cRPG

Strategus => Strategus General Discussion => Topic started by: Tears of Destiny on September 10, 2011, 06:51:59 pm

Title: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on September 10, 2011, 06:51:59 pm
With the new Strategus being split up between forced NA and forced EU servers, will you pay attention to the "claims" that clans usually try to do (and did in Strategus Version 2?) where "This land traditionally belongs to us?"

With the new split, many clans will be forced to relocated as their old land may sit on an undesirable server spot (example, EU clan on NA Server Land).

What say you?
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: PhantomZero on September 10, 2011, 06:56:50 pm
I'm a cute bitch.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention ot "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Rikthor on September 10, 2011, 06:57:09 pm
Seems like it would be hard to do without knowing where the Great Caldarian Wall™ will be located and the split of land between Eu and Na. Some clans may end up where their traditional land is but I am sure a few won't.

^^Phantom really is
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: kukufarikki on September 10, 2011, 07:03:10 pm
the desert is ours
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: SeQuel on September 10, 2011, 07:10:08 pm
Will LLJK still go to the desert if it's EU ping?
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: SPQR on September 10, 2011, 07:10:40 pm
^^ we dont give a fuck. we lose thousands of troops regardless of which server we're on

strategus 101:

lesson 1

stay the fuck out of our desert
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: kukufarikki on September 10, 2011, 07:11:19 pm
Will LLJK still go to the desert if it's EU ping?

Quote
the desert is ours
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 10, 2011, 07:11:53 pm
Will LLJK still go to the desert if it's EU ping?
LLJK's new goal is to ally with as many NA clans as possible, destroy all the EU clans, and then demand that Strategus only be played on NA servers because the majority of the population is NA.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Smoothrich on September 10, 2011, 07:12:50 pm
Afghoonistan is our birthright, EU or NA, LLJK will never stop until the deserts run green of our triple boars and red of our enemies, Allahu Snackbar, الله يمنح القوة الثلاثية قبل اﻷسطوري
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: SeQuel on September 10, 2011, 07:13:41 pm
Hope bottom is EU then. That way they can destroy you ;D.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 10, 2011, 07:14:14 pm
Hope bottom is EU then. That way they can destroy you ;D.
Hasn't worked out that way so far.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: SeQuel on September 10, 2011, 07:15:13 pm
Hasn't worked out that way so far.

Yah but if thats the case you can expect STR, Grey Order and DRZ to all move south.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 10, 2011, 07:17:19 pm
Yah but if thats the case you can expect STR, Grey Order and DRZ to all move south.
This is the same kind of "Heh, good luck with that, LLJK" stuff that was posted when the Shogunate attacked us, just FYI.

I've been completely unimpressed with the fighting ability of about 90% of EU clans in this iteration of Strategus.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: PhantomZero on September 10, 2011, 07:18:01 pm
Yah but if thats the case you can expect STR, Grey Order and DRZ to all move south.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: LLJK_Siggy on September 10, 2011, 07:18:45 pm
I like desserts where is my dessert? They better not take my desserts to Europe.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: SPQR on September 10, 2011, 07:19:24 pm
we can add them to the "eu clans we've crushed" list

gotta catch em alllllll strategus clannsss
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: PhantomZero on September 10, 2011, 07:19:49 pm
I like desserts where is my dessert? They better not take my desserts to Europe.

Best Avatar/Post combination Winner 2011
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Goretooth on September 10, 2011, 07:20:02 pm
KILL
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Smoothrich on September 10, 2011, 07:23:00 pm
Yah but if thats the case you can expect STR, Grey Order and DRZ to all move south.

Either way I'm sure European Strat will sure be fun for all the new players and small clans that chadz wants to get involved once the UIF 3.0 immediately forms and takes over nearly the entire map within the first week, heh

But nope better wish those LLJK scumbags all collapse because of how much they shit up the game, always getting aggressively attacked by fail EU alliances and supporting allies across the globe, Strat needs to be Northern Empire + UIF circle jerk for all times or else its GOONS TROLLING OUR GAMEZ
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: The_Devious_Duc_Volpe on September 10, 2011, 07:23:26 pm
I wish LLJK the best of luck in all there desert capturing endevours (unless I own a small share in the desert....in which case..id like to keep it. :) )
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Goretooth on September 10, 2011, 07:23:57 pm
I wish LLJK the best of luck in all there desert capturing endevours (unless I own a small share in the desert....in which case..id like to keep it. :) )
Don't count on it
Kill
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: The_Devious_Duc_Volpe on September 10, 2011, 07:28:10 pm
Don't count on it
Kill
Illegitimi non carborundum
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: SeQuel on September 10, 2011, 07:28:32 pm
Either way I'm sure European Strat will sure be fun for all the new players and small clans that chadz wants to get involved once the UIF 3.0 immediately forms and takes over nearly the entire map within the first week, heh

But nope better wish those LLJK scumbags all collapse because of how much they shit up the game, always getting aggressively attacked by fail EU alliances and supporting allies across the globe, Strat needs to be Northern Empire + UIF circle jerk for all times or else its GOONS TROLLING OUR GAMEZ

Where did I say it needed to be NE? or any of that at all? I hated the thought of NE but just because I was in Eastern Tsardom doesn't mean I agreed with it. I think all alliances that big like NE and UIF are carebear nutcuppers.

LLJK is a big enough clan to be an allaince within itself lol  :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: kukufarikki on September 10, 2011, 07:33:51 pm
Where did I say it needed to be NE? or any of that at all? I hated the thought of NE but just because I was in Eastern Tsardom doesn't mean I agreed with it. I think all alliances that big like NE and UIF are carebear nutcuppers.

