cRPG

cRPG => Announcements => Topic started by: Meow on February 24, 2012, 10:31:42 am

Title: New Market Rule
Post by: Meow on February 24, 2012, 10:31:42 am
From now on, exploiting other players' mistakes on the market will be against the rules.

This means that if you find offers that are obvious mistakes you must return those item/gold to the original owner without any personal gain.
You can buy the item and instantly contact the owner so no one else can grab it or you just PM him and make him aware of his mistake.

If you instead decide to keep the stuff or try to get some extra money out of it, we will forcefully return those items/gold and make sure there is a proper punishment.

We had to put this rule in place since lately some players decided that their own gain is more important than the community and we will make sure they change their mind about that.
Players quit over such mistakes and this will not happen anymore.

There is no way we can return items that were lost this way before since there was no rule against it.
Now there is.
So if you get into trouble on the market because you entered some wrong numbers, be assured from now on you will get your stuff back.

If your "trade partner" is not cooperative according to this rule - contact us.

This only goes for obvious mistakes, some examples:

As always - common sense applies, cases that fall under this rule will be obvious to everyone.

Do not try to abuse this to revert trades because you could have gotten a better one some minutes later or to get temporary money to do other deals, it will be completely obvious to us.

EDIT: Stickied since it's becoming a problem again lately.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Stabby_Dave on February 24, 2012, 11:06:19 am
Great justice
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Cosmos_Shielder on February 24, 2012, 11:19:27 am
What about someone selling a +1 item for 100 000 gold. If the guy is just a fool but didn't make any mistake is that exploiting?
So will there be minimum price for heirloom now?

In fact i definetely agree with these new rules, I just think that this need precise explaination.

What about someone offering a dagger +3 against a German Greatsword +2.
If i had a dagger+3 i would definetely try to replace it by a +2 German Greatsword
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Meow on February 24, 2012, 11:29:14 am
I edited the +2 part of that example but as said, this is about obvious mistakes not about real deals that people want to do.

You can if you like trade a +3 item for a +1 item or 5 gold, we do not care.
This is about people getting ripped off for failing to enter the right numbers or the right heirloom modifier.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Vibe on February 24, 2012, 12:42:11 pm
bout time yo
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: BlackMilk on February 24, 2012, 12:43:36 pm
TurmoilTom pls give me back my lordly light kuyak btw.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Stabby_Dave on February 24, 2012, 12:54:58 pm
Punishing people who have done this previously would be awesome but it wouldnt be right unfortunately.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kafein on February 24, 2012, 01:10:06 pm
Yay, now I can safely sell my +3 KAS for 100000 gold and still get it back with the money cause obviously enough I wanted to sell it for one million.


Please define precisely what is an "obvious input error" or "getting ripped" and what is not. Otherwise it just sounds like the "We can revert trades we don't like now trolololz" rule.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Dezilagel on February 24, 2012, 01:14:46 pm
Yay, now I can safely sell my +3 KAS for 100000 gold and still get it back with the money cause obviously enough I wanted to sell it for one million.


Please define precisely what is an "obvious input error" or "getting ripped" and what is not. Otherwise it just sounds like the "We can revert trades we don't like now trolololz" rule.

Common sense?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: MrShine on February 24, 2012, 01:15:06 pm
Is there going to be some time limit when you can no longer contest an older trade?  I feel like it will be important to draw a line between someone putting something up as a mistake, and someone putting something up underpriced but intentionally, and then realizing how much they could have made later.

As long as this new rule is kept to the very obvious mistake exploiting I think it's a good change... but I foresee some gray areas in the future.

TL;DR Mod is once again alive and kicking
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Meow on February 24, 2012, 01:16:16 pm
Yay, now I can safely sell my +3 KAS for 100000 gold and still get it back with the money cause obviously enough I wanted to sell it for one million.


Please define precisely what is an "obvious input error" or "getting ripped" and what is not. Otherwise it just sounds like the "We can revert trades we don't like now trolololz" rule.

Do not try to abuse this to revert trades because you could have gotten a better one some minutes later or to get temporary money to do other deals, it will be completely obvious to us.

Also which of the examples do you want specified?

If you do such a trade and do not realize that minutes after seeing the trade happened, you will not get anything back, nor will you if you use that money since the trade will be fully reverted which means the other side of the trade will get his/her gold back as well.

EDIT: Removed some "obviously"s.
It amazes me that common sense seems to be very very rare in this community or some people just try ignore it to make a point.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Siiem on February 24, 2012, 01:32:35 pm
Socialist big brother, now coming to c-RPG... sad day for civil liberties!
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Xant on February 24, 2012, 01:38:52 pm
Meow, you should know by now. There is no common sense, you should call it "Good Sense" instead.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Miwiw on February 24, 2012, 01:50:17 pm
It is quite easy to notice mistakes. We all know the average prices of certain items. If someone puts up a Flamberge + 3 for 150,000 Gold, it is surely a mistake. If someone puts up a Ligh Lance +1 for 300,000 Gold it is no mistake. It is cheap for +1 items but Light Lances aren't really worth more (at least that is around the price that is in the market all the time). If someone forgets a "0" it is a mistake, if someone puts it for 20,000 less than he could earn, it is not. Well it could be, but anyone could claim that. If there is the same item for 400,000 and someone puts it for 300,000, it could be seen as mistake.
I guess in most cases it is up to the admins (but why should someone sell the same item for 100,000 less if ppl could probably buy it for a higher price (ie. 390,000)). :)

Good idea however. Probably some work coming up...
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Arrowblood on February 24, 2012, 01:57:51 pm
POOPHAMMERRRR :(
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: BlindGuy on February 24, 2012, 02:06:18 pm
Ozin gimme my MW SS back I realise now I could have got much more (kills) with it  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Xol! on February 24, 2012, 02:09:24 pm
Good rule.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Christo on February 24, 2012, 02:43:16 pm
Excellent.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Polobow on February 24, 2012, 02:49:42 pm
Also which of the examples do you want specified?

If you do such a trade and do not realize that minutes after seeing the trade happened, you will not get anything back, nor will you if you use that money since the trade will be fully reverted which means the other side of the trade will get his/her gold back as well.

EDIT: Removed some "obviously"s.
It amazes me that common sense seems to be very very rare in this community or some people just try ignore it to make a point.

It's hard to get common sense from people when they can profit from something themselves.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Zanze on February 24, 2012, 03:25:40 pm
Yeah...Mail Mittens+3 for 550k is a fair trade to some people... >_>
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Meow on February 24, 2012, 03:34:19 pm
Yeah, that was one of the two people who were the main reason why we introduced this rule.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Mephistoles on February 24, 2012, 03:39:05 pm
One Little Question: You are going to buy a loompoint and accept a offer "stones for a +1/+2 item" and you had the deal: item gets loomed and then youself put offer up "600k for +2/+3 item". What happens if the Guy just ignores you after you accepted the offer? So you lost your item and he gets +1/+2 for free. Will there also be justice?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Meow on February 24, 2012, 03:57:28 pm
That's called scamming and gets the guy perma banned.

We are doing that for a few month now and there was not a single case of this happening in a while.

Just report those cases directly to me.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Thovex on February 24, 2012, 04:01:58 pm
Great improvement on marketplace security.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Son Of Odin on February 24, 2012, 04:02:20 pm
marketplace very very bad !!

injustice ! !
 I love Marketplace but

 a very difficult game, marketplace and hit hard

-SoO
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: RRush_Mia on February 24, 2012, 04:26:30 pm
Finaly and thanks.
Somnium read this topic lol
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kafein on February 24, 2012, 04:26:32 pm
Also which of the examples do you want specified?

If you do such a trade and do not realize that minutes after seeing the trade happened, you will not get anything back, nor will you if you use that money since the trade will be fully reverted which means the other side of the trade will get his/her gold back as well.

EDIT: Removed some "obviously"s.
It amazes me that common sense seems to be very very rare in this community or some people just try ignore it to make a point.

It is common sense that rules should be clear. It is common sense that common sense is subjective and subject to change. It is common sense that anything unclear in rules can and will be used to justify unjust punishments. It is common sense that interpretation should be kept away from the law. It is common sense that never stops drawing us back into uncreativity and obscurantism. Ideas never progress with common sense. Common sense isn't logic, for there aren't any clearly defined concept or rules in common sense. As such, it should be ignored as much as possible when people try to make a point.

I love how we all are (rightfully) screaming about the Patriot act or SOPA, yet somehow doing the exact same thing ourselves isn't a problem.

However, I do understand this is a game, and a minimum of goodwill and benevolence is expected from everybody. Just like with 99% of the mods out there, the development and administration aren't and never were democratic, as well as not being required to be.

