31
General Off Topic / Re: Let's play a game
« on: June 15, 2018, 10:58:12 pm »Quote
For your information sucker #blacks dont give a flying fuck about some bastard IQ system created by #NaziGermany melanin is a far better judge of intelligence.
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
32
General Off Topic / Re: Is Islam not a religion of peace or is it simply a religion at war?
« on: June 14, 2018, 08:55:51 pm »
The Middle-East and North Africa was Christian heartland from Roman times. Christian lands hundreds of years before the birth of Muhammad. Conquered by invading Arab and Turkish Muslims from Late Antiquity until the Fall of Constantinople and increasingly purged of Christians continuing to this day. The Crusades were an attempt by the Church to take back what had been Christian territory since Constantine, and had been European-controlled lands since the days of Alexander the Great.
That the Caliphates were centers of tolerance is not corroborated by modern scholarship (see 'The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise: Muslims, Christians, and Jews under Islamic Rule in Medieval Spain' https://www.amazon.com/Myth-Andalusian-Paradise-Christians-Medieval/dp/1610170954). Jews and Christians were treated harshly by their Islamic rulers in Spain and one of the reasons for the First Crusade was the ill treatment of pilgrims in Jerusalem by the Seljuk Turks. Contrary to how they are often portrayed today the Frankish crusaders treated their non-Christian subjects with a lot of leniency (confirmed by Arab sources such as Ibn Jubayr), allowing complete religious freedom and Muslim villages to govern themselves locally according to Sharia. Even military orders such as the Knights Templar were known for displays of religious tolerance, in one source we have a temple knight showing a Muslim pilgrim the direction to Mecca to help him with his prayer, or by allowing Muslims to pray in the Temple of Solomon.
That the Caliphates were centers of science, culture and learning was not because of Islam but despite Islam. The desert-dwelling Arabs (and later the Turks) on the periphery of civilization took over the most developed area in the known world, the splendours of the ancient world, the heritage of the kingdoms of the hellenistic Diadochi, the most advanced provinces of the Roman and Byzantine Empires, themselves inheritors of the ancient Egyptians, Phoenicians, Persians, Hittites, Assyrians, Babylonians, Greeks etc. Rather, it could be viewed as strange that the Islamic world was not more cultured after taking possession of this cultural treasure hoard, perhaps a testament to the backwardness of Arabic religion and culture. Yes, ancient texts (mostly Christian or pagan Greek) were translated and survived to later inspire Christian Europe but it would never have been an issue if the area hadn't been overrun by Muslims in the first place. Many of the most famous Islamic centres of learning were previously Nestorian Christian and pre-Islamic Persian schools and universities (School of Edessa, School of Nisibis, Academy of Gondishapur), or staffed and led by Christian scholars (House of Wisdom in Baghdad) drawing on Byzantine Greek and Persian knowledge.
That the Caliphates were centers of tolerance is not corroborated by modern scholarship (see 'The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise: Muslims, Christians, and Jews under Islamic Rule in Medieval Spain' https://www.amazon.com/Myth-Andalusian-Paradise-Christians-Medieval/dp/1610170954). Jews and Christians were treated harshly by their Islamic rulers in Spain and one of the reasons for the First Crusade was the ill treatment of pilgrims in Jerusalem by the Seljuk Turks. Contrary to how they are often portrayed today the Frankish crusaders treated their non-Christian subjects with a lot of leniency (confirmed by Arab sources such as Ibn Jubayr), allowing complete religious freedom and Muslim villages to govern themselves locally according to Sharia. Even military orders such as the Knights Templar were known for displays of religious tolerance, in one source we have a temple knight showing a Muslim pilgrim the direction to Mecca to help him with his prayer, or by allowing Muslims to pray in the Temple of Solomon.
That the Caliphates were centers of science, culture and learning was not because of Islam but despite Islam. The desert-dwelling Arabs (and later the Turks) on the periphery of civilization took over the most developed area in the known world, the splendours of the ancient world, the heritage of the kingdoms of the hellenistic Diadochi, the most advanced provinces of the Roman and Byzantine Empires, themselves inheritors of the ancient Egyptians, Phoenicians, Persians, Hittites, Assyrians, Babylonians, Greeks etc. Rather, it could be viewed as strange that the Islamic world was not more cultured after taking possession of this cultural treasure hoard, perhaps a testament to the backwardness of Arabic religion and culture. Yes, ancient texts (mostly Christian or pagan Greek) were translated and survived to later inspire Christian Europe but it would never have been an issue if the area hadn't been overrun by Muslims in the first place. Many of the most famous Islamic centres of learning were previously Nestorian Christian and pre-Islamic Persian schools and universities (School of Edessa, School of Nisibis, Academy of Gondishapur), or staffed and led by Christian scholars (House of Wisdom in Baghdad) drawing on Byzantine Greek and Persian knowledge.
