31
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
32
Diplomacy / Re: The Reconquista of Reyvadin
« on: October 20, 2013, 10:19:28 pm »
33
Diplomacy / Re: The Reconquista of Reyvadin
« on: October 20, 2013, 07:47:43 pm »
That thread made me remember one expression that i haven't used it recently. "Some my old friends live in their dreams." Thanks for helping me to not forget it.
34
Closed Requests / Re: [UNBAN] 3x combo: Sanxus, Vladislav, Widmozgon
« on: October 19, 2013, 12:26:52 am »
I dont know whether they deserved ban or not but i'm sure they should get banned because of your some intelligent determinations and you have explanations. I got used to it.
You should unban this guys. Another way, your strat battle will be stained. I'm quite sure that you are not giving a shit about it. You're running rules like Arabic democracy style.
Keep on it.
You should unban this guys. Another way, your strat battle will be stained. I'm quite sure that you are not giving a shit about it. You're running rules like Arabic democracy style.
Keep on it.
35
Diplomacy / Re: Has the coalition given up?
« on: October 10, 2013, 11:41:23 am »
Well, if you weren't able to choose your regular items and you've had to clean your inventory choices, we would have waited until you could fight properly and we would wait for it as Ozan explained in TS before battle. But you could choose your all items and weapons as you got used to it.
So please do not try to blame or accuse us. There was no unusual thing when we compared the old battles at the begining. Just a flying wall which built with snowflakes and wind by invisible architect.
So please do not try to blame or accuse us. There was no unusual thing when we compared the old battles at the begining. Just a flying wall which built with snowflakes and wind by invisible architect.
37
Closed Requests / Re: Ban/ warning request Brt
« on: August 19, 2013, 02:36:27 pm »
(I'm talking as Skoff_Tuesday which is my alt)
Brt opened a kick thread with no reason and he failed at the poll. After than he/she started to try getting kicked Kiddius with m button. Started to stalking Kiddus. M button is for intentional hits. Defend the virgin servers is for fun not leeching or preventing other people getting fun from it.
Brt opened a kick thread with no reason and he failed at the poll. After than he/she started to try getting kicked Kiddius with m button. Started to stalking Kiddus. M button is for intentional hits. Defend the virgin servers is for fun not leeching or preventing other people getting fun from it.
38
Closed Requests / Re: Ban Request - Kapikulu_Azap & Sultan_Hodor
« on: August 07, 2013, 03:48:36 am »
I'm very suprised that these literate discussions about turkish-english language and i think it'll help to solve the problem about this situation.
When we came to this pointless ban thread. These thread have some deficiencies. Wulfgaar is also insulting to Azap, why didn't this jobless thread opener mention about this guy? He/she has to include this thread if it'll be there some punishments. Also this is the second part of this speech. You couldn't know things that i'll mention after this paragraph. As we can see from the right side of screenshot, the bar is at the down side. Our brave thread opener has to confess why did he hide the first part of this speech from us?
I talked with Azap, he said:"He teamhitted me for 3 times and i asked him "why did you hit me?", then he started to insult me." You can check the records. Nobody has right to insult someone from no reason. It's normal that Azap answered but it's wrong. While you're giving punishments you have to consider about it. The main guilty guy is Hodor.
I agree with Thassadar. You should give the harshest punishments to these keyboard bullies who are insulting a lady.
My opinion if you care: you should take a justification why didnt he include Wulmy old friendaar and hide the first part of this speech which is a prove for the reason of Azap's lost his temper because of Hodor.
You should punish Azap for insulting after a provocation.
You should give the harhest punishment as rules let to Hodor for insulting a guy with no reason and insulting a lady without a reason and for the example who'll consider to it again. You should give this guy a chance to get of his keyboard and go Turkey's streets insult someone without a reason especially a lady and to get being punished real ways.
xoxo,
gossip girl.
When we came to this pointless ban thread. These thread have some deficiencies. Wulfgaar is also insulting to Azap, why didn't this jobless thread opener mention about this guy? He/she has to include this thread if it'll be there some punishments. Also this is the second part of this speech. You couldn't know things that i'll mention after this paragraph. As we can see from the right side of screenshot, the bar is at the down side. Our brave thread opener has to confess why did he hide the first part of this speech from us?
