Author Topic: Thoughts on Religion and the State  (Read 19446 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline TurmoilTom

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1089
  • Infamy: 166
  • cRPG Player
  • Doesn't really play that much anymore
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #360 on: December 12, 2013, 01:45:23 am »
0
How about deduction from anthropological findings?

What deduction from anthropological findings?

Offline BlindGuy

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 996
  • Infamy: 583
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • De oppresso liber et plus ultra.
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #361 on: December 12, 2013, 01:49:08 am »
+2
What deduction from anthropological findings?

As a colourblind person: fuck you for always making your text navy blue and making me think Im going more spastic than normal.
I don't know enough

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline zagibu

  • cRPG President
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1436
  • Infamy: 228
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #362 on: December 12, 2013, 02:22:34 am »
+1
Evolution is just another myth of another culture, though.  The only difference is that evolution is a more modern myth.  We'll never know for sure how morality and ethics came about because they weren't documented as they occurred.

It is a "myth" that can be observed in nature. Like all scientific "myths".
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 Why am I beswung by sharpe and pointed utensyls?

Offline TurmoilTom

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1089
  • Infamy: 166
  • cRPG Player
  • Doesn't really play that much anymore
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #363 on: December 12, 2013, 02:41:37 am »
0
It is a "myth" that can be observed in nature. Like all scientific "myths".

Observed?  I don't recall the general human anatomy changing significantly within recorded history.  Care to provide some info?  All of the evolutionist studies I've read have been contrary to recent findings or had problems in their methodology.

Offline zagibu

  • cRPG President
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1436
  • Infamy: 228
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #364 on: December 12, 2013, 02:52:31 am »
0
You didn't say evolutionism before.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 Why am I beswung by sharpe and pointed utensyls?

Offline TurmoilTom

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1089
  • Infamy: 166
  • cRPG Player
  • Doesn't really play that much anymore
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #365 on: December 12, 2013, 03:23:50 am »
0
You didn't say evolutionism before.

I thought that's what we were talking about.  What did you think I was talking about?

Offline kinngrimm

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1026
  • Infamy: 320
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • The Betrayer of Nations
  • Faction: Wolves of Fenris
  • Game nicks: kinngrimm, Karma
  • IRC nick: kinngrimm
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #366 on: December 12, 2013, 03:45:49 am »
0
What deduction from anthropological findings?
The question was not about a specific deduction, but deduction as method to determin and validate anthropological knowledge. As you stated
... We'll never know for sure how morality and ethics came about because they weren't documented as they occurred.
I think, moral is not something you are born with, but you are imprinted in with by your parents and over time by experiences. By what we find at excavation sites, we can deduct behaviour, traditions and therefor deduct further values, morals, ethics, religious believes. In agypt we have the pyramids, huge monumental graves for their god kings. The old agyptians pharaos had been around for a while and due to many findings the hiroglyphs had been translated and lots of the past culutre been learned.

Then again, if someone believes we have a soul, for that mans own mental health he may need to believe he is born good, clean without sin.

...The idea is that all humans are born with an innate understanding of good and evil ...
So from there to we are born with morals is not a big stretch right?
I deny the concept of a soul, i dont deny the concept of something godly, not sure there is something like it or not though.

Nevertheless you now would answer my first question, here another one.
TurmoilTom do you support and believe the concept of the original sin?
learn from the past, live the moment, dream of the future

Offline zagibu

  • cRPG President
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1436
  • Infamy: 228
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #367 on: December 12, 2013, 12:29:00 pm »
0
I thought that's what we were talking about.  What did you think I was talking about?

What you were writing about.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 Why am I beswung by sharpe and pointed utensyls?

Offline TurmoilTom

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1089
  • Infamy: 166
  • cRPG Player
  • Doesn't really play that much anymore
    • View Profile
  • Faction: KUTT
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #368 on: December 12, 2013, 03:03:20 pm »
0
I think, moral is not something you are born with, but you are imprinted in with by your parents and over time by experiences. By what we find at excavation sites, we can deduct behaviour, traditions and therefor deduct further values, morals, ethics, religious believes. In agypt we have the pyramids, huge monumental graves for their god kings. The old agyptians pharaos had been around for a while and due to many findings the hiroglyphs had been translated and lots of the past culutre been learned.

