No. Looms have already better stats. I would even say, they should break more often. Thats a way to balance them out. You want more dmg, better stats for your items? Pay more. Simple.
Then why not just buy more expensive, regular equipment?most loomed weapons are already the most expensive. More expensive regular armourstuff is heavier. loomed have better protection with same weight, enough advantage.
The whole point of heirlooms (for me at least) is being able to consistently use better equipment at a lower upkeep cost.
No. like others said, its bad for game balance, against new players and very unnecessary.
most loomed weapons are already the most expensive. More expensive regular armourstuff is heavier. loomed have better protection with same weight, enough advantage.
I agree. Heirlooms are good enough as is. It's just that I don't understand why Miwiw thinks there should be a penalty.counterstrike.
Older things break a way more often.
In that context though it doesnt make any sense that the older things do more damage and can be swung faster than the new ones.