Deep message = muslims are bloodthirsty barbarians
Or just that people regardless of "race" or creed are tribal and irredentist by nature.I don't not know anyone who is tribal or irredentist by nature.
I don't not know anyone who is tribal or irredentist by nature.Caught myself
A place called "Holy Land", and yet hatred, suffering, rivers of blood come to my mind when I hear it.
historically inaccurate, yet with a deep message...
first property = first warFalse, apes don't have "property" yet they too go to war.
False, apes don't have "property" yet they too go to war.
Chimps do have property : territories, females, food storage and clear water place...etc.
And, genetically we ARE apes... so.... we still make same wars as apes do :mrgreen:
Chimps do have property : territories, females, food storage and clear water place...etc.Then why are you talking about "sedentarisation" being the cause of first wars and linking to agricultural revolution maps?
And, genetically we ARE apes... so.... we still make same wars as apes do :mrgreen:
Then why are you talking about "sedentarisation" being the cause of first wars and linking to agricultural revolution maps?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but chimps have no agriculture.
And you think hunter-gatherer humans didn't have territory? You think nomadic humans would let other groups of humans drive them off from their current land?
And, genetically we ARE apes... so.... we still make same wars as apes do :mrgreen:God damn it Pepe. You made baby Jesus cry again.
And lol. I would literally pay money to see Xant and Nightmare in the same room together.Why? It's not like he evokes any particularly strong feelings in me; I'm mostly just exasperated at how thick someone can be, and even the very thought of having to explain the extremely rudimentary chain of logic that has led to the current discussion and why, owing to this, his posts are utterly absurd, makes me sigh very slowly.
Why? It's not like he evokes any particularly strong feelings in me; I'm mostly just exasperated at how thick someone can be, and even the very thought of having to explain the extremely rudimentary chain of logic that has led to the current discussion and why, owing to this, his posts are utterly absurd, makes me sigh very slowly.
Why? It's not like he evokes any particularly strong feelings in me; I'm mostly just exasperated at how thick someone can be, and even the very thought of having to explain the extremely rudimentary chain of logic that has led to the current discussion and why, owing to this, his posts are utterly absurd, makes me sigh very slowly.
Most likely. A lot of things must not make sense to you.
I understand, I'll try to use small words when talking to you.
Good comeback, if it weren't for the fact that you're so autistic you don't even understand basic logical links.
Good comeback, if it weren't for the fact that you're so autistic you don't even understand basic logical links.
Good comeback, if it weren't for the fact that you're so autistic you don't even understand basic logical links.I might be wrong but doesn't this line simply transform into a "no u"?
I might be wrong but doesn't this line simply transform into a "no u"?Really? Tell me, then, how do you reply to an autist calling someone else an autist that isn't a form of "no u"? I await with bated breath...
Rather disappointing.
I might be wrong but doesn't this line simply transform into a "no u"?
Rather disappointing.
I don't think so because nightmare didn't question Xan't ability for logic, he just called him an autist....and Xant made a link between autism and logic therefore nightmare began to question Xfhfksla.....god damn it, im bad at this......
I don't think so because nightmare didn't question Xan't ability for logic, he just called him an autist
Really? So where is my logic lacking, exactly?
Also, you do not say" lack of thereof", you say "lack thereof"
False, apes don't have "property" yet they too go to war.
And you think hunter-gatherer humans didn't have territory? You think nomadic humans would let other groups of humans drive them off from their current land? No? Then how is that relevant? Let me tell you how: it isn't.
Word of the day, Nightmare, is context.
Then why are you talking about "sedentarisation" being the cause of first wars and linking to agricultural revolution maps?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but chimps have no agriculture.
Oh yeah, I bet you are the kind of person who would hang people for typos. Yeah fuck me.
At this point we started discussing that apes fight between each other because they have properties to fight for, hence the first property = first war comment made by pepe earlier.
