cRPG
cRPG => General Discussion => Topic started by: Warborn304 on March 16, 2014, 03:45:15 am
-
63 people in siege right now, JOIN THE RAID!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
-
all of acre left, there is like 40 people on now
-
It's 37 vs 37 right now. We must not be playing the same game.
-
they all left and then different people joined, it was weird though, it was 34 vs 34 and then it was 34 vs 24
-
Still 50 ppl, but the number is dwindling. Ppl heading to battle I suppose.
-
I leave for one day and the world turns upside-down. What happened?
-
It's 37 vs 37 right now. We must not be playing the same game.
The fact that my words are still in your signature makes me cream.
-
play moar seeege!
was fun... :mrgreen:
-
Fun indeed... but my computer can't handle so many people so close together! :evil:
Was as bad as playing strat performance-wise.
-
Fun indeed... but my computer can't handle so many people so close together! :evil:
Was as bad as playing strat performance-wise.
It wasn't quite that bad for me, but it was pretty close. But it was worth it for one night of super siege! :mrgreen:
-
Had some glorious boxing moments and an annoying weaboo, all in all a good night
-
I am really sorry for you NA players. To me, siege is the best game mode and it is truly sad to see that you guys don't get to enjoy it due to lack of active players. Gotta do something about it. I don't know. Maybe you should arrange a traditional NA siege day or two every week.
-
I am really sorry for you NA players. To me, siege is the best game mode and it is truly sad to see that you guys don't get to enjoy it due to lack of active players. Gotta do something about it. I don't know. Maybe you should arrange a traditional NA siege day or two every week.
Funny thing Flockula is that we often have like 90-110 in battle at primetime, which *in my opinion* is too much - just turns into randomness and rounds take too long (again, personal opinion only). At the same time siege will have like 20-30.
Would be great in those cases if like 20-30 left battle making battle have like 60-90 people (much better in my opinion) and siege having like 40-60 people (also much better...)
It would be a win-win.
----
But yeah a SIEGE NIGHT NA would be great....Saturday night?
-
i dont play siege very much. i see the amount of players on siege, i enter and play a few rounds where i usally keep respawn on top of charging enemies so i quit again. i think respawning on siege is utter fail.
-
I think the current multiplier/valor reward system is just not compatible with siege, which is why NA2 is usually dead. You can save like the flag like four times, amass tons of kills (while defending the objective), close gates a few times, yet when your team is eventually overwhelmed and loses, you get rewarded with x1 and no valor (because scores are much closer on siege since everyone is alive for about the same total amount of time).
I actually played battle mid-day yesterday (for the first time in years). I was amazed how easy it is to attain valor on battle. Just run around with the clump, generally be a pussy and don't put yourself at risk, take a swing every now and then when the opportunity arises, and bam, valor. Valor on siege generally means that you ignored the flag and ran around on the walls killing archers and stragglers.
-
its not compatible with anything mate :D :D
-
You lads really are lucky. On EU there are constant 100+ people, and at least 50of them are members of either Druzhina or The Gay Order, having fun pubstomping. Also they communicate with their crazy-ass hieroglyphs, so I can't really understand what's happening, so I just hope I'll be put into the right team, and won't be slaughtered with cold blood. :D
God, I wish I wouldn't have such high ping on NA. I need muh freedum boys. :cry: :cry:
-
dont mention specific clan names, you just boost their epeen. they think its because they are good that people whine about them :lol:
pubstomping iz hard.
banner balance is fail and so is the way we gain xp and gold.
GIVING THEM RUN!