33
Historical Discussion / Re: Real Crusades History
« on: June 13, 2018, 08:14:04 pm »
On how the Muslims treated Christian female captives after the Siege of Jerusalem (1187):
“Women and children together came to 8,000 and were quickly divided up among us, bringing a smile to Muslim faces at their lamentations. How many well-guarded women were profaned, how many queens were ruled, and nubile girls married, and noble women given away, and miserly women forced to yield themselves, and women who had been kept hidden stripped of their modesty, and serious women made ridiculous, and women kept in private now set in public, and free women occupied, and precious ones used for hard work, and pretty things put to the test, and virgins dishonoured and proud women deflowered, and lovely women’s red lips kissed, and dark women prostrated, and untamed ones tamed, and happy ones made to weep! How many noblemen took them as concubines, how many ardent men blazed for one of them, and celibates were satisfied by them, and thirsty men sated by them, and turbulent men able to give vent to their passion. How many lovely women were the exclusive property of one man, how many great ladies were sold at low prices, and close ones set at a distance, and lofty ones abased, and savage ones captured, and those accustomed to thrones dragged down!”
-Imad ad-Din, as quoted in Arab Historians of the Crusades, translated by Francesco Gabrieli (Barnes and Noble Books, 1993), p. 162-63.
Imad ad-Din was secretary to Nur ad-Din and then to Saladin. He was an eyewitness to much of Saladin’s career, and chronicled Saladin’s capture of Jerusalem, and Third Crusade.
“Women and children together came to 8,000 and were quickly divided up among us, bringing a smile to Muslim faces at their lamentations. How many well-guarded women were profaned, how many queens were ruled, and nubile girls married, and noble women given away, and miserly women forced to yield themselves, and women who had been kept hidden stripped of their modesty, and serious women made ridiculous, and women kept in private now set in public, and free women occupied, and precious ones used for hard work, and pretty things put to the test, and virgins dishonoured and proud women deflowered, and lovely women’s red lips kissed, and dark women prostrated, and untamed ones tamed, and happy ones made to weep! How many noblemen took them as concubines, how many ardent men blazed for one of them, and celibates were satisfied by them, and thirsty men sated by them, and turbulent men able to give vent to their passion. How many lovely women were the exclusive property of one man, how many great ladies were sold at low prices, and close ones set at a distance, and lofty ones abased, and savage ones captured, and those accustomed to thrones dragged down!”
-Imad ad-Din, as quoted in Arab Historians of the Crusades, translated by Francesco Gabrieli (Barnes and Noble Books, 1993), p. 162-63.
Imad ad-Din was secretary to Nur ad-Din and then to Saladin. He was an eyewitness to much of Saladin’s career, and chronicled Saladin’s capture of Jerusalem, and Third Crusade.
34
Historical Discussion / Real Crusades History
« on: June 13, 2018, 08:12:58 pm »
Historical Youtube channel and podcast on the Crusades: https://www.youtube.com/user/RealCrusadeHistory/featured
Good videos to start with, the background for the Crusades:
Good videos to start with, the background for the Crusades:
36
General Off Topic / Re: Am I racist? 2.0
« on: June 10, 2018, 02:31:22 pm »
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1790
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1870
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Exclusion_Act
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1917
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Quota_Act
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1952
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990
Quote
The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free White persons of good character.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalization_Act_of_1870
Quote
The Naturalization Act of 1870 (16 Stat. 254) was a United States federal law that created a system of controls for the naturalization process and penalties for fraudulent practices. It is also noted for extending the naturalization process to "aliens of African nativity and to persons of African descent."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_Exclusion_Act
Quote
The Chinese Exclusion Act was a United States federal law signed by President Chester A. Arthur on May 6, 1882, prohibiting all immigration of Chinese laborers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1917
Quote
The Immigration Act of 1917 (also known as the Literacy Act and less often as the Asiatic Barred Zone Act) was the most sweeping immigration act the United States had passed until that time. It was the first bill aimed at restricting (as opposed to regulating) immigrants, and marked a turn toward nativism. The law imposed literacy tests on immigrants, created new categories of inadmissible persons, and barred immigration from the Asia-Pacific Zone.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergency_Quota_Act
Quote
Although intended as temporary legislation, the Act "proved in the long run the most important turning-point in American immigration policy"[2] because it added two new features to American immigration law: numerical limits on immigration and the use of a quota system for establishing those limits.
