cRPG

Other Games => ... and all the other things floating around out there => Topic started by: Molly on June 06, 2016, 04:52:29 pm

Title: E3 2016
Post by: Molly on June 06, 2016, 04:52:29 pm
The amount of bullshit...


...I wasn't aware how bad it actually is.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Overdriven on June 06, 2016, 10:13:45 pm
I knew the obvious ones like Watchdogs and Division. Didn't know about Far Cry and AC now.

They have to stop blaming it on other things. It's clearly just a marketing ploy and they have no intention of releasing them like that.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Golem on June 06, 2016, 11:44:00 pm
I'm not sure this is so legit. Division looked gorgeous, atleast in the Beta.
+ it also comes down to contrast and colour saturation
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Kafein on June 07, 2016, 12:46:18 am
CD Project did it too. The line is not so clear between legit "this is beta footage subject to change" and "we're just hyping up the pre-orders".
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Golem on June 07, 2016, 01:33:23 am
CD Project did it too. The line is not so clear between legit "this is beta footage subject to change" and "we're just hyping up the pre-orders".

Honestly, though. What happened to the 'I care about gameplay, not graphs' line everyone was repeating ad nauseam just a few years ago?
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Rhekimos on June 07, 2016, 05:47:33 am
Somewhat related, as in more stupidity in the games industry.

Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Gravoth_iii on June 07, 2016, 05:54:34 am
All im hoping for is a tekken 7 release announcement, the rest of e3 is probably nothing for me.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: SeQuel on June 07, 2016, 06:41:52 am
Holy shit the Rainbow Six Siege part was hilarious. At 8:16 when he pans to the door it just doesn't exist, and then while running away with the hostage hes intentionally missing.

Good shit.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Tristan_of_Erzoth on June 07, 2016, 07:57:58 am
Honestly, though. What happened to the 'I care about gameplay, not graphs' line everyone was repeating ad nauseam just a few years ago?

Theres a difference between sacrificing graphics for gameplay or story and showing the game to have great graphics with the pretense of good gameplay/story and then on ship date the graphics are ass tier
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Overdriven on June 07, 2016, 01:18:54 pm
CD Project did it too. The line is not so clear between legit "this is beta footage subject to change" and "we're just hyping up the pre-orders".

CD Projekt was a one off though. Sure they don't churn out games like Ubisoft but doing it every single game is a little bit bollocks. There comes a point when you have to admit that you're hyping expectations to get sales with no realistic aim of having it look that way in the final game.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Daunt_Flockula on June 07, 2016, 02:49:35 pm
The deception is obvious and unacceptable. Still, I'd rather have more games playable on my current rig than see every new AAA title breaking the standard and requiring more and more frequent upgrades. That would be really unsustainable.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Xant on June 07, 2016, 04:10:18 pm
With the new Pascal GPUs coming out, consoles are going to hold back gaming so frigging much.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Golem on June 07, 2016, 04:25:05 pm
Or we might get more PC-only games. You never know.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Overdriven on June 07, 2016, 05:35:18 pm
They do say PC gaming is making a resurgence.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Leshma on June 07, 2016, 06:39:44 pm
New consoles will be announced on E3, will have AMD Polaris GPU. Should be quite a lot faster than current consoles. They say it is for enabling 4K/VR support but I think they are changing consoles to be even more like PCs.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Golem on June 07, 2016, 06:58:48 pm
Somewhat related, as in more stupidity in the games industry.


p good
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Falka on June 07, 2016, 11:18:32 pm
All im hoping for is a tekken 7 release announcement, the rest of e3 is probably nothing for me.

I hope that TW will announce Bannerlord's early access or beta.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Kafein on June 09, 2016, 12:21:24 am
Honestly, though. What happened to the 'I care about gameplay, not graphs' line everyone was repeating ad nauseam just a few years ago?

It's not about graphics, most of the downgraded games looked good in their final version anyway. It's about misleading advertisement.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Gravoth_iii on June 13, 2016, 10:29:17 am
(click to show/hide)

Best part so far.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Leshma on June 13, 2016, 05:47:41 pm
wtf :shock:

I thought booby girl from PROland playing BF1 while Snoop was smoking weed was absolute highlight of this E3.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Asheram on June 14, 2016, 01:10:10 am
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: karasu on June 14, 2016, 10:26:20 am
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Vibe on June 14, 2016, 11:46:08 am

This looks cool. If only this game had depth with trading/commerce and country wars and so on, it'd be awesome.

