Author Topic: Regarding Performance Ratings  (Read 871 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline HardRice

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 740
  • Infamy: 161
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: 187/Alligator
Regarding Performance Ratings
« on: October 23, 2013, 04:37:30 am »
+1
Do many people actually check performance ratings before hiring?
Just curious    :D

Offline Dach

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 444
  • Infamy: 92
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn A Gentleman and a Scholar
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Dach_BRD / SNSD_Taeyeon
Re: Regarding Performance Ratings
« Reply #1 on: October 23, 2013, 08:40:16 am »
+5
Probably not... people that hire often, already know which player are good.

Here's a quick guide of thing to do to get accepted in a Strat Fight.

1- Be in the TS for rolecall.
2- The fight is for your own faction or close ally.
3- Be higher than lvl 31.
4- Be a well known high skill player. (in whatever class you play)
5- Be known to listen to order on TS. (or not being a solo dick who do whatever he want, notable exception is Allers  :mrgreen: see point 4)
6- Be a well known engineer.

That's all I can think off ATM. If someone got some to add feel free! :)

A lot of people in the NA community know that Dach rages and in the process of his uncontrollable rage, he tends to kick people.

You've been warned! :twisted:

Offline Matey

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1327
  • Infamy: 372
  • cRPG Player
  • A Pirate
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Matey_BRD
Re: Regarding Performance Ratings
« Reply #2 on: October 23, 2013, 10:10:00 am »
+4
Probably not... people that hire often, already know which player are good.

Here's a quick guide of thing to do to get accepted in a Strat Fight.

1- Be in the TS for rolecall.
2- The fight is for your own faction or close ally.
3- Be higher than lvl 31.
4- Be a well known high skill player. (in whatever class you play)
5- Be known to listen to order on TS. (or not being a solo dick who do whatever he want, notable exception is Allers  :mrgreen: see point 4)
6- Be a well known engineer.

That's all I can think off ATM. If someone got some to add feel free! :)

7- Be ranged and not totally inept at it.

Offline Malgalad

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 178
  • Infamy: 4
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Regarding Performance Ratings
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2013, 04:56:57 pm »
+2
 8-) performance is not very exactly.
when I have a high performance score like 5 or 6, maybe I will have a less kill or more die on next battle.Then performance score down.
on the other hand, when I have 1 or 2 performance score, I can kill more than 20 and less than 5 die on next battle. Then performance score up.
It's a cycle.
 :mrgreen: But the above-mentioned content only if I'm an archer.The engineer is my part-time job.

Offline Relit

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 574
  • Infamy: 109
  • cRPG Player Sir White Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Relit
Re: Regarding Performance Ratings
« Reply #4 on: October 23, 2013, 05:01:35 pm »
+1
Ive found that performance does not mean so much as 'who' you are. If people do not know you, then you are much less likely to get into a battle. Showing up on time and letting people know you are there also helps a bunch, just do not be annoying about it. Maybe politely message a member of the clan who is around and ask for help, but do not spam the channels or pokes on people.

Offline StonedSteel

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 717
  • Infamy: 400
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: Regarding Performance Ratings
« Reply #5 on: October 23, 2013, 07:03:51 pm »
0
Ive found that performance does not mean so much as 'who' you are.



True, good example is Ermax...who never has a high performance, but the guy is a pro engineer, highly valuable , always willing to be engineer

gets accepted everytime, and why not? good engineers are huge assets
I REMEMBER PLAYING IN RAIN
THROUGH THE NIGHTFALL WITH FOG
THAT CLOGGED UP OUR EYES
BUT IM MORE HORRIFIED OF A MOD
I NO LONGER RECOGNIZE

Offline Gmnotutoo

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1387
  • Infamy: 229
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • Space Pope of BIRD CLAN
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Unicorns
  • Game nicks: Gmnotutoo
Re: Regarding Performance Ratings
« Reply #6 on: October 23, 2013, 08:57:04 pm »
0
I'm an anti-performance type of player because I solo-yolo at the opposing side's flags and equipment. Usually I go 1|1 which is just fine for my line of work, but I still feel bad when I get the occasional .5/1.
(click to show/hide)

Engineers also have a very low performance rating so the best way to gauge skill is to do what has already been mentioned, that is playing in the battle server and knowing our community.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

THIS IS A MANLY CLAN. FOR MANLY MEN. DOING MANLY THINGS.

Offline Real_Dece_Guy

  • Baron
  • ****
  • Renown: 91
  • Infamy: 22
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Crusaders of Acre
  • Game nicks: Viceroy_Axeman_of_Acre
Re: Regarding Performance Ratings
« Reply #7 on: October 23, 2013, 09:01:44 pm »
+2
I'm an anti-performance type of player because I solo-yolo at the opposing side's flags and equipment. Usually I go 1|1 which is just fine for my line of work, but I still feel bad when I get the occasional .5/1.

This is me too, only with even less success.  Defending sieges are especially bad, because I think nothing of jumping out onto a good ladder and wrecking it point blank, which usually ends up with several enemies dying along with me, but nothing in the way of kills.
His Excellency Viceroy for Life, Field Marshal Al chadzi Doctor Idi Axemin, VC, DSO, MC, CBE, Lord of all the Beasts of the Earth and Fishes of the Sea, and Conqueror of the Free Company Empire in Calradia in General and the Tundra in Particular.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Varadin

  • fite me irl
  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 577
  • Infamy: 353
  • cRPG Player Sir White Knight
  • Serbian
    • View Profile
    • http://steamcommunity.com/id/19930206800039/
  • Faction: Grey Order
  • Game nicks: Varadin
  • IRC nick: Varadin
Re: Regarding Performance Ratings
« Reply #8 on: October 23, 2013, 09:52:43 pm »
0
i care for k/d thats what makes me good :)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Man of Steel

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 368
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player Sir Black Pawn
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Mercenaries
  • Game nicks: Linux, Traitor
Re: Regarding Performance Ratings
« Reply #9 on: October 23, 2013, 09:55:53 pm »
+1
i care for k/d thats what makes me good :)

if he got a bad one he is raging!  :rolleyes:


(but he always got a very good one)
For fuck sake Linux, fix your signature.

Offline njames89

  • the Old Leaf
  • Supreme Overlord
  • *******
  • Renown: 1488
  • Infamy: 457
  • cRPG Player
  • Deus vult, Dieu le veut, God wills it!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Kingdom of Acre, The Holy Chadzian Empire
  • Game nicks: King James IV, John IV, Temujin of the Wolves, William III
Re: Regarding Performance Ratings
« Reply #10 on: October 24, 2013, 02:04:21 am »
+2
Yeah i'm pretty shit but I get put on because I head a relatively active faction and can follow orders. Well when im not shitfaced on sailor jerry's. Sorry about that last one kesh..... lol Got too rowdy at an Acre lan

Learning engineering is a super easy way to get on rosters. There are not that many effective catapult teams in the realm and so if you can get good with that on duel server its an easy way in. But like it was said before find a niche and learn how to exploit game mechanics in your favor.

Getting into an active faction on strategus will also greatly benefit your chances of getting onto rosters. People need to know who you are, be able to count on you not to flake and not to feed.

Offline HardRice

  • Marshall
  • ********
  • Renown: 740
  • Infamy: 161
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: 187/Alligator
Re: Regarding Performance Ratings
« Reply #11 on: October 24, 2013, 02:59:44 am »
+2
Thanks for all the responses guys.