Poll

Is this admin doing their job correctly?

Yes
114 (50.2%)
No
113 (49.8%)

Total Members Voted: 226

Author Topic: [NA] Ganner  (Read 31114 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline San

  • Developer
  • ******
  • Renown: 1456
  • Infamy: 143
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • 1/Sympathy = Divide By Zero
    • View Profile
    • My youtube Brawl videos
  • Faction: Chaos
  • Game nicks: San_of_Chaos
  • IRC nick: San
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #240 on: June 27, 2014, 08:32:26 pm »
+2
http://forum.melee.org/na-(official)/ban-stratigos_cosmas_palailogos/

This ban thread was up for 10 days with many screenshots and other people hinting towards suicide leeching. Allers shooting himself in the foot with his post certainly didn't help, which was probably the biggest catalyst. The thread creator made a good point for prolonged suicide leeching with no one really saying otherwise. I think the case that there was suicide leeching is stronger than the case against, but the amount of ban time that he received can be argued imo; whether it should be the last straw or treated as an isolated incident all on its own.

I also gave a short summary of what happened in the "unban allers" thread.

Offline Switchtense

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1137
  • Infamy: 137
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
  • poking you where the sun dont shine!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Unicorns, BIRD CLAN BEST CLAN!
  • Game nicks: All sorts of Switch's
  • IRC nick: Switchtense
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #241 on: June 27, 2014, 10:06:52 pm »
0
For all the non-believers, look no further than this thread for proof that while strat battles are won/lost in NA3/EU3, strat wars are won and lost on the forums.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Muki

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 455
  • Infamy: 78
  • cRPG Player
  • 偽善正義
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Exile
  • Game nicks: Muki
  • IRC nick: Muki, Muki39
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #242 on: June 27, 2014, 10:35:12 pm »
+1
you're such a shitlord you ignorant prick. It wasn't just Ganner's decision. It was NA admins together holding hands and singing about bans. So you can go fuck yourself.

Muki - not sure, was Red Lotus, then BRD or Bird clan


All of these admins are personal friends of Canary and have been elected because they all share his viewpoint and are either in Chaos or FIDLGB. That's what you're implying so there it is.

mmm I think I been in more clans or at least supported alot of clans, I know I was included as a LLJK member and was in KUTT and way back in the day when I first started was playing with the Hospitaller's
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

As a volunteer admin I clearly have no life and live only to eradicate all fun and enjoyment from the game. Your tears of rage are all the payment I need.
Yes I drew most of my avatars

Offline Allers

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 292
  • Infamy: 134
  • cRPG Player
  • Ca$hville
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Ca$hville Records, Ruff Ryders
  • Game nicks: Allers, Young Buck, DMX
  • IRC nick: Allers
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #243 on: June 28, 2014, 06:24:36 am »
-4
Basically the admins take whatever is beneficial and convenient to them and use it and throw out the rest. Writing posts when youre mad makes you write things you dont mean, you know
also to clarify, i blocked some times and tried my best the others, i STILL wasnt leaching nor was I meaning to, but of course the admins wont take my word on that because they all want me banned even though ive caused no trouble ever since my unban
« Last Edit: June 28, 2014, 06:28:04 am by Allers »
Ca$hville 615

Offline Switchtense

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1137
  • Infamy: 137
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
  • poking you where the sun dont shine!
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Unicorns, BIRD CLAN BEST CLAN!
  • Game nicks: All sorts of Switch's
  • IRC nick: Switchtense
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #244 on: June 28, 2014, 06:48:22 am »
+2
Basically the admins take whatever is beneficial and convenient to them and use it and throw out the rest. Writing posts when youre mad makes you write things you dont mean, you know
also to clarify, i blocked some times and tried my best the others, i STILL wasnt leaching nor was I meaning to, but of course the admins wont take my word on that because they all want me banned even though ive caused no trouble ever since my unban

To be very fair, you admitted to have suicide leeched in the ban request thread.