The sea/waves look amazing.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: LordBerenger on June 15, 2016, 10:11:02 pm
New remake of Prey looks good. Like what DOOM should've been like.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Leshma on June 15, 2016, 11:40:39 pm
lolwut?
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Golem on June 16, 2016, 12:19:22 am
good joke i laugh
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Banok on June 16, 2016, 01:11:59 am
https://streamable.com/tha2

E3 cannot be summed up any better.

When they say 4k gameplay no compromises that is a complete straight faced lie, and they should be legally liable for saying such bullshit.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Kafein on June 16, 2016, 01:54:08 am
The wording is horrible, but what that guy really means is that the console is compatible with the wider color gamut available on modern TVs. As for 4K gameplay, yes, with 6th gen kind of graphics.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Son Of Odin on June 16, 2016, 07:05:49 pm
What the fuck is this shit? Sure looks like ubisoft crap.



They sure invented a UNIQUE COMBAT SYSTEM WHICH LETS YOU EXPERIENCE MELEE COMBAT AS THOUGH YOU HAVE A WEAPON IN YOUR HAND.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Vibe on June 16, 2016, 07:07:31 pm
They sure invented a UNIQUE COMBAT SYSTEM WHICH LETS YOU EXPERIENCE MELEE COMBAT AS THOUGH YOU HAVE A WEAPON IN YOUR HAND.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Rofl I thought this was a joke but it's not :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Son Of Odin on June 16, 2016, 07:24:46 pm
Rofl I thought this was a joke but it's not :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Yeah they actually said that :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Asheram on June 16, 2016, 07:44:45 pm
Woopsry didn't realize it was the same one as yours as the video skin was different and couldn't watch yet as I am at work. :(
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Son Of Odin on June 16, 2016, 08:17:05 pm
(click to show/hide)

Slowpoke
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Asheram on June 16, 2016, 10:42:59 pm
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Daunt_Flockula on June 16, 2016, 11:55:39 pm
It was already expected, but they finally announced Tekken 7 for PC. To me, there is nothing more exciting than that.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Leshma on June 17, 2016, 12:50:02 am
Got into a fight with some retard who said he's eagerly expecting two games, For Honor and Mount&Blade. I told him that those two aren't the same, M&B is much better. Seriously, anyone who considers giants smashing human AI heads to be on same level as most historically accurate representation of medieval combat, is plain retarded.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: LordBerenger on June 17, 2016, 12:58:10 am
Got into a fight with some retard who said he's early expecting two games, For Honor and Mount&Blade. I told him that those two aren't the same, M&B is much better. Seriously, anyone who considers giants smashing human AI heads to be on same level as most historically accurate representation of medieval combat, is plain retarded.

We don't know if Bannerlords will be good though
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Gravoth_iii on June 17, 2016, 01:49:47 am
Got into a fight with some retard who said he's early expecting two games, For Honor and Mount&Blade. I told him that those two aren't the same, M&B is much better. Seriously, anyone who considers giants smashing human AI heads to be on same level as most historically accurate representation of medieval combat, is plain retarded.

Did he just say he's wants those 2? How do you start a fight off of that, he just wants to play melee fighting games.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Asheram on June 17, 2016, 02:04:58 am
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Leshma on June 17, 2016, 02:25:17 am
Did he just say he's wants those 2? How do you start a fight off of that, he just wants to play melee fighting games.

I just said those two aren't alike and that M&B is better. Then some other dude said I'm full of shit. Was accused of being loser who plays cRPG and they basically said M&B is low budget crap. You know, typical gamers who value only AAA games. Then I had to attack first dude and ridicule his choice of games, he mainly plays Rust so I made fun of survival genre. Typical gaming chatter, nothing special :mrgreen:
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Xant on June 17, 2016, 04:23:39 am
Got into a fight with some retard who said he's eagerly expecting two games, For Honor and Mount&Blade. I told him that those two aren't the same, M&B is much better. Seriously, anyone who considers giants smashing human AI heads to be on same level as most historically accurate representation of medieval combat, is plain retarded.
Did you throat punch him?
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Jarold on June 17, 2016, 04:36:20 am
I just said those two aren't alike and that M&B is better. Then some other dude said I'm full of shit. Was accused of being loser who plays cRPG and they basically said M&B is low budget crap. You know, typical gamers who value only AAA games. Then I had to attack first dude and ridicule his choice of games, he mainly plays Rust so I made fun of survival genre. Typical gaming chatter, nothing special :mrgreen:

