Don't use bugs . It's terrible.This, to everyone.
so haboe??? where you have any sky ladder ?? every ladder is on the ground.... hm maybe i am blind
Btw as I remember sky ladder is forbidden, so pls explain me this
"solid ground" what this mean ??
walls and roof is not solid ? so try hit the wall form head, maybe after this you will get some brain in our head
btw this half of "sky ladder" is neverending story because everybody know you will not get ban because you are mercs coalition and wolves so pls end this topic
But if Mercs grace me to read my post pls explain me this first half of topic because this "admin" is mercs memeber
We took this castle a couple of days ago and had no problems with ladders, keeps, archers, racks, catas etc. For me the problem is about the lack of tactics and management, but not the game mechanics. :P
Added:
A simple solution for overhanging ladders
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
anything defying that physics law is not allowed.
According to Shik as long as one end is on something that's not another ladder/constructable it's fine.
This is the biggest strategus battle problem... lots of things arent publicly forbidden (or tolerated).
ok nocti so we have 3 ladder (on the top) because rest ladders is ok, it was useless, no body shot form them, it wasn`t ours "last castle" and it doesn`t do anything to help us.
and you have many ladders (sky ladders) which you used to killed us
but ok end of this half of topic (as i said) you used from last 10 min of battle and we had 3 .... but ok we had sky ladders
....Look mate i know that DRZ and Grey Order as other UIF factions have many excellent players and you put a lot of effort in this game, did you use other means too sure, but that's not my point here. I will grant you only respect if it is given in return. My guys are partly new to the game, partly inexperienced, most of them have never ever done a lot with siege stuff, from that perspective i am complettly ok with their accomplishments. When you now deminish their efforts this i can only see as a bad character trait of yours. You took the castle by surprise and intercepted the reinforcements and we are having a tough time taking it back, not arguing there at all and a lot of things we tried out bluntly failed, but we are getting better from time to time. Wolves aren't a 80 members faction we have roughly 30ish and we need to organize a lot with our also in comparison to DRZ/GO small factions and no we aren't that effiecent and haven't even trained this siege stuff on a trainings server effectivly. Still keeping the tone is something i tell my guys always, not all of them succeed and i appollogize for those who flame and rage, so lets keep it civil shall we?
and stuping enginers shooting from catapult just before the wall (it's very funny, crazy and your enginners are stupid kids hahahaha).
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
You complain that Pawlo was banned mid game, for what? obvious cheating. Of course you're not allowed to use the enemys spawn, that's just common sense...
I ain't apologizing for shit, if anything, Jacu should apologize for his bad English. LOLZ.Poor Lizard, to stupid to comprehend what a guy means if his English isn't 100% perfect.
if you select your spawn point in opponent spawn pointThe first time I hear about something like this, very strange situation for me, and I think that this is a problem of game mechanics/scripts/whatever, not of players. If devs leave such cases in game and then ban
You complain that Pawlo was banned mid game, for what? obvious cheating. Of course you're not allowed to use the enemys spawn, that's just common sense...I saw a lot of times then one side was stealing c.materials from enemy's stack of materials to build something.
I saw a lot of times then one side was stealing c.materials from enemy's stack of materials to build something.
There was a lot of times then one side used enemy's rack to put\take an equipment.
So why is it so bad to use enemy's spawn point? Perhaps if spawn points had more HP, we could see more spawncapturing :)
In fact, I don't care, but during today's siege, representative of administration (of course Mercs) banned our player (for a few days - why not - he can) because our player selected enemy spawnpoint.
so haboe??? where you have any sky ladder ?? every ladder is on the ground.... hm maybe i am blindphysics, only ninjas can avoid it
Just play the game and don't give a reason to ANYONE to whine about something I think this would be less time consuming then writing pages of stuff on forum.
The same applies to you. Just let people play and ask your teammates to keep bans for the real culprits of real offenses, not imaginary ones. And noone asks you to spend your precious time to write anything here. Don't bother to comment.
