Author Topic: The Future of the NA Kingdoms  (Read 6054 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline [ptx]

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1871
  • Infamy: 422
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • such OP. so bundle of sticks. wow.
    • View Profile
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2012, 08:41:43 am »
+1
The only reason it seems that way is because they don't have a common first language to spout the same old generalisms with. All you have to do is take a look at their (grab a translator: I'm sure the Fallen have several who understand most of the represented languages) Teamspeaks, and you'll find the same sentiments are present in both groups.

The only real difference is NA's tendency toward fractionalism, which is more of a showcase for individualism in our culture as opposed to any greater degree of xenophobia.

Due to the greater willingness of EU clans to work with each other, it's not hard to come to the conclusion that they're going to look for a target they don't play with everyday.
You didn't quite follow the start of this Strat iteration, did you not?

Offline KaMiKaZe_JoE

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 904
  • Infamy: 117
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Cavalieres
  • Game nicks: KaMiKaZe _______
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2012, 04:30:57 pm »
0
The end times are upon us.

Fucking Russians.
"I don't think I'd want to meet anyone from cRPG. Sorry no offense lol" -TG

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2012, 05:06:27 pm »
+5
A strat wipe at this time would be pointless with the bugs that have been un-addressed, not to mention the general suggestions that have been great over the last 3 or 4 months have been ignored. 

So even if DRZ takes over the whole map, wiping strat is pointless if we're going to still have all the same familiar problems in strat 4.0
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Hobb

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 489
  • Infamy: 96
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TKoV
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2012, 05:27:04 pm »
+3
This is why we need na eu split.. If the table was reversed im sure na would have invaded eu

The fact that the big eu factions wont fight eachother is their problem

Either split eu/na or add victory objectives like in a strategy board game to give incentives to attack eachother

Maybe give crpg gold/ exp to The faction that wins

Offline Aseldo

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 147
  • Infamy: 80
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • you reading this?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TKoV
  • Game nicks: Egad_Captain_TKoV
  • IRC nick: Egad
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2012, 05:29:35 pm »
0
This is why we need na eu split.. If the table was reversed im sure na would have invaded eu

The fact that the big eu factions wont fight eachother is their problem

Either split eu/na or add victory objectives like in a strategy board game to give incentives to attack eachother

Maybe give crpg gold/ exp to The faction that wins

Kind of like risk :) I likey

Offline Rikthor

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 432
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: BOARD Clan
  • Game nicks: Historian_Rikthorrr
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2012, 06:19:14 pm »
+3
A strat wipe at this time would be pointless with the bugs that have been un-addressed, not to mention the general suggestions that have been great over the last 3 or 4 months have been ignored. 

So even if DRZ takes over the whole map, wiping strat is pointless if we're going to still have all the same familiar problems in strat 4.0

Seconding this sentiment, I mean its absolutely abysmal the way bugs have been addressed in Strat 2 and 3. Strat 4 won't be much different unless something changes. No amounts of suggestions will cover up underlying issues. I mean who can honestly say they didnt lose members of their clan to just how boring and unfun this iteration of Strat is. We lost a ton of people because it was a chadzonomics simulator instead of Strat 2. Strat 2 had bug issues and exploits of course but it was still a lot more fun.
Quote from: chadz
No matter how long you guys cry - I will not give in to dumbing strategus down because some people just want battles. If all you want are battles, then play cRPG, not strat. There are other people who like advanced gameplay.

Trolololololol

Offline dynamike

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1212
  • Infamy: 187
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Let's be friends again?
    • View Profile
    • The Remnants Clan Website
  • Faction: Stratia
  • Game nicks: Remnant_dynamike
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2012, 07:13:39 pm »
0
Not even to mention that there is by far not enough incentive for clans to take castles, much less cities. I mean we are discounting a huge portion of the game by having everyone just sit around in villages.

I WANTZ CITY SIEGES!  :mad:
For while the fire in the heart of a single Remnant still burns... can Stratia truly have fallen?

Offline CrazyCracka420

  • Minute Valuable Contributor
  • Strategus Councillor
  • **
  • Renown: 1950
  • Infamy: 794
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Welp
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vaegirs
  • Game nicks: Huseby
  • IRC nick: Steam name: crazycracka420
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #22 on: March 12, 2012, 07:15:25 pm »
+1
So...in conclusion:

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 - Stolen from Macropussy

Offline Turboflex

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 648
  • Infamy: 212
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Ravens of Valhalla
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #23 on: March 12, 2012, 07:41:21 pm »
0
Not even to mention that there is by far not enough incentive for clans to take castles, much less cities. I mean we are discounting a huge portion of the game by having everyone just sit around in villages.