I think that Rust's graphics are terrible, just something about them. However, the peak of Warband's graphical fidelity are the guard's back stretching animation.  :lol:
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Gravoth_iii on June 17, 2016, 05:39:21 am
I just said those two aren't alike and that M&B is better. Then some other dude said I'm full of shit. Was accused of being loser who plays cRPG and they basically said M&B is low budget crap. You know, typical gamers who value only AAA games. Then I had to attack first dude and ridicule his choice of games, he mainly plays Rust so I made fun of survival genre. Typical gaming chatter, nothing special :mrgreen:

Ok that makes sense, nothing like bashing someones taste in games  :lol:
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Vibe on June 17, 2016, 10:26:36 am
The real video you were all waiting for


ch ch ch ch ch FINGER GUNS chc hch ch chch ch ch
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Gravoth_iii on June 17, 2016, 11:10:58 am

Now this is what i was waiting for, and pc confirmed? Hell yes. 3d fighting games need more air, and since soul calibur is fucked since a while, tekken is the only one to shed some light.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: IR_Kuoin on June 17, 2016, 12:00:39 pm

Now this is what i was waiting for, and pc confirmed? Hell yes. 3d fighting games need more air, and since soul calibur is fucked since a while, tekken is the only one to shed some light.

I'm so hype for T7. You got DOA5 on steam though but that port is a joke. Didn't get online  after over a year and graphics are worse than on console :D
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: LordBerenger on June 17, 2016, 12:20:02 pm
I really need a new PC. Especially now with Tekken finally coming to PC. We only had Dead Or Alive meh-y port with super expensive DLC and then new Street Fighters with weird-ish graphics. Finally we get masterrace Tekken.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Vibe on June 17, 2016, 12:33:33 pm
So whats better about Tekken compared to SF?
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Oberyn on June 17, 2016, 01:13:05 pm
I just said those two aren't alike and that M&B is better. Then some other dude said I'm full of shit. Was accused of being loser who plays cRPG and they basically said M&B is low budget crap. You know, typical gamers who value only AAA games. Then I had to attack first dude and ridicule his choice of games, he mainly plays Rust so I made fun of survival genre. Typical gaming chatter, nothing special :mrgreen:

For Honor seems more like mechanics along the lines of Dynasty Warriors than anything like M&B.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: LordBerenger on June 17, 2016, 02:17:22 pm
So whats better about Tekken compared to SF?

It's all subjective. But IMO, better graphics and while I like some SF fighters, overall Tekken got cooler fighters. Otherwise it's hard to compare the two.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: [ptx] on June 17, 2016, 02:59:48 pm
Tekken has completely different pace of combat, moves are generally slower, with more "weight" behind them. Less fireball throwing as well.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Gravoth_iii on June 17, 2016, 03:47:34 pm
I really need a new PC. Especially now with Tekken finally coming to PC. We only had Dead Or Alive meh-y port with super expensive DLC and then new Street Fighters with weird-ish graphics. Finally we get masterrace Tekken.

Clay fighters 5 is pretty wack, the artstyle is weird, i like watching tournaments of it at times but other than that none of the characters appeal to me while in tekken theres just a ton of cool characters to choose from.

So whats better about Tekken compared to SF?

I think Tekken has a steeper learning curve, much bigger movesets on every character although ive heard tekken 7 will be a bit better for new players. Tekken is very balanced for having such varieties in characters and such big amounts of movesets. It is very combo based, lots of launchers to look out for, if you whiff an attack you may get launched for a ton of damage combos easily. No ranged spam. And of course its 3d, so theres the sidestepping to dodge moves, which can be punished with homing moves that track sideways etc, another layer of footwork i guess.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: LordBerenger on June 17, 2016, 06:33:44 pm
Last real Tekken though I played was this 1.


Tried a bit Tekken 6 but not much.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Gravoth_iii on June 17, 2016, 07:37:32 pm
Last real Tekken though I played was this 1.


Tried a bit Tekken 6 but not much.

Tekken 5 and 5DR are so sick, definitely my favourites. I played quite a bit of tag 2 though, but tagging is just 2 deep. Not just knowing one, but 2 characters, knowing their combos well and being able to tag combo with them properly got me pissed off and bored. Also it has so many characters its hard to really know any matchup as a scrub.

