cRPG

cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: Miley on January 29, 2012, 08:47:01 am

Title: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Miley on January 29, 2012, 08:47:01 am
I am curious about this. Who would play on the Community Servers, if they were to come back, for the maps, ping, etc.? This is just out of curiosity; I like the official servers.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Stylin_ATS on January 29, 2012, 08:56:52 am
Can't wait for the old map rotation! Hopefully the ping will be on par with official.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Miley on January 29, 2012, 08:59:44 am
Valt
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Ganner on January 29, 2012, 09:01:55 am
It depends on where the servers are located.  If they are in Texas or the west coast then yes.  If its another east coast server then no why bother.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Gristle on January 29, 2012, 10:15:33 am
I like playing on moderately filled servers (20-40 players). If this also lowers the official servers down to that amount, I will probably pick the server with a better current map, so most likely community.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Dan lol on January 29, 2012, 10:44:18 am
I will continue to play on the official servers to spite ecko as is my duty
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Snoozer on January 29, 2012, 11:26:40 am
I am curious about this. Who would play on the Community Servers, if they were to come back, for the maps, ping, etc.? This is just out of curiosity; I like the official servers.

what made you bring this up? it seems rather random and out of nowhere lol

personally im with Ganner on this if its west then yes if its east there is no point seeing how there no demand for another east server
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: oprah_winfrey on January 29, 2012, 11:37:51 am
THIS JUST IN: Chicago is on the east coast.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Snoozer on January 29, 2012, 11:44:30 am
THIS JUST IN: Chicago is on the east coast.
i must be missing some information where did you get Chicago from?
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: oprah_winfrey on January 29, 2012, 12:13:14 pm
i must be missing some information where did you get Chicago from?

Well you say another east coast server, which implies there are others in the east coast. The official servers are in chicago.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Rapture on January 29, 2012, 02:36:07 pm
I would, if the server was West Coast.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: rustyspoon on January 29, 2012, 03:58:25 pm
One thing that I always thought was funny is that the Official servers are the ONLY Chicago servers I get terrible ping at. Every other Chicago server in this game or any other I get ping in the 20's. On the official though, it's always around 80. It probably senses how much I hate it.

Anyway, I've been wanting the community servers back for a while. Finally some good maps and good map variety and not the same fucking hilly village/open plains maps that seem to be the only things in rotation on official.

On an amusing side note, do you guys remember when the official servers were first announced? Remember how everyone was saying that the server will be soooo awesome that it will never, ever lag? LOL.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Miley on January 29, 2012, 04:55:04 pm
what made you bring this up? it seems rather random and out of nowhere lol

personally im with Ganner on this if its west then yes if its east there is no point seeing how there no demand for another east server

Well I've been thinking about doing a poll on the forums for a while, but I finally did it last night. I'd play in Community if there were people in it... just for the maps.

EDIT: And because ATS RULES!
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Xol! on January 29, 2012, 06:05:29 pm
I might be tempted, just for the old ATS maps.  Those were great.

I like the open field, open field, village in an open field, open field, ~village with a wall around it~ (in an open field), open field map rotation as much as the next cavalry, but to be honest they're repetitive as hell.  I get legitimately excited every time one of the old maps comes up, even that godawful one where both teams have to walk up a gigantic hill to fight eachother.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: BADPLAYERold on January 29, 2012, 07:15:28 pm
Just put the few ATS maps that were good in the official server rotation and take out all the random plains/steppe ones. Variety is good, having a server heavily bias towards infantry (old ATS servers) or cavalry (official servers now) is bad.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: SuperNewb on January 29, 2012, 07:42:04 pm
You will not see me trolling on that server because there will be competent enemies and friendly teammates.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Miley on January 29, 2012, 07:45:14 pm
Just put the few ATS maps that were good in the official server rotation and take out all the random plains/steppe ones. Variety is good, having a server heavily bias towards infantry (old ATS servers) or cavalry (official servers now) is bad.

ATS maps were balanced... most of them at least. These are all cavalry maps.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Sergee on January 29, 2012, 07:45:39 pm
BRING BACK TEXAS SERVERS
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: roymorrison on January 29, 2012, 07:49:00 pm
Shut up sergee
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Dehitay on January 29, 2012, 08:29:17 pm
Did the ATS servers die out because they weren't being used so much or because Ecko just didn't want to continue paying with official servers available?
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Nehvar on January 29, 2012, 08:35:43 pm
Can't wait!  I've had more than my fill of the cavalry horde; and the random_ maps...there's nothing random about always being shitty.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Rikthor on January 29, 2012, 08:45:50 pm
No thanks, the maps were unbalanced then and they wont be much different now. That's before you even get into the can of worms that was adminning on those servers.

How bout we actually fix and remove the maps that no one likes on the official servers for new maps. Crazy notion I know.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Tears of Destiny on January 29, 2012, 08:49:18 pm
I would, simply for the maps. The community servers always had fast map updates and a dedicated person or two to actually find and fix map problems. A lot of the maps were tweaked with additional wooden planks or ladders to remove one-entrance camping nests, and I loved that. Bad maps never lasted more then a few weeks. Though this is talking about Battle, I found the community siege server had attacker biased maps that I never cared for at all.

I hope though that they will have a better connection then old though, as they never ran as smooth as the Officials for me  :(

Edit: I am assuming that they will have a more... Careful selection of admins though... If the communities are run same as before, I will only sometimes use them.

