cRPG

cRPG => Game Admin Feedback => Topic started by: EyeBeat on November 20, 2011, 03:53:05 pm

Title: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: EyeBeat on November 20, 2011, 03:53:05 pm
Yeah.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Classical on November 20, 2011, 03:55:01 pm
People still play this fucking game shitty mod?
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Smoothrich on November 20, 2011, 03:59:57 pm
GrannPappy I just want to direct you to the relevant thread in the NA admin board

http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,20704.0.html

Don't touch it unless there's a really good reason. So in general, don't.

Banner Balance is pretty much supposed to be on at all times, the server was low population, but distinctly not imbalanced, and turning off banner balance should not be a rule of thumb as a first act to do.

Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: EyeBeat on November 20, 2011, 04:01:27 pm
So yeah.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on November 20, 2011, 04:02:16 pm
Yep.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: EyeBeat on November 20, 2011, 04:06:38 pm
Yesterday we played.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Classical on November 20, 2011, 04:11:21 pm
The population was 10 players. Auto-balance will be adjusted to account for server population.

You need more room for an ego that believes server actions were designed for nothing more than to grief yourself and Smoothrich.

Chaos should be as surprised as I am about a Chaos tag.

This is a prime example of a Narcissist believing their own personal desires outweighs balance for the community.

I'm here for the sole purpose to shit up this thread in a feeble attempt to troll EyeBeat, but turning the conversation into a pissing match between yourself and EyeBeat instead of discussing rationally a valid point while still maintaining civility is fucking stupid, and seems to reflect you as a major fucking moron.

Basically what I'm saying is stop trying to maintain the validity of any rebuttals or replies to the aforementioned problem in the original post by using personal insults, you stupid fuck.

e: EyeBeat is gay.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on November 20, 2011, 04:31:21 pm
I answered to charges that the motivation was personal, but yes, point taken.

As to that screenshot, banner balance was back on at 20 players.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Earthdforce on November 21, 2011, 04:24:37 pm
Does it really matter? Just shut up and play the game.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: KaleLord on November 21, 2011, 09:33:21 pm
I was there when the "argument" happened.Granpappy did turn off banner balance at 20 players not 10 players. Though it didn't affect me.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: joey_bologna on November 22, 2011, 02:58:15 am
Eyebeat you sound like a fat whiny bitch who needs to get out more if this is bothering you so much. Pappy is a great admin, and he turned off banner balance at 10 players not 20.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Dach on November 22, 2011, 03:36:22 am
totally off topic!

Nice to see King Chris is still playing... and still owning with plate i guess  :mrgreen: :P
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: dynamike on November 22, 2011, 03:17:51 pm
Server population is 24 currently and I have no idea why he would implement something like this other than the fact to split me and Smoothrich up on purpose.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


He split you and Smooth up so much, he does not even show up on the player list anymore. Abooze!  :D
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Tears of Destiny on November 23, 2011, 03:31:05 am
This is a prime case of admin abuse and it should not be tolerated.  Please remove his admin privileges and let someone else like myself who has been an admin in the past on other servers take over.  I am usually on in the 4am - 8am central time hours.  When no other admins are on.

Thanks for reading.

So you are a "one strike you are out" kind of guy? Scary...
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: EyeBeat on November 23, 2011, 07:11:59 am
Alright sounds good.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: palatro on December 06, 2011, 03:15:40 am
Can someone clarify to granpappy that you cannot rejoin the battle server to get 2 lives. I killed him in the beginning of the round, he was on his alt gramps. Then he rejoined again to be killed by me again. I then tell him that you are not allowed to do that and he argues with me telling me its not a rule and you can do it. I have been banned for doing this before for 3 days and just yesterday knight_lord_ricky_777_LoC was banned for 4 days by geardhart for rejoining in the same round. So would someone please make sure the admins know the rules before becoming admins?
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: KaleLord on December 06, 2011, 03:54:26 am
Can someone clarify to granpappy that you cannot rejoin the battle server to get 2 lives. I killed him in the beginning of the round, he was on his alt gramps. Then he rejoined again to be killed by me again. I then tell him that you are not allowed to do that and he argues with me telling me its not a rule and you can do it. I have been banned for doing this before for 3 days and just yesterday knight_lord_ricky_777_LoC was banned for 4 days by geardhart for rejoining in the same round. So would someone please make sure the admins know the rules before becoming admins?

Agreed
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on December 06, 2011, 04:04:48 am
It was not a rule. It has since been added and may now be enforced as such.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: KaleLord on December 06, 2011, 04:08:45 am
It was not a rule. It has since been added and may now be enforced as such.

It was exploiting game mechanics.
So therefore you broke the rules
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: palatro on December 06, 2011, 04:12:21 am
why was i banned for rejoining then 2 months ago? and just yesterday another person banned for doing it? and just today it gets added as a rule??????
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: SuperNewb on December 06, 2011, 04:16:32 am
why was i banned for rejoining then 2 months ago? and just yesterday another person banned for doing it? and just today it gets added as a rule??????

