Messages

16

General Discussion / Re: The NA Baddies List v2.0

« on: May 05, 2016, 01:15:40 am »

Lol, in what universe is ChesterOtab bad at the game? He's one of the VERY few players left that still play that I actually have to try my ass off when I fight and he still stomps me usually. Also I've never seen him do worse than 2:1 KD in a strat battle this strat. Daruvian however I've never even broken a sweat while fighting. Kesh, you're pretty trash at the game and for the amount of time you've been playing you should be a whole lot better.

Lol, you of all people shouldn't be talking smack. lol, so bad.  Your character description describing you beating some of the worst players in NA in duels is hilarious though, few of us had a good laugh when we saw that.  Still don't get how you never even notice everytime I play na1 im top 1-3 on scoreboard on all my melee characters, and I never use heavier armor than cav robes (tristran the plate crutcher) often much less as I rely on skill and manual blocking instead of high strength builds (chesterotab) with plate.

But yes, please continue the popularity contest of chesterotab and his friends!


You guys don't like me, so I guess that instantly makes me a baddie, lol.  To be fair having bigots and friends of bigots not like me doesn't really hurt my feelings, kind of makes me glad I'm no some dumb redneck who still thinks the traitor flag stands for something other than a bunch of uneducated rednecks who can't think for themselves.

17

Game Admin Feedback / Re: [NA] Sparvico

« on: May 04, 2016, 10:56:55 pm »

Wow your hypocrisy is astounding.

How do you feel about Desire's "system to strictly follow in order to hand out punishments" ? Any thoughts? Pretty sure you've praised him for doing exactly that.

Sparvico is a class act despite his alcoholism. The finest admin cRPG has known throughout its days (and he was only an admin for the last couple lmao).

God damn son, you are unbelievably dumb.

First, Switchtense wasn't supporting desire's actions.

Second, the whole point of what Desire did was adapting to the circumstances with an entire half the server behaving like mindless lemmings and acting obnoxious using the N-word.  It wasn't a hard and fast rule of everyone gets a mute (getting way too far out of hand too quickly for that to even work especially with an admin supporting the misbehavior)  - making up a quote for desire doesn't make it true.  She adapted to the circumstances, just like any good admin, instead of using set standards for NA1 to be used to favor friends on na3, while ignoring the circumstances and ramifications.

18

Game Admin Feedback / Re: Admin, rules, minor announcemets

« on: May 04, 2016, 10:49:44 pm »

lmao does the truth hurt you? my old friendgot

Homphobic slurs, racist slurs.  The real you comes out for all to see, just like your clanmates.

19

Game Admin Feedback / Re: Admin, rules, minor announcemets

« on: May 04, 2016, 10:09:49 pm »

(click to show/hide)

You are a fucking idiot. How about you stay in your Soviet Bloc concrete box instead of grandstanding about something you obviously don't understand and haven't taken the time to look in to. Feel free to stop reading now.

Nobody ever gave either of those "excuses," IN FACT the very first Goddamn thing Sandersson said was that this has NOTHING to do with "muh Freedom and apple pie" (while those are lofty goals, they have FUCK ALL to do with anyone saying "friend"). You people keep harping on that because Rando used the word principle in describing something entirely different from the initial act/ban situation you imbeciles. Read it again.

Aren't you a paralegal or something Kesh? Shouldn't you understand precision of language? Or are you willfully ignoring the way sentences work because you're an ass?

Similarly, what's up with accusing people at random of wronging you when you have no proof of that, rather than waiting for an admin with necessary perms to take care of it? And now you're going to tell your little underlings to berate Sparvico because he took admin action in accordance with precedent and his stated ban methodolgy (trademark: Desire)?

I wasn't at that battle, as I work all the time, but I wish I could have been. Do you not get that at a certain point, fucking with you can represent more utility to a person than can playing this game for its own sake? Diminishing marginal utility is not a difficult concept. Continuing to shriek about your weeks of hard work only cements that utility compared to doing literally anything else. Your petty whining is self-defeating (feel free to quote that and type "yes dracul is" you tool).

You should have let the whole thing die rather than bring it up again in this thread, which had become much less obnoxious Eurodrama.

Incoming still-butthurt Merrrica post about GOBBLINS and Artyem.

lol  Pure, sad nerd-rage in action! This is straight-up hilarious buddy.  And yes they did defend using the word and bragged about saying it in that ts recording.  Just because they are your friends doesn't mean they are always right. lol  Learn to think for yourself buddy.

20

General Discussion / Re: The NA Baddies List v2.0

« on: May 04, 2016, 09:35:55 pm »

I nominate Daruvian.  Rides around in full plate on heavy horse with shield and still runs away from a lightly armored archer in melee with only a hammer and no bow out if his shield breaks.  Doesn't get more sad than that.  Also, constantly team bumps allies into dying in melee desperately trying to get a kill making his team lose.

