Author Topic: Inverse production efficiency.  (Read 974 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tristan

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 200
  • Infamy: 52
  • cRPG Player
  • Listen to wisdom!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild (Guards)
  • Game nicks: Guard_Tristan
  • IRC nick: Guard_Tristan
Inverse production efficiency.
« on: December 23, 2011, 02:31:21 pm »
+6
While I have made many suggestions to strat improvement, I am fully aware that not all can come at once or will at all be implemented.
The following suggestion is a minor improvement to the current workings of strat.

In short, inverse production efficiency.
or, said in other words, chance PE to increase, not decrease the more people are crafting in a village.

Effects?

1) Randomers would then be more welcome in villages, and we can even imagine tax as a payout to people working in the village.
2) It will primarily be a bump to larger clans with fewer villages. Which is good. This tends to leave room for other clans.
3) It is more logical, that a village with many citizens, investment and production would be more effective and grow faster.

Start with pe of 50% and let it increase the more there are working in a village with a max of 100%.
Be nice and give a bonus to PE if clanless or people from a different faction are working there as well (multicultural bonus? ;))
He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief. He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened his mouth.

Offline Sphinxer

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 53
  • Infamy: 16
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: _Sphinx_
Re: Inverse production efficiency.
« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2011, 11:09:05 pm »
+1
While I have made many suggestions to strat improvement, I am fully aware that not all can come at once or will at all be implemented.

Since when they do care about the suggestion section of the forum anyway ? They made it so people think they are helping out and they aren't going on IRC to PM cmp or chadz with their lame suggestion. So they made a section where players go and write their suggestions and argue between themselves.

I thought people would have understood by now ... how many suggestions were really implemented or even read ? lol

Offline Vovka

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1174
  • Infamy: 240
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Druzhina
  • Game nicks: Druzhina_Vovka
  • IRC nick: Vovka
Re: Inverse production efficiency.
« Reply #2 on: December 23, 2011, 11:14:43 pm »
0
Since when they do care about the suggestion section of the forum anyway ? They made it so people think they are helping out and they aren't going on IRC to PM cmp or chadz with their lame suggestion. So they made a section where players go and write their suggestions and argue between themselves.

I thought people would have understood by now ... how many suggestions were really implemented or even read ? lol
This week we planned several sieges of castles)) unfortunately a bug and the mechanics of battle broke our plans ^ ^ To be honest, I do not know when you have Christmas) We only have a New Year and the first 10 we drink)) Up to 31 workers weekdays

Total Time Spent Online:
    50 days, 19 hours and 39 minutes.


General Discussion
    294 posts of the member's 1192 posts (24.66%)

 
Strategus Issues
    67 posts of the board's 2941 posts (2.28%)

   
I think they read all this crap that we write here  :P
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline PieParadox

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 219
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: PieParadox
Re: Inverse production efficiency.
« Reply #3 on: December 23, 2011, 11:20:52 pm »
0
This actually makes perfect sense to me... SO LOGICAL!!!!

e: derp, tot makes a good point
« Last Edit: December 24, 2011, 01:49:15 am by PieParadox »

Offline Tot.

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 517
  • Infamy: 133
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Inverse production efficiency.
« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2011, 01:11:35 am »
0
Why would you bother capturing other villages then?
Mods compatible with cRPG. New crosshairs, textures, sounds, yay.

Offline Fluffy_Muffin

  • Permanently Banned
  • **
  • Renown: 429
  • Infamy: 122
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Tribunal
  • Game nicks: Vivec_the_Poet
  • IRC nick: Umbra
Re: Inverse production efficiency.
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2011, 01:17:28 am »
0
Why would you bother capturing other villages then?

I guess a cap on the population of the village would make you capture more villages.

Defy me, and you will know what it is to stand against a god.

Offline Tot.

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 517
  • Infamy: 133
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Inverse production efficiency.
« Reply #6 on: December 24, 2011, 01:29:36 am »
0
Kick out all randomers -> fill village with clanmates -> stagnation, no reason to expand further -> even less wars than now.
Mods compatible with cRPG. New crosshairs, textures, sounds, yay.

Offline Tristan

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 200
  • Infamy: 52
  • cRPG Player
  • Listen to wisdom!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild (Guards)
  • Game nicks: Guard_Tristan
  • IRC nick: Guard_Tristan
Re: Inverse production efficiency.
« Reply #7 on: December 25, 2011, 10:41:07 pm »
0
No, it would mean more wars as more people had the resources to actually wage war.

He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief. He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened his mouth.

Offline Tot.

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 517
  • Infamy: 133
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Inverse production efficiency.
« Reply #8 on: December 25, 2011, 10:53:13 pm »
0
War, what for?
Mods compatible with cRPG. New crosshairs, textures, sounds, yay.

Offline Tristan

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 200
  • Infamy: 52
  • cRPG Player
  • Listen to wisdom!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Caravan Guild (Guards)
  • Game nicks: Guard_Tristan
  • IRC nick: Guard_Tristan
Re: Inverse production efficiency.
« Reply #9 on: December 25, 2011, 11:02:15 pm »
0
Well in the current strat it would be better villages with better production prices.

However I do see your point in having unlimited spaces.

Something more along these lines would be better then:

       . . . .
    -         -
  -             -
-                 -
He is despised and rejected of men; a man of sorrows, and acquainted with grief. He was oppressed, and he was afflicted, yet he opened his mouth.

Offline Lepintoi

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 81
  • Infamy: 18
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Shu Han
  • Game nicks: Lepintoi
Re: Inverse production efficiency.
« Reply #10 on: December 25, 2011, 11:21:32 pm »
0
It's time for an autoresolve button...