1
General Discussion / Re: Welcome Back Package [150k Gold, 3 Heirloom Points]
« on: December 12, 2021, 02:01:03 am »
Character name: Sral
package sent ✔
package sent ✔
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2
General Discussion / Re: Describe crpg with gifs
« on: January 27, 2016, 09:41:08 pm » (click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
3
General Discussion / Re: 24 hour Heirloom point flash sale is back!
« on: January 12, 2016, 05:11:57 pm »4
General Off Topic / Re: "Cologne sex attacks"
« on: January 08, 2016, 12:45:57 am »Northern Europe(and my country) are so incredibly humane, that you are better off not touching robbers and just letting it happen. Even if someone breaks into your house, its just better to leave or go back to sleep than trying to confront the robber, even if your life was at threat(unless you have fucktons of evidence to back it). Somehow these countries are so horribly frightened of even a slightest form of vigilantism, that citizens arent really allowed to even touch a lawbreaker, let alone stop them.
It's fucked up here too, anyway if your life is at risk, always defend yourself (or run if you can't defend yourself, just don't stay there if you plan to do nothing)
There's a saying here "A bad trial is better than a good funeral".
Few years ago (near Verona if i remember well) a guy blocked 2 thieves who were about to break into his house, then he tied them up and waited for the cops; later the 2 thieves reported the house owner for abduction... " ehi i'm gonna break into your house, if you stop me i'm gonna report you for abduction or unlawful restraint"
If I you end up hurting badly an intruder who broke into your house, maybe you'd better make him disappear in the wood-burning stove or in the garden, rather than calling the cops
5
General Off Topic / Re: Christians plotting to bomb London
« on: January 05, 2016, 04:16:39 pm »http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35231046
Lel imagine if those savages try to do something like that in eastern Europe or southern Italy, how long before they are gonna get shrekt?
6
Spam / Re: I'VE 99 PROBLEMS, BUT A (V)ITCH AINT ONE.
« on: January 04, 2016, 02:19:58 pm »
Panos terrone
8
General Off Topic / Re: I ask you Romans !
« on: November 17, 2015, 03:14:36 pm »Why are you stupid enough to go to war with the Parthians? They're gonna wreck you!
Not really, the ancient romans sacked/captured the capital of the Parthian empire 3 times.
Quote
The Roman–Parthian Wars (66 BC – 217 AD) were a series of conflicts between the Parthian Empire and the Roman Republic and Roman Empire. It was the first series of conflicts in what would be 719 years of Roman–Persian Wars.
Early incursions by the Roman Republic against Parthia were repulsed, notably at the Battle of Carrhae (53 BC). During the Roman Liberators' civil war of the 1st Century BC, the Parthians actively supported Brutus and Cassius, invading Syria, and gaining territories in the Levant. However, the conclusion of the second Roman civil war brought a revival of Roman strength in Western Asia.
In 113 AD, the Roman Emperor Trajan made eastern conquests and the defeat of Parthia a strategic priority, and successfully overran the Parthian capital, Ctesiphon, installing Parthamaspates of Parthia as a client ruler. Hadrian, Trajan's successor, reversed his predecessor's policy, intending to re-establish the Euphrates as the limit of Roman control. However, in the 2nd century, war over Armenia broke out again in 161, when Vologases IV defeated the Romans there. A Roman counter-attack under Statius Priscus defeated the Parthians in Armenia and installed a favored candidate on the Armenian throne, and an invasion of Mesopotamia culminated in the sack of Ctesiphon in 165.
In 195, another Roman invasion of Mesopotamia began under the Emperor Septimius Severus, who occupied Seleucia and Babylon, and then sacked Ctesiphon yet again in 197. Parthia ultimately fell not to the Romans, but to the Sassanids under Ardashir I, who entered Ctesiphon in 226. Under Ardashir and his successors, Persian-Roman conflict continued between the Sassanid Empire and Rome.
9
General Off Topic / Re: Meanwhile in Ukraine
« on: October 11, 2015, 05:17:25 pm »
I don't know if it was already posted
10
General Off Topic / Re: Refugees "flooding" Europe
« on: September 21, 2015, 09:23:18 pm »No need to be so defensive.
I only intended to clarify that these incidents which were used before to discredit German integration of Kurds and Turks are not daily business in Germany either. That's why I picked your post up. Wasn't aimed at you personally.
I wasn't defensive, I only said I never wrote that if some Kurds and Turks brawl/run over each other is a massive poroblem to society. if someone gets hurt even better, blood for the blood god.
"European leaders seek refugee deal with Turkey"
(click to show/hide)
11
General Off Topic / Re: Cryonics and cheating death
« on: September 20, 2015, 11:02:20 pm »
Eternal life for me!? For ever young? I would like to keep my body, or get a very OP one , better liver, or 2 livers, better organs in general and internal or retractile testicles, everything improved please.
12
General Off Topic / Re: Refugees "flooding" Europe
« on: September 20, 2015, 08:39:06 pm »Well, those are isolated cases in Germany too. Except your calling 3 to 5 times a year 20vs20 a massive problem in society
I've read about marriage parties having bigger fights.