This guy plays atleast 8 hours a day. He should be refunded the xp and gold that he missed during that ban.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: arowaine on December 06, 2011, 05:17:57 am
why was i banned for rejoining then 2 months ago? and just yesterday another person banned for doing it? and just today it gets added as a rule??????
i support this
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: cmp on December 06, 2011, 12:25:23 pm
why was i banned for rejoining then 2 months ago? and just yesterday another person banned for doing it? and just today it gets added as a rule??????

It's been a rule for a long time, it just wasn't explicitly stated in the forum post (because we thought it was common sense that rejoining is an exploit).
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: oprah_winfrey on December 06, 2011, 09:54:03 pm
It's been a rule for a long time, it just wasn't explicitly stated in the forum post (because we thought it was common sense that rejoining is an exploit).

So how long is grannpappy getting banned for?
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Ufthak on December 08, 2011, 07:33:10 am
http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,19957.0.html
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Anwyl on January 17, 2012, 05:11:48 am
Since when is using "U" chat to insult players something an admin is supposed to do Failpappy?
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Blackzilla on January 17, 2012, 05:56:56 am
He was using you as an example. Why dont you tell everyone what you said to him.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Anwyl on January 17, 2012, 06:24:13 am
He was using you as an example. Why dont you tell everyone what you said to him.

Certainly! In fact I'll post the logs:

http://pastebin.com/bsAPz5pN

I still maintain my question:

Since when is using "U" chat to insult players something an admin is supposed to do Failpappy?
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Earthdforce on January 17, 2012, 07:29:17 am
Certainly! In fact I'll post the logs:

http://pastebin.com/bsAPz5pN

Obviously fake! The real Coy is not fallen!
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Anwyl on January 17, 2012, 07:32:17 am
Obviously fake! The real Coy is not fallen!

I've been framed!
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Earthdforce on January 17, 2012, 08:00:58 am
I've been framed!
:O!
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: FF_GeorgeWashington on March 18, 2012, 12:31:05 am
It seem this admin who has almost double negatives to positive feedback as an admin reflects his overall character and judgement as an admin.  I was banned for one week for what he called "trolling" to hide his damage control.  I accidentally team wounded which I then get tk'd so I tell the admin and instead of him checking into the issue, he decides to warn me that he doesn't accept tking or team wounding and this is my only warning.  I tell him I was tk'd but it seems he never saw it and I have to show proof on the forums to have someone banned.  I go on to tell him that if he continues to be biased, I will report him on the forums as I am doing now.  He takes it as a joke and seems to shrug it off to where his immaturity shows in his response.  I am keeping this chat to admin only but instead of pming me personally, he responds in global admin chat so others may see his response and try flaming me over our argument.  I for one think that if there is an issue between admin and player, the admin should show better judgement and keep it confidential between the two parties involved.  I answer him back and tell him that he lacks in judgement and character and that his is an immature person.  He doesn't answer for maybe 10-20 minutes so I figure the  argument is done but to my amazement, he decides to send me a message "I'm glad you decided to stay on George because now you're banned for a week for excessive trolling and grieving, feel free to screen shot this to sue on your unban request".  All can think when seeing this is how old is this kid and what gives him a right to flex his admin powers for no reason other than to accuse me of trolling.  Admins can either make a positive gaming atmosphere or a negative gaming atmosphere for gamers and unfortunately for this guy, he is biased and he lacks maturity to be an admin any longer.  I propose his admin is stripped and given to someone who doesn't let his personal feeling decide his actions.  I hope an admin reads this and see hows incompetent this individual is with admin powers.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Muki on March 18, 2012, 12:41:46 am
Still the best admin in NA
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: joey_bologna on March 18, 2012, 01:37:53 am
George every since I've been playing crpg and see you on, you are always causing some BS. I always thought you must have been a friend of some high level admin to always get away with so much crap. It's good you finally got a serious ban. Pappy is one of the best NA admins there is. Pappy is finally doing something about your shit, where other admins should have a long time ago.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: SeQuel on March 18, 2012, 01:53:28 am
Quite frankly Granpappy is the only fucking admin on the team who isnt a fucking pussy and bans people who deserve to be banned.

Good job Granpapy.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on March 18, 2012, 02:41:50 am
Thanks for the support. While I may not get every decision right, I do my best to maintain a fun atmosphere for all to play.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 18, 2012, 02:54:46 am
Granpappy is fine, George is just a silly troll.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Ganner on March 18, 2012, 07:18:29 am
Quite frankly Granpappy is the only fucking admin on the team who isnt a fucking pussy and bans people who deserve to be banned.

Good job Granpapy.

*cough*

Honestly I support pappy in this.  George, you are a known teamkiller teamwounder and general asshat.  Almost every time I have seen you on the server you are causing some kind of grief, be it in chat or by teamkilling.  Enjoy your ban, get some time in the sun, and come back with a modified behavior.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on March 19, 2012, 04:28:50 pm
I've seen George delay and leech before, but generally I just know him as one of the few throwers.