LLJK is a big enough clan to be an allaince within itself lol  :lol: :lol: :lol:

perpetual civil war, no alliances
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Smoothrich on September 10, 2011, 07:36:32 pm
One day if an LLJK visionary general can unite the warring LLJK tribes we may be a threat for the outside world.  Until then we are stuck in our barbarian ways of endless infighting and human sacrifice
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Kingtrisp on September 10, 2011, 07:37:41 pm
All i see is germany
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: The_Devious_Duc_Volpe on September 10, 2011, 07:43:54 pm
All i see is germany
I saw the Iroquois Confederacy in those statements.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: kukufarikki on September 10, 2011, 07:52:51 pm
All i see is germany

your avatar, my eyes, i'm glad i don't have epilepsy
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Shadowren on September 10, 2011, 08:47:54 pm
I think claims are useless now since that map will be split some weird way.

But of course there still will be fighting about it, like LLJK seems to be going for the desert again.  :D
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Jarlek on September 11, 2011, 12:26:55 am
This is the same kind of "Heh, good luck with that, LLJK" stuff that was posted when the Shogunate attacked us, just FYI.

I've been completely unimpressed with the fighting ability of about 90% of EU clans in this iteration of Strategus.
Who's the 10%?
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 11, 2011, 12:36:38 am
Who's the 10%?
Legio, Bashi-Bazouks, and the split clans like Risen and Fallen.

You know, the EU clans that actually did anything ever during this iteration. The ones who actually fought battles and didn't just take up space while they plotted like some brain damaged Rodrigo Borgia.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Jarlek on September 11, 2011, 12:38:53 am
Legio, Bashi-Bazouks, and the split clans like Risen and Fallen.

You know, the EU clans that actually did anything ever during this iteration.
xD We are split clan already? Our might NA battalion of 3 must have really impressed you guys xD

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Matey on September 11, 2011, 12:54:03 am
Merc and DRZ archers stood out from my experience.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 11, 2011, 01:01:02 am
Merc and DRZ archers stood out from my experience.
I've got nothing against the players themselves, nor am I begrudging their skills. I actually quite liked the DRZ guys and a lot of other EU players. It's just the environment the EU clans have created for themselves that's just toxic.

More than a third of the Strat map is dominated by clans that refuse to fight internet horsies in a game about fighting internet horsies. That's a giant fucking problem.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Dach on September 11, 2011, 01:11:09 am
I'm a cute bitch.

New avatar to prove it!  8-)
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Thovex on September 11, 2011, 01:18:55 am
I've got nothing against the players themselves, nor am I begrudging their skills. I actually quite liked the DRZ guys and a lot of other EU players. It's just the environment the EU clans have created for themselves that's just toxic.

More than a third of the Strat map is dominated by clans that refuse to fight internet horsies in a game about fighting internet horsies. That's a giant fucking problem.

The intense fighting is awesome, it makes you fucking stream adrenaline when the end result is 24 vs 0 when both started with high number.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Dach on September 11, 2011, 01:25:33 am
Yruma Castle, I was there!  8-)

Free Companies Of Calradia  a:11508 s:41 k:11467   
[Knights Hospitaller]  a:12316 no survivors
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Canary on September 11, 2011, 02:01:38 am
I hated the thought of NE but just because I was in Eastern Tsardom doesn't mean I agreed with it. I think all alliances that big like NE and UIF are carebear nutcuppers.

It's funny, because the NE was supposedly designed to thwart the possibility of any giant EU alliance invading and dominating most of the NA population. They must've borrowed their business model from the people they set out to work in counter to - but ended up being passive against them anyway.

...I would also add Mercs to that list, btw. They did great.

Yes, and the Mercs may have had support from elsewhere, but they still operated in relative independence. While I don't (didn't) enjoy the bullshit discussion surrounding that conflict, it had some impressive displays presented by both sides.


Back on topic: War is fun, peace is not. Being comfortable and having to deal with less stress might be easier, but it removes the entire reason the system of strategus was set up - to play dog gone Mountain Glade Moribund. On the other hand, I see no reason a grudge should be held against anyone, and by the same token, a claim on a territory (basically an excuse to form a grudge against people). How often is it real and viable to call dibs on something and get away with it? Anyway, let's get some new conflicts started!
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Braeden on September 11, 2011, 04:21:21 am
Personally, I have no relations to carry over, but knowledge of who to trust and with what is trustworthy is eternal.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Spanish on September 11, 2011, 04:27:04 am
Where did I say it needed to be NE? or any of that at all? I hated the thought of NE but just because I was in Eastern Tsardom doesn't mean I agreed with it.

Dont remember the Eastern Tsardom being apart of any NE cuz that 6000 man army seemed to disappear but of course I dont know anything bout it, they might have used it valiantly somewhere.

Spaniard Agrees with Canary bout war is fun besides peace just gets you screwed over later so be in a war :D
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Tanreall on September 11, 2011, 01:24:22 pm
Who's the 10%?

The BashiBazouk rock.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 11, 2011, 01:51:13 pm
The BashiBazouk rock.
I don't think it can be said enough how much we enjoyed working with the Bashi-Bazouk/Risen/Legio guys. They seem to be like, the only European clans that realized Strategus is supposed to be about battles, not making giant alliances or ultra-nationalist roleplay, or doing absolutely nothing while waiting for THE PERFECT MOMENT TO STRIKE.

Of course, their willingness to work with NA clans and their refusal to sit around on their asses plotting schemes that will never happen will probably get them killed next Strategus by whatever super duper giant alliance claims the entirety of the EU side.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: okiN on September 11, 2011, 02:16:27 pm
Do you seriously not even realize those three clans were part of the super-alliance you claim to hate so much?
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 11, 2011, 02:20:01 pm
Do you seriously not even realize those three clans were part of the super-alliance you claim to hate so much?
I'm quite aware. I'm also quite aware that their alliance-mates did absolutely nothing over the course of Strat, as opposed to them.

