Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Harafat

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 9
1
Diplomacy / Re: Shu Han declares war on the infamous Crusader Alliance
« on: February 06, 2013, 02:49:44 pm »
It was a hot summer night, the air was moist like a london prostitute after a night of backbreaking work. In a little tavern hidden in away in the slums of a large city, a meeting had been called. The room was filled with hooded knights and warriors, maimed and beaten, however, their eyes were lit up by a fiery craving for revenge. One by one the hoods were removed, and they revealed to be the leaders of all the free factions crushed by the mighty hordes of barbarians from the West. They toasted to their fallen brothers in arms, then feasted wildly on the stew, strongwine and women that were provided. After the feast the men sat down at the table and they would pledge their swords that this would never happen again. No longer would they stand divided against this overwhelming force, even if this ment giving up their personal feudes and glorious goals or ideals. To defeat what has crushed generations and generations of their warriors, they had to become what they hated the most. They swore an oath that untill the barbarians were defeated, they would stand together. Blood was drawn from each hand to seal the pact and one child was to be sent hostage to each faction to guarantee loyalty. After this the nobles dispersed and the rest is... history.

So, as anti-UIF, or UIF+ or Eastern CBA or whatever you guys like to call us, we thought we arrived at the point were we would be grinding down the last Grey Order cities/tickets and then move our way up to the DRZ for the real pain. This proces would be excruciating for us, however we can handle it. We already threw 15k tickets at Uxhall, we did a pretty good job on the sieges so far, the K/D's are very acceptable.
This UIF claims to be inactive since they got struck by this "oh, im so butthurt that we got punished for ORGANISED cheating" banwave. What we see is that in the not so for past drz has taken Reyvadin from the Kapi and Slekzh Castle. Forcing us to throw armies on Reyvadin and Kinngrimm loads of armies on Slekzh. Furthermore we see GO throwing thousands of tickets on Tshibitn, also not so long ago. In our Uxhal efforts, the city is filled to the brim with UIF people inside who are recruiting tickets to keep the last stand going. Ofc, all of this is being hugely inactive. I'm not discussing that they lost huge momentum and members on strat. All i'm saying is that we have no compassion whatsoever with their situation due to their cheating. And our goal remains the same, we will wipe them out.

The Rebels are a faction WE, the coalition financed and armed, as anti-UIF raiders/anarchistic attack force to disrupt UIF activities. Remember stolen Nord goods etc. These troops now being used to attack our allied faction, is more then casus belli.

Shu Han attacking templars right on the moment we threw 15k at Uxhall and the other of our allies are occupied in GO lands with their forces smells like a very organised move. They must have considered us weakened and not rdy to make an immediate response to their agression. Sly indeed. Breaking Up the Uxhall siege leaves a very bitter taste in our mouths. Shu han explicitly stated its neutrality and in the past we have looked beyond them trading with DRZ and GO, hence supporting their upkeep/equipment. They were also allowed to shop in our lands. In our perspective we need the templars strong against GO and DRZ, and we cant allow them to be tied up in another war. You guys are the smaller problem here, so 1st we deal with you guys. Bagge knew very well what was going to happen and still you guys persisted with his. We were very fine with you guys living and trading there, but now you are interfering with our main objective and we cant allow that.


2
Diplomacy / Re: Official "[STR] The Strangers" factions note
« on: November 07, 2012, 02:22:11 pm »
So long, dont ever come back and dont let the door crush your skull while leaving; you miserable, cheating, #é!&!!!

For chadz:
You gave birth Strategus - you killing him.

Russian Psychology 101 for you. Banning cheaters = killing the game.
Killing your way of destroying this game, that would be more correct.

I really hope you guys meet a bunch horny bears in the russian woods that try to fornicate every orifice of your bodies.
Lowlife scum!
Now shoo, other browser game to be destroyed!


3
Strategus General Discussion / Re: Strategus Changes
« on: October 22, 2012, 04:50:49 pm »


During designing economics of your block, you have committed a serious error in distribution of points (PP). Shit happens (Incidentally, I don't understand how this could have happened, if you have access to first-hand information. A little loltarded hehe), but that doesn't mean that we think that's good because it means less battles, and we want more and larger battles.


This is how you look at it. We made no error, we did it different then you guys. Your thing to put all on prosperity from the start gives you a lot of s/d, however, as the game advances this advantage gets smaller and smaller, cuz we could invest 10 prosperity each time. I will gladly admit that we should've put more points in prosperity at the start. The reason we have low s/d all the time is cuz of retards wasting it where they shouldnt have.
But destroying our economy? What a joke, we've been fighting the whole UIF with basicly 2 factions. Only reason we are alive, is cuz of what we did.
Also you lost a lot of tickets due to you guys not looming your equip high enuff. So this is rly a potato-potatoe issue.

And cicero: i'm not wasting any more words on you. Let people like Harpag speak who actually have a clue what they are talking about.

4
Diplomacy / Coalition Closing Its Borders
« on: October 16, 2012, 05:57:16 pm »
As from today the Coalition is closing its borders.

visitors can't see pics , please register or login


Most of our trade deals are cancelled, some are kept but changed. All factions involved will be pm'ed or notified on TS tonight.
No Randommers are allowed in our area. Any dirty smuggler trespassing or trying to steal our precious kittens will be hunted down.
If you want any special clearance you have to contact us first.
This is for EU ofc.

