cRPG

Strategus => Strategus General Discussion => Topic started by: Matey on November 14, 2011, 09:36:18 am

Title: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: Matey on November 14, 2011, 09:36:18 am
Since no one else has made a post...

Good fight guys, and fuck you Raina! you shot me so many damn times when i thought my shield would protect me  :evil:
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: Digglez on November 14, 2011, 10:12:00 am
FCC equipment was lacking or it would have been a win for them

If they had ladders would have been able to take the roofs and hold them.  Kudos to your melees for defending the roofs for archers.
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: mandible/splinteryourjaw on November 14, 2011, 02:14:42 pm
FCC equipment was lacking or it would have been a win for them

If they had ladders would have been able to take the roofs and hold them.  Kudos to your melees for defending the roofs for archers.

One thing about ATS is they know the worth of archers.  I can't tell you how many times in battle one will run in front of me and throw up his shield to protect me while I fight...and me just a randomer...that is appreciated.  It used to be fun to watch Goretooth protect Raina.  If the enemy went for Goretooth, Raina added some weight to them,  If he went towards Raina, Goretooth would remove a little weight with his BEC
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: Dasty on November 14, 2011, 04:01:43 pm
Good fight guys, ended up being very close at the end, we only lost 20 less tickets than you guys at the very end.

And digglez, your equipment wasn't bad at all, you guys had quite a few of those massive board shields. Also, I was surprised when I had to stab some of your guys 3-4 times with my MW Longspear, so your gear wasn't terrible. I usually average 2-3 stabs per kill on the battle server for your information.
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: Dach on November 14, 2011, 05:21:13 pm
Sorry I missed that fight...  :shock:

My need to sleep is damn hard opponent to beat!  :lol:
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: Digglez on November 14, 2011, 05:42:25 pm
Good fight guys, ended up being very close at the end, we only lost 20 less tickets than you guys at the very end.

And digglez, your equipment wasn't bad at all, you guys had quite a few of those massive board shields

Round shield > Board shield.

I got shot thru my shield at least 3 times and heard others on TS saying same thing. 
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: rubicon_crossed on November 14, 2011, 06:00:25 pm
Good fight, felt like a damn pin cushion by the end there  :D.
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: Matey on November 14, 2011, 08:08:58 pm
ZE BOARD SHIELDZZZ ZEY DOO NUSSING!
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: Keshian on November 14, 2011, 08:16:27 pm
ZE BOARD SHIELDZZZ ZEY DOO NUSSING!

And here Gristle slaves over a hot stove blacksmithing these board shields for you all day long and you come home from your battle and this is the thanks he gets.  He never gets appreciated anymore.  No flowers, no sweetalk, just bitch bitch bitch. 

P.S. My fault on the whole no ladder thing guys, sorry.  Really easy to camp all those roofs with ranged by defenders.
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: Damatacus_ATS on November 14, 2011, 08:50:01 pm
It seemed like you were getting up on that back roof a lot without ladders. You definitely had more archers than us anyways, considering you had 49 fighters to our 29.
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: Matey on November 14, 2011, 08:51:48 pm
I dunno, as a rambo shielder it sure felt like you guys had more archers than us! lol. I think we had 5 or so archers and 2-3 xbows.
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: Gristle on November 14, 2011, 09:58:46 pm
There is nothing wrong my with my crafted crossbows or board shields! You're not getting shot through the shield. No bow has ever done that to me. I suspect you're just not appreciating the shield's actual size since the force field nerf. You must be aware of how thin they are.

I say bring back the force fields, and just nerf huscarls!
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: Wiawins_ATS on November 14, 2011, 10:39:34 pm
I say bring back the force fields, and just nerf huscarls!
Nay. -1
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: Konrax on November 15, 2011, 05:20:23 pm
FCC equipment was lacking or it would have been a win for them

If they had ladders would have been able to take the roofs and hold them.  Kudos to your melees for defending the roofs for archers.

I guess Kesh should have hired me as a crafter to make some decent armour and shields.
Title: Re: The Siege of Bhulaban (FCC VS ATS)
Post by: Gristle on November 15, 2011, 05:59:54 pm
I guess Kesh should have hired me as a crafter to make some decent armour and shields.

Them's fightin' words!