You wanted assassins, you got them :mrgreen:
No I won't. I can block 114 fast dagger but you can't block any weapon, no matter how slow it is :D
Seriously, whoever dies to daggers is a nub, I've never had issues with players using weapons that can't block, no matter how good those players are (Kastu). They can't win if you use your brain for few seconds.
You know, he could take a shield.
Maybe it's easier(reflected by speed movment). But what about DAMAGES ? Why do you think most fighters were using any kind of sword instead of daggers on battlefields ?
Which may end up being broken in a few hits because two-handers have crazy high damaging shield-breakers now. Persian Battle Axe has 51c damage at +3, dude. I think it's going to become a popular weapon in the near future.
Which may end up being broken in a few hits because two-handers have crazy high damaging shield-breakers now. Persian Battle Axe has 51c damage at +3, dude. I think it's going to become a popular weapon in the near future.
The balance argument is, block down and S key.
Which may end up being broken in a few hits because two-handers have crazy high damaging shield-breakers now. Persian Battle Axe has 51c damage at +3, dude. I think it's going to become a popular weapon in the near future.
I doubt it. You have no idea how many people are WHINING in the NH battles because they have to use 96 speed unbalanced battle axes instead of their 92 speed danish's or 98 speed HBS. Women.
For all who missed it: secondary mode is slashing for 28 pierce.i already can imagine agor spamming this with a gay shield.
I think this dagger it's a very nice (OP maybe) 1h for Arbalest xbowman.
2 slots for Arba 1 for bolts 1 for some decent shield and 0 for dagger. This way you get projectile proof ranged that can 1 hit in melee with a (pierce) slash to the face.
Just a thought... Don't do it... Especially in organized hordes :wink:
BTW bring back ladderpulting.