NB - such situations clearly show the reason why we have taken our decision.
"solid ground" what this mean ??
walls and roof is not solid ? so try hit the wall form head, maybe after this you will get some brain in our head
btw this half of "sky ladder" is neverending story because everybody know you will not get ban because you are mercs coalition and wolves so pls end this topic
But if Mercs grace me to read my post pls explain me this first half of topic because this "admin" is mercs memeber
ooooh i am idiot
Please, attack a little earlier. Don't be Mercs.
you are SOOOO pathetic.
I could create a set of strat rules for you guys but noone would technically have to adhere to them, as I do not have the status required to legitimise their enforcement.
...Please, attack a little earlier....i will try to get our attacks to be done in between 20:00 and 22:00 gmt+1(this is prime time of most of our members).
And to all in so called Anti-UIF.I always refer to us as the Eastern-Block and the Western Block on the other side. In my opinion it has a nicer tone to.
...
One thing I always hated about the UIF clans is that they would always look for any possible thing to exploit to win instead of just using common sense and playing the game. Is spawning at the enemy spawn point a fair situation?If you're talking about the forward spawn siege gear, then yes, sucks to be you, you let them get that close and do that and you gotta destroy it and rebuild it, only fair, really. And as this is something which isn't just "common sense" your admins shouldn't just ban without first getting permission from a dev AND warning the person first. However, if this is some glitch that lets them use your actual spawn flags then that is another case which clearly isn't up for discussion.
UIF are cheating? Wtf?
Your side banned our players, change economy on strat and destroy our armies in villages and castles.
This is fair? Shut up lames.
Constantly attack the Slezkh Castle and can't get it.
You're pr0 and you can't win.
Cry moreee, maybe create a Tsunami wave and destroy our lands.
UIF are cheating? Wtf?realy?
Your side banned our players, change economy on strat and destroy our armies in villages and castles.
This is fair? Shut up lames.
Constantly attack the Slezkh Castle and can't get it.
You're pr0 and you can't win.
Cry moreee, maybe create a Tsunami wave and destroy our lands.
Fuck the UIF, and fuck you!Whatever cheater.
If anyone has ever caught every single member of uif cheating please come forward, if not then I guess you either owe UIF an apology or you should finally admit that you guys aren't any fucking better than them.if i understand it right than multi accaunting is form of cheating.
if i understand it right than multi accaunting is form of cheating.And have every single UIF member got caught multiaccounting?
And have every single UIF member got caught multiaccounting?
And have every single UIF member got caught multiaccounting?i still sometimes think that UIF consists of 100 keys of harpag and vovka :)
5:45 PM <Shik> chadz can we get some confirmation
5:45 PM <Shik> on whether it should be bannable and considered exploiting
5:45 PM <Shik> to use the enemy's forward spawn
5:45 PM <Shik> in strat battles
5:46 PM <chadz> dont think its a problem(click to show/hide)
I have my respect to Kinngrimm. Everybody makes mistakes (except Mercs, of course, they are innocent and holy, as usual). So I don't think that the ladders were so horrible problem as some players counts (Mercs started to whine about it, so some Greys had to continue that).
No complaint to Wolves. May be only one, the attack was too late (Not only because of you, but also Rus-Government-Dicks who kept Summer time in Winter). Please, attack a little earlier. Don't be Mercs. Let me play as well. Please :)
And to all in so called Anti-UIF.
Banning player from Defenders team by absolutely imaged reason - you are SOOOO pathetic. Keep on insulting on Forum and complain about GO and Druzhina cheaters - the only and the best thing you can.
Best bit, on some DRZ thread Gingerpussy made a comment on how DRZ was the best of UIF with good discipline and tacticsEven I gave him some + for that :P
I never imagined +'s and -'s on the forum were the most touchy part of people here. :lol:They are renown whores(me too) :wink: It's so painful than somebody damages your good reputation(everyone thinks he is good person) :rolleyes:
but wasn't it DRZ that attacked us during Christmas last strategus?Sure. But as we said last year, we didn't know about your Christmas. You know, communistic-atheistic legacy of our previous country :oops: Damn, I didn't even know that we have our own Xmass at 7th jan :lol:
Harpag. 100 CD keys :wink:
... but guess what, Naduril minused it...