The Emergency Quota Act restricted the number of immigrants admitted from any country annually to 3% of the number of residents from that same country living in the United States as of the U.S. Census of 1910.[3] This meant that people from northern European countries had a higher quota and were more likely to be admitted to the U.S. than people from eastern Europe, southern Europe, or other, non-European countries. Professionals were to be admitted without regard to their country of origin. The Act set no limits on immigration from Latin America. The act did not apply to countries with bilateral agreements with the US, or to Asian countries listed in the Immigration Act of 1917, known as the Asiatic Barred Zone Act.[1] However, the Act was not seen as restrictive enough since millions of immigrants from eastern and southern Europe had come into the USA since 1890. The Immigration Act of 1924 reduced the Quota to 2% per the Census of 1890 when a fairly small percentage of the population was from the regions regarded as less than desirable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1952
Quote
The Act abolished racial restrictions found in United States immigration and naturalization statutes going back to the Naturalization Act of 1790. The 1952 Act retained a quota system for nationalities and regions. Eventually, the Act established a preference system which determined which ethnic groups were desirable immigrants and placed great importance on labor qualifications.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_and_Nationality_Act_of_1965
Quote
The Hart–Celler Act abolished the quota system based on national origins that had been American immigration policy since the 1920s. The 1965 Act marked a change from past U.S. policy which had discriminated against non-northern Europeans.[2] In removing racial and national barriers the Act would significantly alter the demographic mix in the U.S.
Quote
The Hart–Celler Act of 1965 marked a radical break from the immigration policies of the past. Previous laws restricted immigration from Asia and Africa, and gave preference to northern and western Europeans over southern and eastern Europeans.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1990
Quote
It increased total, overall immigration to allow 700,000 immigrants to come to the U.S. per year for the fiscal years '92–'94, and 675,000 per year after that. It provided family-based immigration visa, created five distinct employment based visas, categorized by occupation, and a diversity visa program that created a lottery to admit immigrants from "low admittance" countries or countries where their citizenry was underrepresented in the U.S.
Quote
The lottery is administered by the Department of State and conducted under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). It makes available 50,000 immigrant visas annually and aims to diversify the immigrant population in the United States, by selecting applicants from countries with low numbers of immigrants in the previous five years.
38
General Off Topic / Re: Am I racist? 2.0
« on: May 29, 2018, 02:01:42 am »
Yes, it is appalling, must be the ugliest parliament in the western world, the kind of soulless modernist architecture only a rootless people wanting to forget its own history would think of building and which increasingly fills up cities all across western civilization.
The Bundestag, the plenary chamber is right under the giant glass dome that sprouts from the beautiful old neoclassical building like some pus-filled boil or cancerous growth. The eagle is its only redeeming quality:
The Bundestag when it was still the Reichstag, during the Weimar Republic:
Reichstag after the Reichstag fire and the rise of the National Socialists, Kroll opera house:
Compare with France:
The French National Assembly in the Palais Bourbon, resplendent neoclassicism with Corinthian columns outside and Ionic columns inside, plenty of tradition and history (note the imperial eagle standards on the rostrum):
The French Senate in the Palais du Luxembourg, the statues are of great French 16th to 18th century statesmen:
The French Congress in Louis XIV's Château de Versailles:
Merkel's office also looks like the headquarters of some tasteless corporate technocrat, which is fitting I guess. Suitably, the impressionist portrait is of Konrad Adenauer, Germany's first chancellor after the war.
Macron's baroque office, the Salon Doré (the Golden Room), in the Palais de l'Élysée:
Der Führer's tasteful office in Speer's Neue Reichskanzlei in Stripped Classicism (statues in the courtyard by Breker), regrettably destroyed in the war.
The Bundestag, the plenary chamber is right under the giant glass dome that sprouts from the beautiful old neoclassical building like some pus-filled boil or cancerous growth. The eagle is its only redeeming quality:
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
Compare with France:
The French National Assembly in the Palais Bourbon, resplendent neoclassicism with Corinthian columns outside and Ionic columns inside, plenty of tradition and history (note the imperial eagle standards on the rostrum):
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
Merkel's office also looks like the headquarters of some tasteless corporate technocrat, which is fitting I guess. Suitably, the impressionist portrait is of Konrad Adenauer, Germany's first chancellor after the war.