Where have I said that is a massive problem to society if some Turks and Kurds run over each other with a car? I simply answered to the Swiss guy who wrote that clashes between Turks and Kurds are not even thinkable over there.
13
General Off Topic / Re: Refugees "flooding" Europe
« on: September 20, 2015, 07:41:10 pm »(click to show/hide)
But a major difference between Switzerland and Germany is that our foreigners are well integrated, even tho we have lots of serbs,bosniak, kosovar, I never saw any of them insult another. Something like the clash between kurds and turks inside germany is not even thinkable here.
Are you sure? If i'm not mistaken this happened in Switzerland
Turkish vs Kurds http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=617_1442119315 (click to show/hide)
I'm quite sure this is probably an isolated case, but saying it's unthinkable is a bit naive imo.
14
General Off Topic / Re: Refugees "flooding" Europe
« on: September 20, 2015, 04:51:06 pm »For fuck's sake, every time someone replies to this post I watch a few more minutes of it, and it gets worse every time. This time I watched around the 30 minutes mark and the Swede was making literal "omg u chocolate chip cookie u would have said that about the jews" comparisons. Christ.
I watched it too, that guy Henrik Arnstad is a total douche, then I googled some pictures of him and i found this pic among the first ones:
(click to show/hide)
It seems accurate.
" A:Drink everytime Arnstad says racism!
B: Thats a highway to liver faliure. "
15
General Off Topic / Re: Refugees "flooding" Europe
« on: September 20, 2015, 10:50:50 am »
From time to time i read several regional and national online newspapers .
One of news-websites I use to read to have some infos about what is happening in the rest of the country and the world went full retard on the refugees topic, two days ago they published an article with this picture on top
Well the picture is the classic "book-heart" like, as we say here, to create an emotional connection with the readers, but let's skip the picture, the title was retarded ( the day after they edited it) "Baby refugee crawling in front of the police in anti-riot formation" Which kind of headline is that? wtf
The article started (they edited it the next day and removed some pieces, the following bits i transated are still in the article but they moved them to the bottom) :
"Little pajama with dummies/puppets on it, bib and uncombed/ruffled curly hair: the small one crawls, looking around , then she sits. She is not at the kindergarten or in a park, not even in her room, but on the Instambul-Edirne highway, in front of a police cordon.
A baby Syrian refugee, not even one year old who waits, even her, to cross the border between Turkey and Greece, while the militaries are in formation behind the anti-riot shields, observing her with curiosity ( you are not behind a shield, you are the shield, can you stay behind yourself? Of course not. source: i was a shielder in a previous life, but i was trained in using any weapon, so at the occurence i could switch)
By looking at the small earrings you can clearly understand that the baby is a female, she has socks on her feet because she doesn't need shoes yet, too young to walk. She's much younger than the unlucky Aylan, who drowned near the beach of Bodrum, but the loneliness is the same, her position isn't much different either, but the baby Syrian has her head up and she can look forward."
People comments were like: "wtf? is that an article?Wtf is that journalism"
The article went on with other emotional bullshit, but as i said the day after they removed some pieces and changed the title.
Edit: the headline now is "Migrants: baby refugee cralwing in front of the police in anti-riot gear" Lmao
One of news-websites I use to read to have some infos about what is happening in the rest of the country and the world went full retard on the refugees topic, two days ago they published an article with this picture on top
(click to show/hide)
Well the picture is the classic "book-heart" like, as we say here, to create an emotional connection with the readers, but let's skip the picture, the title was retarded ( the day after they edited it) "Baby refugee crawling in front of the police in anti-riot formation" Which kind of headline is that? wtf
The article started (they edited it the next day and removed some pieces, the following bits i transated are still in the article but they moved them to the bottom) :
"Little pajama with dummies/puppets on it, bib and uncombed/ruffled curly hair: the small one crawls, looking around , then she sits. She is not at the kindergarten or in a park, not even in her room, but on the Instambul-Edirne highway, in front of a police cordon.
A baby Syrian refugee, not even one year old who waits, even her, to cross the border between Turkey and Greece, while the militaries are in formation behind the anti-riot shields, observing her with curiosity ( you are not behind a shield, you are the shield, can you stay behind yourself? Of course not. source: i was a shielder in a previous life, but i was trained in using any weapon, so at the occurence i could switch)
By looking at the small earrings you can clearly understand that the baby is a female, she has socks on her feet because she doesn't need shoes yet, too young to walk. She's much younger than the unlucky Aylan, who drowned near the beach of Bodrum, but the loneliness is the same, her position isn't much different either, but the baby Syrian has her head up and she can look forward."
People comments were like: "wtf? is that an article?Wtf is that journalism"
The article went on with other emotional bullshit, but as i said the day after they removed some pieces and changed the title.
Edit: the headline now is "Migrants: baby refugee cralwing in front of the police in anti-riot gear" Lmao