I'm fine with this rule personally, I just don't like the fact that nobody points out the problems that can and will emerge when we will have borderline cases. Let's say I fucked up the item selection, and sold my +3 heavy lance instead of my +3 KAS, but for the KAS price. Determining wether I actually got scammed is hard because it depends on the relative value of the HL and KAS.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Bjord on February 24, 2012, 04:29:58 pm
What about old trades? Or mistakes rather.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Xant on February 24, 2012, 04:31:40 pm
sold my +3 heavy lance instead of my +3 KAS, but for the KAS price. Determining wether I actually got scammed is hard because it depends on the relative value of the HL and KAS.

Obviously not. It isn't hard to determine if you use some Good Sense. HL and KAS both have relatively similar prices. You're not trading a +3 item for 1500 gold, you're trading them for 1.1 million instead of 1.3 million, maybe. Something like that, something sensible for a +3 item in any case.

What about old trades? Or mistakes rather.

Bjúúúúúúrd not so gud at reading comprehension? Check the OP again.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Raven_Joy on February 24, 2012, 04:50:25 pm
A "confirmation" option to be added to the seller side would solve this problem and also facilitate trading by eliminating the need of intermediate items and allowing people to choose specific buyers...
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Meow on February 24, 2012, 04:51:58 pm
I love how we all are (rightfully) screaming about the Patriot act or SOPA, yet somehow doing the exact same thing ourselves isn't a problem.

Really? Patriot act?

Well, you are totally right about the part where this never was a democracy and I will under no circumstances define this rule in a way where people start exploiting possible loopholes.

If there is a dispute between both trade partners and they can not agree on something we will judge the cases individually.
And yes we will decide on what we think is the right thing.

This rule is there to prevent people from ruining other people's game experience.

So instead of common sense just ask yourself: "Would I want to be on the other side of that trade?"

If the answer is no - don't do it.

Smart trading is fine and if you can make money with honest trades on the market there is no problem at all.

I'm fine with this rule personally, I just don't like the fact that nobody points out the problems that can and will emerge when we will have borderline cases. Let's say I fucked up the item selection, and sold my +3 heavy lance instead of my +3 KAS, but for the KAS price. Determining wether I actually got scammed is hard because it depends on the relative value of the HL and KAS.

This is a case where that rules does not apply since it's in no way obvious for your trade partner that you made a mistake.

A "confirmation" option to be added to the seller side would solve this problem and also facilitate trading by eliminating the need of intermediate items and allowing people to choose specific buyers...

This I totally agree on.
Not sure it's gonna be added though.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: RandomDude on February 24, 2012, 04:54:26 pm
Good to see this new rule.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kafein on February 24, 2012, 05:12:37 pm
Really? Patriot act?

Well, you are totally right about the part where this never was a democracy and I will under no circumstances define this rule in a way where people start exploiting possible loopholes.

If there is a dispute between both trade partners and they can not agree on something we will judge the cases individually.
And yes we will decide on what we think is the right thing.

This rule is there to prevent people from ruining other people's game experience.

So instead of common sense just ask yourself: "Would I want to be on the other side of that trade?"

If the answer is no - don't do it.

Smart trading is fine and if you can make money with honest trades on the market there is no problem at all.

This is a case where that rules does not apply since it's in no way obvious for your trade partner that you made a mistake.

This I totally agree on.
Not sure it's gonna be added though.

Good points :)

I put the Patriot act as example because it allows the US government to take grave actions based on very unclear criteria. Just like SOPA that says that any site "helping or enabling" foreign sites to give access to copyrighted material is a site dedicated to theft of US property. The part about helping and enabling is easily the cause of 80% of the fuss about the text.

Nobody needs to be part of the cRPG community, so it is completely legit and probably the best option to run it in a undemocratic manner. Afterall, those that get the job done are the ones that decide what is done. I think this wording is better :

"If there is a dispute between both trade partners and they can not agree on something we will judge the cases individually.
And yes we will decide on what we think is the right thing."

Anyway, best is not making mistakes at all. This new rule will probably give you more work Meow :P
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Espu on February 24, 2012, 05:41:07 pm
Better rename him Maow.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Jarlek on February 24, 2012, 07:22:00 pm
:D
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: POOPHAMMER on February 24, 2012, 07:42:02 pm
my life is over
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Jacko on February 24, 2012, 07:43:52 pm
I don't like the rule. A market is made up by winners and losers, and preying on other peoples mistakes is a valid strategy, regardless of morals. Coming from EVE I have a pretty thick nose when it comes to scams and trickery.

But, this is just a game after all, and maybe it's better to have rules like this to prevent people from getting 'griefed'. I don't have to like it, but I can still agree to it.

Chairman Maow, glorious leader and noobsaver.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: TurmoilTom on February 24, 2012, 07:55:22 pm
my life is over
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kherr on February 24, 2012, 08:10:31 pm
Finaly and thanks.
Somnium read this topic lol
I sent Somnium a link of this thread. I know what he does. The new rule was published a few days too late for me...
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Adalwulf on February 24, 2012, 08:30:20 pm
if you honestly can't realize the price or offer you want for an item before you press the confirmation button then in all fairness tough luck. This isn't noob friendly jacko....it's stupid friendly.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Rhaelys on February 24, 2012, 08:33:11 pm
I don't like the rule. A market is made up by winners and losers, and preying on other peoples mistakes is a valid strategy, regardless of morals. Coming from EVE I have a pretty thick nose when it comes to scams and trickery.

But, this is just a game after all, and maybe it's better to have rules like this to prevent people from getting 'griefed'. I don't have to like it, but I can still agree to it.

Chairman Maow, glorious leader and noobsaver.

I stopped reading after that.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: RibaldRon on February 24, 2012, 08:34:52 pm
How about putting in a warning saying "THE TRADE YOU'RE ADDING IS PROBABLY A REALLY BAD IDEA" if you request too little gold/pay gold & item for nothing/etc. so that people will actually know beforehand?

That'll take the guesswork and manpower out of trying to deal with the cases of somebody crying because they wanted just a slightly better deal than they settled for initially.


If cases that trigger this rule are obvious enough, it shouldn't be too hard.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Zanze on February 24, 2012, 08:55:50 pm
The majority of the problem wasn't people putting up bad deals, it was people like Somnium preying on loom point trades.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 24, 2012, 09:13:56 pm
I don't like the rule. A market is made up by winners and losers, and preying on other peoples mistakes is a valid strategy, regardless of morals. Coming from EVE I have a pretty thick nose when it comes to scams and trickery.

Coming from EVE myself, I have to say it is a radically different game and should not be compared in this fashion to the c-RPG game. They are both indeed called "markets" but all similarities end there.

EVE is also built for cut-throat PvP, c-RPG does not have the same player base nor mentalities for that.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Turboflex on February 24, 2012, 11:18:17 pm
good rule.

No people this is not eve or the real life stock exchange, it's a small friendly community of people who want to have fun playing an intense combat game, not people who want to e-thug pretending to be space warlords.

People acting like sharks with scripts to snap up typos on market will wreck this mod.

If the mod had more programmers, they could add a better trading validation system to marketplace, where it gives you a warning when you are about to fuckup, but why should someone like chadz have to spend hours of his time just to prevent a few morons with poor morals from making everyone else unhappy? Better to just ban them when they pull shady shit, most people around here don't want these assholes.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: MrShovelFace on February 25, 2012, 12:05:56 am
communist cat is in opposition to great captialism
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Leshma on February 25, 2012, 01:39:02 am
How about putting in a warning saying "THE TRADE YOU'RE ADDING IS PROBABLY A REALLY BAD IDEA" if you request too little gold/pay gold & item for nothing/etc. so that people will actually know beforehand?

That'll take the guesswork and manpower out of trying to deal with the cases of somebody crying because they wanted just a slightly better deal than they settled for initially.


If cases that trigger this rule are obvious enough, it shouldn't be too hard.

This.

I think it's not hard to write a preview script which would show you your offer and color it accordingly (green for sensible offer, red for both overpriced and underpriced items). Sensible offer could be average offer for said item on market +-100K gold. That way market would stabilize because many people would change their price lower and higher if they are suggested to do it. It would do good for marketplace, inflation is kinda ridiculous atm.

And the biggest gain would be... our dear Meow wouldn't have to deal with dumb on the one side and mean people on the other side.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Leshma on February 25, 2012, 01:43:53 am
What about old trades? Or mistakes rather.

Nothing. We are still fucked.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Cosmos_Shielder on February 25, 2012, 01:50:08 am
Also which of the examples do you want specified?

