Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Canary

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 93
16
Sure: Pulling things out of a weapon rack on battle or siege allows you to bypass upkeep and balance-related ammunition limitations and is therefore an exploit. Ban.

Making siege towers (or freaking catapults) has, in my experience, lead only to disruption of the way rounds play, where the portion of the team constructing anything is effectively doing nothing until it's finished and then waits for the enemy team to approach (or slowly wheels forward). Sure, you can do that kind of thing without siege gear, but incentivizing ways to have people effectively stop participating in the majority of a round, or worse, to skew map balance (imagine a siege tower on top of MotF or a siege flag) makes for a much worse game.


They ought to be disabled on non-strat servers like they were before.

17
General Discussion / Re: Show Us Your S Key
« on: August 26, 2014, 09:49:13 pm »
My 'S', 'W' and 'D' keys have these peculiar gashes in them.
(click to show/hide)

18
Announcements / Re: 0.3.0.4
« on: August 26, 2014, 09:46:18 am »
what? so you can't bumpslash anymore? bout fucking time, could not be arsed with that bullshit any longer.

No, rather the 50% damage penalty soft horsebumps already had is now also being applied to knockdown bumps.

19
Announcements / Re: 0.3.0.4
« on: August 26, 2014, 07:20:04 am »
That is utterly retarded.  People gonna hoplite bamboo spears and 1 shot horses.

"Hello I've never actually used a bamboo spear and shield against horses."

20
General Discussion / Re: [Applications] Item balancers
« on: August 26, 2014, 01:43:20 am »
I have lots of dumb opinions and the community already gets mad at me. I think I've got what it takes!

Jokes aside, considering the way the balance discussion and voting works, I have a very diversified perspective on how things go down in the game, having switched my main over to a character that I retire every time I get to 31 at the beginning of this strat; I try a different spec each gen and I'm about to hit gen 25.

I often take a contrary stance to popular opinion: I did over 7 gens of strength melee only after the so-called "strength nerf"(wpf reworking) went into place, because I wanted to find out for myself. There isn't doom and gloom and gamebreaking class ruination in balance, and overdramatizing has no place in a real discussion about game mechanics, let alone individual item balance, particularly when that tends to work out to mostly single plus ones and minus ones these days.

Even my own most vehement complaints are mostly half-hearted. It's easier to complain about something than it is to push yourself to get better. I know better, but I'm addicted to the whine.

I also have access to the damage viewer already...!

21
General Discussion / Re: When is next patch? We need valor back
« on: August 25, 2014, 11:19:21 pm »
It's happening.

22
General Discussion / Re: When is next patch? We need valor back
« on: August 25, 2014, 10:56:17 pm »
chadz patch
chadzbbage patch kids
patch chadzams
Miss cRPG beauty patcheant sponsored by chadz with donations from players like you.
chadzundred patchcent completion
patch, chadz
This apartment is patch adchadzent with a lovely view of the patch.
ain't no patchy like a crpg patchy 'cause when the chadzy gets patchy it don't stop
if patcher piper patched a patch of patch-ed peppers, how many chadz could a woodchadz chadz if a would chadz could patch now?
the apatchy were scattered when the chadzvalry arrived
does the 'c' in cRPG stand for chadz? Then the 'P' must be for Patch.
chadz PATCH.

...

...cmp, patch?

23
NA (Official) / Re: Ban Request: Jarl_Torstein and Jarl_Borg_
« on: August 25, 2014, 10:22:42 pm »
2 hour ban to each Jarl for intentional teamwounding, being first time offenders. If you have an issue where you think someone is breaking the rules report it or post a ban request, taking matters into your own hands in this manner is not okay.

24
Chaos or Something vs. Ironsides, Ironsides no-show.

25
Scheduling / Re: NA Event Server Bookings
« on: August 20, 2014, 11:33:37 pm »
[Event/Tournament abbreviation] OCNA 3s
[Teams involved] Chaos or Something vs Ironsides
[Date & time] Thursday, August 21st @ 10:00pm Eastern (9:00 Central)

26
Game Admin Feedback / Re: [Global] Canary
« on: August 19, 2014, 03:59:09 am »
You said it's not an exploit, but it is, in more ways than one.

The rules do say "no exploiting of any kind"

27
NA (Official) / Re: Ban Request: Gheist_Ritter
« on: August 19, 2014, 03:23:00 am »
Not the first time Ingleram has created this kind of issue.

24 hour ban.


28
Game Admin Feedback / Re: [Global] Canary
« on: August 18, 2014, 11:33:50 pm »
What you did was the same as killing a team mate because you had seen him team kill before that.

Not quite - killing someone and stopping them from playing the round at all is not the same as removing an object that allows people (an entire team) to exploit game mechanics, whether or not that keeps them from enjoying the round the way they were planning.

The only rule that was broken was when u chose to grief us by breaking our box. If you were any kind of just admin at all you would ban yourself for doing that. Also, if it had been a rule we were breaking coming up and breaking our box is not the way to handle that. You have admin chat for a reason.

This is partly true. It's my mistake that I didn't handle the situation with more tact; I should've explained my point before or instead of acting it out.

It's not an exploit. It's plane and simply not against the rules, because there is nothing wrong with it.

You are ill-informed. Weapon racks allow you to avoid upkeep on any items pulled out of them. Additionally, throwing weapons, for instance, were absolutely not balanced around the potential to restock them in endless quantities during a round. The only legitimate use for a construction site on battle or siege is as a barricade.

29
Game Admin Feedback / Re: [Global] Canary
« on: August 18, 2014, 09:36:12 pm »
Exploiters.

30
Game Admin Feedback / Re: [Forums] [NA] Kalam's AMA
« on: August 17, 2014, 10:45:08 pm »
:mrgreen: I like the darker purples  :cry: Please add dark purple text!

dohohoho

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 93