Oh yeah, and this:
Just put the few ATS maps that were good in the official server rotation and take out all the random plains/steppe ones. Variety is good, having a server heavily bias towards infantry (old ATS servers) or cavalry (official servers now) is bad.
If we do get "biased" maps, make sure you rotate the bias very evenly and not in clumps. Right now the officials favour cav spam too much, and the old ats servers had so much street fighting that it almost singlehandedly made NA playstyles revolve around STR builds.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Miley on January 30, 2012, 02:07:01 am
I liked Community maps and admins. It may have been a little laggy, but then I got new internet--ping went down. I liked Official more when they were in Dallas because I had 30 something ping, but now it's also in Chicago like Community were. Official servers still make attacks go through my blocks, which I didn't remember on Community servers, but I guess it could just be a cRPG thing. I like both of them though; I just can't think of more things to say about them.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: LastKaze on January 30, 2012, 02:28:05 am
Hells yea community server, i miss all those ATS maps, the official server maps are shit and the devs are too lazy to even take out those random plains maps.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: SixThumbs on January 30, 2012, 05:44:43 am
Just put the lava pit chasm and jack and the beanstalk pig roast map back in.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Darkkarma on January 30, 2012, 06:08:40 am
Yay! Another Chicago server! I'll probably play on it from time to time.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Rhaelys on January 30, 2012, 07:43:35 am
Depends on a number of factors:

1) Where my clan mates play

2) How my ping on the community servers compares to the official servers

3) Whether or not I have a vested interest in playing on the community servers
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Snoozer on January 30, 2012, 08:49:24 am
i do not get why they put it in chicago...just saying
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Smoothrich on January 30, 2012, 09:07:51 am
Community servers are coming back soon!  Everyone get your construction sites out ASAP
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Malaclypse on January 30, 2012, 11:20:19 am
Looking forward to a better map rotation. Throw Tropical into your mix, community server!
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: dynamike on January 30, 2012, 04:45:10 pm
Classic ATS maps, NA1 is always overcrowded these days, ATS admins are the most fair(haired girls in town).

dyna <3
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on January 30, 2012, 05:29:21 pm
One thing that I always thought was funny is that the Official servers are the ONLY Chicago servers I get terrible ping at. Every other Chicago server in this game or any other I get ping in the 20's. On the official though, it's always around 80. It probably senses how much I hate it.

Anyway, I've been wanting the community servers back for a while. Finally some good maps and good map variety and not the same fucking hilly village/open plains maps that seem to be the only things in rotation on official.

On an amusing side note, do you guys remember when the official servers were first announced? Remember how everyone was saying that the server will be soooo awesome that it will never, ever lag? LOL.

Looking forward to different maps than the official servers.  Also not a big fan of 55ms ping to Chicago when I live in Minneapolis (normally I get 15-25ms response time to Chicago, not 50-60). 

Would be nice if the official servers used the "up and down" votes on the maps to take out maps people don't like.

That being said, I hope it doesn't make it so instead of 100 people in the Official battle server, we'll have 50 in each.  That would blow.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Ecko on January 30, 2012, 05:42:19 pm
Couple things worthy of note:

For starters, the Community Servers went down for two reasons:
(click to show/hide)

Now, as for rumors:
(click to show/hide)

Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: oprah_winfrey on January 30, 2012, 05:47:24 pm
Quote
A little irony that i get to poke at. But I digest....

Whatcha eat?

Also, I am excited to see them coming back.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Snoozer on January 30, 2012, 10:59:10 pm
i think its digress getting respelled by spell check
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on January 30, 2012, 11:55:52 pm
Or someone who has only ever heard the word spoken, not spelled :P
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: LastKaze on January 31, 2012, 12:14:00 am
Sorry texas, go to hell.
word
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Ecko on January 31, 2012, 12:57:19 am
Or someone who has only ever heard the word spoken, not spelled :P

Or a joke.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Reinhardt on January 31, 2012, 01:16:27 am
I'm excited to see the servers brought back. Official is nice, don't get me wrong, but community brings another choice. I won't complain about location, because I'm in NC.

So long as the maps aren't 100% infantry maps like before, I'm all for it and will happily play on them often. Also - cap of 80 or so would be nice. Different server + maps + size would be better than splitting the community 50/50.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: Miley on January 31, 2012, 04:51:41 am
ATS servers are back, success!
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: SHinOCk on January 31, 2012, 05:09:23 am
Best thing to happen since.... ranged nerf (inc flaming!). Hopefully no more shitty random plains and maps where you feel like you're climbing fkn mount everest before you actually start fighting!!
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: EyeBeat on January 31, 2012, 02:31:53 pm
I am curious about this. Who would play on the Community Servers, if they were to come back, for the maps, ping, etc.? This is just out of curiosity; I like the official servers.

I probably will check it out if there is a bunch of players on.

Though I kind of like how the official servers have made me more effective towards cav using my elite scimitar.

Some of those ATS maps are very close quarters so it might take some getting used to.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: dynamike on January 31, 2012, 03:17:01 pm
Was a blast playing yesterday, good player skill level made it positively challenging and the classic maps... well I've been asking for them to be included in the Official servers for a long time already.

I agree with Reinhardt that the Community servers should try to diversify themselves from the Official ones with a few guidelines when it comes to map selection and size, in order to accommodate for players of different play styles. This way there is no direct competition between servers and they can peacefully coexist.
Title: Re: [NA] Poll: Server
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on January 31, 2012, 04:40:29 pm
Back when community was up with official the community server just slowly started dying out and the majority of people played on the official battle server.  I'm assuming most people are like me and would rather play with as many people as possible.  Trying to get a server populated for an hour with 10 people isn't fun.  I like playing with 100-110 people at peak hours.