I think pappy's generally a good admin, at least he's online and available at times other admins aren't on.  He does seem a little emotional sometimes and prone to getting excitable, but I don't see him abusing admin powers (*cough tydeus cough*)
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: RatOnCrack on March 20, 2012, 12:42:41 am
It seem this admin who has almost double negatives to positive feedback as an admin reflects his overall character and judgement as an admin.  I was banned for one week for what he called "trolling" to hide his damage control.  I accidentally team wounded which I then get tk'd so I tell the admin and instead of him checking into the issue, he decides to warn me that he doesn't accept tking or team wounding and this is my only warning.  I tell him I was tk'd but it seems he never saw it and I have to show proof on the forums to have someone banned.  I go on to tell him that if he continues to be biased, I will report him on the forums as I am doing now.  He takes it as a joke and seems to shrug it off to where his immaturity shows in his response.  I am keeping this chat to admin only but instead of pming me personally, he responds in global admin chat so others may see his response and try flaming me over our argument.  I for one think that if there is an issue between admin and player, the admin should show better judgement and keep it confidential between the two parties involved.  I answer him back and tell him that he lacks in judgement and character and that his is an immature person.  He doesn't answer for maybe 10-20 minutes so I figure the  argument is done but to my amazement, he decides to send me a message "I'm glad you decided to stay on George because now you're banned for a week for excessive trolling and grieving, feel free to screen shot this to sue on your unban request".  All can think when seeing this is how old is this kid and what gives him a right to flex his admin powers for no reason other than to accuse me of trolling.  Admins can either make a positive gaming atmosphere or a negative gaming atmosphere for gamers and unfortunately for this guy, he is biased and he lacks maturity to be an admin any longer.  I propose his admin is stripped and given to someone who doesn't let his personal feeling decide his actions.  I hope an admin reads this and see hows incompetent this individual is with admin powers.
I feel you brother, Grannpappy is by far the worst admin i have ever seen in cRPG... actually pretty much all of the NA admins are bull shit but they have to power so we obviously have to follow the rules while they are present, as soon as they leave its party time.
Anyways back to my point, Grannpappy is... special, i dont think it is entirely his fault that he acts the way he does (meaning hes is plain retarded). From what i have seen i think he might be missing a few marbles... if you understand what i mean so its not really his fault, i also think hes very old and he might just have a few(i mean many but thats just too insulting) problems from being so damn old. Overal NA admins are shit, the worst ones i have seen are Grannpappy and canary who is also pretty bad but not nearly was worse as grannpappy.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 20, 2012, 12:43:48 am
so we obviously have to follow the rules while they are present, as soon as they leave its party time.

So your problem is with the rules and not the Admins?
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: RatOnCrack on March 20, 2012, 12:45:09 am
So your problem is with the rules and not the Admins?
nah i hate following rules, grannpappy just has a messed up way of enforcing them
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on March 20, 2012, 01:33:11 am
So your problem is with the rules and not the Admins?

Precisely. They also have a problem when they don't get what they want. George complains that someone TK'd him. I warn the server that intentional TK's are not allowed and I will ban if I see it. George didn't like that I warned instead of banning the guy on George's word alone. In other words, leave them alone, but ban anyone else who bothers them.  :rolleyes:
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: RatOnCrack on March 20, 2012, 02:43:29 am
Precisely. They also have a problem when they don't get what they want. George complains that someone TK'd him. I warn the server that intentional TK's are not allowed and I will ban if I see it. George didn't like that I warned instead of banning the guy on George's word alone. In other words, leave them alone, but ban anyone else who bothers them.  :rolleyes:
Oh yeah? george george george you fucking abusing bastard. Did you forget about me? yeahhh i bet because you are too busy banning others for worthless crimes. Let me refresh your microscopic memory.
It was a dark and stormy night...(it wasnt really but that just sounds cool)...
i called a teamate a dumbass for hitting me, so i aim, AIM my crossbow at him without shooting. Right away he pulls up and attacks me, i block for as long as i possible can, without hope i simply kick his ass resulting in a very unfortunate tk. Yeah very sorry about that. You saw all of that, well at least thats what you said after you kicked me...
So i rejoined and back then there was that anoying bug where it dint alway save your auto-sertup so i spawned naked by accident. CHINASERF started to punch me after i said you were abusing bringing my health down half way (i was naked), the worst part is you were standing RIGHT IN FUCKING FRONT OF ME. You warn him and you warn me... again? confused, i pick up a weapon and tell you that i will fight back if you dont do anything about it.... and you did nothing. I defend myself, again, all right in front of your ugly character with a huge nose (hey man im not racist or anything but are you jewish?) and then i get a 3 day ban while chinaserf gets.... a warning.

sincerely, Fuck you.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on March 20, 2012, 03:09:29 am
Your constant racist remarks are going to earn you a very long ban as well Jezzus. If you can't accept the rules of the server, don't play on it. Spamming my feedback thread won't change the rules of the server or my efforts to enforce them. I'm not surprised to see you or your lies here at all.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Spanish on March 20, 2012, 07:32:48 pm
I support pappy! Mainly because hes one of the admins that helped me be a pretty damn good admin as well.  :) I believe he made the right choice. And that other guy jezzus seems to dislike all admins by the sound of it.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: joey_bologna on March 20, 2012, 07:53:02 pm
You know your doing a good job as admin when the worst trolls are attacking your thread. Keep up the good work pappy.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: RatOnCrack on March 20, 2012, 11:19:30 pm
Your constant racist remarks are going to earn you a very long ban as well Jezzus. If you can't accept the rules of the server, don't play on it. Spamming my feedback thread won't change the rules of the server or my efforts to enforce them. I'm not surprised to see you or your lies here at all.
they arent lies, the only reason i ever started to make racist remarks was because of you, since i saw you just abuse and all of the other admins watch without doing anything, it just pissed me off so much.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Muki on March 21, 2012, 12:33:02 am
they arent lies, the only reason i ever started to make racist remarks was because of you, since i saw you just abuse and all of the other admins watch without doing anything, it just pissed me off so much.

