cRPG

cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: Argoth on November 04, 2012, 05:40:59 am

Title: lol
Post by: Argoth on November 04, 2012, 05:40:59 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login



how does it feel knowing you'll never get my sword
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Smoothrich on November 04, 2012, 05:49:44 am
mute + ban this guy please
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Muki on November 04, 2012, 05:51:23 am
I don't understand....
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Tears of Destiny on November 04, 2012, 05:52:57 am
I don't understand....


He has a Masterwork Heavy Bastard Sword, and the latest major patch and stat changes made it an extremely desirable weapon, so he is now mocking those who now want a weapon that used to be overshadowed by the Longsword in the eyes of many.
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Argoth on November 04, 2012, 05:53:40 am
Exactly my dear King.
Title: Re: lol
Post by: TurmoilTom on November 04, 2012, 06:04:05 am
I always thought the HBS was better, anyway. Weight means less glances and weight is something that the HBS always had more of than the Longsword.
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Smoothrich on November 04, 2012, 06:09:04 am
I always thought the HBS was better, anyway. Weight means less glances and weight is something that the HBS always had more of than the Longsword.

as far as i know weight is only movement speed, knockdown chance (if applicable), and weapon stun.  glancing is based on damage, which is PS, weapon stats, speed bonus, and time into animation
Title: Re: lol
Post by: TugBoat on November 04, 2012, 06:14:50 am
as far as i know weight is only movement speed, knockdown chance (if applicable), and weapon stun.  glancing is based on damage, which is PS, weapon stats, speed bonus, and time into animation

I've always been told heavier weight = less glance
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Smoothrich on November 04, 2012, 06:26:19 am
I've always been told heavier weight = less glance

glancing is only determined by damage of your swing, which weapon weight has nothing to do with.  to the best of my knowledge of esoteric shitty warband mechanics at least
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Miley on November 04, 2012, 06:41:57 am
So why is it good now?
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Tears of Destiny on November 04, 2012, 06:45:56 am
So why is it good now?


Made the longsword more damaging and the HBS much more fast, base 100 speed so 101 with MW.
Title: Re: lol
Post by: bilwit on November 04, 2012, 06:51:22 am
I always used HBS because it had a sheath and longsword for the longest time didn't. It also looks cooler with heirloom mod. I don't know about the trade demands but even before the patch I was seeing a lot more people with +3 HBS than there were 3-4 months ago. People are just catching on to its sexiness.


Made the longsword more damaging and the HBS much more fast, base 100 speed so 101 with MW.

1 speed is "much more" fast?? +1 cut and +1 length with one less speed is superior in every way when it comes down to it.
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Rhaelys on November 04, 2012, 06:59:28 am
I always used HBS because it had a sheath and longsword for the longest time didn't. It also looks cooler with heirloom mod. I don't know about the trade demands but even before the patch I was seeing a lot more people with +3 HBS than there were 3-4 months ago. People are just catching on to its sexiness.

1 speed is "much more" fast?? +1 cut and +1 length with one less speed is superior in every way when it comes down to it.

Heavier weight, less upkeep, and 1 more speed. 1 less cut and 1 less length is, contrary to what you say, not as big of a deal as you seem to make it out to be. The HBS also gets style points for having a sheath for its entire lifetime, and just having a better texture + model in general. Lastly, Longswords were, and still are very common, so there's a certain originality factor with the HBS.
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Tears of Destiny on November 04, 2012, 07:48:34 am
1 speed is "much more" fast??


I meant much more fast as in compared to the original stats, as I do consider a base speed of 100 to be much more fast then 98.
Title: Re: lol
Post by: bilwit on November 04, 2012, 09:56:29 am

I meant much more fast as in compared to the original stats, as I do consider a base speed of 100 to be much more fast then 98.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Tears of Destiny on November 04, 2012, 10:04:29 am
visitors can't see pics , please register or login



Again, much faster as compared to original stats (as in the HBS of 98) I'm not talking about the Longsword  :P
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Rubicon on November 04, 2012, 10:46:58 am
HBS model has always been sexier than longsword, recent buff made it even more attractive for spaming dudes like me :p
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Andy on November 04, 2012, 05:28:27 pm
I don't have any looms. I always sell my points. :(
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Crob28 on November 04, 2012, 05:31:07 pm
Damn I might have to get me a HBS just because of how cheap the upkeep is for how good it is  :lol:
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Bjord on November 04, 2012, 05:36:07 pm
Longsword forever, the pommel is so sexy.

Awaiting cmp's new script for different damage types depending on what area of the weapon hits with. I imagine the pommel will come in handy then, so don't be so sure HBS will remain in the spotlight!!
Title: Re: lol
Post by: cmp on November 04, 2012, 05:39:43 pm
glancing is only determined by damage of your swing, which weapon weight has nothing to do with.  to the best of my knowledge of esoteric shitty warband mechanics at least

Correct.
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Son Of Odin on November 04, 2012, 05:42:45 pm
cmp you forgot this:
  • Give a sensible description of the thread's content in the title, meaningless titles like "help" don't tell anybody about your problem.

Title: Re: lol
Post by: //saxon on November 04, 2012, 05:43:55 pm
lol, all them offers for your sword, but all them offers are rubbish. i wounder how much this sword is in gold now..
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Jarlek on November 04, 2012, 05:44:16 pm
HBS is one sexy son of a bitch.
Title: Re: lol
Post by: TurmoilTom on November 05, 2012, 03:28:54 am
Correct.

Well, shit. Now I have to dig through the entire forum to find that one post that deceived me and downvote it.
Title: Re: lol
Post by: Weewum on November 05, 2012, 03:40:34 am
cmp you forgot this:
All I have to say about that is... lol...
Title: Re: lol
Post by: cmp on November 05, 2012, 03:48:09 am
cmp you forgot this:

Good point.