse
I've interrepted duel, because of changing weapon, so ...
Quote
-loosing against you in fair conditions (no backstabbing)
I didn't forced him to duel with me with a german greatsword.

Quote
He is sorry to act that bad in this situation.
ok, but
Quote
Both, CK_the_Bro and Druzhina_Quentry, did something wrong and maybe not honourful in this situation, but then either both should be punished or none of them.
Do you blame me? Oh, i want justice
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: Chris_the_Animal on January 01, 2013, 05:32:06 pm
This is unecessary argumentating so i will not say something anymore.

Everybody knows mine and CK's point of view and i look forward to the descision of the admin who is in charge. I hope this will be finished soon, because i do not want to invest my time into anger and hate, but in playing this beutiful mod.

Greets,
Chris
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: Quentry on January 01, 2013, 05:34:28 pm
This is unecessary argumentating so i will not say something anymore.

Everybody knows mine and CK's point of view and i look forward to the descision of the admin who is in charge. I hope this will be finished soon, because i do not want to invest my time into anger and hate, but in playing this beutiful mod.

Greets,
Chris
+1
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: Quentry on January 02, 2013, 08:17:07 am
bump
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: Quentry on January 05, 2013, 10:35:57 am
bump
Title: Re: [BAN] CK_the_Bro
Post by: Tennenoth on January 08, 2013, 12:40:07 pm
Having read everything here it is impossible to tell if this CK player was indeed running in-between duels, you have evidenced some idiotic behaviour (the childish caps-lock name calling) and a ban poll but nothing for the major offence of intentionally causing grief while interrupting someone's duel.

With all due respect, as much as "honour" is a nice thing, it is not necessary and not everyone will agree to it, there are many things in this game that are courtesy and most people are honest and willing to follow them which is wonderful.

Anyway, CK_the_Bro I will let off with a warning since this was a while ago now but if something similar happens I won't be so nice about it. Buck your ideas up.

(Personally I don't blame Quentry for running from a mauler, particularly if there was a weapon switch mid way, but sadly it's not against the rules.)