I agree with Tumble, I've beat you in melee regularly on my shielder and polearmer and score higher on NA1, so top spot would be chesterotab just over me, though daruvian could give you a good run for your money.


Also, is this just going to be a biased one in favor of your friends so Daruvian and others won't be considered?  Kind of invalidates the whole point, just makes it a popularity contest for who chesterotab likes and dislikes more than anything else.

21

Game Admin Feedback / Re: Admin, rules, minor announcemets

« on: May 04, 2016, 07:58:56 pm »

Too stupid for words... only double facepalm can do it.

22

Game Admin Feedback / Re: Admin, rules, minor announcemets

« on: May 04, 2016, 07:34:25 pm »

the strat loser who loses all the strat battles and wars

Lol, what rock are you living under. hahahaha, FCC notorious for dominating every strategus we play in.  Your clan only ever really known for losing and using N-word.  Good one! made me laugh!  Kind of makes anything else you post unreliable so no point in reading, since you obviously have no idea of anything that goes on from all your repeatedly incorrect posts in this thread about permabans (of which there are none), Artyem not using the N-word (he did, everyone recognizes that), we were already winning the battle when the bans started with N-word - had nothing to do with us etc. etc.

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)

(click to show/hide)

P.S. you really do have to be the dumbest of the ravens, which is pretty low already - they were never known for creativity - playing the same class year after year without ever trying anything new - stupid ex-military mindset.

23

Game Admin Feedback / Re: [NA] Sparvico

« on: May 04, 2016, 07:06:28 pm »

The system he has is for cRPG.

For the reasons you stated there should be a different set of rules for Strategus (being banned from the strategus servers solely (EU_3 and NA_3), frozen or even wiped on the strategus map, transfer stolen assets, delete duped assets, etc), but as long as there is none you cannot have a fair system if you ban someone from playing battle/siege for days just because he did something that has consequence on a totally different game, think about it.

They actually do.  Pollbanning on NA3 to win a fight has always carried longer sentence of banning because it is much harder to correct what has been done to the people harmed.  Sparvico is friends with these guys and is basically treating them like they had some shits and giggles on NA1 for fun pollbanning and not a concerted effort to pollban off an enemy strategus team in order not to lose a strat fight like the baddies they are even after doing a ninja roster to begin with (and they say they don't care about strat or cprg, lol top kecks)

Situation like that should have left it to someone who might be a bit more impartial.  Sparvico and Artyem(why does he even still have admin) friends with them and they both were active on those ban threads.

24

Game Admin Feedback / Re: Admin, rules, minor announcemets

« on: May 04, 2016, 05:42:43 pm »

I'm sorry I'm not up at 6am to control everything and rely on admins like any sane person in my position would do))

Sparvico already told you that he has no access to logs, do you expect him to call Witchcraft and have him read tarot to find out the real identities of the offenders? As soon as I get access to the logs (goddamnit Dupre), I'll look into it myself, logs allow us to see who is behind a pseudonym. Sparvico handled it as good as he could.

No he treated his friends better - gave ban based on if they had done that on na1 for jokes, not NA3 where someone's work for weeks destroyed by pollabuse in order to cheat to win.  In the past much more connected punishment to fit what is going on.

Also, you need to realize there is a steady trickle of us leaving over these trolls being supported by the current admins - we don't make a loud noise like the crybaby trolls mass spamming n-word and then whining about getting punished for it.  Instead my friends are slowly leaving this game (lost another 2 last night after that incident) because the fact is the trolls are getting their way and the administration is getting rid of the admins that actually stand up to their bullying as the trolls increasingly get their way using their numbers and the admins they have in their factions.

So you can cater to the trolls or you can cater to the community that actually doesn't make a lot of noise and don't do things that are banworthy and usually don't even post on forums.  Your choice - really can't do both!  And it seems like you are making the wrong one so far.

25

Game Admin Feedback / Re: Admin, rules, minor announcemets

« on: May 04, 2016, 06:51:53 am »

The thing is, once you've warned and then banned the first person for doing it you cant back out.

If admin A had warned then the offender didn't stop then admin A, B or C would need to ban that individual. Now if that's already happened, the admin that did it is committed to enforcing that rule at least for that session. If the admin decided 'now too many people are breaking the rules and ignoring my warnings, I guess they sure showed me' then the drama would be different but equally intense; 'OMFG, double-standard, you ban this guy but not everyone else when they ignore your warnings!?!?'

I enjoy TS shenanigans as much as anyone, but deliberately getting yourself banned and whining like a little bitch on the forums about it. Come on.

Finally read last few pages.  Such a good summary!  Whiny trolly bitches the lot of them - will keep doing it as long as their friend admins treat them with kid gloves.

