Author Topic: Bill vs Bec  (Read 2912 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline chief

  • Beggar
  • Renown: 0
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Bill vs Bec
« on: January 12, 2011, 12:22:57 am »
0
Quote
English Bill   7589   
weight 4
requirement 14
spd rtng 89
weapon length 174
swing damage 27, pierce
thrust damage 29 pierce

Bec de Corbin   7312   
weight 2.8
requirement 14
spd rtng 93
weapon length 120
swing damage 36, pierce
thrust damage 26 pierce

It seems logical that the long, heavy, slow weapon should have significantly more swing damage than the short, light, fast weapon. This seems to be the general idea behind all the other weapons. A Military Sickle has just one less damage than the Bill. Something is off, I suggest raising the swing damage of the bill to a reasonable amount.(Keep in mind that the Bill is overhead swing only).
« Last Edit: January 12, 2011, 12:24:16 am by chief »

Offline Stabby_Dave

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 197
  • Infamy: 34
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Stabby_Dave, Squelch, Dave_The_Longbowman, Faggy_Dave
  • IRC nick: Stabby
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2011, 12:25:24 am »
0
Yea those stats do seem pretty weird. I was thinking of buying the bill until i saw how bad it was.

Offline Seawied

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 45
  • Infamy: 21
  • cRPG Player
  • Climbing in yo window, snatching yo people up!
    • View Profile
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2011, 12:51:02 am »
0
you're forgetting to mention the reach on it. It gives the weapon a different purpose than the bec
So with PT >10 stones become simple too effective
:lol:

Offline Vexus

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 198
  • Infamy: 41
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Deus_Mortis
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2011, 01:03:58 am »
0
I was thinking on using bill too bad you can't use it with shield.

And yea while it's dmg is lower bill's reach is on 150 while bec near 100.

Offline bruce

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 262
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: the Freak Army of the Gnjus / Saracens
  • Game nicks: Saracen_el_Brus
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2011, 01:48:23 am »
0
You do know you can't swing the bill? It's like a pike, stab and overhead only.
Best ban reason ever:
Quote from: Wookimonsta
I checked, the only Vagabond I found was Wolves_Vagabond_TheCruel, that guy is now unbanned. Ban reason was: "calling Zotte a cockswoggler".

Offline Joker86

  • Mad & Bad
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1226
  • Infamy: 324
  • cRPG Player
  • Why so serious?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Companions
  • Game nicks: Joker86_TP
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2011, 02:01:24 am »
0
Then it's just real crap. Who would buy it over (Long Awl-) Pike?  :?
Joker makes a very good point.
î saved for eternety (without context  :mrgreen:)

Offline Vexus

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 198
  • Infamy: 41
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Deus_Mortis
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2011, 02:13:52 am »
0
I wanted it for the upward hit in pierce to use as a spear but yea it's kinda useless near the long awlpike.

Offline Joker86

  • Mad & Bad
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1226
  • Infamy: 324
  • cRPG Player
  • Why so serious?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Companions
  • Game nicks: Joker86_TP
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2011, 02:26:42 am »
0
Long Awlpike
5242
weight 2.25
requirement 11
spd rtng 89
weapon length 185
swing damage 18, blunt
thrust damage 32 pierce
Can't use on horseback

English Bill
7589
weight 4
requirement 14
spd rtng 89
weapon length 174
swing damage 27, pierce
thrust damage 29 pierce
Can't use on horseback

Bad balancing fail.  :?
Joker makes a very good point.
î saved for eternety (without context  :mrgreen:)

Offline Joxer

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 55
  • Infamy: 53
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Autolycus Joxer_The_Mighty Salmoneus
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2011, 02:33:11 am »
0
Not so. It does huge damage from the overhead. Almost the same as thrust. No other polearm does that. I love mine and wish to marr... heirloom it few times :D
Why is everybody telling me to think? I think, I just don't show it.