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
39
General Off Topic / Re: Am I racist? 2.0
« on: May 28, 2018, 03:40:19 pm »
Yes, these articles are generally received in a manner contrary to the intended angle, which may be why many MSM websites have begun removing comment sections.
Great speech by Alice Weidel from Alternative für Deutschland from earlier this month. Starts getting lively about half way in:
Great speech by Alice Weidel from Alternative für Deutschland from earlier this month. Starts getting lively about half way in:
40
General Off Topic / Re: Am I racist? 2.0
« on: May 27, 2018, 06:44:45 pm »
Brits demonstrating the jailing of Tommy Robinson:
The Football Lads Alliance protest marches last year, bringing together tens of thousands of mainly working class British men in response to the Birmingham Bridge and Manchester Arena Islamist terror attacks, largely ignored by legacy media including the BBC.
Even the UK's younger upper- and middle classes appear to be waking up with the rise of Generation Identity's UK chapter. Smear article by the Dailymail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5773155/The-Hipster-Fascists-Meet-Britains-sinister-far-Right-group.html#ixzz5GYNEto00
The Football Lads Alliance protest marches last year, bringing together tens of thousands of mainly working class British men in response to the Birmingham Bridge and Manchester Arena Islamist terror attacks, largely ignored by legacy media including the BBC.
Even the UK's younger upper- and middle classes appear to be waking up with the rise of Generation Identity's UK chapter. Smear article by the Dailymail:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5773155/The-Hipster-Fascists-Meet-Britains-sinister-far-Right-group.html#ixzz5GYNEto00
Quote
The Hipster Fascists: Well-dressed, highly educated and from respectable families. Why this new British far-Right group is the most sinister and dangerous yet
Quote
Unlike the traditional image of the far-Right, epitomised by shaven-headed thugs from groups such as the English Defence League and National Action, Tom Dupre is well-spoken, educated, polite and personable. It makes him more plausible and, ultimately perhaps, more dangerous than the easily-dismissed stereotypes from this end of the political spectrum which we have become accustomed to.
He was smartly dressed in a business suit during our encounter with him, but slick publicity photos of him and his fellow ‘patriots’, as they like to call themselves, show them in skinny jeans, trendy trainers and sunglasses with some sporting upswept hair and beards.
The Sunday Times has described them as the ‘Hipster Fascists’. They’ve been accused of using modern branding and sophisticated coded language to ‘normalise’ extremist views.
But Dupre insists Generation Identity is neither fascist nor racist, despite the fact that it is campaigning to preserve ‘our ethnocultural identity’ against what it describes as the ‘great replacement’ of white people in Britain’s cities with black and minority ethnic people.
Quote
These young men might look the picture of respectability with their snazzy suits, fashionable labels and super-cool haircuts. Their rhetoric, however, tells a different story.
41
... and all the other things floating around out there / Re: Battlefield V [Realistic Historical WW2 Shooter]
« on: May 27, 2018, 06:31:55 pm »
How far-left the Verge chooses to cover it (Polygon, unsurprisingly, came with a similar 'explanation' for its 'historicity'):
https://www.theverge.com/2018/5/24/17388414/battlefield-v-fans-game-women-world-war-2-history
https://www.theverge.com/2018/5/24/17388414/battlefield-v-fans-game-women-world-war-2-history
Quote
By Megan Farokhmanesh
Quote
DICE is returning to World War II with Battlefield V, and it’s doing so with the help of feeemales. Following the game’s reveal trailer and confirmation that it will include women, some fragile fans have confirmed they’ve never read a book by protesting what they see as “historical inaccuracy.” Please, keep your women out of my war games!
Quote
Online, this infantile cry has rallied around its own hashtag — #NotMyBattlefield — and it is full of users shrieking about political correctness. “Hey...good job making a shitty unrealistic SJW ‘WWII’ game!” wrote one on Twitter. “Seen the downvotes on your YouTube trailer video? You have til October to fix this shit and give us a realistic gritty WWII experience.” “Very disappointed with the new Battlefield trailer,” wrote another. “Blatant disregard for historical events and mindless political correctness. Sad to see a much loved franchise fall apart.” On YouTube and the game’s subreddit, the comments aren’t much better. “Genderfield V,” complains one, while another whines about “gender fluid mouth breathers in Sweden [shitting] out a revisionist history SJW game shitting on everything people like my grandpa fought for.”