Never seen Gran abuse anyone noir the rules.

On the other note it good to see people are support you Granpappy
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Penguin on March 21, 2012, 12:56:24 am
Jezzus is one of those players who always has something negative to say on the server, he truly besmirches my name.As for Granpappy, he may seem a bit rough on the outside, but inside lies a heart of gold!
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on March 23, 2012, 07:31:15 pm
He seems kind of cranky in the server a lot of times, but he seems fairly rational in the forums.  I use stress the word "fairly" in that last sentence, seem some pretty crazy ideas only a senile man would post. 

Maybe the person in game is different than the poster on forums.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Kreczor on March 23, 2012, 09:59:22 pm
A misunderstood gentleman.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on March 23, 2012, 10:11:44 pm
He seems kind of cranky in the server a lot of times, but he seems fairly rational in the forums.  I use stress the word "fairly" in that last sentence, seem some pretty crazy ideas only a senile man would post. 

Maybe the person in game is different than the poster on forums.

I'm just curt in my responses in-game. Chat spam can also make it difficult to follow my statements or for me to see everything that is said, as well as being done. Not to mention that you guys can often see a one sided conversation, having no idea what was said or relayed to me via the Admin chat  :P What appears to be random warnings from me to the server or individuals more often than not is in direct response to someone voicing a complaint that the rest of you can't see.  :!:

All while trying to take down those blasted Horse Xbow's!  :lol:

Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Kreczor on March 23, 2012, 10:21:07 pm
I ride for you next week.
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Malaclypse on March 25, 2012, 05:37:49 am
There's a new sherrif in NA 2. Goes by the name of Granpappy, and that ol' boy don't mess around.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: BlackWhite on March 26, 2012, 08:21:55 am
My favorite NA admin
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Digglez on March 27, 2012, 08:12:13 am
would be cool if like once every 30 secs, when admin enters admin screen that he levitates up into the air in with his arms spread via matrix style in a swirling cloud and lightning discharges randomly if people approach & try to swing at'em
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on March 27, 2012, 04:01:30 pm
would be cool if like once every 30 secs, when admin enters admin screen that he levitates up into the air in with his arms spread via matrix style in a swirling cloud and lightning discharges randomly if people approach & try to swing at'em

LOL, man that would be great, especially when they are trying to respond to "i" chat.

Thanks again for all the support. I've tried my best to learn from the criticisms from earlier in my Admin career and hope the adjustments that I've made have made a difference  :D
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Kreczor on March 27, 2012, 04:10:07 pm
LOL, man that would be great, especially when they are trying to respond to "i" chat.

Thanks again for all the support. I've tried my best to learn from the criticisms from earlier in my Admin career and hope the adjustments that I've made have made a difference  :D
You worry too much. It's quite clear that most of the people who are a part of this community would be absolutely horrid at keeping everyone in line.

Don't worry about any flak, it's just shrapnel from Smooth's thread hehe
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on March 27, 2012, 04:22:17 pm
Haha, nah not worried. I just try to do my best in whatever it is that I do, and sometimes taking the input of others into account is part of that  :wink:
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Kreczor on March 27, 2012, 04:27:05 pm
Haha, nah not worried. I just try to do my best in whatever it is that I do, and sometimes taking the input of others into account is part of that  :wink:
OH GOD YOU MAKE ME RAGE SO HARD. YOU'RE BAD ADMIN CAUSE YOU BANNED ME THAT ONE TIME IN THAT ONE PLACE FOR DOING THAT ONE THING.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Kreczor on March 27, 2012, 04:30:11 pm
I'm sorry, I just shit up your thread with really bad made-up internet drama. I'll be leaving now...
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: a_bear_irl on March 27, 2012, 11:05:03 pm
You're a fool. I'm the primary person in this thread stickin up for your right to avoid personal harrassment. What I now interpret is that you are trolling people to get those responses. Have fun trying to get a response from me in the future. Don't bother using "i" chat. Post up your "evidence" and I'll take into consideration that you are a troll and doing what you can to evoke those responses. You'll have to prove that it is "personal" and that you didn't do anything "personally" to elicit the response. That's going to be a tough sell after your responses in this thread.

Have fun.

P.S. - I don't think you are gay.

unacceptable
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on March 28, 2012, 02:04:53 am
Its clear that he is trolling for responses. When he posts "evidence" of being personally harrassed, it will be reviewed. Given his responses in that thread, its going to take some real convincing. ie He has forfeited his benefit of the doubt.

