Dear sir,
I'm drunk, therefore my opinion matters.
As a proud polearmer with a delicate build carefully refined to the current meta, I was recently forced to use a 1slot weapon on my 13 PS main in a Strategus battle due to my team only having 3-slot ladders available after a point in the battle. Because of this I was forced to revert to my secret love, the 1h swashbuckler, and to my delight the attacking army had no shitty pierce or blunt 1handers but my dear breadknife Shaska, manliest of 1hs.
I am typically accustomed to utilising scummy agi-builds when I swashbuckle, and rely on abusing the thrust, so it was strange going to 0ath 13 PS. However, especially for held cut attacks on my mighty 13 PS character I noticed the ridiculous number of hits required to hit an enemy to take them down. Like they need to hit me a couple of times and I need to hit them 10+ times to get a kill? Ok that's an exaggeration. Wait, y'know what, I've decided I'm not exaggerating, it was ridiculous! Here I am, trying to show Butan that I actually know how to fight in Mount and Blade, and this shit's giving me no damage? But these fools need so few hits to kill me? Is this how it feels fighting against me as an agi-whore when I use my Great Long Bardiche?
It was a Strat battle, so full plate at +3 for everyone. But damn was the cut damage shitty. And the pierce... I was missing that sweet speed bonus. It is my firm assessment that anyone using a masculine 'cut' 1h weapon, especially without shield, deserves an arbitrary 300% damage increase.
Thank you and god-bless.
Heskey