Author Topic: Serious decission about ranged(might contain qq stuff)  (Read 3525 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline PhayaNak

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 29
  • Infamy: 2
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Serious decission about ranged(might contain qq stuff)
« Reply #15 on: December 28, 2013, 06:39:03 am »
0
How to solve the problem. Go 24-18 8ps 6riding 3 shielding-> grab a courser, battle fork, brown lion heater shield-> go zoom zoom and 1 shot any pew pew.

(click to show/hide)

Pretty soon everybody will have to get polearms instead of ranged

Horse will practically instagib to all that ranged because all the horses are pussies, unless you have a +3 armored horse of some type.

Offline Chosen1

  • Noble
  • **
  • Renown: 23
  • Infamy: 1016
  • cRPG Player
  • din do nuffin
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Castile
  • Game nicks: Chosen1, Matteo, El_Cid
Re: Serious decission about ranged(might contain qq stuff)
« Reply #16 on: December 28, 2013, 07:14:43 am »
-3
I don't understand why the devs can't just make a class balance thingy. Archers themselves are not OP, there are just usually too many on one team.
I'm sorry I hurt your feelings cmp, I would feel pretty bad too if I was a useless no life virgin who spent his adulthood making video games LOL
its ok though, now i have more time to - all the posters i dont like
But I wrote a poem that I would like you all to read
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Jack1

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1029
  • Infamy: 231
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Jack1_, Abbud_Amari, The_Doc, Gottlob_Kohlman
  • IRC nick: Risen_Jack
Re: Serious decission about ranged(might contain qq stuff)
« Reply #17 on: December 28, 2013, 08:18:28 am »
0
Horse will practically instagib to all that ranged because all the horses are pussies, unless you have a +3 armored horse of some type.

Not if your patient.
We're all nerds here, so it doesn't really matter.

Offline tkn123

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 97
  • Infamy: 13
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Norsemen
  • Game nicks: Shagga
Re: Serious decission about ranged(might contain qq stuff)
« Reply #18 on: December 28, 2013, 11:48:14 am »
+1
why don't they just cap the number of archers on the server relative to the number of players. Like they do on native, if too many people are a certain class its made unavailable to everyone else.

Offline korppis

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 404
  • Infamy: 51
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Ninja
Re: Serious decission about ranged(might contain qq stuff)
« Reply #19 on: December 28, 2013, 11:58:29 am »
0
don't play eu1 much that's how i deal with it :D eu2 causes less sadness and rage due to ranged :P

+1

Come to siege, it's about time to break 100 player limit again.  :)

Offline Miwiw

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1267
  • Infamy: 525
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: HRE
  • Game nicks: Miwiw
Re: Serious decission about ranged(might contain qq stuff)
« Reply #20 on: December 28, 2013, 12:54:07 pm »
+1
why don't they just cap the number of archers on the server relative to the number of players. Like they do on native, if too many people are a certain class its made unavailable to everyone else.

What a great idea. And let other people not play? How stupid is that.. gotta ask that again and again if these suggestions come again. On native it's fine because once you join a server, you choose your class. In crpg you choose your class for a certain character. Players shouldn't be forced to play certain classes only. That's what crpg is about, let players choose whatever class they want.
Miwiw_HRE - Two Handed
Trade with me

Offline darmaster

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1398
  • Infamy: 297
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Vanguards
  • Game nicks: Retsamrad
Re: Serious decission about ranged(might contain qq stuff)
« Reply #21 on: December 28, 2013, 12:58:18 pm »
+1
people don't get that this is the only place where racism has reason to be.


(click to show/hide)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Osiris

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1449
  • Infamy: 324
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Merc
  • Game nicks: Osiris. Aethelstan
  • IRC nick: _Osiris_
Re: Serious decission about ranged(might contain qq stuff)
« Reply #22 on: December 28, 2013, 01:06:35 pm »
0
There never will be class restrictions in crpg. If ranged is too much for you to enjoy on eu1 then try a different server :D My main has been shielder for a long time because i cant have fun with other chars very often on eu1. on eu2 there is pew pew but it doesn't make me rage because its not really a serious server. I also get tons more melee action ^^ but when that has too much ranged ill just go watch tv or play something else.

You just need to chill out and if you don't find it fun don't play it. They wont introduce any massive gameplay changes so soon after free respecs so the best you can hope for is a minor tweak in a month or so at the least  8-)
i make terrible warband videos! https://youtu.be/jUdVGIOuULk

Offline Ronin

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 859
  • Infamy: 198
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Serious decission about ranged(might contain qq stuff)
« Reply #23 on: December 28, 2013, 01:20:12 pm »
0
I think it is more about people's expectations from the game.

For me this game has
- An Awesome melee combat (if we disregard lame instastabs and macro-like feints)
- An Excellent teamplay game with many elements
- A Marvelous competition feeling, besting your opponent, being the strongest warrior etc.
- A Great combat system in general, with many possibilities

- EU_1 : Pleases me with the 2, 3, 4
- EU_2 : Pleases me with the 1, 4
- EU_3 : Pleases me with the 1, 3
- EU_7 : Pleases me with the 2

It's all up to my current mood, in which server I want to play in. I don't enjoy EU1 less when there are many ranged, cav or whatever is around. It is just a different scenario, different possibilities. People try to please their every needs with the same server (EU_1) maybe? That's why we have different gamemodes.

Maybe I'm the minority, but I enjoy it when there are some decent archers or cav around in EU_1. Nothing fills me up with more adrenaline when me and a few of my teammates try to deal with many cav at the same time, just an example.
Quote from: BlindGuy
Seems the fascists are gaining ground once again in UKR... right vving politics is SO bad for the general populace but STILL in times of trouble the uneducated turn to them for help, simply because they are so amoral they vvill supply those vvilling to fight vvith vveapons rather than knovvledge.

My UU key is broken incase you can't tell :D

Offline Spleen

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 310
  • Infamy: 79
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • But I am already in my pyjamas...
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Fallen Brigade
  • Game nicks: Fallen_Spleen
  • IRC nick: Spleeno
Re: Serious decission about ranged(might contain qq stuff)
« Reply #24 on: December 28, 2013, 03:18:11 pm »
0
I feel discriminated against.
I'm not included in ANY of the screenshots.
I demand justice!
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline UnholyRolyPoly

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 348
  • Infamy: 68
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Serious decission about ranged(might contain qq stuff)
« Reply #25 on: December 28, 2013, 07:46:04 pm »
0
why don't they just cap the number of archers on the server relative to the number of players. Like they do on native, if too many people are a certain class its made unavailable to everyone else.

Why dont they just completely ruin the game so that people don't have to adapt their tactics and use teamwork?