Messages

16

General Off Topic / Re: Wonderful, after the DLC/Patch rip offs, gamers will pay for mods now aswell!

« on: April 25, 2015, 01:54:05 pm »

My friend who plays Skyrim with alot of mods, checked nexus 2 days after this thing, and i think he said over 40 big good mod's are not downloadable from there anymore, only in steam with price. These mods were free for a long time. Whats most hilarious, he said that theres kinda one mod that is needed for most of the other big mod's to work good :p

17

General Discussion / Re: Duel Challange - Guardian_Ras_Frenzy Vs Varadin

« on: April 13, 2015, 11:34:38 am »

Travel into a dick mate.. you fucking abortion victim

Xanoreita ja sassiin.

18

Strategus General Discussion / Re: strategus and raid

« on: April 11, 2015, 10:15:20 am »

I just dont get it, at this state of strategus, why the fuck are you all raiding eachother? Would think that at this point, there should be only some battles with decent gear. But no, ppl have to raid and rape some peasants...

I know this was completely off topic, but there was somekinda discussion about raid and had to bring this up, ive been looking battle section sometimes, and those raids just made me wonder.

19

WSE2 Beta / Re: Cant start the game with WSE... (or without it seems...)

« on: March 28, 2015, 09:11:49 am »

I had the same problem, sucks to know it's Bitdefender blocking. As much I love their databases and small resource footprint, their lack of customization options really irks me.
If we could get the URL to the WSE2 server, we can submit it to Bitdefender's false positive submission page: http://www.bitdefender.com/site/Main/automaticSampleUploader/

---

I have been trying out Qihoo 360 for some customers of mine and despite the company's main revenue coming from advertisements (and all apparently in China), it seems to be a great free solution. In full security mode, it will also use Bitdefender and Avira's engines for scans.

I still recommend buying Kaspersky Internet Security for anyone willing to pay, though.

Thanks for the info, i changed BitDefender to that 360 total security. Atleast im now able to use wse2 w/o offline mode, hope the game will feel better again. So far it seems to be working nicely, and u can modify alot of setting compared to BitDefender.

20

Suomalainen Foorumi / Re: [Pantheon] Tervetuloa epähauskaan bosseen crpg+strategus

« on: August 26, 2014, 07:56:13 pm »

Kukkaa suoneen ja lappuja nenään!

21

General Discussion / Re: Byzantium is dead

« on: July 26, 2014, 10:23:03 am »

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

That pic killed all the fun from this thread.

22

General Discussion / Re: Horse archery is too strong

« on: July 14, 2014, 12:23:34 pm »

Many things that annoy me about HA, but pls, remove valor from them if flags have spawned and they lose and are on horse. Damn lame to see HA getting valor when they dont even try to win. Oh and insta kill on guys at horseback if flags bug thx.

23

Strategus General Discussion / Re: Anti-Druzhina alliance

« on: June 18, 2014, 10:03:28 am »

Been playing this for allmost 3 years now, allmost every strat same thing, DRZ comes and destroys us at the sight. We lack roster, we have usually GREAT gear, but no men to use them. Even if we would be able to win some of the battles against them, we couldnt get any harm done to them, cuz they have atleast 20x the troops and gear that we have (i think its more like 100x). Weve tried to be part of some fucking alliances, but UIF is the only one that is working in big scale. So why the fuck im still moving on the strat map...

But i gotta thank you Druzhina guys, was fun to look our whole clan on top 20 at the "renown" ladder after you wiped our armies/caravans. Maybe we will do one more battle to keep us in there :p

What i think is the problem of "Anti-UIF", is that you cant get everyone on 10 different clans, to listen up one or two guys, who would make decisions what to loom and shit in the fief's. That was the first thing i noticed at the start of this strat, and it also made it clear in the first 3-4 weeks that its over for "anti-uif". The fucking gear most clans in the north made themselves... + all the ones that wanted to stay "neutral" were only attacking anti-uif cuz "no reason to attack uif cuz we cant win them" so theres kinda like UIF + the ones scared of UIF attacking "anti-uif" = no one left to fight, no one left with interest to do anything to arrenge fights = strat dead, atleast on EU side.

24

Strategus Issues / Re: Help!!

« on: April 30, 2014, 11:45:03 am »

Were u right in top of the village when u tried to attack it? If that was the case, u could have moved a bit away from the village and then put attack to it, atleast that way u can get in the village if uve been thrown out. Attacker also needs to have 1/3 of the troops of the one your attacking, tho it can be a bit different when attacking fief's (capping around 1.6k or 1.8k).

25

Diplomacy / Re: Bubastan a new faction

« on: April 21, 2014, 02:41:59 pm »

Im being butthurt cuz i would have liked to apply for attacker (if they would have taken me), but there were so little defenders that i thought i dont apply at all, cuz theres allmost no fight. But remembered that there will be plate and just wanted to "feel" it :p. I dont like battles where one side is overwhelming the other with roster, gear difference isnt so bad, those fights can still be good, but when the other side has third of the other in players, i rather not join it at all.

It was a good and smart move from Bubastan, i was thinking after Fenris lost that second attack that someone will try to take that castle under their nose, but the way they got it in the battle itself was a bit lame, mostly cuz the ones attacking it first didnt come to defend it. And for real, with that amount of defenders they really could have taken allmost any fief, buts its good to take one out of ur enemy, especially when its middle of their lands

26

Diplomacy / Re: Bubastan a new faction

« on: April 21, 2014, 10:51:24 am »

No, just simply no. I dont have anything against Bubastan, but damn this community, others are fighting against 70 players when they attack castles, and others against 10, its nice . So no, theres nothing to congratulate in this battle. Congrats to GO, DRZ, Byz, Kapis and Bro's for taking places even when there has been +50 defenders(if there has been any), but for attacking a castle against 10 defenders, no. That is just my opinion.
Hope you guys understand what i mean.

So what kinda gear we gonna get from the first castle in north?

27

Diplomacy / Re: Bubastan a new faction

« on: April 21, 2014, 10:27:27 am »

Was laughing badly when i saw ur attack on slezkh. That would have been great victory, but cuz this community is so "lame", there were only 10 defenders. So basically u could have taken any castle that couldve had 10k troops with plate gear, cuz noone came to defend it. I dunno can you be congtratuleted about that?

28

Diplomacy / Re: GO, DRZ, Kapikulu are Embraced

« on: April 12, 2014, 01:49:55 am »

Gimest, where do you get the idea that I´d try to tell others how to play? Also why we haven´t attacked them UIF caravans? Simple answer is that we won´t get any roster support against them. Also we are poor, we can´t afford to fight unwinnable battles. Only like 5 semiactive strat players

Sorry, read again what u had wrote, and i have no idea how i got it the way i got it first, maybe im tired and took something that makes one feel a bit dizzy...

And as i said, i do like Bubastan, no matter what you guys do, under that name you will allways have my love

29

Diplomacy / Re: GO, DRZ, Kapikulu are Embraced

« on: April 12, 2014, 12:51:32 am »

Spurdo, i do like Bubastan, i have even merced for them couple times. But to be honest, Bubastan has been attacked by Kapikulu 8 times, no retaliation from Bubastan. The one's Bubastan has been attacking are ai, independent or "northern alliance" atleast thats what battle history tell's me :p So why are you talking about some anti uif thing that should fight against UIF when Bubastan seem's to be ignoring them as well?

And about what Heskey said  there being 2 sides on "anti uif". I think its more like theres 2 leaders ready to do something to get everyone on "anti uif" to work together. But alot more then 2 sides that would want to do things on their own "scale".

Damn drama been so silent that i have to try to make something with my miserable skills for it

30

Diplomacy / Re: [Empire Franc - Frankish Empire] Diplomacy thread.

« on: April 12, 2014, 12:30:52 am »

Rafle, there's not much trading to do for us, so sorry for taking on two of your unprotected caravans, but we also need money to produce the gear to have those great exp battles ;) And you guys seem to have alot of s&d to spare :p

Btw, if u want drama, be sure to give Haze some fuel ;)