If you do such a trade and do not realize that minutes after seeing the trade happened, you will not get anything back, nor will you if you use that money since the trade will be fully reverted which means the other side of the trade will get his/her gold back as well.

EDIT: Removed some "obviously"s.
It amazes me that common sense seems to be very very rare in this community or some people just try ignore it to make a point.
Personnally i was not trying to make a point at all. I find this new rule very usefull.
I was not really afraid of admin punishing wrongly.
I was just thinking that if the rule are not precise enough , your job will be harder since a lot of people will whine.
And too much work for detective Meow is less efficient Detective Meow!
I am making profit by hiding what i think the true valour of item are.
When I exchange a katana +1 against a german greatsword and 15k gold i definetely know that i make a very good deal and i would never do the reverse deal.
But i think we both dont consider that as scamming, since it is +1 against +1 and a few amount of gold.
Moreover the guy may love Katana , and want to gets rid of his Danish Faster. Our difference in opinion fits us both.
So we can say that i am making unfair deal but your rule doesnt apply to me.
So thats why you need to be precise, so when real people will be scamming it will be easier to close the case fast .

But enough talking i shouldnt just keep criticizing without giving any purposal.
So here may be a rule

for +1 heirloom : Take the 3 lowest heirloom offer. Calculate the average and then divide it by 3
You got your price and you can defintely consider that selling below this price is scamming.
Since forgetting a zero is dividing by ten , every people that try to scam these kind of error will definetely know that they are wrong.

 What i suggest is that no one can bypass  these rule,  but you can still be considered as a scammer even if you didnt bypassed them.
So lets consider that "averageoflowest/3" is equal to 110k and someone make a mistake and type 115k instead of 315 k. You can still argue that buying it, is scaming even if it did bypassed the rule.

What is the interest of this rule ? : It will help closing obvious case faster. You just have to say you bypassed Cosmos Shielder Rule (i love that name , dont you? :P) of averageof3lowest/3
And common sense still need to be applied for people who want to sell below averageof3lowest/3 weird item like +1 smokebomb
You can get this strange item by missclicking when you heirloom them...
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Jarlek on February 25, 2012, 02:20:48 am
Can we also have a Wall of Shame for people being banned for this?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Meow on February 25, 2012, 02:25:35 am
Personnally i was not trying to make a point at all. I find this new rule very usefull.
(click to show/hide)

Haha, I was mainly answering Kaffein with what you quoted, your reply looked perfectly fine :mrgreen:

Not sure about extra specific rules yet but I'll check that out tomorrow.

Can we also have a Wall of Shame for people being banned for this?
(click to show/hide)

Well, it kinda happened with the scammers since those mostly happened publicly.
Some people already dropped names here.

Can't say if we will make them public ourselves but you know how it goes when people get ripped off and are angry  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Cosmos_Shielder on February 25, 2012, 02:33:22 am
Haha, I was mainly answering Kaffein with what you quoted, your reply looked perfectly fine :mrgreen:

Not sure about extra specific rules yet but I'll check that out tomorrow.
(click to show/hide)

Well, it kinda happened with the scammers since those mostly happened publicly.
Some people already dropped names here.

Can't say if we will make them public ourselves but you know how it goes when people get ripped off and are angry  :mrgreen:

Dont exactly check the rule as i gave it. It only took my 15 second to find it it need to be adjusted.
We can make it  average of k lower heirloom offer divided by µ

Where :
k is an integer
and µ a Real number

µ can be 3.14 or 2.76 i don t care we need to find something that fit the market.
The lower is this µ the more cases you will close, but the more strict will be the rule.
But in fact i think we can have it below 2 because from what ive seen , you can always sell instantly every +1 item if you put it to 275k. So putting an offer below 275k seems not logical.





And i think Kafein has been a little too harsh , but dont take it for yourself, he is more thinking about a global point of view about economy.
Finding rule for the market is not easy since you need to avoid obsious scam , but you need to allow people to make strange trade that in fact has meaning.
But Thanks god we dont have this for the moment : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_%28finance%29
Selling thing you dont have in Crpg Would so baaaad!
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Tzar on February 25, 2012, 02:58:21 am
There is no way we can return items that were lost this way before since there was no rule against it.

Bullshit n 100% gay you should rape em an hang em instead of showing mercy not only to pay respect to those who left or rage quit after they got fucked an for the people who have lost countless hours due to some typo...

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Aseldo on February 25, 2012, 05:46:13 am
instead of punishing players you could just make the system more failsafe. So if somebody gives away a loom for way less it'd be way more embarrassing because even a monkey could know how much they are going to put it up for on the market. As it stands I always have to count the amount I'm typing in like 3 times just to make sure because I can never be sure how many zeros there are. It would be nice to have something in place to make it easier to notice how much the amount is going to be.

Simple suggestion, when typing in a number right below it will be the number in bright green with commas at appropriate places(every 3 numbers)
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: PieParadox on February 25, 2012, 06:14:21 am
Maybe it should be like writing a check.

You have to input the things twice (price, item, heirloom)... A little more hassle but I think it might help a lot.

Also why hasnt private trading been implemented yet? WHY!?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Meow on February 25, 2012, 08:26:53 am
Bullshit n 100% gay you should rape em an hang em instead of showing mercy not only to pay respect to those who left or rage quit after they got fucked an for the people who have lost countless hours due to some typo...

Not my call.
I'm mainly glad it stops now.

And i think Kafein has been a little too harsh , but dont take it for yourself, he is more thinking about a global point of view about economy.

Haha, no worries, Kaf and I are bros :mrgreen:
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Ninja_Khorin on February 25, 2012, 09:53:51 am
Bad parenting is the real monster here.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kafein on February 25, 2012, 11:25:01 am
Maybe it should be like writing a check.

You have to input the things twice (price, item, heirloom)... A little more hassle but I think it might help a lot.

Also why hasnt private trading been implemented yet? WHY!?

This might help. Forcing players to write everything twice and maybe even to wait idle during a certain amount of time before they can confirm the offer. I don't think anyone would ever make a mistake on the selected items again if we had to choose them from a list then write the complete name correctly.

Haha, no worries, Kaf and I are bros :mrgreen:

Hey, this is private xD
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: FRANK_THE_TANK on February 25, 2012, 11:37:44 am
good news
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: RiPLeY_II on February 25, 2012, 12:18:27 pm
Usually i'm with the devs decision, as they usually have a taste for common sense. But i think this is really a bad idea, as you're directly getting into players interaction and their rights (even the right to make mistakes).

A game without mistakes is not a game. If you make a mistake and you're able to get back before you made the mistake. Where is the game? Even more for a multiplayer game ...

I'm ok with making messages of confirmation about "bad offers" in the market before making them (p.e. 2 times question: "are you sure? this seems to be a bad idea." You go ok, then second question: "Are you sure? This seems like a wrong offer?" then you go ok, the offer is up in the market), but direct "go back" manipulations are not and should not be fair.

Too much direct manipulation from devs in this case.

PD: i've never exploited someone's mistake in the market.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Cosmos_Shielder on February 25, 2012, 02:35:22 pm
Usually i'm with the devs decision, as they usually have a taste for common sense. But i think this is really a bad idea, as you're directly getting into players interaction and their rights (even the right to make mistakes).

A game without mistakes is not a game. If you make a mistake and you're able to get back before you made the mistake. Where is the game? Even more for a multiplayer game ...

I'm ok with making messages of confirmation about "bad offers" in the market before making them (p.e. 2 times question: "are you sure? this seems to be a bad idea." You go ok, then second question: "Are you sure? This seems like a wrong offer?" then you go ok, the offer is up in the market), but direct "go back" manipulations are not and should not be fair.

Too much direct manipulation from devs in this case.

PD: i've never exploited someone's mistake in the market.
Yes we can also add the formula of the (averageof k lowest offer)*0.60 to warn people when they try to sell.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Leshma on February 25, 2012, 02:48:54 pm
We wanted a way to exchange our loomed items. Marketplace happened. People got ripped off. I'm pretty sure we didn't want that to happen.

We just wanted to exchange looms.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: PanPan on February 25, 2012, 03:10:31 pm
fuck that shit I did 2 fail trades and lost all my looms -.- And now this why didn't that was implented before :(
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: zottlmarsch on February 25, 2012, 03:53:04 pm
if you honestly can't realize the price or offer you want for an item before you press the confirmation button then in all fairness tough luck. This isn't noob friendly jacko....it's stupid friendly.