Were the Egyptians proven to be the first society to have ethics or morals?

Nevertheless you now would answer my first question, here another one.
TurmoilTom do you support and believe the concept of the original sin?


Yes, although I don't believe it for itself.  I simply believe in the Bible and original sin is one of the subjects in the Bible. To explain why I believe in original sin I need to explain why I believe in Christianity and that is going to take a little bit of writing.  I adopted Protestant Christianity as my religion because I found the existence of the universe and the way it functions to be sufficient proof of the existence of a deity and the Bible properly explained all of my questions.

Here's why I find the universe itself to be sufficient proof of a deity:

All events take place as a reaction to previous events that have taken place.  A simple example would be child-birth.  A child cannot crawl on the carpet until it has been born.  It cannot be born spontaneously, it must first be conceived.  A husband and wife must each first be conceived, born, and grown to be able to conceive their own child.  Eventually, actions and reactions are traced so far back into time that one of two events occur. Either the chain continues into infinity or the universe begins at some point in the past.  I'll address the former first.  If the world has existed forever, then an infinite number of events can occur with an infinite amount of variation.  It stands to reason that if infinite kinds of events occur an infinite amount of times, then the event that causes the end of the universe has to have already occurred.  Imagine as if the world has existed forever.  Every event that has taken place within our recorded history has already taken place in the exact same place and manner that we have observed.  It's not far-fetched at all to say that the universe must have already destroyed itself if the universe is infinite in time-span.  Now I'll address the latter.  A beginning to the universe necessitates one of two things.  Either it spontaneously began to exist or some action was made by an entity to create the world despite no previously existing events to make that action a reaction.  The spontaneous generation of the universe stands contrary to reason because we know that nothing is nothing.  Something cannot come out of nothing.  The Bible stresses the timelessness of God's existence and how he is infinite and good in all ways.  He is not restricted by time or space.  The debate discussing how God himself came about is pointless in nature because a finite existence implies an infinite creator.  Finite existence necessitates an entity that can begin the chain of events on its own without outer influence.  Christians call that entity God.

Infinite existence implies nothingness.  Finite existence implies design.

Here's why I find the way the universe functions to be sufficient proof of a deity:

Information regarding how our world functions is acquired through scientific study.  Science is essentially accumulation of measurements regarding changes in an environment and using those numerical measurements in mathematics to find patterns.  Science is just applied mathematics.  Mathematics is just logic with numerical representation of data.  Logic is... Well, something.  We are able to use our reason and logic to discover details about how the universe functions but we are unable to find why the universe functions based upon rational principles.

Why does the world make sense? Weird question. Very simply worded.  Not a trick question.  Not complicated.

But there's no good answer.  There's no observable force that we can observe that makes the universe function on laws of reason and logic.  I couldn't find a good answer, but I got a decent one:

"Reason can't exist in a world that exists for no reason."

Finite existence implies design.  Design implies purpose.  Purpose implies reason.

We are finite.  We are designed.  We were made with a purpose.  Our rational capabilities necessitate these qualities of our existence.

Who is the designer, then?  Some don't call Him anything.  I call Him Lord, God and Savior.

Offline Xant

  • Finnish Pony
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1552
  • Infamy: 803
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Meaning lies as much
in the mind of the reader
as in the Haiku.

Offline [ptx]

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1871
  • Infamy: 422
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • such OP. so bundle of sticks. wow.
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #370 on: December 12, 2013, 03:22:25 pm »
+7
Posting on forums in a colour that is harder to read than black IS A SIN.

Offline Kafein

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 2203
  • Infamy: 808
  • cRPG Player Sir White Rook A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #371 on: December 12, 2013, 04:10:26 pm »
+4
Evolution is just another myth of another culture, though.  The only difference is that evolution is a more modern myth.  We'll never know for sure how morality and ethics came about because they weren't documented as they occurred.