Good day sir.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Crazyi on March 30, 2012, 10:16:07 pm
Benefit of the doubt? Since when do you give benefit of the doubt? Are you allowed to say that? You went out of your way to assume my intent with 0 evidence other then ex post facto of the occurance. And I quote YOU "and thus don't simply issue bans without corroborating evidence supporting those claims. " Holy wow! You sure about that? You banned me on the SOLE reason my intent was malicious in a situitation you DID NOT bare witness to. You found NOTHING in the logs, but you want to say you need hard evidence for bans? You even chronolgically re-arranged my post to somehow in your mind "prove my intent". But no no no, its not right to assume in other situations. *cough* bias *cough*. I like how you keep saying "I await your answer" but you lock the thread. Do you now? I like how asking for equality to you means I have a sick mind and take pleasure out of getting people banned. You seriously crossed the line.

 I will make an assumption of my own. You seem like some one with part of an education and an intillectual complex and feels the need to always be right. You cannot take critisim or anyone that may pose a threat to your delusional state of being.

Now for facts. You are a pathetic excuse for "leadership" and some of the shit you say is downright shameful. Huey's heart was practically bleeding out on the forum and you say some TROLL shit like "You didnt break your hand? you didnt punch hard enough". That is BEYOND FUCKED UP and you have a serious problem.

Your arguments in the HA vs HX thread are pathetic as well. Play a HA against Rohy and prove me wrong. Please, I am challenging you. You didn't once dispute the math I did, nor did anyone. HX is cheaper in gold, in skill points, and ability needed because they can jack WPF through the roof and have an unlimited targeting time. I've seen some pretty insane headshots going at full speed. I have YET to see a HA that can beat a HX. PLEASE PROVE ME WRONG. On the ground a crossbow using the SAME CROSSBOW has to stop, put it on the ground, and use BOTH hands to pull it back. Yet while riding a horse it can be done without bracing the weapon, with one hand, while running 30mph, with the agility of a barrel racing horse. Makes total sense for game mechanics and realism. 

You are a blight to this community and a pathetic excuse for an admin. The only positive thing I can say about you is you don't resort to cursing, name calling, and you have proper grammar. I feel your bads far outweigh your good though.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Smoothrich on March 30, 2012, 10:20:10 pm
god damn dude why are you arguing about horse xbows vs horse archers in an admin feedback thread get a grip I don't even think you are a troll anymore just someone with hilarious rage issues who can never stop posting about it
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on March 30, 2012, 10:47:29 pm
You even chronolgically re-arranged my post to somehow in your mind "prove my intent".

The post still exists unedited.

Quote
Quote from: Crazyi on March 23, 2012, 00:01:52
If you look at the bottom in the active dialogue he in respone to "really?" he said "Yea quit kicking him you fuck".

Quote from: Herr_Thomas on March 23, 2012, 02:25:21
The player being kicked (a few times) was a chaos member,

Quote from: Crazyi on March 23, 2012, 02:40:59
Kicking some one in a closed building with full armor and a shield does NOT HARM THEM.

Quote from: Crazyi on March 23, 2012, 06:16:32
Why did we kick him Sigvards friend(yes we werent even kicking the guy that TKd us)?

Quote from: Crazyi on March 23, 2012, 16:24:20
I kick one player and that = griefing another person into TKing me?

Quote from: Herr_Thomas on March 23, 2012, 21:39:56
I was the other person who was kicking (max 4-5 total kicks between us)

Know how to tell time? Or did I somehow manage to alter the forum database in order to re-arrange the times of your posts? What assumption exactly?  You mean that those quotes don't admit to the kicking?

I would tell you that you are just embarassing yourself, but I'm certain you have no sense of shame or personal respect.

A post against you from Crazyi is a badge of honor  :lol:
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Crazyi on March 31, 2012, 12:52:26 am
Yes you have the posting times in the correct order, you are a brainiac. You used that as a reference to state my malicious intent of kicking the Chaos member, when I kicked before anything was said or done(thats where the chronologic comes from, a reference of EVENTS happening to time passing, not the order in which they were posted, wow). You are trying to justify my malicious intent for things said AFTER I kicked him. Let me make sure you understand. Had I posted something on the forums BEFORE I had kicked him, something along the lines of "I hate chaos members" then you could certainly of said my intent was to cause harm. Even if you had found something in those logs you desperately searched through looking for something to justify blatant stupidity, then you could of once again you could have said my intent was to cause harm. Apparently that went beyond your head. Not going to comment on the rest? Sad, I honestly expected better from you.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on March 31, 2012, 12:56:07 am
Oh look, Crazyi posting again  :o

Didn't read. Don't care.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Crazyi on March 31, 2012, 12:57:58 am
I will make an assumption of my own. You seem like some one with part of an education and an intillectual complex and feels the need to always be right. You cannot take critisim or anyone that may pose a threat to your delusional state of being.