I just hope T7 adds more of my favourites, still missing roger jr (people hate him for some reason) and Lei wulong, i was hoping i could start learning to play him in T7. Such an awesome character, its just like playing jackie chan in a fighting game.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: LordBerenger on June 17, 2016, 09:03:01 pm
Hope they add/keep Bruce Irvin. He's awesome.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: IR_Kuoin on June 17, 2016, 11:16:53 pm
T7 got Akuma / Gouki doe, good shit.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Leshma on June 18, 2016, 02:17:16 am
I prefer Soulcalibur but that ain't PC game and last few games in series were pretty average. Bit like Tekken, but faster and animations are more fluid. Adds melee weapons to the mix and has more interesting characters. Voldo is most distinctive fighter in the series.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Gravoth_iii on June 18, 2016, 05:08:16 am
Hope they add/keep Bruce Irvin. He's awesome.

They do need some black characters tbh, Bruce and Raven are both really cool.

I prefer Soulcalibur but that ain't PC game and last few games in series were pretty average. Bit like Tekken, but faster and animations are more fluid. Adds melee weapons to the mix and has more interesting characters. Voldo is most distinctive fighter in the series.

Yeah, maybe if they attempt another release it will also come to pc. I regularly watch a stream of a guy who was top tier Soulcalibur 2 player, and he mains Voldo. So fun to watch him play because its such a weird character.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Ujin on June 18, 2016, 03:16:11 pm
Hope they add/keep Bruce Irvin. He's awesome.

Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: IR_Kuoin on June 18, 2016, 06:37:53 pm
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Leshma on June 18, 2016, 08:46:43 pm
I really dislike that Geoff fellow, for some reason. Not that I'm fond of other gaming journalists but this guy has something incredibly sleazy going about him. Must say I'm very trilled at prospect of gaming tabloids like Kotaku going bust very soon. Only people truly passionate about their work deserve to make money as gaming journos, we don't need those fake assholes who entered gaming field just because it became incredibly popular.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Mr_Oujamaflip on June 19, 2016, 05:36:14 pm
Oh he's a proper scumbag.

Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Gravoth_iii on June 29, 2016, 01:02:05 pm
Poongko came from Street fighter and rekt a bunch of tekken players in Tekken 7, so for street fighter players that are interested in trying a tekken game out, be ready for T7.

Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Vibe on June 29, 2016, 02:09:13 pm
Poongko came from Street fighter and rekt a bunch of tekken players in Tekken 7, so for street fighter players that are interested in trying a tekken game out, be ready for T7.


I'd be interested in trying but will PC have a decent playerbase? Is the matchmaking connected to consoles like SFV?

Also how hard is it compared to SFV? I heard that it it's harder to get into compared to SFV but 'easier' to master.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: [ptx] on June 29, 2016, 02:41:57 pm
Imho, Tekken just looks so much more visually pleasing than SF, due to the different pacing.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: IR_Kuoin on June 29, 2016, 02:53:46 pm
SF5 is the easiest SF by fucking miles. Tekken isn't that hard to get into either, just playing through the story should give you more than enough time for basics, or just spend time in training mode.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: Gravoth_iii on June 29, 2016, 03:19:48 pm
I'd be interested in trying but will PC have a decent playerbase? Is the matchmaking connected to consoles like SFV?

Also how hard is it compared to SFV? I heard that it it's harder to get into compared to SFV but 'easier' to master.

Im by no means at all good in tekken, ive played a couple since tekken 3, and had some friendly competitive matches with a friend.. But the basics is learning whatever characters combos, what good moves it has and then footwork. Lastly you want to know the common move threats of the enemy characters, but thats something thats just learned in the long run.

Im hoping PC is connected to consoles, it should be anyways, and even if its not i think PC will still have a healthy playerbase.

Imho, Tekken just looks so much more visually pleasing than SF, due to the different pacing.

Ive always thought the artstyle and 3d gameplay was more interesting, but SF5 has had me slightly interested as well, unlike previous street fighters.
Title: Re: E3 2016
Post by: IR_Kuoin on June 29, 2016, 03:56:31 pm
PC community is usually around 200 - 1k active players in prime time, which is more than enough + you got groups and what not and easier communication on PC. And looking at the current hype around T7, a lot from people who don't even play Tekken I'd say if they do the PC port right it might be the biggest playerbase on the PC compared to the other FGs.