You know what the means? That alliance was functionally useless. They weren't.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: okiN on September 11, 2011, 02:21:33 pm
And what did those three clans do? They helped you with a quick gankfest against a weakened enemy. Big whoop. :P

After they finished that, the only thing they did was prepare to gank Guards and Fallen.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 11, 2011, 02:22:13 pm
And what did those three clans do? They helped you with a quick gankfest against a weakened enemy. Big whoop. :P
The irony of a VRN guy saying this is staggering.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: okiN on September 11, 2011, 02:32:25 pm
Everyone has their own perspective. You guys like to big up the threat by talking about the number of clans that were supposedly allied against you, but that's pretty much just spin. It was a very loosely organized thing, and it's no surprise that you never mention the size of those clans and the amount of their total troop strength that they committed to fighting you. We were along for the ride because the sudden map speed nerf had ruined our start, but in the end support turned out to be pretty minimal, and a lot of stupid mistakes were made, so there you go.

Drawing parallels from that to UIF2 is pretty silly, and if you want irony, look no further than you complaining about super-alliances when it was one of those that bailed your ass out.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 11, 2011, 02:41:29 pm
Drawing parallels from that to UIF2 is pretty silly, and if you want irony, look no further than you complaining about super-alliances when it was one of those that bailed your ass out.
To my knowledge, the Risen/Legio/Bashi guys had roughly the same number of troops and fiefs as the Shogunate/Pillagers alliance. If they had allies beyond that, they didn't get dick from them. They also did not "bail our ass out", with respect to them. For all the constantly harped on inferiority of LLJK players and the supposed prowess of the Shogunate's and their buddies, I didn't see a single thing to be impressed with that entire war. Awful planning, awful fighting, awful tactics.

And I've already clarified my position on this: If you absolutely feel the need to be in a giant fucking alliance, at least fucking do something. Don't sit around taking up a third of the map gloating like some even lazier Jabba the Hutt.

I mean, Jesus, the entire point of the last Strategus was to find bugs. Exactly how many bugs did the Grey Order or DRZ find? A quick look at the Strat Issues subforum shows that nearly everything was reported by NA clans.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: okiN on September 11, 2011, 02:58:12 pm
That's my point, the entire war was a silly clusterfuck and nobody really seemed to have their shit together. In the battles VRN fought we lost something like 900 of our troops against 1600 of yours (plus about 400 ill-equipped villagers we had captured pretty much for free), but that didn't really mean much in the end. That's why I think it's funny that you guys keep making such a big deal out of it -- a bunch of the clans supposedly involved didn't actually do anything. For our part, the only clan we were ever allied with were the Sea Raiders, and I can tell you right now that this loosely-knit coalition where each clan had different goals and many just deserted rather than fighting was absolutely nothing like the mega-alliance in the west.

It also strikes me as strange that you keep bragging about how many of you there are, but you don't seem to think that gives smaller clans any justification for treating you as a serious threat and banding together. I get that you want to write your own narrative with you as the heroes and everyone else as bad guys, but gimme a break. Also, do you really think Risen/Bashi/Legio/Union would have sent all their armies out on campaign if they didn't have Greys watching their back? Come on, you benefited from their support as much as anybody. Greys didn't exactly do nothing, either; they did wipe out a few small clans that happened to get on their bad side.

As for the testing part, our Polish friends certainly didn't help much that I saw (aside from raising the account sharing issue on the table again), but to their credit DRZ actually discovered a number of bugs and exploits. Unfortunately they did pretty much make the most of some of them, but there you go, it's not like they're alone in that.

Anyway, that's all in the past, next round is a brave new world. Nothing really happened in this Strat that I'd consider very important for us, though we did learn a few lessons from both our own experiences and events elsewhere. We'll see how it goes with the new changes and all.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: NuberT on September 11, 2011, 02:59:48 pm
they didnt need support from their friends because they had nothing to fear, as all their neighbors were friends..

grey,22nd,legio,union,drz, and bashi are big friends and wouldnt have fought each other, which made strat quite boring from the beginning
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: okiN on September 11, 2011, 03:01:45 pm
Exactly. Unlike everyone else on the map, none of them ever really had anything to worry about. They're playing a different game from the rest of us.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Karmazyn on September 11, 2011, 03:23:02 pm
Victory conditions and rules can fix this problem, like:
1. A winner can be only one faction never a coalition.
2. A winner faction will be listening as best faction in crpg (champions).
3. Strategus is about war so no landowner faction can have alliances with all neighbors.
4. Every landowner faction need to make war against at least one of the neighbors, only peace period of 2+- weeks is allowed.
5. If a faction do not follow the victory conditions it can lose all fiefs.


Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Jarlek on September 11, 2011, 03:32:14 pm
Ok, let's clear this up. The only alliance we (Risen) are in is with Bashi and Legio. You keep saying we were in a "huge ass coalition" with Greys and DRZ and satan or whatever. The fact is. We just have FRIENDLY RELATIONS with them. We were never allied, we just didn't have any reason to fight them. Why would we fight both Shogunate + allies and at the same time the Greys? And why would the Greys attack us, leaving them possibly open to attacks from the North/East? And yeah, we are friends with each other. We play the same game and we respect each other. Is that not allowed?

Besides, who should we have gone to war with? The Greys in the north, which we really like, or the Shogunate in the east which tried to disband our alliance and kept telling us how much better they are then us.

Stop claiming there was a huge coalition after you guys, just because you managed to piss off all your neighbors and got crushed from it.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: okiN on September 11, 2011, 03:36:29 pm
Wait, you had friendly relations with Satan? Anyway, they must have been really friendly given that 22nd and Greys went to war with RuConquista just to defend you guys and Union.