Offline Joker86

  • Mad & Bad
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1226
  • Infamy: 324
  • cRPG Player
  • Why so serious?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Companions
  • Game nicks: Joker86_TP
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #9 on: January 12, 2011, 02:34:37 am »
0
Even if you are right - this is not worth 7589  :?
Joker makes a very good point.
î saved for eternety (without context  :mrgreen:)

Offline bruce

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 262
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: the Freak Army of the Gnjus / Saracens
  • Game nicks: Saracen_el_Brus
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #10 on: January 12, 2011, 02:43:10 am »
0
The price is a bit high, but it's not a bad weapon as such when you think about it, I just wouldn't make it my primary choice of a polearm, I guess. The range makes it decent enough for a support weapon, and the high damage pierce overhead is much much better then the (lightish) blunt damage of the, eg. awlpikes.
Best ban reason ever:
Quote from: Wookimonsta
I checked, the only Vagabond I found was Wolves_Vagabond_TheCruel, that guy is now unbanned. Ban reason was: "calling Zotte a cockswoggler".

Offline chief

  • Beggar
  • Renown: 0
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #11 on: January 12, 2011, 02:47:23 am »
0
Not so. It does huge damage from the overhead. Almost the same as thrust. No other polearm does that. I love mine and wish to marr... heirloom it few times :D


What about the bec...you know, the weapon I was comparing it to? Or any of the poleaxes, long axes, hafted blades, clubs or the glaive?

Right now it's a prettier, slightly longer version of the Swiss Halberd, with a crappier overhead attack. It's a mediocre support weapon, the overhead is not even worth the difficulty it is to land, and the thrust is lower than the other support polearms.
« Last Edit: January 12, 2011, 02:53:10 am by chief »

Offline bruce

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 262
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: the Freak Army of the Gnjus / Saracens
  • Game nicks: Saracen_el_Brus
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #12 on: January 12, 2011, 03:08:22 am »
0

What about the bec...you know, the weapon I was comparing it to?

The bec is really short. Axes, poleaxes, etc are all shorter, too. The bill is much more effective for stopping horses (and generally killing them, 29p is a lot), supporting teammates (174 range makes it much eaiser), etc.
Best ban reason ever:
Quote from: Wookimonsta
I checked, the only Vagabond I found was Wolves_Vagabond_TheCruel, that guy is now unbanned. Ban reason was: "calling Zotte a cockswoggler".

Offline Joker86

  • Mad & Bad
  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1226
  • Infamy: 324
  • cRPG Player
  • Why so serious?
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Companions
  • Game nicks: Joker86_TP
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #13 on: January 12, 2011, 04:22:09 am »
0
EITHER:

English Bill
3520 (same price a long voulge, I spontaneously estimated about the same value on the battlefield)
weight 4
requirement 14
spd rtng 89
weapon length 174
swing damage 27, pierce
thrust damage 29 pierce
Can't use on horseback

OR:

English Bill
7589
weight 4
requirement 14
spd rtng 92 (89)
weapon length 174
swing damage 34(27), pierce
thrust damage 31(29) pierce
Can't use on horseback

Joker makes a very good point.
î saved for eternety (without context  :mrgreen:)

Offline chief

  • Beggar
  • Renown: 0
  • Infamy: 0
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Bill vs Bec
« Reply #14 on: January 12, 2011, 04:48:48 am »
0
The bec is really short. Axes, poleaxes, etc are all shorter, too. The bill is much more effective for stopping horses (and generally killing them, 29p is a lot), supporting teammates (174 range makes it much eaiser), etc.

"Not so. It does huge damage from the overhead. Almost the same as thrust. No other polearm does that."

I was responding to the above (which is false), the other attributes of the weapons I mentioned are irrelevant.
__________________________________________________________
Any way...
The bill doesn't really have a niche, there is no one saying "I want a weapon with less reach and thrust damage than a pike that also has an inferior overhead to a long voulge". It's above average at stopping cav, less than average at support, and useless in 1 on 1.

My suggestion for new stats,

English Bill   
weight 4
requirement 14
spd rtng 88
weapon length 174
swing damage 35, pierce
thrust damage 24 pierce
bonus against shields?
___________

 Just by looking at it, stabbing shouldn't be its' specialty. It should be for taking the rider off of a stopped horse (something that a pike isn't really able to do), taking the shield out of someones hand, dealing damage to an occupied knight...thoughts?


« Last Edit: January 12, 2011, 04:51:26 am by chief »