cRPG
Strategus => Strategus General Discussion => Topic started by: Herr_Thomas on September 20, 2012, 11:08:50 am
-
- People will get peasant gear when spawning naked. no more naked peasant genocide
What happened to this? Sounded like a neat feature.
-
I've heard it might get implemented later today. Though those might just be rumours.
-
What happened to this? Sounded like a neat feature.
Seems like it was totally abused because of the fact it isn't implented yet.
-
Seems like it was totally abused because of the fact it isn't implented yet.
Heh. Funny guy.
-
I believe it was just implemented, heard that defenders got peasant gear in last village battle.
Also, AI auto-hiring mercs.
-
I believe it was just implemented, heard that defenders got peasant gear in last village battle.
Also, AI auto-hiring mercs.
AI..?
-
Mercenaries auto-hired, if roster does not get touched.*
-
AI..?
For when the "owner" or anyone else responsible doesn't hire people for battle, AI will do it
EDIT: fuk u pxt
-
For when the "owner" or anyone else responsible doesn't hire people for battle, AI will do it
I hope that not the reason for this problem: http://bundle of sticks-reset/
I don't want the AI fuck with my roster!
-
9) What was suggested for Strat 4 but left due to time restraints[/b]
- AI Caravans and Bandits
- Automatic AI hiring for players that do not manage their rosters
- Automatic peasant gear for naked peasants
to actually buy an item.
See Strategus FAQ ;)
Dont know if it is in now. Last info I got is: its not in.
Peasantequipfights last nicht ( coalition one and huron fight ) were equiped by the players not by AI.
EDIT:
Villages DO buy peasant equipment now! just got corrected :)
-
DO you have to have gold their for the gear or is it just free?
-
Mercenaries auto-hired, if roster does not get touched.*
i urge everyone to re-check their rosters, the system seems to have fiddled with them already, even touched those who already where fixed by people in charge, prolly cus they where used by players before the system got set in place, so it didn't register that :P
-
does this apply to field battles too?
-
So, why did I buy peasant gear for my army now?? :|
-
HI Im going to let everyone in on some info for the free gear, For the battle at Faraway Mechin i had got 300 armor 120 lag armor 30 two-handed axe's and just about 150 in other items, I'm letting everyone know that even when i had payed for like 800 gold in gear the fief still got free gear.
this gear was
Arrows+0
Short Bow+0
every color shield +0
I think Practice long swords but i payed for two handed axes so i didnt see anyone using them. and i forgot to look
Felt Hat +0 there was more then just that hat but it had the most armor
pitch forks and scythes +0
rocks+0
and the sickle cudgel and pickaxe +0 for one-hander
-
Thanks for the info Oogie.
-
does this apply to field battles too?
Can we get an answer to this?
-
I believe it does.
-
Is this supposed to only benefit defenders or what? We attacked with 0 gear and... spawned naked. Enemy was given free equipment as intended.
-
Is this supposed to only benefit defenders or what? We attacked with 0 gear and... spawned naked. Enemy was given free equipment as intended.
This seems to be the case.
-
Is this supposed to only benefit defenders or what? We attacked with 0 gear and... spawned naked. Enemy was given free equipment as intended.
LOL... what? What do you expect? Win for free? :lol:
-
LOL... what? What do you expect? Win for free? :lol:
If both sides were to get free gear, it would hardly be a free victory. But I can see reasons for not having it like that. Such as making the attackers actually need to be prepared geared out and not just spamming 100 man armies at their enemy for free
-
LOL... what? What do you expect? Win for free? :lol:
No, but that is what defenders got this morning. Why is it ridiculous to think attackers might get free gear, too? What I expect is a fair fight. Why do defenders deserve free gear, but not attackers? Why, then, does anyone deserve free gear?
-
There is no need to attack, but you have to defend, if attacked.
And this:
But I can see reasons for not having it like that. Such as making the attackers actually need to be prepared geared out and not just spamming 100 man armies at their enemy for free
-
Because you choose to attack. If you are going to attack someone, you prepare for it, not just get 2 swords and chop down 100 defenseless troops, simply because you've gotten a lucky drop on them. Naked slaughters are dumb and not fun for either side.
-
Naked slaughters are dumb and not fun for either side.
So you agree attackers should also be given free gear or no one at all?
-
So you agree attackers should also be given free gear or no one at all?
you choose to attack.
-
We are all choosing to play. Attacking and defending is part of the game. "You chose to attack" almost seems to say we are choosing to be punished for doing so at this stage of the game. I have to prepare my attack, but you don't have to prepare your defense. No one sees a problem with this? Why should the unprepared be given any advantage? What game are we playing here?
You can say there is no need to attack, and to that I'll ask again, what game are we playing here?
Give both sides free gear or take it away.
-
Perhaps you just woke up to strategus and did not see the nonsense that happened for the last few days with everyone attacking everything, getting just a few weapons, since they knew that their enemies wouldn't have any, because they either hadn't gotten to their fiefs yet or had just spawned and didn't have any time to get anything. I will forgive you for that. Now hush.
-
I don't think it was nonsense...AI was giving fiefs to people when nobody voted on the fief...that is fair game in my mind...just because you're given a fief on the first day of strat, doesn't mean it's yours unless you actually are managing it, and able to defend it.
-
Perhaps you just woke up to strategus and did not see the nonsense that happened for the last few days with everyone attacking everything, getting just a few weapons, since they knew that their enemies wouldn't have any, because they either hadn't gotten to their fiefs yet or had just spawned and didn't have any time to get anything. I will forgive you for that. Now hush.
Hush? Better keep your downvotes coming, because I'm still not satisfied. Let's try again without your condescending bullshit.
I don't care about random stragglers, but it sounds like nothing was really lost or gained, and it does not suggest at all that giving both sides free gear would be anymore unfair than giving one side free gear. I am still waiting for a good reason. Right now it's pretty much impossible to lose a village if you just manage to show up. You get to completely ignore your defenses and you're given better gear than any attacker could afford right now. Why is this a good thing? Why should fief owners have it so easy? I'm not saying attackers should have it easy. I'm simply saying, again, that either both sides or neither side should be given free gear. Both sides should have to fight with the resources they are limited to, or everyone should get something for free. That's fair. If this gear system is not going to be fair, then it should be removed. Currently attackers are catching people off guard (and I mean people with something worth losing), and are being punished for it. It's a bad system. Neither side should be given a free advantage. If you don't properly defend what's yours, you should lose it. You should not be given a handout.
(guarantee someone will ignore my point and instead throw some smilies at my "bullshit" remark)
-
i do agree on that free stuff should be something both sides can leech on, it can actually be a usefull tactic to just buy about enough gear, so u still get your free peasant gear for your fief or small caravans.
bandits or people at war should have the same benefits as the peasants do.