Also, I'm not sure but you seem to think I'm a member of Byzantium or something. Or were you talking to somebody else? :)
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Jarlek on September 11, 2011, 03:59:33 pm
Wait, you had friendly relations with Satan? Anyway, they must have been really friendly given that 22nd and Greys went to war with RuConquista just to defend you guys and Union.

Also, I'm not sure but you seem to think I'm a member of Byzantium or something. Or were you talking to somebody else? :)
No, we didn't have any friendly relations with Satan. It was just to express how some people think about "those mean evil, Risen/Bashi/Legio/Grey... who BEATS us IN A GAME :O They are so evil!"

And about the RuConquista. They didn't go to war with them to "protect" us. They had their own quarrels and reason to attack. They were never a threat to us btw (Risen/Bashi/Legio, which, you know, is the Young Mens Calradian Alliance) because they were so far away. I don't know WHY the 22nd and Greys helped out, maybe they got paid, maybe they were just nice or maybe they just wanted stable and friendly neighbors instead of a war torn volatile border.

Also I know you are VRN, you tool! It was a post to everyone to clear things up.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: okiN on September 11, 2011, 04:02:55 pm
All right, if you say so. Either way, I just hope the next round will be a little more exciting, but I haven't really got very high hopes. Slantedfloors definitely has a point that many clans seem to just want land for the sake of holding it rather than using it to fight proper wars. Not that LLJK exactly spent a lot of time on the offensive, either.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Teeth on September 11, 2011, 04:21:02 pm
LLJK like to wave around their e-peen.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Jarlek on September 11, 2011, 04:28:43 pm
All right, if you say so. Either way, I just hope the next round will be a little more exciting, but I haven't really got very high hopes. Slantedfloors definitely has a point that many clans seem to just want land for the sake of holding it rather than using it to fight proper wars. Not that LLJK exactly spent a lot of time on the offensive, either.
That was because both them and us were HACKED when we tried to attack. Makes you not want to do anything risky. Almost happened after the spawns were changed (to multiple attacker) and we launched our offensive. Luckily this time we managed to change it back again. Not sure about the details, just remember Thovex saying it during the battle before.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: hotcobbler on September 11, 2011, 05:13:17 pm
It's MY island.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on September 11, 2011, 05:34:42 pm
I think LLJK is mainly bragging because 1.) they know it annoys people 2.) They are smart enough not to take this game seriously and 3.) countless people were saying that LLJK would be wiped off the map right after strat started due to being horrible in battle... and then LLJK proved them wrong.

The important thing though, is that I am amused by all of this (as in all of strat, it is an amusing little thing).
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 11, 2011, 05:42:49 pm
LLJK like to wave around their e-peen.
Of course we do. And unlike the Shogunate we actually have the skill to back it up, too.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on September 11, 2011, 05:48:35 pm
Where did Gaga go anyways...
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 11, 2011, 05:49:29 pm
Where did Gaga go anyways...
Vision quest. Won't be back till he finds his spirit animal.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Teeth on September 11, 2011, 06:04:41 pm
Of course we do. And unlike the Shogunate we actually have the skill to back it up, too.
Ouch that hurts, oh wait I wasnt even in Shogunate when they got defeated.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: The_Devious_Duc_Volpe on September 11, 2011, 06:07:43 pm
Vision quest. Won't be back till he finds his spirit animal.
http://www.jerismithready.com/quiz/

Let us see.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: The_Angle on September 11, 2011, 06:48:32 pm
Anti-LLJK Coalition was infact just a set of words tossed around loosely in jest. The clans were infact just a group of like-minded people whom seperately without any cooperation at all tried to take your lands.

SIKRET SHOOGOONAT PLAN@S@¬!@!!! CTHULHU S:ERKS!!! OSAMA NUT REAL.

Paranoid much? :B

Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Cicero on September 11, 2011, 06:50:42 pm
we gonna make same alliance and rule again so okin will whine with his 15 bandit troops in strategus (be careful about VRN but maybe they can wipe us =( )
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 11, 2011, 06:53:14 pm
Anti-LLJK Coalition was infact just a set of words tossed around loosely in jest. The clans were infact just a group of like-minded people whom seperately without any cooperation at all tried to take your lands.
I don't even know what to say.

We literally posted a recording of one of the coalition's planning sessions. Which included all of the coalitions major actors. A recording where they all agreed to work together to get rid of us, all agreeing that we needed to go because we "play for fun". Then they all confirmed the existence of the coalition in the thread we made outing them. Then they attacked in unison, one after another within a period of five hours.

And your supposition is that it was all in our heads? I literally have no words for how retarded you are.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: The_Angle on September 11, 2011, 06:55:09 pm
Bro.




...



















...























...













UMAD?
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 11, 2011, 06:55:53 pm
I don't get mad about internet horsies. I get mad about social injustice.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: The_Angle on September 11, 2011, 07:04:49 pm
I dunno about you, for a time I was a member of Acre for a short space of time. And we told one of your guys to leave our lands and you came in and said ''We're going to kill all you british fucks''. This isn't the first time, this shits happened(Having been in Shogunate previously). And you wonder why people dislike you?
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 11, 2011, 07:07:00 pm
I dunno about you, for a time I was a member of Acre for a short space of time. And we told one of your guys to leave our lands and you came in and said ''We're going to kill all you british fucks''. This isn't the first time, this shits happened(Having been in Shogunate previously). And you wonder why people dislike you?
Amazingly, we have little tolerance for people who demand we leave land they have no control over so they can have their pretend Jerusalem AND who are also plotting against us.

That dog won't hunt, Monseigneur.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: The_Angle on September 11, 2011, 07:08:10 pm
Hypocracy my friend.






