cRPG
cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: erlk0nig on June 06, 2012, 10:24:26 pm
-
The poll speaks for itself: would you play a cav only battle game mode? In order to play you would have to spawn with a mount. Discuss!
-
Yes, I would play it, but probably not regularly.I imagine it to be quite entertaining for a while, but it will soon become annoying.
-
So, people all take 2 riding then insta dismount?
-
So, people all take 2 riding then insta dismount?
You could but if you wanted to play inf why wouldn't you just go regular battle? You'd also be wasting those two skill points in riding just to troll a game mode. I guess if that's your bag.
-
Pointless gamemode. Nope.
-
Yes +1, would be just epic.
-
I don't know about eu, but on na1 it already is cav only game mode. :lol:
-
And only flat random plains on rotation.
-
And only flat random plains on rotation.
see that's what i'm saying, to really get a feel for cav battles!
-
Would play, +1!
-
You could but if you wanted to play inf why wouldn't you just go regular battle?
But then you couldn't get to kill as many cavs as in your mode!
-
Polo with long mauls would be epic.
Also, between cav players, it is very logical that all physical harm should be avoided and strictly forbidden by the rules. We are true gentlemen.
-
I think a better game mode would be all cav on one team against one archer, the archer gets a 30 second head start and we see which player can be the one to run down and kill the archer, kind of like Fox Hunting. And the archer has no arrows or sword, just a bow.
-
Pointless gamemode. Nope.
-
Polo... well, mandatory swingable bec de corbin, yes.
Let's call it... ragepolo!
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1W7c8QghPxk
-
I think a better game mode would be all cav on one team against one archer, the archer gets a 30 second head start and we see which player can be the one to run down and kill the archer, kind of like Fox Hunting. And the archer has no arrows or sword, just a bow.
I WOULD PLAY THIS!