Nailed it right on the head.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: RibaldRon on March 31, 2012, 07:43:31 am
GrannPappy is one of my favorite Admins.  Sorry guys but he does his job well, maybe not often enough and maybe that's why I and most people who like him, like him.  But he's awesome.  :D


Also, this is probably a mistake but hey Crazyi why are you quoting and responding to yourself..  :?:



E: and he's really cool in the ban request threads, if I could +1 his recent post I would!
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Muki on March 31, 2012, 08:48:21 am
GrannPappy is one of my favorite Admins.  Sorry guys but he does his job well, maybe not often enough and maybe that's why I and most people who like him, like him.  But he's awesome.  :D


Also, this is probably a mistake but hey Crazyi why are you quoting and responding to yourself..  :?:



E: and he's really cool in the ban request threads, if I could +1 his recent post I would!

+1
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Digglez on March 31, 2012, 08:08:53 pm
we should all pitch in to get granpappy a toupee
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Muki on April 22, 2012, 07:54:47 am
Thanks for the advice Grannpappy
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Kreczor on April 23, 2012, 01:27:14 am
I am unmuted. Your thread is great and I enjoy stroking your beard.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on April 23, 2012, 06:24:43 pm
And nobody strokes it like you  :P
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: TheFocusedOne on April 25, 2012, 04:40:10 am
This admin looks for reasons to kick/ban people, which I don't really like.

For instance, in seige there was a person standing in spawn whom I gave a kick to "wake up".  I was threatened with a kick/ban for this behaviour.  If I were grief kicking archers off roofs or kicking people off ladders, I would understand - but draconian rulemongering is beneath him.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on April 25, 2012, 05:13:17 am
Here's a tip. When I'm standing 5 feet away from a player don't walk up and start kick spamming them unless you are looking for a kick yourself. In fact, I'm fairly certain those are the exact words I used. It doesn't matter what you thought you were doing. People with slow systems can take more than a couple seconds to be able to control their character. You kicking them while they are loading doesn't help "wake them up". I didn't need to look for a reason to warn you. You walked up and did it right in front of me  :lol:
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: TheFocusedOne on April 25, 2012, 08:30:18 pm
It was ~2:00 left on the round timer.  Besides, it was round 2/3/4 of 5.  If the person wasn't moving, it was more likely that he was tabbed out because of a death than waiting for his slow system to load.  I'm trying to offer some input into how other people view your admining.  Sometimes a heavy hand does more harm to the atmosphere than good, I think.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on April 25, 2012, 09:08:36 pm
Thanks for the input. I do listen to it. On siege however, I don't think that a heavy hand is the current issue and you'll notice that you got warned, not kicked or banned. A warning is the opposite of a heavy hand  :idea:
(Not to mention that people join the game at all times, not just when a round begins)
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: TheFocusedOne on April 25, 2012, 10:22:35 pm
Fair enough.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Count_Curtis on April 30, 2012, 03:12:24 am
I dont like this admin.
cant be arsed writing why
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: mcdeath on May 02, 2012, 04:25:28 am
This guy is pretty cool, I think he is using his adminship the right way
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on May 02, 2012, 04:47:40 am
You were told to stop. You didn't. They were warned not to team hit. They stopped. That is evident because you were still alive and standing in front of me when I banned you for all of 5 minutes.

Read the rules and follow them and you won't have cause to complain.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: mcdeath on May 02, 2012, 05:27:13 am
I was never warned unless you count saying my name in team chat but nothing else was said
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: MrShine on May 02, 2012, 07:35:10 pm
I support all balding old man admins!
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Tanken on May 02, 2012, 08:49:13 pm
First off, I want to say, GranPappy, you're a decent player.

But you spam admin chat while everyone is trying to play like you have to answer every question with Pink Text.

2 Days ago in Siege server, I swear to god, every 30-45 seconds you would say something in admin chat and 50% of the time it had NOTHING to do with Admin stuff.

It was so obnoxious and annoying that players in dead-chat and team-chat were mentioning how you just kept spamming it, that's not needed especially when you wrote BLOCKS AND BLOCKS of messages. So much that everytime you said something I had to double check to see if I had received "All thine hard work" but no, it WAS SPAM.

I nearly said something, but then you were gone from the server, and the Wild West Siege server went right back to chaos.

Please, if you have to admin, use your admin chat for that stuff, instead of answering any and all questions or comments to yourself through Admin chat. I swear, if we looked at the logs there was probably a 30 minute time-frame where you had 10-15 things, BIG BLOCKS OF TEXT, in admin chat.


I don't need that, and I'm guessing since the a majority of the rest of the community in the server was complaining, they didn't need it either.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on May 02, 2012, 09:58:41 pm
It wasn't spam. Half of it was answering McDeath there who demanded answers about his 5 minute ban. You notice I finally told him to come to the forums because I wasn't interested in continuing the conversation in game (for this very reason). The other half was answering the questions of a new player who asked those questions in 'i' chat.
When I die, I can't talk to living players any other way. When I am alive and start typing, half the time I die mid-sentence because I'm standing there typing to answer questions.
All of the messages were to either warn players for team attacks, attacking siege equipment, afk leeching, or to address McDeath or the new players directing problems they are having to me. Every bit of that is admin related.

Any "spam" by me was in white text, not pink.