This is true, I've done 100's of trades on the market and never made a  mistake, simply because I check the numbers before I add the trade. Is that really so hard to do?? I'm sorry but if you can't tell the difference between a 6 figure number and a 7 figure number you should really be spending less time playing computer games and more time learning basic mathematics.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Leshma on February 25, 2012, 03:57:00 pm
I made my mistake at 3 AM lol. Item went after one minute or so. Of course it was NA player, who else could be....
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kafein on February 25, 2012, 04:08:06 pm
I think the main target of this rule is people that run scripts that automatically buy the fail offers, not the real marketplace sharks that actually know something about the value of things.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Chris_P_Bacon on February 25, 2012, 04:20:40 pm
I made my mistake at 3 AM lol. Item went after one minute or so. Of course it was NA player, who else could be....
Well it could be an EU.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Tears of Destiny on February 25, 2012, 04:59:08 pm
We wanted a way to exchange our loomed items. Marketplace happened. People got ripped off. I'm pretty sure we didn't want that to happen.

We just wanted to exchange looms.

This is basically what I wanted to post, word for word.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Teeth on February 25, 2012, 07:30:29 pm
Usually i'm with the devs decision, as they usually have a taste for common sense. But i think this is really a bad idea, as you're directly getting into players interaction and their rights (even the right to make mistakes).

A game without mistakes is not a game. If you make a mistake and you're able to get back before you made the mistake. Where is the game? Even more for a multiplayer game ...
This post wasn't first in line at the making sense department.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Christo on February 25, 2012, 07:38:15 pm
We wanted a way to exchange our loomed items. Marketplace happened. People got ripped off. I'm pretty sure we didn't want that to happen.

We just wanted to exchange looms.

Indeed my friend.

Down with the market exploiters!

For great justice.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Corwin on February 25, 2012, 08:06:16 pm
I would like to suggest another rule.

Introduce a time limit for filing complaints for this sort of things, for example one week or one month. Because we have inflation on our hands, and market value of items is not a constant. So, it is possible to imagine that someone complains that he has been cheated because after the patch/several nerfs or buffs, MW Shashka is worth now 2000k, and he sold it for 900k.
Anyway, I suppose this is covered with common sense rule, but I think it wouldn't hurt.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Cosmos_Shielder on February 25, 2012, 08:39:53 pm
Corwin we are speaking about people writting 150k instead of 1500k
Its not about complaining because someone sold something 290 k whereas he could sell it 360k. This is marketting that no rule should apply to that. You are a good trader or your are not.
What Meow want to rule is people exploiting the fact that other people can make stupid error like forgetting a zero, or selling for 10 k gold a +1 heirloom because they forget to put which heirloom they wanted in exchange
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kherr on February 25, 2012, 09:05:37 pm
And now some people want to hide... not to take responsibility for their actions.

Somnium did a namechange and his name is DarkOmen now.

So he got mine morningstar +3 with an offer by mistake and now he also wants a clean history. Bah!
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: POOPHAMMER on February 25, 2012, 09:13:08 pm
I think the main target of this rule is people that run scripts that automatically buy the fail offers, not the real marketplace sharks that actually know something about the value of things.

People used scripts? Now thats just lame. It was not hard to hit refresh in-between rounds.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: zottlmarsch on February 25, 2012, 09:50:58 pm
Can I just ask from an innocent buyers point of view, if you buy something that is really cheap. then you PM the seller and get no response, what do you do next? wait or resell and risk getting into trouble at a later date if they decide to 'press charges' against you. I think the introduction of a time frame in which after a certain amount of time the item becomes legally yours would be the best idea. Looks to me like this rule seems to protect sellers, but maybe buyers should get a little protection too?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Zanze on February 25, 2012, 10:09:02 pm
People used scripts? Now thats just lame. It was not hard to hit refresh in-between rounds.
yeah. Somnium for one used one. Bought out my +3 mail mittens the day before this rule was implemented. The person who loomed it was on vent with me and counted down when he was placing it so i could start spamming refresh to buy it quick. I never even saw the item go up while spamming refresh on a +3 mail mitten search.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kherr on February 25, 2012, 10:16:50 pm
My morningstar +3 was bought by Somnium/DarkOmen immediately.
I saw my mistake directly after setting up the offer. So I tried to delete it a few seconds after creating... too late.

Assumed he used a script, was the action of Somnium/DarkOmen illegal independently of the new rule?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: POOPHAMMER on February 25, 2012, 10:43:19 pm
My morningstar +3 was bought by Somnium/DarkOmen immediately.
I saw my mistake directly after setting up the offer. So I tried to delete it a few seconds after creating... too late.

Assumed he used a script, was the action of Somnium/DarkOmen illegal independently of the new rule?

Actually IIRC scripting was a big no-no on the marketplace anyway, imo should be put under the same class as autoblock (same theory, having a script automate stuff for you for your own gain)
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Corwin on February 25, 2012, 10:46:14 pm
Corwin we are speaking about people writting 150k instead of 1500k
Its not about complaining because someone sold something 290 k whereas he could sell it 360k. This is marketting that no rule should apply to that. You are a good trader or your are not.
What Meow want to rule is people exploiting the fact that other people can make stupid error like forgetting a zero, or selling for 10 k gold a +1 heirloom because they forget to put which heirloom they wanted in exchange

What we are speaking off, at least this is how I understand the intention of developers, is to create a system that works. With new market options come new possibilities for abuse. There is a possibility that all the cases wont be as clear cut as they use to be.

I suggested this in order to preserve some security in those cases, so that people could be sure that their transactions are secure after certain amount of time has passed and to prevent those simple "change of heart" complaints. Anyway, I am sure that it can't hurt.

And for the record, I never scammed anybody, never bought extra cheap items and this suggestion has nothing to do with me personally.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Eugen on February 26, 2012, 09:29:32 am
The new rule is nothing I care much about, BUT:

Ther sould be a protected mode to make deals between two specific players.

About a week ago, I set a special offer (cheap), with an unpopular loomed weapon - and it was bought in the instant I set the offer. I am not shure if someone could react this fast. So the script story seems not out of hands for me.

So there is no safe way to make deals between friends - becouse of fast buyers (maybe script, maybe not).

What about an option that makes the deal protected - so the seller has the possiblity to confirm the transfer or decline it and wait for another buyer. This way one could safely trade with friends.

Just a proposal to throw in.

Greats
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Rhaelys on February 26, 2012, 09:34:15 am
The new rule is nothing I care much about, BUT:

Ther sould be a protected mode to make deals between two specific players.

About a week ago, I set a special offer (cheap), with an unpopular loomed weapon - and it was bought in the instant I set the offer. I am not shure if someone could react this fast. So the script story seems not out of hands for me.

So there is no safe way to make deals between friends - becouse of fast buyers (maybe script, maybe not).

What about an option that makes the deal protected - so the seller has the possiblity to confirm the transfer or decline it and wait for another buyer. This way one could safely trade with friends.

Just a proposal to throw in.

Greats

Incorrect. Just conduct two trades using stones to guard against marketplace snipers.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kafein on February 26, 2012, 11:26:01 am
Incorrect. Just conduct two trades using stones to guard against marketplace snipers.


This is how people get really scammed, for example while "buying" an heirloom point for that +2 armor.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: okiN on February 26, 2012, 12:15:49 pm
No need for stones anymore, just offer to buy for x gold. Never, ever sell.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: BlackMilk on February 26, 2012, 12:15:56 pm
My morningstar +3 was bought by Somnium/DarkOmen immediately.
I saw my mistake directly after setting up the offer. So I tried to delete it a few seconds after creating... too late.

Assumed he used a script, was the action of Somnium/DarkOmen illegal independently of the new rule?
Same here with TurmoilTom and my Lordly Light Kuyak
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Rhaelys on February 26, 2012, 01:33:21 pm

This is how people get really scammed, for example while "buying" an heirloom point for that +2 armor.

Obviously taken out of context. I was referring to a trade between two people who know each other, and want to guard against random marketplace snipers.

And yes, you can just do buy offers now >.>
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Captain_Georges on February 26, 2012, 02:23:25 pm
We had to put this rule in place since lately some players decided that their own gain is more important than the community and we will make sure they change their mind about that.

I read this sentence and then I look at meow's avatar.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Bjord on March 02, 2012, 04:11:37 pm
Bjúúúúúúrd not so gud at reading comprehension? Check the OP again.

Ah yes...

From now on...

Missed the first sentence.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Patoson on March 02, 2012, 09:30:23 pm
This is great news! Thank you!
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Digglez on March 02, 2012, 11:56:38 pm
kinda sad that you have to run a nanny state for careless people

What you SHOULD be doing is improving the marketplace with STANDARD features such as; denominator separators like , for NA . for EU and a notification system that warns you if you are selling an item for say 10-15% below the norm average recorded price
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Tears of Destiny on March 03, 2012, 12:17:39 am
...such as; denominator separators like , for NA ....

