cRPG

cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: Slamz on February 25, 2012, 05:58:31 am

Title: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: Slamz on February 25, 2012, 05:58:31 am
For those of you who own TS servers, what provider do you use and how long have you used them?

I'm pondering the switch.  I've run a Vent server for probably 7 years years and while TS has moved ahead and added a lot of cool features, Vent is almost unchanged from what it was when I started using them.


Things I still like about Vent:
Better voice quality (maybe most of you TS people just use shitty codexes, though, I dunno)

Things I like about TS:
Everything else about the client is superior



I use NationVoice for Vent but they don't do Teamspeak servers so I'd need recommendations on a new provider.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: Casimir on February 25, 2012, 06:15:52 am
You know you want those call pictures next to your name.

Join the teamspeak force mayte.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: RibaldRon on February 25, 2012, 06:48:03 am
Things I still like about Vent:
Better voice quality (maybe most of you TS people just use shitty codexes, though, I dunno)

Things I like about TS:
Everything else about the client is superior
That honestly about sums it up.

TS seems more reliable in my experience, easier to set up/use (lots of win7 issues with vent) and the voice quality is "acceptable" - especially considering the reduced latency, which while not a big deal for most of us, can cause considerable lag for some.

Personally I would set up a ventrilo server if I were to set a voice server up, despite the fact that I personally prefer TeamSpeak, but it would really depend on what I was going to be using it for.

You know you want those call pictures next to your name.

Join the teamspeak force mayte.
Yeah but you can put words in front of people's names in VENTRILO!!!
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: Korgoth on February 25, 2012, 07:00:50 am
Ventrilo was better than Teamspeak a few years ago but in my opinion Teamspeak has become a lot better.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: Digglez on February 25, 2012, 07:24:56 am
Ventrilo was better than Teamspeak a few years ago but in my opinion Teamspeak has become a lot better.

voice quality is still subpar from every experience I've had.  Maybe its just lazy and/or cheap hosts/admins that arent selecting a worthwhile codec, but  for a program whose purpose is voice communication it still sounds like shit
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: Xol! on February 25, 2012, 08:03:27 am
Personally, I like Mumble/Murmur the best.  It's lightweight, has overlay options, has excellent voice quality, and has almost no lag at all.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: grenadierman on February 25, 2012, 08:04:09 am
Use Mumble, it shows who's talking in-game and has plugin support for positional voice in-game and other neat stuff.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: Xol! on February 25, 2012, 08:11:55 am
Use Mumble, it shows who's talking in-game and has plugin support for positional voice in-game and other neat stuff.

You can turn the overlay on, off, or have only people talking show up.  It's pretty neat.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: Digglez on February 25, 2012, 10:09:32 am
all 3 of them have overlays, so thats not exactly a selling point
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: oprah_winfrey on February 25, 2012, 10:11:27 am
I prefer vent, its so simple and does what I want.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: ShinySpoons on February 25, 2012, 11:15:34 am
Teamspeak for its versatility, vent does what it does well, teamspeak just has more features a clan could use.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: Elmokki on February 25, 2012, 12:18:36 pm
Teamspeak and Ventrilo are both shit, use Mumble.

It scales codec by bandwith allowing people with total crap connections hear robot voices instead of not being able to hear anything and by default it does not sound as terrible as most Vent/TS servers with their horrible codecs thanks to that. Mumble is also 100% free to host unlike TS/Vent, which probably is the reason it's in general the cheapest voip software to rent servers for. Mumble also has the crapton of features TeamSpeak has (might not have all and might have more, no exact clue)

But to be honest I really don't give a crap what voip software I'm using, I just prefer Mumble.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: HarunYahya on February 25, 2012, 12:20:02 pm
I love server groups with cock icons in teamspeak .Afaik Vent hasn't got those kinda shit so
Winner is Teamspeak .
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: Xol! on February 25, 2012, 04:08:32 pm
all 3 of them have overlays, so thats not exactly a selling point

Having used all three, mumble's overlay is far superior. 

That said, having used all three, one downside of mumble is that you can't set individual users' volumes client side.  If someone is too loud, they have to fix it.  You can adjust your output and input volumes, but can't do it individually, like with teamspeak.

edit: though of course you can mute people client side.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: BaleOhay on February 25, 2012, 04:55:54 pm
I get a decent amount of lag with TS that I do not ever have in vent. I am not sure why
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: Digglez on February 25, 2012, 05:51:40 pm
I get a decent amount of lag with TS that I do not ever have in vent. I am not sure why

lol prob using that free dnations shit thats hosted in denmark? lol
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: larlek on February 25, 2012, 05:52:26 pm
Skype. Yeah, I said it. I also use windows explorer.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: H4rdn3ssKill3r on February 26, 2012, 01:45:04 am
lol prob using that free dnations shit thats hosted in denmark? lol

Pretty sure its germany mate...

 :rolleyes:

Also beggers aren't choosers, so off you go, some people dont want to spend ludricous amounts of money on VoIP.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: Casimir on February 26, 2012, 01:49:56 am
NDitions doesn't cause me any lag, get better internet :P
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: Vieuxcrotter on February 26, 2012, 02:27:48 am
Mumble is better then TS and vent.

Open source, lower latency. Overall better software , give it a try.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: BaleOhay on February 26, 2012, 08:34:18 pm
lol prob using that free dnations shit thats hosted in denmark? lol

I get the lag on the BRd TS server and the Chaos one.

Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: dynamike on February 27, 2012, 05:14:36 pm
TS is what works great for our clan, I have no complaints.

For a bit of advertising: there is a free multi-clan TS server out there, Bulldog runs it and offers slots for interested clans.

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,6471.0.html

One big advantage of having multiple clans together in this TS is ease of communication: for Strat battles or inter-clan talks all you need to do is switch channels instead of changing servers or even communication tools.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: Para on February 27, 2012, 05:14:53 pm
As soon as they add the option to individually change another persons volume, I'll use mumble.

I actually think voice quality is a little better on TS compared to vent, it may all depend on the codec though. For now I'm still using vent with no reason to switch.
Title: Re: Teamspeak vs Ventrilo: FIGHT
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on February 27, 2012, 07:38:17 pm
teamspeak is just nice because of all the client features (like voice priority, setting up groups/icons, being able to have channel and server commanders for coordinating in game for large battles).