I'll keep them to a minimum, but all of the messages were necessary to do the job. Trust me, it is annoying to me to spend my time typing rather than playing, and yes the siege server is FAR FAR worse. Take my word for it, I would prefer to be playing on Battle where the job is cake and I prefer the game mode. I go to siege for the players benefit, not my own.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Tanken on May 03, 2012, 09:13:09 am
Agreed that in hindsight I vaguely remember it being directed towards McDeath and yeah, for me the text is pink like the all-thine-hard-work message, at least admin chat is. Didn't see if you used normal chat for any of the questions but it was to the point I was really going to ask you to stop but you were gone.


No harm done, it's understandable to be the only sheriff in the server when you've got 100 would-be crooks running around and trying to observe them all not to mention handling all the pointers.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on May 03, 2012, 06:44:42 pm
No problem, trust me that I completely understand.  :wink:

Also when re-reading my shit I realize that I really need to add more smiley's and winks. I sound curt and cold  :shock: :P  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: EyeBeat on May 03, 2012, 07:53:50 pm
I noticed sometimes that it's hard to reply to a player asking questions in admin chat.  The only way we can reply is through admin chat or regular chat.  Either generate confusion.

Maybe all admins should have their steam name listed by their avatar so private conversation can be achieved outside the game in a one on one fashion. 

This way if something is happening a player can tell the admin with out telling the whole server.  Or if someone has just general newbie questions they can get answered in non troll fashion by someone that can be trusted.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Dalfador on May 04, 2012, 05:44:41 am
he's cool and he makes noobs feel good about themselves by giving them compliments.

nuf said
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: mcdeath on May 05, 2012, 08:10:27 pm
I love lamp.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on May 06, 2012, 06:48:27 am
You can edit them if you want. You can change them all to yep if you want and I'll edit my responses to the same  :P No hard feelings ;)
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: POOPHAMMER on May 06, 2012, 10:56:32 pm
You need to use your reading abilities when someone is teamwounding at spawn in siege and im hammering M, report it, and the only thing you can tell me to do is press M so you can see it so you have proof despite me doing it already. This has happened 3 times now.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on May 07, 2012, 06:21:55 am
You need to use your reading abilities when someone is teamwounding at spawn in siege and im hammering M, report it, and the only thing you can tell me to do is press M so you can see it so you have proof despite me doing it already. This has happened 3 times now.

Yeah. Haven't been on siege recently. Assuming someone else's alt is me? A little bird told me so.  :idea:
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: WITCHCRAFT on May 13, 2012, 12:56:34 am
Every time I'm on a server and GrannPappy is on a server, he lets naked leechers and team-hitting trolls know "hey you are doing something bannable and an admin is looking right at you, cut that shit out or else."

I approve of this no bullshit admin style. Sets an example for other players who might be breaking rules to get in line and stop it before they get caught next.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Muki on August 08, 2012, 10:48:19 pm
The old man needs to be more active :D
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on August 17, 2012, 09:12:52 am
Can't a guy enjoy a peaceful vacation without receiving a malicious bump?  :lol:
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: chimy727 on November 18, 2012, 10:44:33 pm
Seems alright, though I dont really see why you had to ban more for accidently teambumping with my horse... so not exactly a good impression for me, but could just be miscommunication. 
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Mae. on November 19, 2012, 02:50:00 am
you da you da besssst
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on November 20, 2012, 12:02:15 pm
you da you da besssst

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Seems alright, though I dont really see why you had to ban more for accidently teambumping with my horse... so not exactly a good impression for me, but could just be miscommunication.

Hi there! Thanks for chiming in! Let's be honest with each other okay? After telling you to stop the team bumping with your horse the previous round, I watched you on spawn. Sure enough, you began walking your horse systematically through teammates. Not enough to do damage, but enough to register the bump. Once you got through the crowd, you turned around and walked through again. So you were kicked. And you rejoined on the other team because you still had a few seconds left to go. This was explained to you at the time, and yes, you were banned for 5 minutes to ensure that you missed a round to get the point. So again, let's be honest with each other. That "accidently teambumping?"

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Harrys Oil Can on December 14, 2012, 06:14:45 am
Grannpappy is by far the sexiest admin this game has ever seen.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: mcdeath on December 21, 2012, 12:54:44 am
Grannpappy is by far the sexiest admin this game has ever seen.

Too bad his sexiness can't make him a good admin.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on December 21, 2012, 12:56:08 am
Too bad his sexiness can't make him a good admin.

Is there a way to delete posts cause I feel stupid for my posts
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Jack1 on January 07, 2013, 05:44:54 pm
Pappy best admin. Nuff said
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Mechanix on January 07, 2013, 08:51:01 pm
best nigga out there

LOVE YOU GRANDPA
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on January 07, 2013, 10:51:38 pm
Love you kids!

