Author Topic: ban reason?  (Read 12698 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline autobus

  • OKAM Developer
  • ***
  • Renown: 598
  • Infamy: 127
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Bartering Brigade "Black Tea"
  • Game nicks: Autobus, Shushu, Samodur
  • IRC nick: Autobus
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #45 on: March 13, 2016, 04:40:12 am »
Macro feints are really obvious the problem is getting proof. Really the only way to catch someone is in a duel server and recording them in action, I would love for them to be global banned too.
A video of someone pulling sick feints wouldn't be a proof of macro usage since we don't really know how those feints are produced. Reading some sort of input data, if its possible, could be interesting. If someone is consistently pulling off a sequence of 3(4,5,n) hits with exact to the millisecond time period between them each time, and the pattern repetition can be detected - i'd say that is enough evidence to conclude that our someone is using some program assistance.

Good luck with MBG
Thanks, you too have a nice day  :)

Offline Sparvico

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 976
  • Infamy: 174
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Steam ID: Sparvico
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mossbacks
  • Game nicks: Sparvico et al.
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #46 on: March 13, 2016, 05:54:54 am »
I'd really prefer to not have native (or even native crpg) textures forced on every player. There are some really good aesthetic mods out there totally unrelated to giving the user an advantage. The heirloom models, certain heraldic horse retextures. Having a whitelist of accepted mods is probably not a bad idea, but allowing no texture modifications at all seems counter to the idea of crpg, which is itself a mod.
Quote
Mossback_Westwood: "I swear 2 my semitic God if you give me this bundle of sticks's address I'll cut off his ear and eat it"

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Keshian

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1176
  • Infamy: 992
  • cRPG Player
  • Diggity diggity
    • View Profile
  • Faction: FCC (Bridgeburner, Unicorn, Cavalieres, Narwhal)
  • Game nicks: Red-haired bitch from hell
  • IRC nick: Bitch, pleasssse.
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #47 on: March 13, 2016, 06:07:29 am »
Id prefer stopping cheaters over silly textures.  Cheaters really do wreck the game.  Good call admins.
http://keshoxford.com/  - Where middle-eastern meets red-hot and spicy!

"[Strat 5]... war game my ass, tis more like a popularity contest"  Plumbo

Offline Gravoth_iii

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1454
  • Infamy: 341
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
  • \ [†] / ☼
    • View Profile
  • Faction: ▬▬ι═══════ﺤ
  • Game nicks: Byzantium_Gravoth, Prince_of_the_Land_of_Stench, Gravy, Igor_Boltsack
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #48 on: March 13, 2016, 06:27:30 am »
The more i think about this, the more i feel that banning for something so petty as green arrows is silly. Such a minor thing, removing bushes or having transparent walls would probably be something id be bothered with, though.
Paprika: ...the Internet and dreams are similar. They're areas where the repressed conscious mind escapes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VXQSs1Qfcc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LW6y-kgKtA
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Turkhammer

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 376
  • Infamy: 194
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #49 on: March 13, 2016, 06:56:39 am »
It's a good place to start and it gives the archers that have them an advantage the devs never intended.  It's a good ban.

Offline Malaclypse

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1299
  • Infamy: 146
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • In girum imus nocte et consumimur igni.
    • View Profile
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #50 on: March 13, 2016, 07:04:34 am »
I'd really prefer to not have native (or even native crpg) textures forced on every player. There are some really good aesthetic mods out there totally unrelated to giving the user an advantage. The heirloom models, certain heraldic horse retextures. Having a whitelist of accepted mods is probably not a bad idea, but allowing no texture modifications at all seems counter to the idea of crpg, which is itself a mod.

Could probably whitelist some things somehow I'd hope.
You think you're pretty smart with your dago mustache and your greasy hair.

Offline Sandersson Jankins

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1450
  • Infamy: 223
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CSA Apologists
  • Game nicks: fnord
  • IRC nick: "There's always a bigger nerd"- Qui-Gong Jim, Star Trek IV: Electric Boogalo
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #51 on: March 13, 2016, 07:23:54 am »
This sort of thing isn't as bad as when I was like 15 and installed "noobskins" for DoD:S and CS:S, making all the character models and guns bright pink and blue. Now THAT was some fucking my old friendetry right there.

A lot of people are really riled up about it, and that's fine. I think that using them is pretty shitty, but the real reason that this clown should be banned is that he was god-awful stupid/arrogant enough to post OVER AND OVER in a bragging way on the forums that he is using/sharing the shit.

Like dude, what? The fuck man, did you put a coherent thought together about that? If you don't care about getting banned I can understand, but if you've got the slightest inclination to continue playing the game, why the FUCK would you post about your green skydicks repeatedly?

It's just autistic darwinism, is all. Nothing to see here.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

the administrator of this forum is the Internet Keyboard man? Can only play "authority" in the virtual world?Can you tell me why?

