Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Jacko

Pages: 1 ... 98 99 [100]

1486

Faction Halls / Re: Mercenaries [Recruitment ON]

« on: January 12, 2011, 11:37:55 am »

I never get why people think black is cool. It's not like it's a good colour for hiding. And the 80's ninja themes is, err, Special.. I'd say dress as a peasant if you wanna ninja people.

And no, black is not cool simply because it's black. Silly emos.

1487

General Discussion / Re: The NA Alarm List

« on: January 12, 2011, 11:32:32 am »

Alarm list..

Only on NA.

1488

Svenska/Norsk/Dansk Forum / Re: En acceptabel riddare stats/skills?

« on: January 12, 2011, 11:08:05 am »

Quote from: Aemaelius on January 11, 2011, 02:41:00 am

Min plan er, at han på lvl 30 skal være 18/18. 6IF, 6PS, 5 shield, 6WM, 4ath og 3 riding.
På lvl 35 vil han så blive 21/21, med 6 shield og 5 athletics og 7 ps.

Allting över 31 är önsketänkande och inte värt besväret. 30-31 är viable builds.

Ska du bygga en char runt riding Bör du ta något annat än 1h. Förslagsvis polearm (då kan du dessutom gå 2h på mark med den nya secondary mode som många 2h har (secondary 2h = polearm skill).
Du kan köra pole som secondary weapon med 1h som main, på 7wm bör du hamna någonstans 145 1h/90 pole. Kör du enbart 1 weapon skill hamnar du på dryga 150 på WM 6. Athletics är fint, men ju mer man sprider ut sina skills ju sämre blir man. Specialisering slår bredd. Riding var 3:e Agi så du behöver inte ha speciellt hög agi för riding 5 (15 närmare bestämt). Riding ger plus till "ridning" förutom att bara ge dig tillgång till higher tier horses.

http://infinitum.dyndns.org/crpg/calc.htm icke uppdaterad calc, men char planner funkar typ (inte riding).

1489

Faction Halls / Re: Mercenaries [Recruitment ON]

« on: January 11, 2011, 10:57:50 pm »

Quote from: Gnjus on January 11, 2011, 07:07:23 pm

~~Olwen( Lamhban, Casadh )~~ Loltrollwen

Fixed that for ya

1490

General Discussion / Re: Fix List v210

« on: January 11, 2011, 09:21:40 pm »

Quick feedback.

Xbow: Good price range. Might need minor dmg buff.
2h: Fine, but heir-loomed katana is Too fast, don't really fit.
Cav: A tad Too expensive.
Bow: Everkistus has the right idea, not sure about the amount of dmg, his numbers seems really low. I'd say TESTING needed (lazy bum devs).

Overall, GJ as always.

1491

General Discussion / Re: "Accused of exploiting Awlpikes"

« on: January 11, 2011, 10:24:07 am »

Quote from: Vicious666 on January 11, 2011, 09:57:28 am

In soviet russia awlpike exploit you

1492

Announcements / Re: more chadzhate incoming - heirloom theft

« on: January 10, 2011, 01:12:01 pm »

You will never get bigger stones Warcat. Yours just aint potent enough..

1493

General Discussion / Re: My take on why the siege became so popular after the xp boost

« on: January 04, 2011, 05:02:32 pm »

How did this turn out to be a "i'm-better-then-you thread"? If everyone could stop making silly assumptions about each others play styles this could actually turn out to be a good thread. Agi-spammer and elephant-nub-rider, use PM's instead, this wannabe E-peen contest is silly.

Now, on to the actual thread: NEVERMIND

I agree with bablefish on most points. I find myself joining Siege oh so more then Battle. Why?
Well, I get to play more or less instantly and "teamwork" if forced (we have a common goal, like it or not, we are going the same way). Somehow Siege is much more relaxed and less spastic then regular Battle. Probably because of the respawn and the way exp/money is counted: I don't have to play my very best just to stay alive, I can still skirmish around and get money without losing out on money and exp. While I do enjoy battle, I feel that modes like siege is necessary and Vital to the game in the long run (hell, being a peasant on a full battle server is awful).

Simply put, Siege doesn't require (read demand) your full attention, and sometimes that's all you want (you know, for the game to be a game and not just a chore you do to gain money).

1494