5
Diplomacy / Re: KITTIYA ... ... ... Big battle upcomming.
« on: October 09, 2012, 10:24:26 pm »
With all do respect, if you cant find what Harpag wrote funny, then you have no humour at all. -1-ing a rly funny post is a shame, even if it arouses your anger.
Altho im in the other carebear block, +1 Harpag.

Lighten up trolls.

6
Diplomacy / Re: Bounty for the head of [EU]The Rebels
« on: October 09, 2012, 11:51:33 am »
5000 strat gold for 2000 S/D?
 :rolleyes:

Sounds a bit cheap tbh, given the risk of an attack.

7
Let cicero be, he's a rabid dog. Nothing can be done with a rabid dog, putting him down is the only option.

If he thinks it "cool" to "roleplay" something that hurts thousands of innocent lives each day and is something misused by political leaders around the globe to get ignorant people motivated to give their own blood for their cause, then thats his business. DOnt belittle yourself by giving into it.
Also he's not the only one doing it, i found the "usa usa usa" thing last round as offensive as his shit, its not cuz most of us are in the west, thats not hurtfull for cicero's people as well. Roleplaying shit that's sensitive today is just a sign of bad taste, just like chocolate chip cookie-shit, russian-communist-shit or whatever.

On Topic: You guys are just lucky i wasnt in the batlle last night, an army without their moral leader is useless.

8
Better option.. at a certain time in the match if raiders have not won pop gets mobilized and joins the fight... have a count down timer if the raiders do not win in that time the pop joins the defenders numbers.

makes.raiding viable but risky at the same time

You sir, have earned yourself 25 internets!

Awesome idea, blast that i didnt come up with it myself!

9
But its being abused constantly.  Whether its a 500 man army in the fief with 2000 population, attackers just attack with 3000 troops but only raid and win the gear and then win the real fight because they avoided having the 2000 population having real gear and there is no risk whatsoever to them.  Its being abused not only by your faction, but also every other faction like yours that can't win stand-up fights so they resort to glitch abuse.

I dont agree this is bad. 2000 pop would mean a city/castle, or a heavily converted army>population to avoid upkeep. If you hold a city/castle, you should protect it with an anrmy. If they raid, they lock themselves down for 24hrs, hence, as i said be4, leaving the defenders time to reinforce. If def fails at this, then thats their problem, not the people raiding.
Raiding is introduced to give small timers a chance to rip off large clans that dont pay attention last strat. this is good. That large factions are also using this feature is being smart, not exploiting



However Kesh, i can agree that it should be a limited time, like half, but nothing that adds too much more disadvantage for attackers.


10
Disagree, put an army in your fief and your troubles are gone.

Dont react emotional because mercs lost with 50 agaisnt 800.

The way you put it attackers should be at disadvantage no matter what. Raiding locks you down for 24 hours, thus makes you pay upkeep and gives defence another 24 hrs to reinforce, and you can only do it if there's not much of an army there.
That's nerf enough.

12
Diplomacy / Re: KITTIYA ... ... ... Big battle upcomming.
« on: October 04, 2012, 01:47:18 am »
is all this trashtalking a metagame of strat,  like in those WWF fights?

still dont get it.

you do get it. This is basicly dickwaving before the fight!

13
Diplomacy / Re: KITTIYA ... ... ... Big battle upcomming.
« on: October 04, 2012, 01:03:41 am »
(click to show/hide)

Yes, hurting the enemy economy in a war is an exploit and should be taken into the Geneve-convention. Its more moral and strategicly to bomb civilians and schools instead of the factories. In all the wars of the last, what, all of time mankind has walked this earth, economics have been the 1st target of sensible leaders. Ok, stupid me. Should've realised sensible.
Honestly, if you guys only have figured out this yet, then i wish you a lot of luck for the rest of strategus.

Ofcourse economies will be targeted. With S/D introduced, you're basicly introducing a local economy, which should be protected by its owners and targetted by the enemies. This happens IRL since the dawn of man. And then you go on to flamewars. Wow, causing your enemy to go into a massive flame, must mean you're doing it wrong. When you're enemy is calm and sober in his decisions, it must mean you're doing it right.

What do you think, that we are in a gentlemens agreement here? Yes, you bring you're army there at that time, we'll do as well, and we will make sure that after that you will have an economy back home to bring another army to fight us?

A grey on a about possible exploits that are game-features? I must be in a parallel universe. Think be4 you speak, or decide to sober up be4 you speak.

14
Strategus General Discussion / Re: Papal Guard glitch abusing?
« on: October 03, 2012, 03:57:29 pm »
There are no longer Templar Papal guards since they have failed in their duty

Of course they failed, cuz you did it wrong!

The elite guards throughout history were nearly all times recruited from other lands then the ones the ruler hailed from. Tihis way they would have little interest in local politics. Also almost allways, they we're recruited from the lowest ranks of the populace and bestowed with great wealth, so their loyalty would be undisputed. What you need is fierce warriors, with little or no moral or gold, that hail from other lands then your own.
I'm not saying i'm applying, but i am applying :)


15
Diplomacy / Re: Coalition & UIF - what clans do they consist of?
« on: October 01, 2012, 03:12:24 pm »
What is this coalition you speak off?

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 9