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on January 18, 2013, 01:20:29 pm
I dig him. I mean... his forum posts are unbelievably gay but he seems cool enough in game.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on January 18, 2013, 05:16:49 pm
Now that means a lot to me! I mean sure, I can be gay in the forums, I'm not an Admin or Developer here. In game I take the role quite seriously and try to keep my personal opinions out of it and do my best to provide a positive example while having all the fun that also being the hall monitor allows  :wink:
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Sandersson Jankins on January 19, 2013, 01:39:25 am
Yeah, gotta agree with the bundle of sticks that posted above you, Grannpappy. Don't see you post stupid stuff in the forums, but you're probably the only admin that I really hold respect for. I may become irritated when you enforce the "no tking before round end" when it's 1v20, but you're doing your job to the very best of your ability when you do that.

Seriously dude, I may have talked a bit of shit about you in the past (enough to where I voted your admining horrible, although that may have been a joke...can't fucking remember), but you're #1 NA admin in my book.

Oh, and I think that you're one of the few admins that won't become immensely offended on behalf of others when I utter the dreaded word "nigga, nigguh, nukka, black in spanish, niqqa, etc."
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Mae. on January 23, 2013, 06:06:34 am
biggest fans <3

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on January 23, 2013, 06:45:27 am
I'm the Mulatto Mestizo behind the camera  :wink:
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Jack1 on May 24, 2013, 06:52:54 pm
Hey pappy where you the one who wanted the gaming tag removed from the site?
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on May 25, 2013, 09:12:44 am
Yes, it interferes with my fuck off time at work!  :lol:
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Jack1 on May 26, 2013, 05:27:51 am
Well I use a iPhone and go through the school wifi, that is blocked like you could believe. Found an app called opendoor, it gets past web nannies. Not sure what you try to use but it works with my phone
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Penguin on June 03, 2013, 09:36:55 am
Even though pappy used to kick me for QIA'ing and in my opinion had something to do with the voice command limit, he's still one of the best NA admins. That's why it's so sad that he will go mad from dementia some time soon and mass ban everyone!
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: FrugFrug on June 03, 2013, 01:28:38 pm
Even though pappy used to kick me for QIA'ing and in my opinion had something to do with the voice command limit, he's still one of the best NA admins. That's why it's so sad that he will go mad from dementia some time soon and mass ban everyone!

[R]etreat! [G]rannPappy Incoming!
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on June 03, 2013, 04:44:29 pm
Even though pappy used to kick me for QIA'ing and in my opinion had something to do with the voice command limit, he's still one of the best NA admins. That's why it's so sad that he will go mad from dementia some time soon and mass ban everyone!

Those blasted Penguins think they are Jesus Christ....well I've got something planned for them, damn flightless birds....*mutters incoherently*
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: mcdeath on June 03, 2013, 11:41:39 pm
Those blasted Penguins think they are Jesus Christ....well I've got something planned for them, damn flightless birds....*mutters incoherently*
Fuck the Penguins...Bruins are way better
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Jack1 on June 08, 2013, 09:57:28 pm
Fuck the Penguins...Bruins are way better

Redwings are the best hockey team and the best shoe company
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: mcdeath on June 09, 2013, 01:50:06 am
Did you not see that sweep?
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Bronto on June 09, 2013, 04:07:17 am
Fuck the Penguins...Bruins are way better

It was shameful. Penguins should've won the series but we ch chchchchchchoked. FUCK MAN. I am disappoint. Also, McDeath, you're a masshole why you care bout this series?
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Matey on June 09, 2013, 04:27:38 am
It was shameful. Penguins should've won the series but we ch chchchchchchoked. FUCK MAN. I am disappoint. Also, McDeath, you're a masshole why you care bout this series?

Poor Iginla picked wrong. I was hoping he would finally get himself a cup D:
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: WITCHCRAFT on August 25, 2013, 08:04:53 am
I found a pic of grannpappy in my crpg images folder.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on August 26, 2013, 04:18:54 am
Nice find!

But damnit I must have been on page 3 by now!  :P
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: CrazyCracka420 on August 26, 2013, 09:21:04 pm
W need more complaints about this ban happy badmin.  The rage posts versus rage admin decisions are disproportional. 
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on August 27, 2013, 07:58:39 am
W need more complaints about this ban happy badmin.  The rage posts versus rage admin decisions are disproportional.

Once you've pummeled their will often enough, they roll over and capitulate without a whimper  :P
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Lemon on September 01, 2013, 07:05:23 pm
Bans me for 3 days for accidentally hitting someone once, and doing less then 1/10th of their health. LOGIC.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER on September 07, 2013, 12:45:23 am
That doesn't sound like GrannPappy at all. As far as I could ever tell he is one of the most forgiving admins in NA_1.

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Rumblood on September 07, 2013, 04:16:10 am
That doesn't sound like GrannPappy at all. As far as I could ever tell he is one of the most forgiving admins in NA_1.

(click to show/hide)

Well as you guessed it, that isn't the whole story. I gave a 5 minute ban when it should have been 24 hours, and so when he did a similar thing 2 weeks later, I made it 48 + the original time he should have had. Taking my leniency for granted.
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: Gmnotutoo on September 10, 2013, 03:21:18 am
Title: Re: [NA] GrannPappy
Post by: FrugFrug on September 10, 2013, 05:03:53 am
W need more complaints about this ban Pappy badmin.  The rage posts versus rage admin decisions are disproportional.