Maybe I'll admin some Merc strat battles for fun so the admin abuse isn't that one-sided.
"Noctipussy & Gingervaginavisitors can't see pics , please register or login
Regarding Pawlo's ban, it may have been a bit harsh. Maybe if possible a ban for1-2 days on EU_3 and NA_3 so he can't play in strategus battles would have been better. No matter who it is whether HRE, Grey Order, DRZ, Mercs anyone would be pissed if enemies were spawning in your spawn point. I mean why do it in the first place, it just creates a problem on the forums. If it's under handed and being cheap don't do it. Simple as that...Yeah, he totally deserved a ban at all even though chadz sorta said it was allowed, ban him!
Yeah, he totally deserved a ban at all even though chadz sorta said it was allowed, ban him!When chadz is not there to judge, the admins do have the power right? chadz statement onto this topic came afterwards, so that admin(which we still don't know who it was and i also don't really care) didn't act against any rules setted by chadz. I am arguing here for the admins in general not for this particular ban.
When chadz is not there to judge, the admins do have the power right? chadz statement onto this topic came afterwards, so that admin(which we still don't know who it was and i also don't really care) didn't act against any rules setted by chadz. I am arguing here for the admins in general not for this particular ban.I am aware of that, however, even now when it has been settled Adalwulf is still saying the guy needs a ban, and I personally believe that when you're fighting against someone, who is doing something that isn't necessarily rule breaking, and that rules haven't been laid down against, then you shouldn't assume you're right and ban the guy, you should either get permission from the devs or you should post a banthread like every regular guy has to, that way no guys get banned for doing something that offends the admin fighting against them but besides that isn't against the rules.
I am aware of that, however, even now when it has been settled Adalwulf is still saying the guy needs a ban, and I personally believe that when you're fighting against someone, who is doing something that isn't necessarily rule breaking, and that rules haven't been laid down against, then you shouldn't assume you're right and ban the guy, you should either get permission from the devs or you should post a banthread like every regular guy has to, that way no guys get banned for doing something that offends the admin fighting against them but besides that isn't against the rules.
Sure because Khorin and Shik weren't on uif sideOh yes. I have always supported UIF in its endeavours.
Oh yes. I have always supported UIF in its endeavours.
Didn't mean that, we both had admins on our roster, its not like how Paul made the situation look like : Poor UIF getting tortured by us and our evil admins who have nothing to do but looking for an open spot to ban them. Thats actually what Grey members said in couple of topics "system is against them"
Naduril, grow the fuck up and stop minusing peoples posts for no fucking reason... :|how about we all just cycle through naduril's posts and minus them? it wont change mind of this ignorant person but atleast we would let him know how we reputationwhores feel.
how about we all just cycle through naduril's posts and minus them? it wont change mind of this ignorant person but atleast we would let him know how we reputationwhores feel.
For me it seems like if someone capture a catapult and use it against owners or use a ladder that was SUPPOSED to bring attackers to the walls to go down from the walls.
I am aware of that, however, even now when it has been settled Adalwulf is still saying the guy needs a ban, and I personally believe that when you're fighting against someone, who is doing something that isn't necessarily rule breaking, and that rules haven't been laid down against, then you shouldn't assume you're right and ban the guy, you should either get permission from the devs or you should post a banthread like every regular guy has to, that way no guys get banned for doing something that offends the admin fighting against them but besides that isn't against the rules.
"Noctipussy & Gingervagina"
Oops, sorry man, my mistake, of course it should be Noctivagina & Gingerpusy :wink:
Oops, sorry man, my mistake, of course it should be Noctivagina & Gingerpusy :wink: