In Melee nobody tries to hit your legs and archers usually don't aim at the legs.
Oh that effort is like 3 Gens ago, I planned to stay 2h and play to level 32 and such, but I just retired 100 k xp after level 31, because more looms and changing your build is better then a few levels more :mrgreen:
2h and polearms can hit me in the leg, too. But still nobody really aims for them.
Pikeman and spearman can hit you in the leg
Yeah, by asking "is it worth it" I also ask if it is worth at all, so maybe I could just sell my loom point and be a rich man again, or loom another nice weapon to fight with. Thats the question :mrgreen:
I also want to feel "complete"
schniddengruber sauerkraut, autobahn achtung blitz, ja?
Leg armour doesn't matter at all. I have a very heavy body armour but I still roll with Rus cavalry boots because they look good. You are better of selling your loompoint or just looming something else.TBH there are players like me who purely aim for the leg and groin region with their throwing lances...
TBH there are players like me who purely aim for the leg and groin region with their throwing lances...They can aim for my groin all day. Thats where my 60 body armour will keep me safe. Keep in mind that the only portion of the body that uses leg armour is from below the knee. A very small part. They lower legs move around a lot, so its quite hard to shoot. If they get hit they get reduced damage compared to the body, the overall body and leg damage was reduced last patch so there is even less to fear there.
When you say that, I´ll do it. 630 k left to level 31, but what to loom then, hehe.If its a choice between looming something completely useless or looming leg armour, then go for leg armour. Loomed leg armour is not completely useless, but only just so. Why not keep going after lvl 31? I just hit lvl 32 and having both 7 ps and 7 athlethics is sweet!
Imho leg an head armor is pointless to loom due to the bonous dmg received when hit in either one...
I'm pretty sure "leg" is deemed as the thighs and down...It's not in this game.
yes this was one of the things i was debating about which armor i should wearComing from a guy who wears a Rus Lamellar Cuirass and Rus Cavalry boots, I haven't really experienced me dying unusually quick due to leg hits, nor actually getting shot in them. On the rare occasions that my legs do get shot they take little damage. Going cheap on leg armour is a good weight and money saver imo.
it was either the studded leather coat or the lemallars
i think i picked the studded due to the fact it was lighter
do you guys think they should put more importance on the legs?
liike a strong attack would cause knockdown or at east bare minimum have the same damage as body?
to me it makes no sense it should be taken into more importance(like to aim at the head for more damage)
legs receive like 75% damage, feet 100%where did you get that information?
As i said, as cav, defo recommend good foot armour.
where did you get that information?
i heard it was far less only around 50%(tennenoths post 1st page)