cRPG

Strategus => Diplomacy => Topic started by: Inglorious on October 04, 2012, 11:17:19 am

Title: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Inglorious on October 04, 2012, 11:17:19 am

Papal guard has shamefully abandoned their post in the desert!

The Chevalier will fly the glorious alliance banner once more upon their walls!


We ride to Samarra at dawn!

Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Vovka on October 04, 2012, 11:26:43 am
Yeah cool!

(click to show/hide)



Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Inglorious on October 04, 2012, 11:27:59 am
 :cry:
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Vovka on October 04, 2012, 11:29:41 am
Quote from: IngloriouslyBad on October 04, 2012, 11:27:59 am
:cry:
oh common! do u want free candy?
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Inglorious on October 04, 2012, 11:44:54 am
 :D
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Cradoc on October 04, 2012, 11:54:00 am
Shameful Deserters, they shall be met with fire and steel. The territory will be well looked after in our hands.

Also side note: Gief Candys plox
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: LordBerenger on October 04, 2012, 01:11:58 pm
Quote from: IngloriouslyBad on October 04, 2012, 11:17:19 am
Papal guard has shamefully abandoned their post in the desert!

The Chevalier will fly the glorious alliance banner once more upon their walls!


We ride to Samarra at dawn!

Just curious. Who's not to say there's not gear in the castle? And 4k population? Won't be easy to take it. Unless they log in and surrender it directly.
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Keshian on October 04, 2012, 03:52:17 pm
If they give it freely, then cheavliers is taking advantage of the 4K exploit.  Can we fix this back to 1000 population??
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on October 04, 2012, 04:20:07 pm
Hospitallers support Chevaliers' claim to take over control of Samarra castle from the Papal Guard...

Hopefully that glitch or bug abuse is looked into as far as why there's 4000 population...
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Shik on October 04, 2012, 04:30:13 pm
Hero_party considers Samarra Castle to be an inalienable part of our sacred land by right of proximity, and will be taking control of it. We strongly protest against any attempt to violate our sovereignty.
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Rikthor on October 04, 2012, 05:51:47 pm
Quote from: Shik on October 04, 2012, 04:30:13 pm
Hero_party considers Samarra Castle to be an inalienable part of our sacred land by right of proximity, and will be taking control of it. We strongly protest against any attempt to violate our sovereignty.

Yeah not trolling but IngloriouslyBad, why do you think you have claim to this castle situated in the middle of hero_party's area? I could understand New Shibal Zumr if PopeJohn was giving that up but not New Samarra Castle.
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Spanish on October 04, 2012, 06:04:17 pm
Quote from: Shik on October 04, 2012, 04:30:13 pm
Hero_party considers Samarra Castle to be an inalienable part of our sacred land by right of proximity, and will be taking control of it. We strongly protest against any attempt to violate our sovereignty.

Oh noes hero party wants it guys :O looks like things may start to heat up finally!
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Inglorious on October 04, 2012, 08:45:58 pm
Because, God wills it

Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Keshian on October 04, 2012, 08:50:25 pm
I guess God willed it a little too late.  :wink:

Also, both of you realize that the autohiring and autogear for defenders feature will actually make this a rather difficult castle to take.  You would be better off thinking of it as a Neutral Bot castle with 4000 population - pretty impregnable until you get a large army and then you just end up destroying the population anyway.
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Spanish on October 04, 2012, 08:55:54 pm
Yeah, Just let me take it! The population loves me, we all know they will open the gates for me and we will parade around the desert giving free ice cream with purple text!

Besides I bet chadz will fix that population thing
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Rikthor on October 04, 2012, 08:58:11 pm
Quote from: Spanish on October 04, 2012, 08:55:54 pm
Yeah, Just let me take it! The population loves me, we all know they will open the gates for me and we will parade around the desert giving free ice cream with purple text!

Besides I bet chadz will fix that population thing

I don't know, they already locked my thread asking about it :( They want to censor historians like Smoothrich tried to do. The truth will win in the end!
Title: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Inglorious on October 04, 2012, 09:00:26 pm
Quote from: Spanish on October 04, 2012, 08:55:54 pm
Yeah, Just let me take it! The population loves me, we all know they will open the gates for me and we will parade around the desert giving free ice cream with purple text!

Besides I bet chadz will fix that population thing

And I was going to offer a KDR boosting party once we claimed it to knock down the population to regularity... Sigh...



Orders to concede the castle to hero_party: Confirmed
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Spanish on October 04, 2012, 11:00:47 pm
Pfft what wimps giving up after making a thread to claim it! :D
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Braeden on October 04, 2012, 11:10:44 pm
I claim the Steppes.

I have honorably chosen to allow the Hospitaller to live there anyway!
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Florent48 on October 04, 2012, 11:31:51 pm
Quote from: Spanish on October 04, 2012, 08:55:54 pm
Yeah, Just let me take it! The population loves me, we all know they will open the gates for me and we will parade around the desert giving free ice cream with purple text!

Besides I bet chadz will fix that population thing

He should fix it.
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Valdian on October 05, 2012, 02:13:23 am
Just to let hero party know Papalgaurd was under hospitaller castle there claims go to who we say. Samara castle is now under the rule of Chevaliers  the owner of the castle will be giving controll of it to inglorius and we will fix the bug with the population in the seige.
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: HardRice on October 05, 2012, 02:25:13 am
Quote from: Hospitaller_Valdian on October 05, 2012, 02:13:23 am
Just to let hero party know Papalgaurd was under hospitaller castle there claims go to who we say. Samara castle is now under the rule of Chevaliers  the owner of the castle will be giving controll of it to inglorius and we will fix the bug with the population in the seige.
ohhhhhh damn, here we go!!
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Keshian on October 05, 2012, 02:30:36 am
Quote from: Hospitaller_Valdian on October 05, 2012, 02:13:23 am
Just to let hero party know Papalgaurd was under hospitaller castle there claims go to who we say. Samara castle is now under the rule of Chevaliers  the owner of the castle will be giving controll of it to inglorius and we will fix the bug with the population in the seige.