I talked with Azap, he said:"He teamhitted me for 3 times and i asked him "why did you hit me?", then he started to insult me." You can check the records. Nobody has right to insult someone from no reason. It's normal that Azap answered but it's wrong. While you're giving punishments you have to consider about it. The main guilty guy is Hodor.
I agree with Thassadar. You should give the harshest punishments to these keyboard bullies who are insulting a lady.
My opinion if you care: you should take a justification why didnt he include Wulmy old friendaar and hide the first part of this speech which is a prove for the reason of Azap's lost his temper because of Hodor.
You should punish Azap for insulting after a provocation.
You should give the harhest punishment as rules let to Hodor for insulting a guy with no reason and insulting a lady without a reason and for the example who'll consider to it again. You should give this guy a chance to get of his keyboard and go Turkey's streets insult someone without a reason especially a lady and to get being punished real ways.
xoxo,
gossip girl.
40
Closed Requests / Re: Ban Guray
« on: July 31, 2013, 02:43:58 am »
Guray was trying to do what enemy team's trying to do. Also player get kicked with 6/10 ratio.
In additon, someone has opened a banpoll already and after it, guray opened a banpoll and you're complaning about only guray's behaviour. Good joke, be brave next time and open a ban thread for both.
In additon, someone has opened a banpoll already and after it, guray opened a banpoll and you're complaning about only guray's behaviour. Good joke, be brave next time and open a ban thread for both.
41
General Off Topic / Re: Happy birthday Panos!
« on: July 21, 2013, 11:38:30 pm »
Happy birthday mate. Your capacity of talking about bullshit always impressed me.
42
Strategus General Discussion / Re: Why the current battle system needs a fix… (in big battles)
« on: July 09, 2013, 02:46:50 pm »
I see and raise.
They should change that 1/3 rule for Sieges.
After 4500 army inside the fiefs, army upkeep should be same like traveller army. As an example, you have to pay 5232 golds for 4500 troops in a fief and 4176 golds for 1500 troops who are on field. If you had 6000 troops in a fief, you had to pay 5232+4176=9408 golds.
Now, if you have 6000 troops army in a fief, you should pay 7056. 2400 golds are between them. More you have after 4500, more you pay. It hasn't to be so basic to upkeep troops at fiefs.
They should change that 1/3 rule for Sieges.
After 4500 army inside the fiefs, army upkeep should be same like traveller army. As an example, you have to pay 5232 golds for 4500 troops in a fief and 4176 golds for 1500 troops who are on field. If you had 6000 troops in a fief, you had to pay 5232+4176=9408 golds.
Now, if you have 6000 troops army in a fief, you should pay 7056. 2400 golds are between them. More you have after 4500, more you pay. It hasn't to be so basic to upkeep troops at fiefs.
43
Closed Requests / Ban request for Sharingan
« on: July 06, 2013, 08:33:04 pm »
Sharigan did 5 team hits (intentional headshots) and get kicked, then he/she opened me a kick poll without any reasons. Here some pictures about situtaion.
at the mid of SS.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
at the top of SS.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
reasonless kick poll
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
You can also see Sharigan is naked. It's not against rules but you can understand his/her intent .
at the mid of SS.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
at the top of SS.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
reasonless kick poll
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
You can also see Sharigan is naked. It's not against rules but you can understand his/her intent .
44
Other / Re: Take off admin rights from Kaldralinn!!
« on: June 12, 2013, 03:22:28 pm »
I was there too.
All incidents have reasons which happened before itself. Conquistador guys were annoying Kaldralinn like saying him "Can i hit LeMikz?" and so on. Also they said this 5 or more times. Maybe this was the reason why he said to you "son" or "kid". Don't tell the story just your own angle. In my opinion, ban decision was true.
Permanent ban seems unfair but taking off admin rights is absurd.
All incidents have reasons which happened before itself. Conquistador guys were annoying Kaldralinn like saying him "Can i hit LeMikz?" and so on. Also they said this 5 or more times. Maybe this was the reason why he said to you "son" or "kid". Don't tell the story just your own angle. In my opinion, ban decision was true.
Permanent ban seems unfair but taking off admin rights is absurd.
45
Other / Ban request for Sir_Turric
« on: June 12, 2013, 03:02:57 pm »
As you can see bottom, Sir_Turric tried to undress Vivi at the start of a new wave than left the server before poll ended in HRE server.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Thanks.
visitors can't see pics , please register or login
Thanks.