However, ever since I actively started playing on NA servers (quite a while ago) I have not realised that Allers apparently is a huge troublemaker. People talk shit all the time, so the usual "OMG Allers, stop being a cunt" did not point towards him actually being someone who brings no good to this community. In fact, whenever you play you basically see that sentence, just with any other name.
Whenever I have played he was beneficial to the team, sometimes more, sometimes less. Seeing that this apparently was his 6th key or so really surprised me. If he indeed was such a huge jerk, then I can say that he definitely changed. And no, I am not saying he is without flaws, everybody likes the occasional troll, everybody leeches every now and then for whatever reason, but that does not mean that this behavior is harmful for the cRPG community. All of this together IS the cRPG community.
Justifying a perm ban with pretty much no chance of lifting just because of his past is not right.
There are some individuals here who may not have a big ban record, but certainly are far more harmful to this community than Allers. Yet they are free to reign on their throne of retardness that drives new players away and makes veterans quit etc.
In fact, banning people who might do a slight mistake that causes no real harm for good is more harmful as well. The playerbase is quite small as it is, so why try anything possible to make it even smaller?
For all the non-believers, look no further than this thread for proof that while strat battles are won/lost in NA3/EU3, strat wars are won and lost on the forums.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline GOBBLINKINGREATLEADER

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1509
  • Infamy: 515
  • cRPG Player Sir White Bishop
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Daruvian, GOBBLINKINGGREATLEADER
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #245 on: June 28, 2014, 07:31:35 am »
+2
There are some individuals here who may not have a big ban record, but certainly are far more harmful to this community than Allers.

like me

and somehow ive only been banned like once or twice

it fucking mystifies me that im not permabanned

Offline Goretooth

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 634
  • Infamy: 237
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #246 on: June 28, 2014, 11:00:43 am »
+1
like me

and somehow ive only been banned like once or twice

it fucking mystifies me that im not permabanned
Yet people like me or allers can get banned for one team wound. I better keep my score up or get banned now.
« Last Edit: June 28, 2014, 11:05:38 am by Goretooth »
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Braeden - Clanless maybe? or Free Peasant not sure - Rarely plays, plus might be retarded
Tydeus - Nord EU Scum - Hates adminning

Offline MURDERTRON

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1337
  • Infamy: 428
    • View Profile
  • Faction: TRUMP / WEST 2020
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #247 on: June 28, 2014, 04:29:21 pm »
+8
I generally don't post in Game Admin Feedback threads, because ror the most part I hate all admins equally.   However, Ganner seems like the only admin who rarely plays that tries to make it a point to ban someone everytime he plays.  Really, he isn't active enough to be an admin and should probably have it removed.  Half of that list, is in the same boat.

Ganner- Chaos - Rarely plays
Eyebeat - Hospitaller - Rarely plays
Shadowren - Former Hospitaller - Rarely plays
San - Chaos
Artyem - Dracul - Rarely plays
Witchcraft - BRD now Acre I think
Phantasmal - Astralis
Desire - No Idea, used to be chaos, was LCO, was Hospitaller, now Acre maybe?
HungrynBroke - no longer admin was Raven
Rhalzo - FIDLGB
Canary - Chaos
MrShine - Astralis - Rarely plays
Jeade - BIRD Clan; Best Clan
Adoptagoat - TKoV - Rarely plays
Spaniard - Hospitaller - Rarely plays
Granpappy - BRD?
Braeden - Clanless maybe? or Free Peasant not sure - Rarely plays, plus might be retarded
Froyoyoyoyo - Free Peasants - Didn't play for 6 months until he played for 2 days recently
Muki - not sure, was Red Lotus, then BRD or Bird clan - Rarely plays
Tydeus - Nord EU Scum - Hates adminning
Aristeia - Pistachio is Marauders or something like that - Is this person even an admin?