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: isatis on March 03, 2012, 02:25:58 am
lol... snap!
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Digglez on March 03, 2012, 01:16:16 pm
yep, viewing existing offers shows you a denominator *golfclap*, it DOES NOT however show up when you are typing in YOUR offer amount...exactly when it would be the MOST useful in preventing careless mistakes and make it so admins dont HAVE to do any of this nanny work in the first place.  Its pretty advance programming, like those forms that auto insert -'s when you type in a phone number
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kherr on March 03, 2012, 01:34:57 pm
Imho a common sense solution is good. cRPG has got a small, but stable playerbase and the developers, admins and equus africanus asinuss do a really great job. Of course you can make a technical solution for a lot of problems. But you need time to think about a technical solution and the implementation. Then the developers have to do that in their spare time. Of couse a simple message box "Do you really want that" is easy to implement, but something like an average price is not.
I dont like the idea to force technical solutions for a team who works for free.

Edit:
the forum converts d_o_n_k_e_y (without _) to equus africanus asinuss... LOL
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Wraist on March 04, 2012, 01:40:14 am
yep, viewing existing offers shows you a denominator *golfclap*, it DOES NOT however show up when you are typing in YOUR offer amount...exactly when it would be the MOST useful in preventing careless mistakes and make it so admins dont HAVE to do any of this nanny work in the first place.  Its pretty advance programming, like those forms that auto insert -'s when you type in a phone number

Highlighting works fine.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: TurmoilTom on March 04, 2012, 03:51:59 am
the forum converts d_o_n_k_e_y (without _) to equus africanus asinuss... LOL

donkey donkey donkey donkey donkey
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Haze_The_Hobo on March 04, 2012, 09:07:52 am
In my opinion, if you can't calculate, go back to school and learn mathematics.
How hard is it to count if there is 3, 4, 5 or 6 zeros?

p.s. You should focus on fixing that annyoing marketplace bug, where it shows me 1,000,000 +1 as cheapest in that category, almost got scammed there!!
(jk)
 :mrgreen: :D
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kherr on March 04, 2012, 10:21:14 am
« Last Edit: Today at 10:26:03 by Von_Hazaa »
How hard is it to read your text before you post? That's not meant as an insult, but as example that people make mistakes and there should be the possibility to fix it.
Some buyer of misoffered items had more than luck. They systematically crawled technically the market.
If you take a look around you will see that the law in real life takes account of such things. In cRPG it's often Wild West.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Haze_The_Hobo on March 04, 2012, 10:37:15 am
How hard is it to read your text before you post? That's not meant as an insult, but as example that people make mistakes and there should be the possibility to fix it.
Some buyer of misoffered items had more than luck. They systematically crawled technically the market.
If you take a look around you will see that the law in real life takes account of such things. In cRPG it's often Wild West.

How hard is it for a person to realize what means p.s.? POST SCRIPTUM, MEANS IT WAS ADDED AFTER ORIGINAL POST.

Thanks bye mmkay.

p.s. If you wanna talk about laws: in my country if i go shopping and see item underpriced, law orders the place to sell it to me with the price i saw, even if it was 10x lower than they wanted to.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kherr on March 04, 2012, 10:59:26 am
How hard is it for a person to realize what means p.s.? POST SCRIPTUM, MEANS IT WAS ADDED AFTER ORIGINAL POST.
Where does p.s. comes from? In a hand- or typewritten text it was not possible to edit the text afterwards. So they used p.s. to say something additionally which the editor forgot.
I did not know the cause of your edit. But again... it was not meant as an insult.

p.s. You caps lock is defect
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: IR_Kuoin on March 05, 2012, 10:39:45 am
From now on, exploiting other players' mistakes on the market will be against the rules.

This means that if you find offers that are obvious mistakes you must return those item/gold to the original owner without any personal gain.
You can buy the item and instantly contact the owner so no one else can grab it or you just PM him and make him aware of his mistake.

If you instead decide to keep the stuff or try to get some extra money out of it, we will forcefully return those items/gold and make sure there is a proper punishment.

We had to put this rule in place since lately some players decided that their own gain is more important than the community and we will make sure they change their mind about that.
Players quit over such mistakes and this will not happen anymore.

There is no way we can return items that were lost this way before since there was no rule against it.
Now there is.
So if you get into trouble on the market because you entered some wrong numbers, be assured from now on you will get your stuff back.

If your "trade partner" is not cooperative according to this rule - contact us.

This only goes for obvious mistakes, some examples:
  • Selling heirlooms for a fraction of their actual value. (e.g. selling a +3 item for 1/1500/15000/150000 gold and similar deals)
  • Offering a multitude of their value in gold. (e.g. offering 3 million gold for a +1 Item)
  • Offering a +3 item for a +0 +1 item without requesting extra gold.

As always - common sense applies, cases that fall under this rule will be obvious to everyone.

Do not try to abuse this to revert trades because you could have gotten a better one some minutes later or to get temporary money to do other deals, it will be completely obvious to us.

I once sold my Mw katana for 650k because a market / heirlooming selling veteran "fooled" me, I don't want to say his name because he might get angry :P But He said that he would buy my mw katana for 650k, which he convinced me was a good price, he went afk and i put up and offer for mw katana for 650k and then it was bought 4 min later. The guy who "fooled" me did not buy it but another guy did, and when I said i wanted to buy it back since I did a "BIG" mistake he said he wanted 1.2 mill for it  :|

I now got a mw katana which i have loomed myself and bought looms for, but just wondering if i could get some compensation from whoever etc. When I said it was a mistake he was beeing a real asshat and he even TK'd me at spawn once for "whining" about my mistak.

I'm just saying this because I thought I should say it :D I have gotten a mw katana back but I had to buy 2 looms for it and loom it myself, I lost some looms on this. And when I lost my mw katana which i had used all my crpg time to loom i felt like ".....pfffff" It is quite some time since this happened but, meh. I still got the messages from the market.

P.S I dont realy care if you choose to ignore this, sicne its quite some time back, and I just thought i might tell :P
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Old_Sir_Agor on March 05, 2012, 12:02:07 pm
all what i can say about it kuoin, you nOOB )) hehehe
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: IR_Kuoin on March 05, 2012, 01:54:14 pm
all what i can say about it kuoin, you nOOB )) hehehe
:cry:
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Old_Sir_Agor on March 05, 2012, 02:02:41 pm
:cry:

will you come back in game btw?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: IR_Kuoin on March 05, 2012, 05:31:34 pm
will you come back in game btw?

Maybe... when I'm tired of my other games :D
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Zanze on March 05, 2012, 06:42:47 pm
If it happened before the rule was made, you are screwed. Someone using a script bought my +3 mail mittens during a loom pt trade the day before rule came up. Person refused to return it, admins weren't allowed to help. : /
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Bulzur on March 05, 2012, 06:59:31 pm
That's a shame, cause using a script is definitely a proof of bad intentions.
(If the guy doesn't give it back saying "Hey, i secured your item, feel free to put the same offer so that i can give it back. Cheers.")
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: BlindGuy on March 06, 2012, 02:29:03 am
the forum converts d_o_n_k_e_y (without _) to equus africanus asinuss... LOL

Where have you been your whole life?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: BlindGuy on March 06, 2012, 02:35:40 am
yep, viewing existing offers shows you a denominator *golfclap*, it DOES NOT however show up when you are typing in YOUR offer amount...exactly when it would be the MOST useful in preventing careless mistakes and make it so admins dont HAVE to do any of this nanny work in the first place.  Its pretty advance programming, like those forms that auto insert -'s when you type in a phone number

HAD to repost when I read this :D

If you cannot count how many times you pressed 0, then....well, sry, it goes like this:

Lets use base 1

Place a 0 after 1, you get 10, thats TEN

Add another 0 and thats 100, ONE HUNDRED

another and you have 1000, ONE THOUSAND

are you getting this?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Digglez on March 06, 2012, 02:41:04 am
HAD to repost when I read this :D

If you cannot count how many times you pressed 0, then....well, sry, it goes like this:

Lets use base 1

Place a 0 after 1, you get 10, thats TEN

Add another 0 and thats 100, ONE HUNDRED

another and you have 1000, ONE THOUSAND

are you getting this?