And, also oh noes NWO BRO.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Jarlek on September 11, 2011, 07:24:56 pm
Slanted. Why are you having a conversation with a guy who knows jack shit about what's going on?
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: The_danish_lost_viking on September 11, 2011, 07:39:29 pm
When dó strategus start up again?
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on September 11, 2011, 07:42:25 pm
In theory, seven days from when the freeze was announced, assuming that some stupid moron does not delay it by creating a big mess for the devs to fix (like all the scams lately).
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Rikthor on September 11, 2011, 07:43:59 pm
That's my point, the entire war was a silly clusterfuck and nobody really seemed to have their shit together. In the battles VRN fought we lost something like 900 of our troops against 1600 of yours (plus about 400 ill-equipped villagers we had captured pretty much for free), but that didn't really mean much in the end. That's why I think it's funny that you guys keep making such a big deal out of it -- a bunch of the clans supposedly involved didn't actually do anything. For our part, the only clan we were ever allied with were the Sea Raiders, and I can tell you right now that this loosely-knit coalition where each clan had different goals and many just deserted rather than fighting was absolutely nothing like the mega-alliance in the west.

more words

I think you need to give the full story there, because I am sure hacking something to do with the fact we lost that battle rather than VRN SUPREME BATTLE TACTICS. Every clan, including VRN, in the Coalition of the Not So Honorable™ got destroyed or were made moot. It's also funny you say you only had semi relations with one clan despite the fact you weren't and then you claim Risen/Bashi/LEgio are in a mage alliance when they same the same thing.

In other words, you lost to the absolute worst clan in the game, with 8 other clans helping you, and you are still trying to make excuses why you did.

As for Risen/Bashi/Legio, A++ transaction would buy work with from again.

Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Jarlek on September 11, 2011, 07:47:14 pm
I think you need to give the full story there, because I am sure hacking something to do with the fact we lost that battle rather than VRN SUPREME BATTLE TACTICS. Every clan, including VRN, in the Coalition of the Not So Honorable™ got destroyed or were made moot. It's also funny you say you only had semi relations with one clan despite the fact you weren't and then you claim Risen/Bashi/LEgio are in a mage alliance when they same the same thing.

In other words, you lost to the absolute worst clan in the game, with 8 other clans helping you, and you are still trying to make excuses why you did.

As for Risen/Bashi/Legio, A++ transaction would buy work with from again.
Wut? Is that some sort of... american rating thingie? Please educate me about this...
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Rikthor on September 11, 2011, 07:56:19 pm
Wut? Is that some sort of... american rating thingie? Please educate me about this...

Haha yeah sorry, its an ebay thing when rating someone's transaction.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on September 11, 2011, 07:58:13 pm
Wut? Is that some sort of... american rating thingie? Please educate me about this...

A++ is a mockery of the A+ score in school (97% or higher marks), basically saying it was better then perfect, similar to other idiotic sayings like "I'll give 110% effort!"

Also, eBay apparently uses it.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Jacko on September 11, 2011, 08:02:50 pm
Also, America is only AA- nowadays.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 11, 2011, 08:03:22 pm
Slanted. Why are you having a conversation with a guy who knows jack shit about what's going on?
Quite frankly, I don't know why I try to have any conversations on these forums at all. It's always like trying to talk to a heavily-sedated brick wall.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Smoothrich on September 11, 2011, 09:09:52 pm
Hypocracy my friend.


And, also oh noes NWO BRO.

It makes sense, this guy was in Acre who LLJK annihilated with barely any casualties in one of the first wars in the game.  Then he joined Byzantium, who LLJK also annihilated with help from our Legio/Bashi/Risen bros.  LLJK fought a fief attack in shogunate lands, on EU server, with half LLJK players and half EU mercs of our friendly clans, and we beat shogunate killing about 300 more tickets then we lost.  It was a nice hilly field battle too so it was all about Superior Goon Tactics (strong EU archers, Bashibazouk flanking berserkers, LLJK cav, hilariously fragile LLJK infantry in the middle that constantly baited shogunate into reckless charges by dying and falling back PURPOSELY getting Shogunate overextended and outflanked).  That was one of my favorite LLJK strategus fights as it was a very pitched battle, but their bonzai charges and Inferior Weeabo Tactics were no match.

And yes, you can't even pretend that ATS and Shogunate didn't go to every clan's teamspeak and vent that played the game in order to foster a great alliance to eliminate LLJK immediately from Strategus within the first 2 weeks, because we "didn't take the game seriously enough"  and "liked to have fun."  Really, this was the Casus belli for the first gigantic alliance in the game to form.  How embarrassing for all participants of that little cabal.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 11, 2011, 09:17:53 pm
That was one of my favorite LLJK strategus fights as it was a very pitched battle, but their bonzai charges and Inferior Weeabo Tactics were no match.
It really cannot be stated how funny that battle was. They charged directly into a killbox like fifteen times. Usually our teamspeak is pretty reserved during battles, but we were laughing our asses off during that one.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Tears of Destiny on September 11, 2011, 09:18:54 pm
I think LLJK do so well because they don't take themselves seriously... :lol:

But what do I know? Nothin! That is what!
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: SPQR on September 11, 2011, 10:13:33 pm
I think LLJK do so well because they don't take themselves seriously... :lol:

But what do I know? Nothin! That is what!

