cRPG

cRPG => cRPG Technical problems => Topic started by: polkafranzi on November 03, 2011, 04:46:02 pm

Title: Con Sites e.t.c.
Post by: polkafranzi on November 03, 2011, 04:46:02 pm
Just wanted to get one thing straight, as per cmp's rules below, using CS sites to block doors is ok...but is it o.k. to use them and block the only possible ways to the flag...it's ghey.

No siege equipment spam

    OK: Planting ladders to get to roofs or walls
    OK: Blocking a door with a construction site
    OK: Planting siege shields to provide cover from ranged fire
    NOT OK: Creating a weapon rack and spawning more than a few items to block movement

Look at timer, (and my multi) :) but then this...
(click to show/hide)
and this...
(click to show/hide)
:( we had no chance, just seems retarded and can the CS spammers be punished?  Or is it allowed.

I'd appreciate this to be a no trolling zone, just one answer from an admin/dev will be fine.
Title: Re: Con Sites e.t.c.
Post by: Digglez on November 03, 2011, 10:58:17 pm
OMG you mean organized defenders actually won a round WHEN ITS STACKED AGAINST THEM?

Csites arent sturdy by any means.  Plus you could have easily laddered over them.  Csites are fine, ladders were the problem and they were dealt with.
Title: Re: Con Sites e.t.c.
Post by: Herkkutatti on November 03, 2011, 11:27:51 pm
Don't listen him, he is a leecher. he lost his x5 and now he is rage posting at forums.
Title: Re: Con Sites e.t.c.
Post by: Bulzur on November 03, 2011, 11:51:18 pm
Quote from: Digglez on November 03, 2011, 10:58:17 pm
OMG you mean organized defenders actually won a round WHEN ITS STACKED AGAINST THEM?

Csites arent sturdy by any means.  Plus you could have easily laddered over them.  Csites are fine, ladders were the problem and they were dealt with.

Pfff, if you now need ladders INSIDE the city to take the flag, AFTER having taken the walls already, then it's indeed lame.

I honestly believe all this CS crap should be gone, or make them at least 3x easier to destroy.

Siege should be playable without ladders for attackers, and without CS, ladders, and siege shields for defenders.
The way it is now, it's like the loto. I hope the attackers don't have ladders. Oh, they do, we're screwed. I hope the defenders didn't put CS and ladders everywhere. O, they did, we're screwed.

But since not one siege map is balanced that way, i'm pretty sure we're gonna keep all that siege equipement for evar. That's way i always go there as a 1h now, with 2-3 free slots. Else... i feel useless. Siege is for engineers now.
Title: Re: Con Sites e.t.c.
Post by: polkafranzi on November 04, 2011, 10:29:43 am
Quote from: polkafranzi on November 03, 2011, 04:46:02 pm
I'd appreciate this to be a no trolling zone, just one answer from an admin/dev will be fine.

Quote from: joosto on November 03, 2011, 11:27:51 pm
Don't listen him, he is a leecher. he lost his x5 and now he is rage posting at forums.

How many hours do you leech in siege per day?  8-)
Title: Re: Con Sites e.t.c.
Post by: TucKMuncK on November 04, 2011, 02:42:54 pm
Quote from: joosto on November 03, 2011, 11:27:51 pm
Don't listen him, he is a leecher. he lost his x5 and now he is rage posting at forums.
Quote from: polkafranzi on November 04, 2011, 10:29:43 am
How many hours do you leech in siege per day?  8-)
Leeching? No, hes very usefull to team, those times I have played with him I have seen him to be very usefull to our team. Like when we are attackers if hes not so well geared (think thats why you call him leecher) he focuses on opening gate, which is key to success in many maps.