I like how they make shit up.  Because Papal Guard dissolves they get a castle in the middle of hero_party's land, just because they feel like it and they are not dealing with a clan of equal size.  Only do that against clans 1/10th their size in members.
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: HardRice on October 05, 2012, 02:31:51 am
Inb4 DRZ
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Spanish on October 05, 2012, 02:52:49 am
What are you going to do about it kesh? I'm kind of eager to see this famous FCC thirst for blood and war mongering. And maybe hero party should take this opportunity to show off some valour ;P

However it is fun reading about how we're cowardly carebears. Maybe FFC should start taking action instead of relying on the forums to fight your brattles!

And As always this is just my humble opinion.
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Smoothrich on October 05, 2012, 03:05:25 am
Not really much to it.  Some douchebag exploited 3000 extra population into a castle directly in the middle of our kingdom, then disbanded his clan and fled the desert, which cost him all diplomatic protection and rights, ceding the castle into a neutral political state.

Because of those actions, we were compelled to attack it, and if we overcome the thousands of exploited bullshit behind the castle walls, will be keeping it as a rightful asset to our kingdom.

Allahu Ackbar, death To Israel, this Papal whore SaletHope will be drowned in camel blood, Ahmerrad is the one true Mecca.
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Tanken on October 05, 2012, 03:14:14 am
Quote from: Smoothrich on October 05, 2012, 03:05:25 am
Allahu ackbar, death To Israel, this Papal whore SaletHope will be drowned in camel blood, Ahmerrad is the one true Mecca.

As a Jew and an Israeli from birth, I am offended and you should be warned for posting these things on the Diplomacy forum and stripped of your admin title you mean, mean savage.


(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: HardRice on October 05, 2012, 03:23:16 am
Quote from: Spanish on October 05, 2012, 02:52:49 am
What are you going to do about it kesh? I'm kind of eager to see this famous FCC thirst for blood and war mongering. And maybe hero party should take this opportunity to show off some valour ;P

However it is fun reading about how we're cowardly carebears. Maybe FFC should start taking action instead of relying on the forums to fight your brattles!

And As always this is just my humble opinion.

Now you leave poor old FrugFrug out of your rantings, Spaniard!

(FCC is Free Companies, FFC is FrugFanClub. Painfully similar.)

Also, from what I witnessed last strat, (making all of NA pretty much your vassals or threaten extinction), you do enjoy carebearing it up with gear/support from Europeans. Just sayin, dawg.
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Blackzilla on October 05, 2012, 03:25:05 am
Tanken, learn to role play! (whole point of these forums ) I'm glad the chevaliers are not going through and taking samarra, i mean it would be awkward with you in the middle!
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: HardRice on October 05, 2012, 03:35:47 am
Quote from: IngloriouslyBad on October 04, 2012, 09:00:26 pm
Orders to concede the castle to hero_party: Confirmed
Quote from: Hospitaller_Valdian on October 05, 2012, 02:13:23 am
Just to let hero party know Papalgaurd was under hospitaller castle there claims go to who we say. Samara castle is now under the rule of Chevaliers  the owner of the castle will be giving controll of it to inglorius and we will fix the bug with the population in the seige.
One more little thing, Valdian, the Chevaliers refuted their claims to Samarra, why must you dastardly Hospitallers go messing around with the valiant Heroes of Semen, (I prefer to pronounce it as you would Yemen (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yemen)) while they are just consolidating their first claims? I do not wish to impede upon the Knights Hospitaller's actions, but this seems as though some blatantly aggressive action.

 
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Spanish on October 05, 2012, 05:53:07 am
Lol I've been accidentally typing FFC all day and changing it back to FCC before posting and that time I think I changed the FCC to FFC in any case I can't type on my phone.

Secondly Valdian said it and sorry Valdian you say a lot of things that don't actually end up being what us Hosps be doin so until I get on tonight idk if that's even our stance.

Besides we should be douches it's our god given right to step on smaller people and get rid of their filthy pagan ways. Because who's stopping us right now! Oh noes we getting a trolled on the forums! Hahaha hopefully things get interesting soon with all this douchebaggery we be doin.
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Devestater on October 05, 2012, 06:37:12 am
lol... drama this early? really?
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: Kreczor on October 05, 2012, 08:17:42 am
Quote from: Devestater on October 05, 2012, 06:37:12 am
lol... drama this early? really?

Are you really that surprised? All strat is really is a way for people to get at each others throats. The real game is seeing how you can play the pieces in the puzzle.
Title: Re: Chevaliers Claim Samarra under alliance ruling!
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on October 05, 2012, 03:33:11 pm
Quote from: HardRice on October 05, 2012, 03:35:47 am
One more little thing, Valdian, the Chevaliers refuted their claims to Samarra, why must you dastardly Hospitallers go messing around with the valiant Heroes of Semen, (I prefer to pronounce it as you would Yemen (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yemen)) while they are just consolidating their first claims? I do not wish to impede upon the Knights Hospitaller's actions, but this seems as though some blatantly aggressive action.

It's not blatantly aggressive.  There is still an owner of the castle.  He was our vassal as Papal Guard, and choose to join our faction and give us the castle.  We planned on giving it to the Chevaliers.  I told Inglorious we were trying to work out a diplomatic solution to the castle with hero_party.  As it stands, our vassal controlled the castle, and we intend to keep it that way until a deal is reached.  Seems pretty easy for all parties to comprehend except for forum posters.