cRPG
cRPG => Suggestions Corner => Game Balance Discussion => Topic started by: Fartface on August 08, 2012, 02:20:12 pm
-
They're slow weak short and low damage , please buff them.
-
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
-
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
-
you renown whore. Now u will get 100 renown points for this thread. :mrgreen:
-
and here I was thinking "what an obvious troll thread"
-
berenger u obivesly stupid man when you don't see that guy is ironic.
-
obivesly
dafuq?
-
nuts.
-
They're slow weak short and low damage , please buff them.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
-
he is trolling you
-
Seriously buff Greatswords. Jokes away!
-
http://qkme.me/3qedq4
-
But he's right! Greatswords are like, so UP! Shortest, slowest, least damaging weapons in the game!
-
that thread isn't even close to be funny
-
I agree, they are really underpowered compared to glaives, poleaxes, and all the 2 directional polearms. All of those weapon types do 5-10 more cut/pierce damage on their attacks, bust shields, rear cav, and half of them are way longer than any greatsword except on the stab, but polearm stab is instant so its even better.
Nerf polearms, buff great swords.
-
I agree, they are really underpowered compared to glaives, poleaxes, and all the 2 directional polearms. All of those weapon types do 5-10 more cut/pierce damage on their attacks, bust shields, rear cav, and half of them are way longer than any greatsword except on the stab, but polearm stab is instant so its even better.
Nerf polearms, buff great swords.
You also forgot how much faster all the polearms are and how they can stunlock you to death!
-
I say we buff greatsword to 999999 length to make sure they never ever hit an enemy again.
-
What next then? Take out all the sharp edges from polearms because hell the big 2h sword was the only thing that could harm anyone in the middle ages!! They should do less damage! Also polearms should be heavier and slower. The grip has nothing to do with speed. Axes, poleaxes and hammers were not in any ways meant to work against plate armor!!!!!! It was the magical great sword that pierced through the armour gaps and sliced plate and men in pieces with hiltslashes.
Archery should be nerved too!!! Archers were not able to kill anyone in RL history. In middle ages everyone was wearing plate and thats why archery was totally USELESS! THIS IS NOT REALISTIC! Crossbows are just the same. Throwing didn't do anything either.
Cavalry IS NOT REALISTIC IN THIS GAME!!! Horses making those incredible manouvers and WTH lance kills from one hit and it doesn't break! DON'T YOU SEE THAT COUCHING LANCES WERE DESIGNED TO BREAK IN BATTLEFIELD ONCE THEY HIT SOMETHING??!!! WHY DON'T YOU LISTEN TO ME!?!?!??! HORSES SHOULD DIE ONCE THEY HIT A SOLID OBJECT! HORSES ARE STUPID ANIMALS AND THEY RUN INTO WALLS IF THE RIDER TELLS THEM TO!
2H SWORD WAS THE ONLY WEAPON THAT COULD DO REAL DAMAGE IN MEDIEVAL BATTLEFIELD!!! THOSE DAMN POLEAXES BEC DE CORBINS AND HAMMERS WERE NOT DESIGNED TO BE USED AGAINST PLATE!!!!! 2H SHOULD HAVE THE HILTSLASH NOT POLEARMS!!!
-
Why haven't this thread been moved to the spam section yet :?: :shock:
-
Suggestion nab.
-
dafuq
Why haven't this thread been moved to the spam section yet :?: :shock:
-
Nerf :mad:
-
nerf!
-
nerf!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
-
lol at all the 2h nabs upvoting my post :lol:
-
I have to agree with the OP, greatswords are clearly underpowered. I mean, just this morning, I hit a shielder with my claymore and you know what? He died. That's not enough, though. This is a GREATsword, not merely an OKsword or a EHHsword; a G.R.E.A.T. sword. When I hit a guy it should kill not just him but his best friend and his grandmother too. Digglez can back me up with real-life factoids here.