| Semifinal Match 1 |
Red Alert (3) vs. SeaRaiders (9) |
| Semifinal Match 2 |
Old S. School of Slavimir (13) vs. Die Superschurken (9) |
Why would they need the whole week to arrange only 2 battles?Because people have lifes to attend?
That's a solid reason of course but battles aren't usually longer than 30 minutes and most of the players are online at evenings. I messed up my question a bit and was curious if both battles are done before deadline will the next round start after that or waiting a week is mandatory?Both teams arrange a date that fits all members or most of the members of each teams, the dates that are arranged are most likely the best for everyone. That's why it can take a full week.
SeaRaiders vs. Red Alert 9-3Share ure flag hax pls, i wont say to any one ;)(click to show/hide)
gg, cant deny we were lucky with flags. :wink:
SSS wanted to have a second match but Die Superschurken didn't want to cuz they allready won.^^ It's sort of totally retarded how the teams got splitted up (just noticed that :O ).Red War style :lol:
They fought, but in one round Die Superschurken joined with 6 players. SSS wanted to have a second match but Die Superschurken didn't want to cuz they allready won.^^ It's sort of totally retarded how the teams got splitted up (just noticed that :O ). Red Alert KFN EU and SeaRaiders were the 4 "favourits" of the tournament. After 3 matches there is now only one left, final will be boring anyways.... QQ
They fought, but in one round Die Superschurken joined with 6 players. SSS wanted to have a second match but Die Superschurken didn't want to cuz they allready won.I heard another story. SSS asked to count this round with 6 players from Superschurken as a win round for SSS. Bagge said: yes. Because of that win it become a draw in the match. Superschurken disagreed. Also they made many draw rounds, as I remember some teams replayed them, but Superschurken disagreed to replay draw rounds, thinking that they won. Well Bagge said that there must be rematch. But Superschurke keeps silence. Bagge made a new time for a match 18+1 Sunday
I heard another story. SSS asked to count this round with 6 players from Superschurken as a win round for SSS. Bagge said: yes. Because of that win it become a draw in the match. Superschurken disagreed. Also they made many draw rounds, as I remember some teams replayed them, but Superschurken disagreed to replay draw rounds, thinking that they won. Well Bagge said the there must be rematch. But Superschurke keeps silence.
Still would make the total score 8-7 with 2 draws so we still won.8-6 is your score, if that round with 6 players from your side counts as a win for SSS, then ----> 8-1=7, 6+1=7. Thats a draw
8-6 is your score, if that round with 6 players from your side counts as a win for SSS, then ----> 8-1=7, 6+1=7. Thats a draw
We cannot tell if that round with the 6 players is a draw or win. So could alternatively make the score 8-7 with 1 draw.I'm not a captain, I think you should speak with Red War and Bagge, I think Bagge will decide what to do.
Not been there but I can confirm that the last decision will be made by Bagge in any case.yes, bagge said fight again or lose, so i decided to fight again. But at all, we won fair and Red War cant accept that he lost, we are missing Cyber and probably some other good players at Sunday.
Was there not an admin spectating? I mean there is other people other than Bagge that can back you up.No admin was present
It seems like they screenshotted that 6 player bs but still continued to play.. if they lost then they would use it to get another chance, but might not be true. It just seems like they did that.
yes they continued to play the round and then only made BS about it after they lost, and with the draws as well.
Im sure they would have not complained if they had won
When i mean they, i mean Red War
Why not check the logs to see if it had any impact on the round?
Thought Bagge was there... Anyway...
My PoV right now from reading this, is the following:
Supposingly by accident, tho the reason does not really matter, one team spawned with 6 players for a round. This against the rules. There is a screenshot which provides proof that it indeed happened.
I have to be honest, I can't remember right now what the "punishment" for this specific rule break was, but it did happen, it is against the rules and therefore it will be acted accordingly on it.
The reason why it happened is of no concern. The 6th player should not have joined. The team should have told him that very clearly and the player should have listened very carefully. All that did not happen, mistake lies with the team with the additional player.
Everything else is about fairness, sportsmanship and gamer's honour but it has nothing to do with rule break.
If Bagge decides to go strict or lenient is up to him. Should he ask my opinion, I will tell him after he told me the whole situation.
Personally I know I am not going to replay this match, SSS doesn't deserve it, if they want to have a win in such a way being this petty they can have it.
First reason is that SSS actually did the exact same thing during the first map. They saw that red was ineffective as an archer on port assault and they switched him out for a another melee player. They had 6 different players spawned during a round where red joined spec, just like us, however since we knew it didn't affect the round in any way and we aren't extremely petty we didn't take any issue with it nor did we take any screens because again we saw no reason for it. Therefore when I bought this up to baggy after they started complaining about us doing the exact same thing they had we had no evidence.
The match really wasn't as close as 8-6 indicates either. When there were 2 rounds to go the score was 8-5, since we already thought we had won we had no reason to take those rounds seriously and just yolo charged, if we had the score would probably have been different and giving them the win for the one round they complain about wouldn't have changed anything anyway.
So far all the matches had been fun and everyone been quite nice but it's clearly not the case with SSS who are super serious about a cRPG tournament and very salty about their loss. First when the match ended with 8-6 they tried to convince us that we are supposed to replay the draws, when that got shut down they started searching for something else that would lead to them not having to accept the loss. They found something that clearly didn't affect the round in any way and what they had actually already done themselves before. Again, from my part someone like that just doesn't deserve to be replayed, if they want to win like that they can have it, then advance to finals and get destroyed there.
I'd disagree with this, if you're better than them and they're being petty. Beat them again, then they'll feel worse.
this is the rule:
Any team to have a 6th player spawn in a single round, will be considered to have forfeited the round.
i don't see why we have to play the map again though
Forfeited means you lost the round, which ended the match a draw 7-7.
Since the match ended a draw, there will be a overtime played. Overtime = you replay the 2nd map, which was in this case Field by the River.
That is why you will play the map again.
Forfeited means you lost the round, which ended the match a draw 7-7.
Since the match ended a draw, there will be a overtime played. Overtime = you replay the 2nd map, which was in this case Field by the River.
That is why you will play the map again.
8-6 is your score, if that round with 6 players from your side counts as a win for SSS, then ----> 8-1=7, 6+1=7. Thats a draw
2nd map screenshots.
During ROUND 3 Die Super had 6 members spawned the score was 2-0 in favor of SSS(click to show/hide)
End of the half screenshot says the score is 2-2, which means Die Super won the third and the fourth round of the half.(click to show/hide)
Which means exactly what DonNicko wrote:
Not necessarily, because 2 of the rounds were drawn, so its impossible to tell whether we won the next round or it was a draw. So that does not in fact clearly show the result in its true form. That means the 2nd screenshot is redundant.
But im never going to win this argument because you have clearly made up your mind bagge.
Not necessarily, because 2 of the rounds were drawn, so its impossible to tell whether we won the next round or it was a draw. So that does not in fact clearly show the result in its true form. That means the 2nd screenshot is redundant.
But im never going to win this argument because you have clearly made up your mind bagge.
But strudog. There's 4 rounds before Switch/reset. at start of the 3rd round it was 2-0 for sss. at halftime/switch, it was 2-2. therefor, superschurken won 3rd and 4th round.
If 3rd round would be a draw, then it would have been 2-1 at half-time. The 2 draws happened in the last part.