This is the key to strategus. It's just RISK: My Little Pony Edition

Taking it any more seriously than that is a fast way to burn yourself out
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: PhantomZero on September 11, 2011, 10:33:24 pm
This is the key to strategus. It's just RISK: My Little Pony Edition

Taking it any more seriously than that is a fast way to burn yourself out

I don't know about you mister, but I take my RISK very seriously. If I start to lose I just flip the board over and call the other players bundle of stickss for allying against me and how horribly unfair that is.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Jarlek on September 11, 2011, 10:36:41 pm
I don't know about you mister, but I take my RISK very seriously. If I start to lose I just flip the board over and call the other players bundle of stickss for allying against me and how horribly unfair that is.
You are gonna love this:
http://www.boardgamegeek.com/boardgame/105134/risk-legacy

Here's an article:
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/112543-Risk-Legacy-Makes-Your-Board-Game-Decisions-Matter
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Renegat on September 11, 2011, 10:39:26 pm
Wow, so many poeple speak about my dear clan here :s

-We are arrogant and we said everywhere that we're far better than LLJK, risen, ect ... ?
Who posted a thread to congratulate risen-bashi-legio coalition? George, who's a byzantium. Of course, the good members of risen/bashi/legio roted this topic with insults and other kind messages ...
Some days after, the very mature thovex opened a new thread to congratulate himself about his great victory against us, and again this topic was only about trolling and insult against byzantium.
So who was really arrogant in here?

-We made a huge coalition against LLJK and risen/bashi/... and there was much more players in our coalition than in LLJK+legio+bashi+risen?
LOL?
First, in every battle i did, there was byzantium and pillagers, and some other players from various clans. But i didn't see any other clan participate in battles. I mean, there was no searaiders/templars/... with us ... And even if they were with us.
And plus, how dare you comparing templars (for exemple) and risen or LLJK? Their is, by far, more players in LLJK (for exemple) than in templars ... So please, stop saying that you fought literally alone against a huge coalition ;)


So, as many poeple are sharing their view about strategus on this topic, i ll give you mine :
For me, strategus would be realy good if their were not those 2 problems :
First, strategus seems to be all about the number of players in a clan. I mean, the best clan, so the one which will have the highest number of fief, will ever be the one which have the highest number of players. Of course, the number of player should be an important fact, but it should not be all about this fact. But also about general strategy, tactic, skills of clan members, ect (please don't say me that it's already the case, we all know that's not true).
Plus, a even more annoying problem, i couldn't participated to most battles because those battles was at 00h00, 01h, 02h, or 04h am.
Indeed, i actually have a life, i ve to wake up early (and i think it's the same for most of average crpg players) so i couldn't participate to those battles (which were by the way very important).. For exemple, most of the time, when our villages were attacked, it was not at 18h00 or 19h00, but at 00h00, 1h, or even 2h. So strategus would be fun if i could particpate to all battles which are concerning my clan and not only one or two because the rest are at stupid hours.

Notice, i managed to not insult or deride risen/bashi/legio/lljk despite i'm a bad arrogant byzantium ! (i'm certainly an exception !)

And sorry if i did grammar mistake, i'm only a poor french :(
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Renegat on September 11, 2011, 10:44:51 pm
Sorry, error x)
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Rikthor on September 11, 2011, 11:51:44 pm
stuff

Maybe you joined Byzantium after their renaming, I don't know, but they were the Shogunate, The Shogunate led the Coalition of the Not So Honorable™. The Coalition of the Not So Honorable consisted of:

Shogunate/Byzantium
SeaRaiders
Pecores
VRN
Knights Templar
Crusaders of Acre
Sovereignty of Aegis* (SoA realized what was coming from their not so honorable alliance leaders and broke away somewhat early on)

+

Aid from the Northern Empire (ATS, Hospitallers, TS, LL, Occitan)

So you see Renegat, before Risen/Bashi/Legio even attacked the first fief of Shogunate/Byzantium, we had 8 clans directly coming after just us plus help from another Alliance. That would be 12 clans against 1. We are making up claims, this is simply what happened. We have recordings of it that we posted on the forums for everyone to see. Hell, the actual password to Shogunate's most secret place to plot LLJK's demise was "lljk is gay". No matter, how much Ujin tried to spin things or now okiN, this is simply what happened.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Thovex on September 11, 2011, 11:58:07 pm
Wow, so many poeple speak about my dear clan here :s

-We are arrogant and we said everywhere that we're far better than LLJK, risen, ect ... ?
Who posted a thread to congratulate risen-bashi-legio coalition? George, who's a byzantium. Of course, the good members of risen/bashi/legio roted this topic with insults and other kind messages ...
Some days after, the very mature thovex opened a new thread to congratulate himself about his great victory against us, and again this topic was only about trolling and insult against byzantium.
So who was really arrogant in here?

-We made a huge coalition against LLJK and risen/bashi/... and there was much more players in our coalition than in LLJK+legio+bashi+risen?
LOL?
First, in every battle i did, there was byzantium and pillagers, and some other players from various clans. But i didn't see any other clan participate in battles. I mean, there was no searaiders/templars/... with us ... And even if they were with us.
And plus, how dare you comparing templars (for exemple) and risen or LLJK? Their is, by far, more players in LLJK (for exemple) than in templars ... So please, stop saying that you fought literally alone against a huge coalition ;)


So, as many poeple are sharing their view about strategus on this topic, i ll give you mine :
For me, strategus would be realy good if their were not those 2 problems :
First, strategus seems to be all about the number of players in a clan. I mean, the best clan, so the one which will have the highest number of fief, will ever be the one which have the highest number of players. Of course, the number of player should be an important fact, but it should not be all about this fact. But also about general strategy, tactic, skills of clan members, ect (please don't say me that it's already the case, we all know that's not true).
Plus, a even more annoying problem, i couldn't participated to most battles because those battles was at 00h00, 01h, 02h, or 04h am.
Indeed, i actually have a life, i ve to wake up early (and i think it's the same for most of average crpg players) so i couldn't participate to those battles (which were by the way very important).. For exemple, most of the time, when our villages were attacked, it was not at 18h00 or 19h00, but at 00h00, 1h, or even 2h. So strategus would be fun if i could particpate to all battles which are concerning my clan and not only one or two because the rest are at stupid hours.