Here's what you are left with after you ignore all the admins who don't play.
San - Chaos
Witchcraft - BRD now Acre I think
Phantasmal - Astralis
Desire - No Idea, used to be chaos, was LCO, was Hospitaller, now Acre maybe?
Rhalzo - FIDLGB
Canary - Chaos
Jeade - BIRD Clan; Best Clan
Granpappy - BRD?
Tydeus - Nord EU Scum - Hates adminning
▀█▀▒█▀█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒█▒█▀█▒▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█▀█▒█
▒█▒▒█▄█▒█▒█▒██▒██▒█▄█▒▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒▄▄█▒█▒█▒█
▒█▒▒█▀▄▒█▄█▒█▒█▒█▒█▒▒▒▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒█▄▄▒█▄█▒▄

Offline Ganner

  • Duke
  • *******
  • Renown: 553
  • Infamy: 138
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • The other white meat
    • View Profile
  • Faction: CHAOS
  • Game nicks: Ganner_of_Chaos
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #248 on: June 28, 2014, 04:58:23 pm »
+2
Why does everyone assume I dont play this mod anymore when I in fact still play the same time of day i always have? just because I dont keep prime hours doesn't mean i dont play this game. I have a 40+ hour a week job and a life.

Offline EyeBeat

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 432
  • Infamy: 175
  • cRPG Player A Gentleman and a Scholar
  • 20th BEST PLAYER IN HOSPITALLER
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Hospitaller
  • Game nicks: EyeBeat_The_Wanderer
  • IRC nick: EyeBeat
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #249 on: June 28, 2014, 11:52:24 pm »
0
Why does everyone assume I dont play this mod anymore when I in fact still play the same time of day i always have? just because I dont keep prime hours doesn't mean i dont play this game. I have a 40+ hour a week job and a life.

You are not allowed to have a job and a life.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Being a smallish community doesn't entitle you to act more like a dick than other communities.

Offline Muki

  • Earl
  • ******
  • Renown: 455
  • Infamy: 78
  • cRPG Player
  • 偽善正義
    • View Profile
  • Faction: Exile
  • Game nicks: Muki
  • IRC nick: Muki, Muki39
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #250 on: June 29, 2014, 02:07:34 am »
+4
You are not allowed to have a job and a life.
^
As a volunteer admin I clearly have no life and live only to eradicate all fun and enjoyment from the game. Your tears of rage are all the payment I need.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

As a volunteer admin I clearly have no life and live only to eradicate all fun and enjoyment from the game. Your tears of rage are all the payment I need.
Yes I drew most of my avatars

Offline Shadowren

  • Count
  • *****
  • Renown: 255
  • Infamy: 63
  • cRPG Player
  • It isnt sufficient that I succeed-others must fail
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Shadowren_ATS
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #251 on: June 30, 2014, 01:25:12 am »
0

Shadowren - Former Hospitaller - Rarely plays

Still play normal hours  :{D

(click to show/hide)
visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Away with you, vile beggar.

Offline Porkthegreat

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 32
  • Infamy: 97
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #252 on: June 30, 2014, 07:45:11 am »
0
I got a mute from ganner, it was unjust.  somewas complaining a lot so i called them a  "*agger"  like someone who nags a lot...

i guess im lucky i didnt get a ban. pfffft
"GOD WILLS IT!"

"First I want you to wash my back.  Then I want you to hug my back." - Hospitaller_Cain

Offline Dexxtaa

  • King
  • **********
  • Renown: 1268
  • Infamy: 200
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
  • Game nicks: Remnant_Dexxtaa
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #253 on: June 30, 2014, 10:40:20 am »
+2
Don't let them keep an independent black woman down, Ganner. You go girl.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login

Offline Supreme_Leader

  • Knight
  • ***
  • Renown: 37
  • Infamy: 162
  • cRPG Player
    • View Profile
Re: [NA] Ganner
« Reply #254 on: July 02, 2014, 08:18:52 pm »
-8
Reminder that Ganner is the only admin who isn't a badmin