cRPG

cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: Wizard_of_chaos on November 08, 2012, 07:14:28 am

Title: Battle reliability
Post by: Wizard_of_chaos on November 08, 2012, 07:14:28 am
Hey I have a question, when you miss a battle you're inscribed in start for some reason or another, you get less reliability. If you play perfect and miss no battle further more in a while, is it possible to return to 10/10 reliability if you're perfect? Does it takes the 10 last battles, or does it leaves you a way to catch yourself up?
Title: Re: Battle reliability
Post by: Segd on November 08, 2012, 07:35:32 am
is it possible to return to 10/10 reliability if you're perfect? Does it takes the 10 last battles, or does it leaves you a way to catch yourself up?
Yep, you can reach 10 again. I think it counts more than 10 last battles. Maybe all battles from current strat.
Title: Re: Battle reliability
Post by: CaveSquirrel on November 08, 2012, 07:45:21 am
I believe it doesnt only have to do whether you come to the battle or not.

I joined every battle I applied for yet, still I had only 8/10 or 9/10 for a while.
Title: Re: Battle reliability
Post by: Thovex on November 08, 2012, 09:59:44 am
I've been to all but 1 battle out of 50~ battles and I got 10/10 reliability
It was 9 when I missed that battle.

However, they should switch performance to points and not KDR.
Title: Re: Battle reliability
Post by: [ptx] on November 08, 2012, 10:24:44 am
I missed a whole day of battles at the very start of this strat and was down to 2/10. Now, not that many battles afterwards, i'm at 10/10 :)

So yeah, it is possible.
Title: Re: Battle reliability
Post by: Falka on November 08, 2012, 10:35:55 am
Only last 10 battles are taken into account, checked  :wink:

I believe it doesnt only have to do whether you come to the battle or not.

I joined every battle I applied for yet, still I had only 8/10 or 9/10 for a while.
If you quit in the middle of battle it counts as "not showed up". At least that's what I noticed when I left one battle before the end.
Title: Re: Battle reliability
Post by: Segd on November 08, 2012, 10:37:36 am
However, they should switch performance to points and not KDR.
As a crossbowman I should disagree with your statement   :)
Title: Re: Battle reliability
Post by: Everkistus on November 08, 2012, 11:01:56 am
However, they should switch performance to points and not KDR.
As archer, I also disagree.
Title: Re: Battle reliability
Post by: Kuujis on November 08, 2012, 04:23:03 pm
<...>
However, they should switch performance to points and not KDR.

In order not to make the archers/xbowers cry I suggest displaying two or using an average of both scores/avg score (5 being 1:1 with an average team fighter) and KDR.
Title: Re: Battle reliability
Post by: Boss_Awesome on November 08, 2012, 08:11:59 pm
I've been to all but 1 battle out of 50~ battles and I got 10/10 reliability
It was 9 when I missed that battle.

However, they should switch performance to points and not KDR.

Considering the point score system is completely retarded they should keep it at KDR.