Notice, i managed to not insult or deride risen/bashi/legio/lljk despite i'm a bad arrogant byzantium ! (i'm certainly an exception !)

And sorry if i did grammar mistake, i'm only a poor french :(

That's one big awesome QQ post that goes about a month ago - Strategus means lovely drama, Creating troll threads after Strategus battles makes people mad, which is in most cases the most fun thing to do right?

But I'd like some paragraphs please, so I can read it.  :)
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Cicero on September 12, 2011, 01:02:30 am
Wow, so many poeple speak about my dear clan here :s

-We are arrogant and we said everywhere that we're far better than LLJK, risen, ect ... ?
Who posted a thread to congratulate risen-bashi-legio coalition? George, who's a byzantium. Of course, the good members of risen/bashi/legio roted this topic with insults and other kind messages ...
Some days after, the very mature thovex opened a new thread to congratulate himself about his great victory against us, and again this topic was only about trolling and insult against byzantium.
So who was really arrogant in here?

-We made a huge coalition against LLJK and risen/bashi/... and there was much more players in our coalition than in LLJK+legio+bashi+risen?
LOL?
First, in every battle i did, there was byzantium and pillagers, and some other players from various clans. But i didn't see any other clan participate in battles. I mean, there was no searaiders/templars/... with us ... And even if they were with us.
And plus, how dare you comparing templars (for exemple) and risen or LLJK? Their is, by far, more players in LLJK (for exemple) than in templars ... So please, stop saying that you fought literally alone against a huge coalition ;)


So, as many poeple are sharing their view about strategus on this topic, i ll give you mine :
For me, strategus would be realy good if their were not those 2 problems :
First, strategus seems to be all about the number of players in a clan. I mean, the best clan, so the one which will have the highest number of fief, will ever be the one which have the highest number of players. Of course, the number of player should be an important fact, but it should not be all about this fact. But also about general strategy, tactic, skills of clan members, ect (please don't say me that it's already the case, we all know that's not true).
Plus, a even more annoying problem, i couldn't participated to most battles because those battles was at 00h00, 01h, 02h, or 04h am.
Indeed, i actually have a life, i ve to wake up early (and i think it's the same for most of average crpg players) so i couldn't participate to those battles (which were by the way very important).. For exemple, most of the time, when our villages were attacked, it was not at 18h00 or 19h00, but at 00h00, 1h, or even 2h. So strategus would be fun if i could particpate to all battles which are concerning my clan and not only one or two because the rest are at stupid hours.

Notice, i managed to not insult or deride risen/bashi/legio/lljk despite i'm a bad arrogant byzantium ! (i'm certainly an exception !)

And sorry if i did grammar mistake, i'm only a poor french :(
if you fail in diplomacy like ujin's sex tapes (joke) , u cant blame us ?

Like you tried to make a coaliton also :

DenBitre called but they were dead after they come to byzantium lands they didnt even send their 1.5k army so after the battle they teleported to somewhere else also roster support which ronald was playing and some other denbitre even if roland was our friend.

SeaRiders left byzantium cos u didnt help them against LLJK also roster support

VRN left byzantium cos u didnt help them against LLJK also roster support

Templars left byzantium cos u didnt help them against LLJK also roster support which our relations were going down about this.

Kapıkulu helped you with 3.5k army also roster support which were actually made u down lol they got 2-20 or 4-15 scores.

Pecores helped you with all their stuff which stopped LLJK for 1-2 days also roster support.

ATS sent 1 million strategus gold to byzantium to support them against LLJK which they never used it trololol.

Guards sent 2k army to war which we were waiting a bit more

So u tried to make a coaliton lets check results:
Pillagers :wiped
Byzantium:wiped
Kapıkulu:wiped 2nd time
Pecores:wiped
ATS:wiped
Seariders:Wiped and moved to somewhere else before our battles
VRN:Wiped and moved to somewhere else before our battles
Denbitre:AFK
Templars:moved to somewhere else after SoA attack

So you need to understand this is not a battle u need to select better friends as a diplomacy and ally with them.Like guards ? U announced that shogunate-guards ally 3 months before strat but they did NOTHING.

"It's not a war on drugs, it's a war on personal freedom, it´s what it is ok?. Keep that in mind at all times. Thank you!"
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: HarunYahya on September 12, 2011, 01:45:09 am
Cicero is lying !
Brave warriors of Shogunate stood against hordes of goons , mujahideens,legionaries,barbarians of north by themselves only they are the best and most honorable clan .
They don't backstab, they don't slander , they don't form alliances,they don't lie.
They are the protectors of holy divine weaboo dynasty.
Accept it and leave this topic noaw !

Shogunate BEST CLAN EVER GTFO !
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Dehitay on September 12, 2011, 01:49:20 am
So u tried to make a coaliton lets check results:
Pillagers :wiped
Byzantium:wiped
Kapıkulu:wiped 2nd time
Pecores:wiped
ATS:wiped
Seariders:Wiped and moved to somewhere else before our battles
VRN:Wiped and moved to somewhere else before our battles
Pecores:Wiped
Denbitre:AFK
Templars:moved to somewhere else after SoA attack
Wow, Pecores got both wiped and Wiped. Impressive wipeage in 2 different forms of capitalization
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Slantedfloors on September 12, 2011, 01:54:31 am
Templars:moved to somewhere else after SoA attack
Naw, they attacked us and we rolled them like a drunk guy at a homeless shelter.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Cicero on September 12, 2011, 01:55:16 am
Wow, Pecores got both wiped and Wiped. Impressive wipeage in 2 different forms of capitalization
lol sorry i ll edit it really too many clans that i even misstype =)
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Rikthor on September 12, 2011, 02:08:06 am
Naw, they attacked us and we rolled them like a drunk guy at a homeless shelter.