We wouldn't know had they been "documented" either. Written accounts, especially in the past, are not exactly trustworthy.

Were the Egyptians proven to be the first society to have ethics or morals?


Yes, although I don't believe it for itself.  I simply believe in the Bible and original sin is one of the subjects in the Bible. To explain why I believe in original sin I need to explain why I believe in Christianity and that is going to take a little bit of writing.  I adopted Protestant Christianity as my religion because I found the existence of the universe and the way it functions to be sufficient proof of the existence of a deity and the Bible properly explained all of my questions.

Here's why I find the universe itself to be sufficient proof of a deity:

All events take place as a reaction to previous events that have taken place.  A simple example would be child-birth.  A child cannot crawl on the carpet until it has been born.  It cannot be born spontaneously, it must first be conceived.  A husband and wife must each first be conceived, born, and grown to be able to conceive their own child.  Eventually, actions and reactions are traced so far back into time that one of two events occur. Either the chain continues into infinity or the universe begins at some point in the past.  I'll address the former first. 


If the world has existed forever, then an infinite number of events can occur with an infinite amount of variation.  It stands to reason that if infinite kinds of events occur an infinite amount of times, then the event that causes the end of the universe has to have already occurred.

This is a common logic error : infinity of different things doesn't necessarily mean everything. For example, we are fairly sure that the decimals of Pi contain all possible information ("everything"), but the decimals of Pi where you replace all the "9" with "0" are equally infinite and without cycles, yet do not contain all possible information.

Imagine as if the world has existed forever.  Every event that has taken place within our recorded history has already taken place in the exact same place and manner that we have observed.

For the same reason, this is not true either.

It's not far-fetched at all to say that the universe must have already destroyed itself if the universe is infinite in time-span.

Therefore, no.

  Now I'll address the latter.  A beginning to the universe necessitates one of two things.  Either it spontaneously began to exist or some action was made by an entity to create the world despite no previously existing events to make that action a reaction.  The spontaneous generation of the universe stands contrary to reason because we know that nothing is nothing.  Something cannot come out of nothing.  The Bible stresses the timelessness of God's existence and how he is infinite and good in all ways.  He is not restricted by time or space.  The debate discussing how God himself came about is pointless in nature because a finite existence implies an infinite creator.  Finite existence necessitates an entity that can begin the chain of events on its own without outer influence.  Christians call that entity God.

The question of "what did exist before" is non-sensical because time started as energy and mass appeared. The world that we observe exists, with its rules that we start to understand. The question of "why does it exist" is only relevant to the human psyche, just like a child will ask why did the cat got run over. It is unsatisfying for us to not know the motives behind something even when there are none, because everything we do ourselves is based around motives, and that's the only kind of reasoning we actually understand. It's only natural we try to coerce everything that we observe into that specific way of thinking.

Infinite existence implies nothingness.  Finite existence implies design.

The only kind of design we know is human. Atoms do not design the molecules they are part of. Hydrogen and Oxygen can assemble and become water, but that is no proof someone specifically designed both to fill that role.

Here's why I find the way the universe functions to be sufficient proof of a deity:

Information regarding how our world functions is acquired through scientific study.  Science is essentially accumulation of measurements regarding changes in an environment and using those numerical measurements in mathematics to find patterns.  Science is just applied mathematics.  Mathematics is just logic with numerical representation of data.  Logic is... Well, something.  We are able to use our reason and logic to discover details about how the universe functions but we are unable to find why the universe functions based upon rational principles.

Because that question is nonsensical. Everything we observe can be described by scientific literature, including processes, structures and other things. But all this doesn't require willpower. Would you ask why is the isotope of Iron with 26 protons the element with the highest nuclear binding energy ? Nobody knows and nobody cares, because there is no answer.

Why does the world make sense? Weird question. Very simply worded.  Not a trick question.  Not complicated.

It is a trick question, because it makes the assumption the world has to make sense. And in effect, to be understood and accepted by humans, it should make sense.

But there's no good answer.  There's no observable force that we can observe that makes the universe function on laws of reason and logic.  I couldn't find a good answer, but I got a decent one:

"Reason can't exist in a world that exists for no reason."