Offline Danetti

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 161
  • Infamy: 7
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: R.I.P Gray
  • Game nicks: I was known as Danior
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #52 on: March 13, 2016, 09:41:40 am »
About "cheaters"

Perma bans
Green arrows: Pandor - ✔
Macros: Spamwhore, Kiddius/Svedjan, etc. - Loading
(click to show/hide)
(click to show/hide)
[...]I haven't ever seen someone using macros.[...]

Offline Tristan_of_Erzoth

  • Game Admin
  • *****
  • Renown: 1000
  • Infamy: 217
  • cRPG Player
  • I dont know
    • View Profile
    • steam id
  • Faction: Calradian Confederacy
  • Game nicks: Tristan_of_Erzoth, Sorcerer_Tholamin, Big_Dick_McCallister
  • IRC nick: wtf is an IRC
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #53 on: March 13, 2016, 09:47:39 am »
IMO ranged would be a lot less OP if you removed the options to have banners+highlights over enemy players lmao. Makes seeing enemies so fucking easy, through bushes etc. They poke their head out for half a second and you can see them. Fog? Who cares I can see your banner. If anything should be banable it should be using that bullshit
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

http://steamcommunity.com/id/evilmagic/

Offline Gravoth_iii

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1454
  • Infamy: 341
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
  • \ [†] / ☼
    • View Profile
  • Faction: ▬▬ι═══════ﺤ
  • Game nicks: Byzantium_Gravoth, Prince_of_the_Land_of_Stench, Gravy, Igor_Boltsack
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #54 on: March 13, 2016, 10:10:31 am »
About "cheaters"

Perma bans
Green arrows: Pandor - ✔
Macros: Spamwhore, Kiddius/Svedjan, etc. - Loading
(click to show/hide)

Kiddius uses macros? You kidding? Spamwhore and Druppi maybe.

IMO ranged would be a lot less OP if you removed the options to have banners+highlights over enemy players lmao. Makes seeing enemies so fucking easy, through bushes etc. They poke their head out for half a second and you can see them. Fog? Who cares I can see your banner. If anything should be banable it should be using that bullshit

Minor things imho, missile speed is the only thing that makes ranged silly atm. They should need to predict patterns and lead-shot based on that. That actually takes skill, while now shots are basically instant hits, so theres not much more than pointing and shooting needed. No predictions.
Paprika: ...the Internet and dreams are similar. They're areas where the repressed conscious mind escapes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VXQSs1Qfcc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LW6y-kgKtA
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Danetti

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 161
  • Infamy: 7
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: R.I.P Gray
  • Game nicks: I was known as Danior
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #55 on: March 13, 2016, 10:33:09 am »
Kiddius uses macros? You kidding? Spamwhore and Druppi maybe.


This post may cos cancer

(click to show/hide)
« Last Edit: March 13, 2016, 10:36:25 am by Danetti »
(click to show/hide)
[...]I haven't ever seen someone using macros.[...]

Offline Kidduis

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 146
  • Infamy: 22
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Kiddius, Fittius, Shittius, Svedjan
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #56 on: March 13, 2016, 01:07:36 pm »
About "cheaters"

Perma bans
Green arrows: Pandor - ✔
Macros: Spamwhore, Kiddius/Svedjan, etc. - Loading
(click to show/hide)

wolololollolololololo

Anyhow, honestly neither me or Spamwhore use macros. How is it that you cannot se that.... If you think it is just because we use multiple feints to kill the enemy faster so we can go on to the next player is just simply pathetic.....   I could just as easily call you a macro user simply because you use the same right to left feints, constantly.......  Go and ask anyother player in native who dosnt have the russian str style of fighting, ( holds and don't take risks ) Everyone who playes there know what a fucking feint is..
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Seroth

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 55
  • Infamy: 14
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: The Nordmen
  • Game nicks: Nord_Seroth
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #57 on: March 13, 2016, 01:47:55 pm »
About "cheaters"


Macros: Spamwhore, Kiddius/Svedjan, etc. - Loading
None of those use macro, the only one i think might be using them is Druppi.

Offline Finse

  • Game Admin (trial)
  • ****
  • Renown: 391
  • Infamy: 61
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Finse, Hated
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #58 on: March 13, 2016, 01:50:22 pm »
About "cheaters"

Perma bans
Green arrows: Pandor - ✔
Macros: Spamwhore, Kiddius/Svedjan, etc. - Loading
(click to show/hide)

They are from scadinavistan thats why xD

Offline McKli_PL

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 294
  • Infamy: 43
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: South_the_grey, HeDdar_the_grey, Wazonowej_the_grey
Re: ban reason?
« Reply #59 on: March 13, 2016, 02:45:11 pm »
IMO ranged would be a lot less OP if you removed the options to have banners+highlights over enemy players lmao. Makes seeing enemies so fucking easy, through bushes etc. They poke their head out for half a second and you can see them. Fog? Who cares I can see your banner. If anything should be banable it should be using that bullshit
hahahaha yeah it's so true i don't know why ppl are so 'GREEN ARROWS op hax'  yet 55 Fps Fov + banner highlight is so freaking deadly and more dangerous than some silly cucumber arrows :mrgreen: