16
Diplomacy / Re: The Mercenaries
« on: March 16, 2014, 08:12:27 pm »
I just apply for both sides when I'm in the mood for strat, is the sites payment system actually working?
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
17
Sell/Trade / Re: The 2 Handed Hero - Looking for +3 stuff
« on: March 15, 2014, 09:26:36 pm »
bump
18
Sell/Trade / Re: The 2 Handed Hero - Looking for +3 stuff
« on: March 12, 2014, 12:13:20 pm »
bump
19
Sell/Trade / Re: The 2 Handed Hero - Looking for +3 stuff
« on: March 11, 2014, 06:25:41 pm »
bump
20
Sell/Trade / Re: The 2 Handed Hero - Looking for +3 stuff
« on: March 10, 2014, 01:45:01 pm »
back in business
21
... and all the other things floating around out there / Re: Single Player games
« on: March 08, 2014, 08:17:25 pm »
Two Worlds I and II are great games, way better rpgs than skyrim imo, and as a crpg player the graphics won't trouble you either.
Witcher I and II, and III once it comes out - it just has to be epic
Dragon Age I
And ofc Mass Effect 1-3, though the 2nd part is quite bad compared to the 3rd and especially to the first, but still a fairly good game.
I also can recommend playing Swtor, just doing your class specific quests - it's free to play and has an awesome storyline, so it's just like playing a SP game, though after that I got bored at it.
Also you should definitly play Dungeon Keeper 1&2 if you haven't done so yet.
Witcher I and II, and III once it comes out - it just has to be epic
Dragon Age I
And ofc Mass Effect 1-3, though the 2nd part is quite bad compared to the 3rd and especially to the first, but still a fairly good game.
I also can recommend playing Swtor, just doing your class specific quests - it's free to play and has an awesome storyline, so it's just like playing a SP game, though after that I got bored at it.
Also you should definitly play Dungeon Keeper 1&2 if you haven't done so yet.
22
Diplomacy / Re: Shogunate Diplomacy
« on: February 22, 2014, 10:43:21 pm »Disclaimer:
the term 'associated fiefs' mayor may notinclude every fief on the EU and NA map
A bit of ambition never hurt anybody
23
Suggestions Corner / Re: Iron Flesh becoming a "skill"
« on: February 05, 2014, 05:16:18 pm »
I'd be glad to see iron flesh becoming like shield skill, not giving extra HP but improving the effectivity of armor, like reducing the effective weight of the armor (moving faster) and maybe giving more protection aswell.
24
Game Balance Discussion / Re: Nerf 1h cav damage.
« on: February 03, 2014, 10:20:48 pm »
Chagan, I am playing at lvl 34, 24/15 with a Mamluk and a Heraldic Transitional. I do not say the i get out unscratched 1v1 against inf, to be honest fighing some archer with a small short gives me more trouble than 2hers due to the ridiculous 1 handed stab, but in the end I will still be killing them, even though that causes me & my horse to lose hp. Yes - the speed bonus works against me aswell, but only in the first hit, which i take with my shield/horse and when I hit them first they are nearly dead anyway.
Killing ranged is what I do nearly all the time - because I simply can't stand them because 1 got shot for 3 years while i played 2her...
Also I don't think heavy horses should get nerfed, there is a reason they are as strong as they are, my mamluk costs more upkeep than the whole equipment of a medium armored player. Imo the cataphract and the Eastern warhorse need a change in upkeep or stats, there is barely any difference in paying upkeep for them or the upkeep of a charger/mamluk, while the last ones are definitly far superior.
The only class i want to see getting a reduced damage advantage from the speed bonus is 1h cav. Lancers are fine and 2h cav need some love!
Killing ranged is what I do nearly all the time - because I simply can't stand them because 1 got shot for 3 years while i played 2her...
Also I don't think heavy horses should get nerfed, there is a reason they are as strong as they are, my mamluk costs more upkeep than the whole equipment of a medium armored player. Imo the cataphract and the Eastern warhorse need a change in upkeep or stats, there is barely any difference in paying upkeep for them or the upkeep of a charger/mamluk, while the last ones are definitly far superior.
The only class i want to see getting a reduced damage advantage from the speed bonus is 1h cav. Lancers are fine and 2h cav need some love!
25
Game Balance Discussion / Re: Nerf 1h cav damage.
« on: February 03, 2014, 03:21:28 pm »
You have the higher range, which means when you are behind them you can hit their horses easily, when i try to do this i get reared/slowed most of the time. Furthermore 90% of the 1h cav use 5 riding horses, which means we have no way to catch up to HA/HX, while lancers use faster & more maneuverable horses.
Also yeah, i can handle most other melee classes, ofc i'll take damage attacking them when they are aware of me, but while i can 1 or 2 hit them usually they need more hits to kill me or my horse.
Also yeah, i can handle most other melee classes, ofc i'll take damage attacking them when they are aware of me, but while i can 1 or 2 hit them usually they need more hits to kill me or my horse.
26
Game Balance Discussion / Re: Nerf 1h cav damage.
« on: February 03, 2014, 02:10:26 pm »
I don't know how you fight infantry, but the only classes i cannot kill in a 1v1 are polearmers with awlpikes/lances
27
Game Balance Discussion / Nerf 1h cav damage.
« on: February 03, 2014, 12:33:54 pm »
I don't know why there is no thread for this on the first page, but srsly, 1h cav damage needs to get reduced. 1 hitting archers and even medium armored infantry is fine when you hit the head, but the damage output of 1h cav on a fast horse (destrier/rouncey/courser) is so high that it is possible to onehit tincans.
The only situation where lancers do better than 1h cav is while fighting HA/HX because the have a higher range, but except for that 1h cav has all of the advantages, therefore i think that the extra damage that 1h cav gets out of speed bonus should be reduced.
This would also encourage 2h cav players, since they will receive the same penalty when they use their 2h as 1h with shield, but if their damage while using a 2h on horse stays at it is now (actually even higher than 1h cav damage) they have an increased risk due to having no shield, but get the damage advantage out of it.
The only situation where lancers do better than 1h cav is while fighting HA/HX because the have a higher range, but except for that 1h cav has all of the advantages, therefore i think that the extra damage that 1h cav gets out of speed bonus should be reduced.
This would also encourage 2h cav players, since they will receive the same penalty when they use their 2h as 1h with shield, but if their damage while using a 2h on horse stays at it is now (actually even higher than 1h cav damage) they have an increased risk due to having no shield, but get the damage advantage out of it.
28
Game Balance Discussion / Re: Armored horses
« on: February 03, 2014, 12:24:43 pm »
I'd give you a +1 because you love heavy horses, but i want to give you an infinite amount of -1's because you mix the speech at Helms Deep with pictures from the Ride of the Rohirrim.
29
General Discussion / Re: Fucking melee
« on: January 30, 2014, 05:51:24 pm »This thread has a point, in quite a hilarious way. I think the reason we have so much ranged is partly that melee is OP, and by OP I mean that it became "gank or get ganked" because of imba stabs. Maybe it's just me, but seems like it became drastically harder to fight against 2+ enemies in melee lately.
It definitly became harder, but i don't think that it's due to the stabs. Ppl simply learned how to play together fighting a single opponent instead of being in each others way while they do. The time of the "godlike" final stands of 1 good player against 5-8 bad ones is over, everyone knows how to gank nowadays
30
General Discussion / Re: The Mercenaries’s Twitch Channel
« on: January 25, 2014, 02:45:23 pm »sure i'll follow and i'm going subscribing if i see some boobies.
Manboobs aswell?