I'm not the one with the problem bro, so no need to patronize me.  I can count my zeros on my numpad just fine.  Instead of wasting admins time every day/week, taking 1 day to put in this kind of feature would save them alot of work in the long run.  This is middle school difficulty stuff and its common sense.  Work smart, not hard
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: BlindGuy on March 06, 2012, 02:48:58 am
I'm not the one with the problem bro, so no need to patronize me.  I can count my zeros on my numpad just fine.  Instead of wasting admins time every day/week, taking 1 day to put in this kind of feature would save them alot of work in the long run.  This is middle school difficulty stuff and its common sense.  Work smart, not hard

cool, you got the code written that recognises the inflation rate of market, the average price currently for that item, the previous spending of the buyer and the previous pricing of the seller? You HAVE? GREAT, hand it over. Telling other people what is smart is great. Im not gonna tell you that your smart. Your not. Your just a smartass.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Digglez on March 06, 2012, 04:01:25 am
cool, you got the code written that recognises the inflation rate of market, the average price currently for that item, the previous spending of the buyer and the previous pricing of the seller? You HAVE? GREAT, hand it over. Telling other people what is smart is great. Im not gonna tell you that your smart. Your not. Your just a smartass.

might wanna look up the definition of 'average' or 'arithmetic mean' before you make stupid comments
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: BlindGuy on March 11, 2012, 10:01:16 am
might wanna look up the definition of 'average' or 'arithmetic mean' before you make stupid comments

Ok, so I did. Now, back to my question: You got the code written?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Wraist on March 11, 2012, 11:28:11 am
Statistics Page of the market implies they're adding it, also Thomek, the GLA is the 10th most offered item on the market place as of writing this, therefore they're horribly underpowered [That's clearly not a reference to anything...]
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kherr on March 12, 2012, 11:19:35 am
And now some people want to hide... not to take responsibility for their actions.

Somnium did a namechange and his name is DarkOmen now.

So he got mine morningstar +3 with an offer by mistake and now he also wants a clean history. Bah!
Again a namechange... his name is BlackGrail now...
But at least he uses different builds. XBow/2H as Somnium >> Pole as DarkOmen >> Tank with Great Maul as BlackGrail
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Perverz2 on March 14, 2012, 11:50:49 am
I'm reading this and i cant believe what i see.
This rule is crap!!!
I never buy something cheap, but i lost my item in my first days on this mod, someone was see my mistake and he get lucky  and i dint cry like some GIRLS here!!!

Leave that guy alone kherr....better watch on your self and your toys!
Someone wright : Can we also have a Wall of Shame for people being banned for this?
                                                          -will be better to put wall of shame for guys that cant see different betwen 100 and 1000!!


Cheers!
(PS: sorry for my English)
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kherr on March 14, 2012, 01:14:33 pm
The system has weak points and if someone (and it was only a small group of players) uses that systematically for his advantage imo there should be done something against that.

Leave that guy alone kherr....better watch on your self and your toys!
Pls don't tell me how to deal with a person from whom I got messages full of lies. It's not a random person who had "luck".
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: BlindGuy on March 16, 2012, 11:08:55 am
You should trace his IP and go shit on his dog!  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Materia on March 16, 2012, 02:42:37 pm
This is to protect selling person, what about the buying one? Im checking market, and see a lot of crap there for X of thousands, while in the market they cost few golds for example.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: BlindGuy on March 22, 2012, 06:36:59 pm
This is to protect selling person, what about the buying one? Im checking market, and see a lot of crap there for X of thousands, while in the market they cost few golds for example.

That's ppl sending their friends money, dont worry about it.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: karasu on March 22, 2012, 07:53:18 pm
I like turtles.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Fips on March 22, 2012, 08:50:17 pm
I got 2 of them as pets.  8-)
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: karasu on March 23, 2012, 12:00:04 am
Only one.  :cry:
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Stormcrow on March 23, 2012, 01:50:56 am
this is a great rule! now the 5 players left in crpg can enjoy  their trading
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Adamar on March 23, 2012, 03:56:18 am
I dont remember CRPG being this active.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kherr on March 24, 2012, 06:38:53 pm
Another namechange...
Somnium > DarkOmen > BlackGrail > Angellore

Angel ??? cmon!
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: POOPHAMMER on March 24, 2012, 10:09:03 pm
Can I return an item wich was sold mistakenly before applying this rule?

I sometimes feel as if a lot of tax money has been wasted in schools teaching people how to read
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Malaclypse on March 25, 2012, 12:44:42 am
I sometimes feel as if a lot of tax money has been wasted in schools teaching people how to read

POST OF THE DAY

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Haze_The_Hobo on March 29, 2012, 04:24:55 pm
I want to ask your opinion on this case:

King_Pave bought +3 Longbow for 100k from Merciless_PanPan, Merciless start whining and ask it back, Pave sold it for 200k(100k profit only) back to PanPan.

Fair or unfair? I think many would have ignored Merciless whine and sold it for price suiting current market. (1.2m back then)

This happened before new rules, now Merciless whining we own them 200k, even Pave only profited 100k, retarded or not? :D

Imo very fair by Pave and very RETARDED from Merciless side. If your clan is full of 12year old people, who can't count if million has 5 or 6 zeros, don't retaliate it on us.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Haze_The_Hobo on March 29, 2012, 04:27:47 pm
I do not know about the cicumstances, but technically you owe them either nothing or 100k.

Situation is how i described it, for bonus they attacked in strat for us being fair!  :lol:
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kafein on March 29, 2012, 04:31:02 pm
I want to ask your opinion on this case:

King_Pave bought +3 Longbow for 100k from Merciless_PanPan, Merciless start whining and ask it back, Pave sold it for 200k(100k profit only) back to PanPan.

Fair or unfair? I think many would have ignored Merciless whine and sold it for price suiting current market. (1.2m back then)

This happened before new rules, now Merciless whining we own them 200k, even Pave only profited 100k, retarded or not? :D

Imo very fair by Pave and very RETARDED from Merciless side, showing how stupid they are. If your clan is full of 12year old people, who can't count if number has 5 or 6 zeros, don't retaliate it on us.

Slap PanPan in the face. Reacting like that means he should not have his item back at all.

First off, paying back the whole 200k is unacceptable, as no more than a 100k profit was made.

Second, selling the item back to the original owner for a tiny profit compared to what could be done is a very reasonable and generous choice. Requesting the money back proves that in this case, this generosity was not deserved.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Haze_The_Hobo on March 29, 2012, 04:43:20 pm
Slap PanPan in the face. Reacting like that means he should not have his item back at all.

First off, paying back the whole 200k is unacceptable, as no more than a 100k profit was made.

Second, selling the item back to the original owner for a tiny profit compared to what could be done is a very reasonable and generous choice. Requesting the money back proves that in this case, this generosity was not deserved.

Yes i told them the same, also that they owe us 1m, since they have only paid 200k this far.  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Zanze on March 29, 2012, 05:03:28 pm
Not like the second line in this thread addresses this issue or anything.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Fartface on March 29, 2012, 05:04:40 pm
It´s usualy nice to return an item like that , but you sold a +3 for 200k??? That makes you the retard.
But your whining in Dezi den of dueling has proven enough of your little problem ...called down syndrome in your life already.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kafein on March 29, 2012, 05:30:52 pm
Yes i told them the same, also that they owe us 1m, since they have only paid 200k this far.  :mrgreen:

That's the spirit :wink:
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Haze_The_Hobo on March 29, 2012, 05:58:33 pm
It´s usualy nice to return an item like that , but you sold a +3 for 200k??? That makes you the retard.
But your whining in Dezi den of dueling has proven enough of your little problem ...called down syndrome in your life already.

This is no place to talk about personal issues, i just told a true story, nothing there to get mad about.

Don't know about your syndromes, but keep them to yourself please!  :!:
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Jarlek on March 29, 2012, 06:47:40 pm
Slap PanPan in the face. Reacting like that means he should not have his item back at all.

First off, paying back the whole 200k is unacceptable, as no more than a 100k profit was made.

Second, selling the item back to the original owner for a tiny profit compared to what could be done is a very reasonable and generous choice. Requesting the money back proves that in this case, this generosity was not deserved.
Kafein. Panpan forgot to add a 0 to the price and sold it for 100k instead of 1 mill. The guy then sells it back, but demand an additional 100k for "compensation". Let's quote the second line of Meows post, shall we?
This means that if you find offers that are obvious mistakes you must return those item/gold to the original owner without any personal gain.
You can buy the item and instantly contact the owner so no one else can grab it or you just PM him and make him aware of his mistake.

Also. Now Von_Hazaa is bitching to us because of strat. He attacked random neutral players around our area and is now whining since we raped his ass. For fun we decided to say "give PanPan back his 100k and we'll leave you be after this". This made him go into a fit and he now demands 1mill from US because he was "so nice to PanPan and gave him back his stuff". Really mature and sportsman-like, you agree?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Haze_The_Hobo on March 29, 2012, 06:50:13 pm
(click to show/hide)

Zapper you come straight from kindergarden or it is just hard for you to read?

New rules do not apply on old cases.

Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Jarlek on March 29, 2012, 06:55:12 pm
(click to show/hide)

Zapper you come straight from kindergarden or it is just hard for you to read?

New rules do not apply on old cases.
No shit, Sherlock! Figured it out yourself?

You are the one who brought this up. I'm the one pointing out that the rules we have now (which this thread is about) would make you have to give the item back, without gaining any money from it. Capiche?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Fartface on March 29, 2012, 07:10:23 pm
Jarlek is it okay with you if i get myself mw bamboo spear army with lordly milanese and hunt him down hmm?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Haze_The_Hobo on March 29, 2012, 07:11:55 pm
(click to show/hide)

It is good they added this rule, Merciless would have ran outta looms by now.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kafein on March 29, 2012, 07:16:11 pm
Kafein. Panpan forgot to add a 0 to the price and sold it for 100k instead of 1 mill. The guy then sells it back, but demand an additional 100k for "compensation".

Ok so this happened at a time there were no rules about this. If PanPan was not happy about being able to buy his item back for only 100k more, then he could have simply refused and the "scammer" would have won ~1100k gold out of this, instead of 100k. I'm quite sure the guy did not demanded to lose ~1M profit.

without gaining any money from it.

without loosing any either. This is a past event and nothing will be done about it one way or the other, but asking for more than what PanPan lost as a compensation is like wandering in town with a "beat me up" sign over your head.

Anyway, I'm done with you two, happy arguing.


Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Fartface on March 29, 2012, 07:19:01 pm
Spuitelf , as i would call you in dutch. Also I'm an excelent marketplace trader making profit all the time without scamming so please every guy has made an typo in his life so .
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Haze_The_Hobo on March 29, 2012, 07:32:35 pm
Spuitelf , as i would call you in dutch. Also I'm an excelent marketplace trader making profit all the time without scamming so please every guy has made an typo in his life so .

I could also call you with many words in finnish, but this is not the time or the place.

(click to show/hide)

Peace out.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Jarlek on March 29, 2012, 07:33:21 pm
Ok so this happened at a time there were no rules about this. If PanPan was not happy about being able to buy his item back for only 100k more, then he could have simply refused and the "scammer" would have won ~1100k gold out of this, instead of 100k. I'm quite sure the guy did not demanded to lose ~1M profit.

without loosing any either. This is a past event and nothing will be done about it one way or the other, but asking for more than what PanPan lost as a compensation is like wandering in town with a "beat me up" sign over your head.

Anyway, I'm done with you two, happy arguing.
Actually you are wrong about this. Remember all those threads with people doing the exact same mistake, other guy refused to give it back, and admins permabanned them? That is what would have happened if he hadn't given the item back. Also, it's not a ~1M profit when you get it because of a typo mistake by the other guy. It's scamming. Also, we just threw the "pay us the money and we will leave you alone" because they started begging us to stop attacking them in strat, and we wanted some fun with them. Nothing wrong with that, no? Besides, he is the one bringing this all up again, remember? We're just explaining shit to ya :P
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Kafein on March 29, 2012, 08:57:22 pm
Actually you are wrong about this. Remember all those threads with people doing the exact same mistake, other guy refused to give it back, and admins permabanned them? That is what would have happened if he hadn't given the item back. Also, it's not a ~1M profit when you get it because of a typo mistake by the other guy. It's scamming. Also, we just threw the "pay us the money and we will leave you alone" because they started begging us to stop attacking them in strat, and we wanted some fun with them. Nothing wrong with that, no? Besides, he is the one bringing this all up again, remember? We're just explaining shit to ya :P

Well as you seem to want it I will reply.

I agree with you, except on one, rather big, thing.

It's scamming.

It is not. Not at any moment did the so-called scammer lied. Hell, he did not even communicate at all. I also don't remember a single thread about someone that was banned for accepting a trade with a typo in it. The actual scammers (those that for example say they sell heirloom points but just keep the item you want them to loom) are dealt with as such, since the beginning of the marketplace. The only consequence of events similar to this was poophammer losing his admin status.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Zlisch_The_Butcher on April 05, 2012, 03:37:59 am
poophammer losing his admin status.
FREE POOPHAMMER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Toffi on April 05, 2012, 08:07:38 pm
Good new rule.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: dreadnok on June 01, 2012, 08:16:02 pm
who would i contact about a problem? i heard meow is taking a break?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Dalhi on June 01, 2012, 08:24:56 pm
http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,20331.0.html (http://forum.c-rpg.net/index.php/topic,20331.0.html)
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Meow on June 01, 2012, 08:50:07 pm
Solved :mrgreen:
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: BlindGuy on June 01, 2012, 10:42:28 pm
Solved :mrgreen:

Gweat Reader Chailmehn Meow Its Bahk
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: jordomeister on June 07, 2012, 05:57:32 pm
Its a small enough community as it already is. We dont need more players quitting due to being scammed. This is good.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Gomer on June 08, 2012, 07:32:14 am
*COUGH* Move to marketplace thread *COUGH*
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: oohillac on June 23, 2012, 08:23:52 pm
Legio_Vel3no - bought my +3 Huscarl for 150k (not 1.5mil -.-) - RETURNED!  Thanks a bunch!

Merc_Eye_Less_Boxxy - bought +3 Shortened Military Scythe for same 150k. - RETURNED

Messaged both via marketplace.

Thanks, Meow!
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Toffey on November 17, 2012, 08:22:53 pm
Could this be put in the market place? I just made what I thought was an amazing trade, only to learn that it's against the rules.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: zottlmarsch on November 19, 2012, 09:42:40 pm
Need some advice regarding this 'new' market rule,

I was on the market the other night when I saw this +1 Rus Bow being sold at 130K. Being pretty sure the guy had made a mistake (and probably meant 310k) I accepted the offer and immediately sent him a pm offering the item back for my 130k as I have done before in this situation. Usually I get a reply saying yes I made a mistake and a nice thank you mate when I give it back  :), however after 5 days this guy hasn't replied, I think he hasn't even read my messages! So what do I do next? Is there some sort of time frame in which the item would legally become mine or do I just hold it in my inventory until I get a reply, whenever that may be!

Here are the messages I sent
(click to show/hide)

[EDIT] After waiting a week I still have no reply at all, so I'm guessing there isn't a problem with this trade, Gonna trade it now.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Macropus on November 20, 2012, 07:29:29 pm
Quote
OGG_Marijuana
I think I know why this guy isn't replying...
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: juv95hrn on January 16, 2013, 04:36:04 am
If you have made an honest mistake (and a very stupid trade) is there any way to get to know who you traded with (if you forget his name) to plead with him to let the trade go back? I realize the chances are slim but maybe he's a decent guy if I just can get hold of his name.

I accepted this trade and obvisouly I thought I would be the one to gain the 150k. Not pay the guy so he could get exactly what he wanted. :-(

Trade   16/01/2013 03:52:05   Lordly Lamellar Vest vs.    Lordly Sarranid Guard Armor and 150,000 gold

Yes, I know I am an idiot for not being able to read the Auction House right but it is one of my first trades and I took for granted the person asking for an armour would pay a fee to be able to change to what he wanted to. Not the other way around.

Thanks...
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Falka on January 16, 2013, 08:45:43 am
juv95, put an offer on the market, stones for 75 k and I'll accept it. And try to contact with Meow -> http://forum.meleegaming.com/profile/?u=2477
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Jarlek on January 16, 2013, 12:19:50 pm
If you have made an honest mistake (and a very stupid trade) is there any way to get to know who you traded with (if you forget his name) to plead with him to let the trade go back? I realize the chances are slim but maybe he's a decent guy if I just can get hold of his name.

I accepted this trade and obvisouly I thought I would be the one to gain the 150k. Not pay the guy so he could get exactly what he wanted. :-(

Trade   16/01/2013 03:52:05   Lordly Lamellar Vest vs.    Lordly Sarranid Guard Armor and 150,000 gold

Yes, I know I am an idiot for not being able to read the Auction House right but it is one of my first trades and I took for granted the person asking for an armour would pay a fee to be able to change to what he wanted to. Not the other way around.

Thanks...
On your character page, in the top left corner next to you gold, is a message button. Click that. Then change "Unread" to "sent" and click search. All your sent messages should be stored there.

When you accept a trade, you automatically send a message to the other guy. When you find that message in the "sent" archive, you can see his name.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Leshma on January 16, 2013, 12:26:40 pm
If you have made an honest mistake (and a very stupid trade) is there any way to get to know who you traded with (if you forget his name) to plead with him to let the trade go back? I realize the chances are slim but maybe he's a decent guy if I just can get hold of his name.