26

Game Admin Feedback / Re: Admin, rules, minor announcemets

« on: May 04, 2016, 06:38:30 am »

I read a few pages back and don't know exactly what the argument is now, but some of the Euros here seem to have the misconception that a bunch of bad players, griefers and memekid types were the people banned when it was pretty much all of NA's current(now past lol) tryhard allstars.

Lol, dream on.

Also, these same guys that "quit", still griefing and trolling.  Desire was one of the few admins left that stood up them since they have over 3 admins in their factions condoning and supporting their behavior.  Havelle, Deltah, and Rando (3 of the last 4 posters saying how they said or supported saying N word on "principle" and glad to see new head admin) all are part of the same group of trollers - some of their group just poll-banned off entire enemy team in strat battle to win after they started losing horrendously as such bad fighter because "they don't really care about strat and Havelle's village because they "quit".  It was Havelle's village and was part of the poll-banning.  I worked for weeks to build that army and gear and they will only get a slap on wrist at best.

http://forum.melee.org/na-(official)/ban-request-(havelle-daruvian-cup457-among-others)/

http://forum.melee.org/na-(official)/really-70461/

http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattledetail&id=1211

People used to get lengthy bans for cheating like that - Desire, Canary would enforce that to prevent it becoming rampant.  Instead EU steps in as head admin and gets rid of one of the few admins who would do anything, basically encouraging them to repeatedly do this over and over again using pseudonyms.  You wonder why many of us were totally okay with them getting a 2 day ban, because all they ever do is troll, grief and cheat to win.  These are the exact same people - cancer in the community that "quit" but continue playing and trolling with no fear of repercussions as only their friends primarily left as admins (only 2 admins to post in that thread were both friens of theirs who were in the same strat faction with them - 1 was artyem who supposedly "quit" and so doesn't lose his adminship.


Uther?!  Damn, Dupre would actually do shit.

27

NA (Official) / Re: Ban Request [Havelle, Daruvian, Cup457, among others]

« on: May 04, 2016, 05:00:52 am »

You do realize after that battle you have taken that title, so desperate to have that village you resort to cheating instead of winning legitimately.  Sure buddy, you don't care about this game anymore.

28

NA (Official) / Ban Request [Havelle, Daruvian, Cup457, among others]

« on: May 04, 2016, 04:55:38 am »

BAN REQUEST FORM:
1. Name of your character involved: Kesh_BRD
2. Name of offending character(s): Havelle, Daruvian, Cup457, and several other of their faction members using pseudonyms
3. Time and server, as accurately as possible: 7:40 pm PST NA3
4. Written description of what happened, the whole story. Also what happened before and after. They pollbanned entire enemy roster off multiple different people initiated but they all worked together and did it on enemy side when they started losing bad like scrubs.  Most of them have long ban history for trolling and griefing.
5. Why you think the offender did what he did.: They cheat a lot in strat, one of the reasons they rage-quitted before: poor losers.
6. Multiple Screenshots
7. Names of players that can witness what happened: Sir_Spacey, Dunsparrow, EarthGeoDude_Da_Defender, Sir_Waterbus_BRD, LucineTheLastSquid


(for artyem who fake-GTXted like a little bitch)

http://c-rpg.net/index.php?page=strategusbattlesarchive#!?page=strategusinfobattleroster&id=1211

When they were heavily losing a battle a few minutes ago, they proceeded to poll ban off the entire enemy team.  (same guys who said they quit for swearing N word and they wonder why no one cares when they just pollute the game and make it toxic)

Dunsparrow (Kalam) witnessed the end of it and was not able to stop it as admin.  Desire would have done it but some idiot took her adminship away.

We were banned before we could get more than 1 screenshot but the server logs should show.  There were several other dracul and frisians there as well under pseudonyms - all initiating and group voting as a faction.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login

29

Diplomacy / Re: The Confederacy Disbands

« on: May 04, 2016, 04:21:02 am »

half the reason we are quitting is because of the alliance that exists right now between Hoc, BRD, and Pars which is the vast majority of the map lol. Not worth the effort to attack places when everyone who still plays is allied.

We had pretty even rosters (we were outnumbered a couple times) except for the one night the website kept crashing and your plans for ninja rostering with the first battle backfired (the one with albus goods - we heard from multiple people that got asked that you were massively recruiting for that).  Definitely plenty of mercs that go against us.  Anyway, good luck.

30

Game Admin Feedback / Re: Admin, rules, minor announcemets

« on: May 03, 2016, 04:21:21 pm »

Artyem actually asked for removal after the incident, he doesn't wish to play anymore afaik, but deadmining an inactive person is redundant in my eyes.

It takes all of two seconds to get rid of an admin that purposefully and willfully broke the rules and encouraged others to do so.  Plenty of people leave and then come back, this really does look like favoritism and many of us don't want artyem adminning when he comes back - he only ever favors his own clan and friends - notorious for this.  Just do your job and get rid of him.  Plenty of people have quit like this before (baby-raging) and then come back.