Quote
It’s laughable to think that any modern video game based on a war is “historically accurate,” but even in this case, Battlefield isn’t off the mark. Women did fight in World War II, from the air force units known as the “Night Witches,” to secret agents like Nancy Wake. Lyudmila Pavlichenko is hailed as the most successful female sniper in history, as well as one of the top military snipers of all time with a credited 309 kills. Wanda Gertz began her military career during World War I and later commanded an all-female battalion in World War II. Young women enlisted in combat roles across the world. That a single British woman in the game’s reveal trailer has Battlefield players so riled up is willful ignorance that such a role could have ever existed in history.
Quote
This ugly, familiar line of thinking reared its head before when DICE dared to put a black man on the cover of Battlefield 1.
Quote
Battlefield V is yet another example of a game, a movie, a TV show, a cultural touchpoint that young, angry white men want to claim as their own.
42
General Off Topic / Re: Am I racist? 2.0
« on: May 26, 2018, 11:05:01 pm »
Non-European food served by white Americans is already now considered 'cultural appropriation'. Two white women had to close their successful burrito shop in Portland, Oregon which they had built from the ground up after travelling through Mexico to learn how to make good mexican food, following accusations of "erasing and exploiting their already marginalized identities for the purpose of profit and praise." (http://www.foxnews.com/food-drink/2017/05/24/portland-burrito-shop-forced-to-close-amid-accusations-cultural-appropriation-stealing-recipes.html)
43
General Off Topic / Re: Am I racist? 2.0
« on: May 26, 2018, 09:04:40 pm »
Yeah, for those who don't know about his previous prison stints here he speaks about his experiences and the state of British prisons:
Sargoy's video about the Muslim prison gangs in the UK:
Sargoy's video about the Muslim prison gangs in the UK:
44
General Off Topic / Re: Am I racist? 2.0
« on: May 26, 2018, 06:45:52 pm »
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/05/orwells-nightmare-articles-about-tommy-robinsons-arrest-rapidly-scrubbed-from-the-internet/
Quote
Articles about the arrest and subsequent imprisonment of independent journalist and activist Tommy Robinson are being rapidly scrubbed from the internet after the British government put restrictions in place banning any reporting on the matter.
Quote
Robinson, 35, was arrested on Friday for suspicion of ‘breaching the peace’ while livestreaming to report on the trial of a child grooming gang. He will now have to serve a prior 13 month suspended sentence for a similar offense.
Quote
Articles from the Daily Record, Birmingham Live, The Mirror, RT and even Breitbart News were all taken offline in the hours following his detention.
The leaked gag-order to the press states that it “appears to be necessary for avoiding a substantial risk of prejudice to the administration of justice in these proceedings.” The order prohibits “any report of these proceedings.”
Quote
According to UK independent reporter Caolan Robertson, Robinson was arrested outside the Leeds Crown Court on Friday morning as he was covering the trial of ten men for offenses including child rape, trafficking, and supply of Class A drugs to children.
Quote
His suspended sentence stems from an arrest last year for contempt of court after trying to film Muslims who had been accused of pedophilia outside a court in Canterbury.
The trial he was attempting to cover was that of Tamin Rahani, 37, Shershah Muslimyar, 20, Rafiullah Hamidy, 24, and an unnamed teenager who are all charged with three counts of raping a teenager.
45
General Off Topic / Re: Am I racist? 2.0
« on: May 25, 2018, 06:46:10 pm »If you removed "interracial", would it be safe to assume pot calling the kettle?
Don't presume anything. You know nothing about me.
There's a great amount of available data, scientific papers and figures from the world's largest dating companies and numerous articles and videoes by black women lamenting the fact that black men often rank white and asian women as the most desirable or attractive. I find the black activists in question comical and absurd but it's not a jab at black women in general, I wish black men would treat black women with more respect and create some functional families. But I'm genuinely curious why there's so many overtly racist and aggressive black women in these movements when it's an exceedingly rare sight among white women.
Other factors could be the lower average IQ in these movements, unfettered tribal loyalty, cultural emphasis on conformity, black women's higher levels of testosterone in combination with women's increased emotional sensitivity and popular culture's onslaught of black victim narratives. We see women playing prominent roles in black power activism not only in America but across the African diaspora in the West, including South Africa.