cRPG
cRPG => Suggestions Corner => Topic started by: Gomer on December 05, 2011, 02:32:42 am
-
I believe that constrution sites should stay and should be able to be used as "barricades" but I don't think that it's cool when
ATS half my team spend the whole round building stuff in battle and making me lose (UNLESS there on the other team). What do you think?
-
Unless.
-
Unless.
Changed!
-
I agree with removing construction sites.
Out of the 20+ times I have seen someone try to make something I can only recall exactly 1 time where they actually completed the item and got some use out of it. Normally it's just "advanced leeching". It also relies on the rest of the team to go out and die so that the construction group can have time to finish. If everyone stands there with them, you get engaged and they never complete their task (and most of them get caught without a weapon).
Related:
Medium ladders should take 3 slots.
Also, why is a ladder sheathable. I mean really. You can't sheath your pike but you can sheath this 3 story ladder?
http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,21772.0.html
-
Ladders and barricades provide a tactical advantage, but Csites, siege towers, and catapults are pointless.
-
I disagree about the mats. I've put some weapon racks (5 materials) to very good use several times
-
Ladders and barricades provide a tactical advantage, but Csites, siege towers, and catapults are pointless.
This
-
I disagree about the mats. I've put some weapon racks (5 materials) to very good use several times
Weapon rack + thrower = win
Weapon rack + 21/15 HT = very win
-
Weapon rack + thrower = win
Weapon rack + 21/15 HT = very win
I do see that it's cool but more often then not its useless exploiting...
-
I do see that it's cool but more often then not its useless exploiting...
Exploiting? Yeah I hate when people exploit stuff by using it as intended.
That being said, in my experience, ATS wins most of the rounds it builds seige towers, so there is that.
-
Just remove ladders
-
I believe that devs said they will remove construction sites from battle/siege, but in the meanwhile chadz had some dragons to kill so probably he just forgot about that :mrgreen:
-
Are you mad that when we did a 5 vs 20 we actually won and you lost?
-
Are you mad that when we did a 5 vs 20 we actually won and you lost?
When? And Im just kiding about the Ats thing don't take it personaly!
-
When? And Im just kiding about the Ats thing don't take it personaly!
When? Approximately 1 week ago.
Everyone didn't know what it was and so we just ran out while they were trying to destroy it (dont even bother trying, it has a million hp) and killed them. Pretty funny actually.
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vc2cPuwpqTg
-
Construction sites and arrow barricades were cool to use to make forts out of to help benefit the team against Cav and archers. We as FF did this a lot before chadz thought it be a good idea to remove all building mats after each round instead of each map. The slot system totally ruined the idea of using it as a fort because one site uses 3/4 slots where before you could carry 4 and make a decent barricade. Personally, I don't know why chadz thought to change everything. It was good back then and only gets worse with each new "awesome new addition". I would rather have chadz add new things to build that specifies to battle such as a wall or small base to give a team a tactical bonus.