Finite existence implies design.  Design implies purpose.  Purpose implies reason.

This is purely play on words. You are using the word "reason" both the in the sense of "logic reasoning" and of "motive" selectively. If I rewrite this sentence properly, it goes like

"Logical reasoning can't exist in a world that has no motive behind its existence"

Which is obviously not true.

We are finite.  We are designed.  We were made with a purpose.  Our rational capabilities necessitate these qualities of our existence.

Who is the designer, then?  Some don't call Him anything.  I call Him Lord, God and Savior.[/font][/size][/color]

The notion that something can be without motive is difficult to accept for us, stupid primates. That the entire world has no purpose is cruel to us. But it is only so because we make decisions and take action based on our emotions and motives and assume that everything works the same, not because it is inherently depressing.

Offline Xant

  • Finnish Pony
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1552
  • Infamy: 803
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #372 on: December 12, 2013, 04:25:30 pm »
0
Also: anthropic principle.
Meaning lies as much
in the mind of the reader
as in the Haiku.

Offline Falka

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1257
  • Infamy: 423
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #373 on: December 12, 2013, 05:07:35 pm »
+1
Why does the world make sense? Weird question. Very simply worded.  Not a trick question.  Not complicated.

But there's no good answer.

So cause there's no good answer - which is arguable - let's invent invisible man living in a sky... He'll be an ultimate answer for all questions.

The Bible stresses the timelessness of God's existence and how he is infinite and good in all ways.

Well, looking at his work here, on the earth, I'd rather say he's sadistic fuck, not a good old man...

I adopted Protestant Christianity as my religion because I found the existence of the universe and the way it functions to be sufficient proof of the existence of a deity and the Bible properly explained all of my questions..

Ok, so you chose to believe in protestant god, but how do u know that catholic god isn't a true god? Both of them have their origins in bible, so even if u come to conclusion that bible is holy book, written by god's spokers, how did u know which interpretation is correct? Did u toss the coin or what? You have to keep in mind that "You shall have no other gods before him", so for your own good I really hope that you didn't choose wrong god.
« Last Edit: December 12, 2013, 05:55:09 pm by Falka »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline kinngrimm

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1026
  • Infamy: 320
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
    • The Betrayer of Nations
  • Faction: Wolves of Fenris
  • Game nicks: kinngrimm, Karma
  • IRC nick: kinngrimm
Re: Thoughts on Religion and the State
« Reply #374 on: December 12, 2013, 05:33:42 pm »
0
Also: anthropic principle.
In other words ...
Is a forest still a forest when there wouldnt be a someone to call it a forest.
... (?)
When on cRPG servers observermode, are you still part of the ongoing game?

@TurmoilTom
As i hinted/stated in another post earlier, only by redifining the question " 'What is'/'Is there'  the/a meaning of life" into "What is the meaning of my life?", only by disallowing relevance of nihilism having effect on my life, i got free of it. At times we may end up in selfbuilt prisons in our mind, for some people it is easier for some not so much to get out of those. Only because we cant imagine a beyond or a different or an infinit, doesnt exlude their existances.  We often choose these prisons as they are small and cosey. Nothingness in a zen way i guess, you also could say is another form of existance, who are we to judge it would be a better or worse kind of existance. Alone the question to judge things, is inherent human, as is all moral, ethics, theological stuff, while i wouldnt say there may not be other beings(aliens  :mrgreen:) also able to do so.... man what a drag that would be, aliens showing up here and teaching us yet another religion ... like we hoping if they would show up :shock: here  they would be beyond that completly ... enligtened ... only to give us new dogmas ^^ with their own religion competing with religions here on earth ... :lol: hilerious.

So change the narrativ if you feel adventures:
And god made all humans like himself

to:
And humans made all gods like themselves



... 'show me' one omnipotent being and i will bow to him/it/whatever ...
then again, only because you cant, doesnt exclude its existance, therefor i am an agnostic :wink:, which is a chosen stance not a religion.
learn from the past, live the moment, dream of the future