I WANTZ CITY SIEGES!  :mad:

Yeah this. That's part of the fact that the economic system isn't quite completed.

Another major issue is that prosperity is still just a random # instead of reflecting actual player activity. There should also be some downside to owning fiefs, especially unprosperous, unpopulated ones.

Offline Garem

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 268
  • Infamy: 37
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
    • The Black Company forums
  • Faction: The Black Company
  • Game nicks: Garem_BlackCompany
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #24 on: March 12, 2012, 07:49:33 pm »
+4
Oh lookie! DRZ is wiping out NA while Grey and Friends take out Templars.

Gasp! How ever could this have happened? Ye gads!

HOW COULD WE HAVE KNOWN THEY WOULD TRAMPLE EVERYONE?!?!?! The horror!!!1!%!one!

Oh wait, we've pretty much known for two months that this shit was happening, and frankly long before that because we're not all blind.
The Black Company's Strategus Trainer
http://forum.melee.org/faction-halls/black-company-recruiting-na/
Forums: http://nadeathsquad.freeforums.org/
Formerly of the Fallen Brigade, Homeys4Lyfe

Offline 22nd_King_Plazek

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 87
  • Infamy: 57
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #25 on: March 12, 2012, 08:48:16 pm »
0
Wow Garem your such a smart guy.

Your foresight sure was useful.

Maybe you can use your crystal ball to help me win the lottery?

Offline SeQuel

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 446
  • Infamy: 129
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: SeQueL
  • IRC nick: SeQueL
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #26 on: March 12, 2012, 08:50:36 pm »
+2
Wow Garem your such a smart guy.

Your foresight sure was useful.

Maybe you can use your crystal ball to help me win the lottery?

Me first.

Offline Kalp

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 750
  • Infamy: 253
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Form ranks, you maggots!
    • View Profile
    • Kahhhaaargaar!!! Uuurrr!!!
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Kalp_the_Grey
  • IRC nick: Kalp
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #27 on: March 12, 2012, 09:08:37 pm »
0
Oh lookie! DRZ is wiping out NA while Grey and Friends take out Templars.

Gasp! How ever could this have happened? Ye gads!

HOW COULD WE HAVE KNOWN THEY WOULD TRAMPLE EVERYONE?!?!?! The horror!!!1!%!one!

Oh wait, we've pretty much known for two months that this shit was happening, and frankly long before that because we're not all blind.
It seems poker's just not your game, Ike. I know: let's have a spelling contest!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
The goal of Strategus battles shouldnt be to deprive your enemies of players, but to have full roster both sides and have the gear/tactics/strategy win the day rather than lack of merc support.

Offline Mannhammer

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 117
  • Infamy: 46
  • cRPG Player
  • Only War is Eternal
    • View Profile
    • Forty Thousand Years In The Future
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #28 on: March 12, 2012, 09:36:58 pm »
0
Oh lookie! DRZ is wiping out NA while Grey and Friends take out Templars.

Gasp! How ever could this have happened? Ye gads!

HOW COULD WE HAVE KNOWN THEY WOULD TRAMPLE EVERYONE?!?!?! The horror!!!1!%!one!

Oh wait, we've pretty much known for two months that this shit was happening, and frankly long before that because we're not all blind.

I love how the UIF gets all uppity when their transparent plans are revealed. 
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Penguin

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 670
  • Infamy: 121
  • cRPG Player
  • JesusChrist
    • View Profile
  • Faction: [A]rrows Incoming!
  • Game nicks: [Y]Retreat!
Re: The Future of the NA Kingdoms
« Reply #29 on: March 12, 2012, 10:35:09 pm »
+3
NA should unite and forge a temporary alliance. Fallen, Hate, Chaos, Hospi, LLJK all fighting alongside eachother to drive the EU menace out of our lands. We are better than that, if we are going to lose our lands, then let's go out swinging.

Do you want to roll over and let them steal everything you fought and bled for? Maybe I have misjudged you men, maybe you just want to run away, keep your precious equipment, and maybe own a small village somewhere in the far north...

And dying in your beds, many years from now, would you be willin' to trade ALL the days, from this day to that, for one chance, just one chance, to come back here and tell our enemies that they may take our lives, but they'll never take... OUR FREEDOM!
"As you gaze upon the cross, and long for conformity to him, be not weary or fearful because you cannot express in words what you seek. Ask him to plant the cross in your heart. Believe in him, the crucified and now living one, to dwell within you, and breathe his own mind there."