cRPG

cRPG => Suggestions Corner => Topic started by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on December 27, 2011, 04:03:53 am

Title: Don't balance armor costs after the looks!
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on December 27, 2011, 04:03:53 am

Let's have a look at one of Zlischs favorite armors...
the Churburg cuirass, there are three items texture choices...

Blue Churburg Cuirass:
weight: 23.6
body armor: 55
leg armor: 19
difficulty: 14

Price 23,097

Red Churburg Cuirass:
weight: 23.6
body armor: 55
leg armor: 19
difficulty: 14

Price 23,589...
...wait what?

Churburg Cuirass:
weight: 23.6
body armor: 55
leg armor: 19
difficulty: 14

Price 24,066...
...WTF?

Am I the only one seeing these numbers? I'm gonna assume the answer is no, and seriously, am I the only one who don't think it makes any fucking sense?

Title: Re: Don't balance armor costs after the looks!
Post by: Casimir on December 27, 2011, 05:23:05 am

Gtta pay for that gold trim mate, same as gilded hourglass gauntlets :p

Title: Re: Don't balance armor costs after the looks!
Post by: ArchonAlarion on December 27, 2011, 05:59:25 am

Add the fancy clothes and the armor rating 7 gauntlets too. I don't mind it though, as long as it is done consistently. The churburg armor with mail should have 1 higher leg armor though imo, and the fat plate armor with the same stats as the churburgs but lower cost should be adjusted too.

Blue churburg - same
red churburg - same (ornate, slightly higher price than blue)
Plate armor - up the weight to 24, +1 to leg armor, price equal to or greater than red churburg
Mail churburg - up the weight to 24, +1 leg armor, price slightly higher than plate armor

this is sort off nit-picky, w/e

Title: Re: Don't balance armor costs after the looks!
Post by: ulfardarri on December 29, 2011, 04:43:16 am

I like it 1 k is not so much

Title: Re: Don't balance armor costs after the looks!
Post by: FRANK_THE_TANK on December 29, 2011, 12:38:55 pm

I remember when the price of noble gear went from 500 to 3000. I was pissed that I wasn't more heavily invested in cotton. I had one of each, I just wish I had put all 80k into these babies visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Then I would have been the rich man!

Title: Re: Don't balance armor costs after the looks!
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on December 30, 2011, 02:25:43 am

Quote from: FRANK_THE_TANK on December 29, 2011, 12:38:55 pm

I remember when the price of noble gear went from 500 to 3000. I was pissed that I wasn't more heavily invested in cotton. I had one of each, I just wish I had put all 80k into these babies visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Then I would have been the rich man!

Heh... petty... that would have been nice for you......

Title: Re: Don't balance armor costs after the looks!
Post by: Glyph on January 01, 2012, 02:17:31 pm

red is moer expensie then blue because of the golden edges, gold is more expensive then the red because it has mail instead of cloth.

proble solved

Title: Re: Don't balance armor costs after the looks!
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on January 02, 2012, 12:57:04 am

Ya'll saying it's more expensive due to the gold and the chainmail, yet, due to the chain shouldn't it give a higher armor bonus then?

Title: Re: Don't balance armor costs after the looks!
Post by: zagibu on January 02, 2012, 05:26:46 pm

We also need the silver one without gold.

Title: Re: Don't balance armor costs after the looks!
Post by: ArchonAlarion on January 03, 2012, 12:49:27 am

Quote from: Zlisch_The_Butcher on January 02, 2012, 12:57:04 am

Ya'll saying it's more expensive due to the gold and the chainmail, yet, due to the chain shouldn't it give a higher armor bonus then?

yeah, maybe 1 more body and leg armor and a bit more weight.