Nope. Canary knows exactly what he is doing and why. Your constant childish impatience is the only reason you are upset about his decision regarding New Ichamur today. A decision, which btw, he made in your favor.
Bear in mind that Canary was one of at least 3 Admins- a team, if you will- in game at the time. The other two's threads are strangely lacking in similar comments.
i was in the battle, and someone in text had just complained about floating ladders. canary then said in the frisia ts "get off the floating ladders". Seconds later was when he used the show names cheat... also how does knowing someones name help identify which one is wasting gear?
Good point, no fun allowed. I'll remember that next time.
How many warnings, do you think, I should have to issue for breaking the most widely understood rule over the course of an hour? Or over the course of one day? Or one week? A month?
How many of those should ever even go to the same person?
You should never be attacking your teammates on purpose during a round. If that rule isn't as widely understood as I'm assuming it is, then with edifying reason has a person been punished who broke it.
Canary, why is your ass so tight? We bend over for you all the time brah... Infact we got so used to it we enjoy bending over for you.
If someone gets tked and complains then its admin time. if someone is breaking a rule and someone complains then its admin time...
This is personally the way that I deal with it unless it's low pop and potentially damaging to the server. Of course, there are numerous situations, and that's where your judgment comes in.
Sometimes people don't complain and just leave.
However, if you break a server rule and an admin slaps you for it, well... you can't really argue.
That's not coming from a dystopian power-starved video game admin- it's a rule.
I can't speak for Murder's situation, but from what I understood there was a TK before the round actually literally ended.
The end-of-round rule is in place because not helping your team at any time is potentially detrimental to your teammates, even if it's 18v2.
Yes, the team with 18 will most likely win, even if you managed to TK half your team down to 9, but gaining a multi isn't the only important aspect here;
It's also about generally helping your teammates, whether that be in making life easier for them and killing the last two quicker, or protecting their KDR by lending a hand.
Just my thoughts.
If no one complains then everything is great.
All the other admin threads are just rants or some kind of themed image thread but this one has various admins having an intellectual debate over proper use of power in various situations.
I... I feel so dirty now.
This is personally the way that I deal with it unless it's low pop and potentially damaging to the server. Of course, there are numerous situations, and that's where your judgment comes in.
Sometimes people don't complain and just leave.
However, if you break a server rule and an admin slaps you for it, well... you can't really argue.
That's not coming from a dystopian power-starved video game admin- it's a rule.
I can't speak for Murder's situation, but from what I understood there was a TK before the round actually literally ended.
The end-of-round rule is in place because not helping your team at any time is potentially detrimental to your teammates, even if it's 18v2.
Yes, the team with 18 will most likely win, even if you managed to TK half your team down to 9, but gaining a multi isn't the only important aspect here;
It's also about generally helping your teammates, whether that be in making life easier for them and killing the last two quicker, or protecting their KDR by lending a hand.
Just my thoughts.
No sense of humor. As well, despises TWing yet doesn't care if he TW/TKs himself.
No sense of humor. As well, despises TWing yet doesn't care if he TW/TKs himself.
No sense of humor. As well, despises TWing yet doesn't care if he TW/TKs himself.
Singles out players to kick.So only the ones that actually break the rules? Maybe they should just not break the rules like all the other people NOT being "singled out."
So only the ones that actually break the rules? Maybe they should just not break the rules like all the other people NOT being "singled out."koree is god, dont talk to her like that
koree is god, dont talk to her like thatLemon, you don't get laid by white knighting women on the internet.
Show me in the rules where it says we cannot have a weapons rack.
BOOM! Checkmate!
What you did was the same as killing a team mate because you had seen him team kill before that.
The only rule that was broken was when u chose to grief us by breaking our box. If you were any kind of just admin at all you would ban yourself for doing that. Also, if it had been a rule we were breaking coming up and breaking our box is not the way to handle that. You have admin chat for a reason.
It's not an exploit. It's plane and simply not against the rules, because there is nothing wrong with it.
You are ill-informed. Weapon racks allow you to avoid upkeep on any items pulled out of them. Additionally, throwing weapons, for instance, were absolutely not balanced around the potential to restock them in endless quantities during a round. The only legitimate use for a construction site on battle or siege is as a barricade.
Despite what your opinion is about this, you don't make the rules just because you are an admin.Actually, him being the head NA admin, he does actually have the authority to do this (within certain limitations.) Still, you don't really need Canary's ability of deciding proper interpretations/adding rules, to enforce the no constructable siege equipment thing.
You said it's not an exploit, but it is, in more ways than one.
The rules do say "no exploiting of any kind"
http://forum.melee.org/na-(official)/ban-request-gheist_ritter/
Hey look at this shit lord responding within 5 minutes to white knight his teamspeak buddy and clan mate. Please make it more obvious.
Actually, him being the head NA admin, he does actually have the authority to do this (within certain limitations.) Still, you don't really need Canary's ability of deciding proper interpretations/adding rules, to enforce the no constructable siege equipment thing.
It's all a conspiracy.
I think Canary is mad because everytime a male character puts on a wedding dress, it reminds him that he'll never be a real woman. And that is exploiting his self confidence.