What slanted said.

Templars tried to attack us, SoA booted them out of their area. Templars came back on LLJKD-Day and were one of the 5, 1-1.5k man armies that attacked us.  They were also stomped and laughed out of afghoonistan.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Matey on September 12, 2011, 02:22:54 am
then they suicided against us up north.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Jarlek on September 12, 2011, 03:29:45 am
then they suicided against us up north.
They did? Lol. I didn't know that.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Matey on September 12, 2011, 03:32:00 am
yeah, sent 4000 to die at tismirr, then gave their other 4k to save sumbuja (chaos owned) from us.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Jarlek on September 12, 2011, 03:36:30 am
yeah, sent 4000 to die at tismirr, then gave their other 4k to save sumbuja (chaos owned) from us.
Nice to hear from the other side of the world too :D Since it's wiped again, mind giving me a small recap? Just the facts, no silly "backstabber junkie clan is evilz" or something :P
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Matey on September 12, 2011, 03:44:37 am
eh we just had our huge war with DRZ going on after the NE war. Templars said they were staying out of the NE war, but joined against us when DRZ sent its initial attacks and said they were supporting Hospitallers. so we killed them pretty bad in Tismirr (TKoV village), and then they brought up the rest of their army from the south and reinforced Sumbuja after we attacked it... thus saving sumbuja. then we tied all those troops in sumbuja till the freeze.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: DrTaco on September 12, 2011, 04:26:41 am
I have the sinking (And by sinking I mean this could be good or bad) feeling that LLJK will take over all of NA, and launch a grand campaign against all of EU.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Keshian on September 12, 2011, 05:46:18 am
I have the sinking (And by sinking I mean this could be good or bad) feeling that LLJK will take over all of NA, and launch a grand campaign against all of EU.

I think you should be a lot more worried about BIRD clan than LLJK, Partyboy was holding back last strategus to give you EU guys a chance.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Captain_Georges on September 12, 2011, 01:20:52 pm
its like ww1 and ww2. we lost both, but we are the cooler side.

haters gonna hate, shogu's gonna skate

also, cicero is obviously the male mata hari.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: The_Angle on September 12, 2011, 01:21:05 pm
This whole thread should be renamed ''Shit talk Byzantium, inviting all Goons and Goonvassals''.

Smells like highschool girl-talk in here.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Dehitay on September 12, 2011, 02:11:30 pm
its like ww1 and ww2. we lost both, but we are the cooler side.

So you're Germany then? I thought you were going more for Japan
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Jarlek on September 12, 2011, 02:44:46 pm
its like ww1 and ww2. we lost both, but we are the cooler side.

haters gonna hate, shogu's gonna skate

also, cicero is obviously the male mata hari.
While I can agree with Imperial Germany, but chocolate chip cookie Germany being the "cool" side? This is just wrong on so many levels. Somebody tell mr. Holocaust fan that he should keep shit like that to himself.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: The_Angle on September 12, 2011, 03:07:09 pm
Theres no taboo in a love for chocolate chip cookie Aesthetics. Heck who wouldn't want to get one of those snazzy uniforms?(Apart from PC people).

*Edit*If you play CoD:WaW or Day of Defeat, everytime you log into a server and you goto the selection screen for your team, you'll find that the chocolate chip cookie-Germany team is either already full or has the most players. Doesn't make them chocolate chip cookie.

Also if you compliment on their prowess in engineering, that also doesn't make you a chocolate chip cookie. Making a note here.
              Alaric,
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Overdriven on September 12, 2011, 03:52:42 pm
While I can agree with Imperial Germany, but chocolate chip cookie Germany being the "cool" side? This is just wrong on so many levels. Somebody tell mr. Holocaust fan that he should keep shit like that to himself.

That depends on entirely which way you look at it. Yes chocolate chip cookie Germany was wrong on many levels, but they also had some of the best military commanders and innovators of modern warfare. Just because there were dark aspects of the time, doesn't mean there weren't things to be impressed of coming from that country.

Hell just look at Rommel. One of the most distinguished commanders of the war, yet it's well documented that he consistently disagreed with much that was happening within Germany to the point where he was ordered to commit suicide after being linked with a plot to kill einstein. Not all was bad in that country.

Don't be so damn touchy.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Jarlek on September 12, 2011, 05:31:45 pm
That depends on entirely which way you look at it. Yes chocolate chip cookie Germany was wrong on many levels, but they also had some of the best military commanders and innovators of modern warfare. Just because there were dark aspects of the time, doesn't mean there weren't things to be impressed of coming from that country.

Hell just look at Rommel. One of the most distinguished commanders of the war, yet it's well documented that he consistently disagreed with much that was happening within Germany to the point where he was ordered to commit suicide after being linked with a plot to kill einstein. Not all was bad in that country.

Don't be so damn touchy.
I know all of that, but I would never call the chocolate chip cookies "cool". Stylish, hell yeah! Every gay mans hidden fantasy (those boots!), also hell yeah!

But COOL?!?!?! Fuck dat!
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Nessaj on September 12, 2011, 06:26:56 pm
Basically every page in this thread is about something totally different :rolleyes:

Next page, ALIEN INVASION CONSPIRACIES!
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: Warcat on September 12, 2011, 06:31:16 pm
Don't care what happens, I want Zagush.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: The_Angle on September 12, 2011, 07:21:09 pm
UFO came an tooc mi famillee awai halp

*Edit* Didn't reach next page, rage.
Title: Re: Will you pay attention to "Ancestral Territorial Claims" for new Strategus?
Post by: DrTaco on September 13, 2011, 12:50:30 am
The S.S. committed most of the atrocities of WW2. Don't bitch at the Wehrmacht because of them. ANYWAY.

Bird clan is best clan?