cRPG

Off Topic => General Off Topic => Topic started by: Templar_Skipper on October 07, 2012, 03:47:03 am

Title: What is the best CASTLE (not town or village) in native campaign, for defending?
Post by: Templar_Skipper on October 07, 2012, 03:47:03 am

What is the best CASTLE (not town or village) in native campaign, for defending?

I personally like Durrin castle as it is on a hill and the attackers have to go all the way round the back to scale the walls.  8-)

Title: Re: What is the best CASTLE (not town or village) in native campaign, for defending?
Post by: Taser on October 07, 2012, 10:50:02 am

Is grunwalder still a bitch to take?

I remember it being hard to take in M&B. Don't remember if it was in warband though.

Title: Re: What is the best CASTLE (not town or village) in native campaign, for defending?
Post by: Weren on October 07, 2012, 10:57:10 am

As far as I know, Grunwalder Castle.

Title: Re: What is the best CASTLE (not town or village) in native campaign, for defending?
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on October 07, 2012, 03:34:25 pm

It all depends on what troops you prefer, most castles with siege towers are divine for ranged stackers, other castles allow for a decently placed Rhodock hoplite shieldwall to destroy giant amounts of infantry.

Title: Re: What is the best CASTLE (not town or village) in native campaign, for defending?
Post by: Corwin on October 07, 2012, 04:47:45 pm

Quote from: Weren on October 07, 2012, 10:57:10 am

As far as I know, Grunwalder Castle.

definitely.