I accepted this trade and obvisouly I thought I would be the one to gain the 150k. Not pay the guy so he could get exactly what he wanted. :-(

Trade   16/01/2013 03:52:05   Lordly Lamellar Vest vs.    Lordly Sarranid Guard Armor and 150,000 gold

Yes, I know I am an idiot for not being able to read the Auction House right but it is one of my first trades and I took for granted the person asking for an armour would pay a fee to be able to change to what he wanted to. Not the other way around.

Thanks...

You can ask the player who accepted the trade to revert it but other than that, you can't force it. That trade is not the reason why this rule exists, it's for the people who lost mw item or more than 500k gold by mistake. 150k isn't enough , I'm sorry.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: juv95hrn on January 16, 2013, 03:26:27 pm
@ Falka:

Thanks!!! Thats a incredibly generous offer! :-)

@ Zapper:

Thanks for the info. I have sent a message to Kukushka although my hopes are very slim he will retract on this (for him) excellent deal.

@ Leshma:

I understand this. But it hurts. A 24 hour automated regret period would be excellent for clumsy players like me. All that remains is to kick myself and start making my own "phising" trades and hope another unfortunate n00b makes the same mistake I did.

Thanks for the info and understanding. I'm sure I'm not the first that made this mistake and at least its good to mention this as a warning example to new people. Hopefully I will get over this soon and get back to grinding back all the money...
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: IR_Kuoin on January 16, 2013, 04:22:08 pm
A 24 hour automated regret period would be excellent for clumsy players like me.

"Woho! A new weapon, better respec so I can use it right away! But, wait whats this? It is no longer in my inventory, but I got my gold back but my respec can't be redone :("

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Mr_Oujamaflip on January 17, 2013, 08:01:31 pm
Then add a 24 hour returns period for respecs if its added for trades.

Or just don't do either.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: mentalcase on April 13, 2013, 05:52:17 am
What if this happend b4 this rule do we just lose the item? :/
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Zaren on April 13, 2013, 07:44:28 am
What if this happend b4 this rule do we just lose the item? :/
before meow put this rule up officially it was sort of a gray area....most of the time the person who benefited(from a cheap loom or from someone paying too much) would give it back but charge a small fee, something like 25k-50k gold. But other times the person would be a dick and basically it was "too bad".

If you got ripped off before the rule I would ask an admin and see what they say.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: mentalcase on April 14, 2013, 05:26:33 am
well i got ripped off long ago aparently when my item sold for 50K and i messeged every admin i could find and got no replies :/
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: peter_afca7 on April 14, 2013, 08:25:03 pm
What if this happend b4 this rule do we just lose the item? :/
yes, for more information or help go to the IRC and find Meow
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: kaassaus on September 20, 2013, 09:04:51 pm
pls help meow! ive send you a pm pls read it?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Harald on September 20, 2013, 10:01:24 pm
Since Meow is taking a break try Paul or me instead.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: kaassaus on October 20, 2013, 11:09:38 am
harald or paul pls help, ive made a mistake on the marketplace.. ive posted it all in a pm..
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: protox2k on December 20, 2013, 04:20:35 pm
Market problem plz get  back to my pm asap or ill be in IRC
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Rebelyell on December 20, 2013, 05:02:09 pm
harald or paul pls help, ive made a mistake on the marketplace.. ive posted it all in a pm..
that was me harald
harald If you cant revert that I will try to fix that with him
I have all the stuffs on me right now and the biggest problem is tax.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: protox2k on December 20, 2013, 05:11:53 pm
that was me harald
harald If you cant revert that I will try to fix that with him
I have all the stuffs on me right now and the biggest problem is tax.
oh this never got fixed.......
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: djalexander on January 02, 2014, 03:52:37 am
From now on, exploiting other players' mistakes on the market will be against the rules.

This means that if you find offers that are obvious mistakes you must return those item/gold to the original owner without any personal gain.
You can buy the item and instantly contact the owner so no one else can grab it or you just PM him and make him aware of his mistake.

If you instead decide to keep the stuff or try to get some extra money out of it, we will forcefully return those items/gold and make sure there is a proper punishment.

We had to put this rule in place since lately some players decided that their own gain is more important than the community and we will make sure they change their mind about that.
Players quit over such mistakes and this will not happen anymore.

There is no way we can return items that were lost this way before since there was no rule against it.
Now there is.
So if you get into trouble on the market because you entered some wrong numbers, be assured from now on you will get your stuff back.

If your "trade partner" is not cooperative according to this rule - contact us.

This only goes for obvious mistakes, some examples:
  • Selling heirlooms for a fraction of their actual value. (e.g. selling a +3 item for 1/1500/15000/150000 gold and similar deals)
  • Offering a multitude of their value in gold. (e.g. offering 3 million gold for a +1 Item)
  • Offering a +3 item for a +0 +1 +2 item without requesting extra gold.

As always - common sense applies, cases that fall under this rule will be obvious to everyone.

Do not try to abuse this to revert trades because you could have gotten a better one some minutes later or to get temporary money to do other deals, it will be completely obvious to us.

EDIT: Stickied since it's becoming a problem again lately.



Hi Meow,

Please help me for a trade on Dec 31 2013.

I was try to trade a heirloom point for some gold but i get the gold i found it's only 42,500 not 425,000 .

May i return the money and get my heirloom point back ?is that a violation of new market place rule?

My trace account:YYY_Ranger_DJ
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Lemon on January 02, 2014, 04:14:23 am
Help this kind man! ^
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Dutchydave on January 02, 2014, 10:12:49 am
Since Meow is taking a break try Paul or me instead.

Is retiring in a strat battle by the rules? Or was the game mechanics that support this designed in the benefit the person who hired the merc who they they didn't know was going to retire in their battle?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Ronin on January 23, 2014, 08:08:22 pm
Oh shit I have fallen to this, I have accepted a deal offering mw item for mw item + 1 heirloom points. Can someone instruct me how to get the item back?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: the real god emperor on January 23, 2014, 08:55:46 pm
Oh shit I have fallen to this, I have accepted a deal offering mw item for mw item + 1 heirloom points. Can someone instruct me how to get the item back?

Contact to Paul, he can take care of it afaik.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: xxkaliboyx on February 06, 2014, 06:14:21 pm
Hey guys,

 I too just did a mistake offer on the marketplace. I apologize and hope to get this rectified. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance. Message was sent from my main Deserter_Merrrrica. 
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: GG_BOND on September 04, 2014, 05:44:15 pm
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

http://forum.melee.org/general-discussion/first-came-here/new/#new (ftp://forum.melee.org/general-discussion/first-came-here/new/#new)
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Ubba_Ragnarsson on October 16, 2014, 08:42:18 pm
I once mistakenly sold my +1 great axe for 40k.. don't suppose we can do something about this now? :p
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Spartacus on October 16, 2014, 08:57:34 pm
I once mistakenly sold my +1 great axe for 40k.. don't suppose we can do something about this now? :p
screens? and when was it?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Belenos on December 04, 2014, 06:17:31 pm
can you cancel this trade :

visitors can't see pics , please register or login
 (http://www.servimg.com/view/16303025/36)
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Schoi on July 05, 2015, 09:52:30 am
I recently purchased a shit ton of items at ridiculously low prices. How long must I wait to sell them or trade them? I don't want to have to hold onto this shit for a long time for some idiot's marketplace fault.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Finse on July 05, 2015, 10:13:25 am
I recently purchased a shit ton of items at ridiculously low prices. How long must I wait to sell them or trade them? I don't want to have to hold onto this shit for a long time for some idiot's marketplace fault.

Sell it at once lol, if he is late to notice, he doest care so much.

I mean srsly if you put up a trade you need to double check it, just incase so these situasjon never happens
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Schoi on July 05, 2015, 10:17:17 am
Sell it at once lol, if he is late to notice, he doest care so much.

I mean srsly if you put up a trade you need to double check it, just incase so these situasjon never happens

Sorry but according to the very caring sensitive man that originally made this thread, I can't do that for some reason. I would though if this thread was inexistent.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: pine on July 06, 2015, 10:18:03 pm
Schoi if you wish to ignore the rule you should be able to sell the items in the shop instead of on the marketplace.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Schoi on July 06, 2015, 11:29:42 pm
The item was masterworked. Anyways, I already sold all of it. I went with Finse's idea and just did it because they failed to contact me.
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Nehvar on July 12, 2015, 06:14:24 am
I just snagged a very under-priced +3 item but I neglected to pay attention to the seller's name before I bought it.  Is there any way to find out who sold an item to you after you accept a trade?
Title: Re: New Market Rule
Post by: Krex on July 12, 2015, 03:50:32 pm
Check your messages archive.