Care to elaborate what was the point of this comment? Those people still fought for same reasons apes fight between each other (with some adjustments)
There, this is where your logic broke.
The point was that it does not matter whenever it is a wheat field or a fruit tree they fight for, it is still the case of fighting for property.
Unless there was a deeper meaning under this that I did not notice, I thought we are talking about how similar are reasons for nations and apes for fighting between each other.
And then you go out and indirectly call me stupid for a reason unknown to me.
1.4) Given this, we conclude that Pepe is of the opinion that agriculture and sedentarization is what caused the first war, and agriculture and sedentarization is when humans first had property (see point 1.2)
1.5) First war means it is the first war, i.e. there were no wars before that. Since he attributes the aforementioned first war to property, which he attributes to sedentarization, we can therefore draw the conclusion that the property he speaks of is not something that hunter-gatherers had.
begining of sedentarisation of human race.... first property = first war
http://www.markbwilson.com/album/1-Mediterranean%20World/slides/2a-Neolithic%20Agricultural%20Revolution%20Sites.html
How in the name of fuck do you get those two statements to be separate things? Hell, there aren't even two possible statements in that post. That'd be a post equivalent of "I like fish. BALLOONS. GALAXY MAP? IPAD!" It even has four dots, meaning it continues. You are grasping at straws. Extremely desperate straws.
And no, I did not think of first property = first land, you dolt. This has nothing to do with what "you" thought property means, or what "I" thought property means. It has everything to do with what Pepe used it to describe. I was replying to him. You can't just invent your own meanings and proclaim how you're right. Read what pepe wrote- actually, nevermind. If you can't understand the argument even after I made a step-by-step guide for you, I can't help you.
And just as a refresher, this, ladies and gentlemen, is what he proposes is "two separate things":
Where does Nightmare suggest pepe cuts it off and makes it into another statement? Does he just change his mind after talking about sedentarisation of human race and instead start talking about something completely unrelated, and then changes his mind again and links to agriculture maps? Or - bear with me, crazy idea here, guys - it's not two fucking statements.
As for you asking me to adjust my attitude, you haven't earned a single shred of politeness with your past behavior.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
begining of sedentarisation of human race.... first property = first war
http://www.markbwilson.com/album/1-Mediterranean%20World/slides/2a-Neolithic%20Agricultural%20Revolution%20Sites.html
If he talked about something concrete with word property, he would have made himself clear earlier. You assume something and then take it for a fact, and any possibility that you got it wrong is simply too outlandish for you and your ego to be true.I don't assume anything at all. Anyone with >75 IQ can tell what he is talking about. It is EXTREMELY obvious.
He did not state that argiculture and sedentarization is what caused first war. He said that, Having property is what started the first war, regardless of what kind of property it is, at least in my opinion.Seriously? OK, I give up trying to explain this to you. You are thickest person I have ever dealt with. Ever. Congratulations. I literally do not know anyone else in the whole wide world who could interpret it that way. And I have known some people who are legit retarded. It seems I can add another person to that list. Not even an insult. I didn't know you were mentally challenged before. I apologize for my earlier harsh behavior. I shan't argue with you again.
I apologize for my earlier harsh behavior. I shan't argue with you again.
I'm sure that makes sense in your brain, but the easier way to achieve that result would be to not start arguing with me, you know. You were the one replying to me, little nightmare-chan.Oh yeah, but not arguing with you would not be as entertaining.
Oh yeah, but not arguing with you would not be as entertaining.You're a professional at not getting logic at all, I'll give you that much. Your previous post and this post proves it once more.
You're a professional at not getting logic at all, I'll give you that much. Your previous post and this post proves it once more.
The prerequisite of a joke is that it's funny.
That is not a prerequisite of a joke, actually.
Chimps do have property : territories, females, food storage and clear water place...etc.
And, genetically we ARE apes... so.... we still make same wars as apes do :mrgreen: